Open Access
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Plast Surg 2015; 48(03): 297-300
DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.173129
Case Report
Association of Plastic Surgeons of India

A report of 2 patients with transient blindness following Le Fort I osteotomy and a review of past reported cases

Authors

  • Philip Mathew

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, The Charles Pinto Centre for Cleft Lip, Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
  • Hirji Sorab Adenwalla

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, The Charles Pinto Centre for Cleft Lip, Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
  • Puthucode V Narayanan

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, The Charles Pinto Centre for Cleft Lip, Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
  • Emily Nyamu

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, The Charles Pinto Centre for Cleft Lip, Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
Further Information

Address for correspondence:

Dr. Philip Mathew
Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute
Thrissur, Kerala
India   

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 August 2019 (online)

 

ABSTRACT

Blindness following a LeFort I osteotomy is a rare but extremely serious complication. Ten cases have been reported to date. None of these patients recovered vision. Optic neuropathy is believed to be the cause but the exact mechanism has not been settled. We report the first, and the only two, documented cases of complete loss of vision that recovered subsequently. The first patient was a 19-year-old male with repaired bilateral cleft lip and palate. He developed loss of vision in the right eye on the second postoperative day. The second patient was a 22-year-old male with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate. He developed complete loss of vision in the left eye on the day of surgery. Both these patients underwent ongoing studies, which did not show any abnormalities. Both were treated with methylprednisolone. Both the patients gradually showed improvement in their vision. The first patient recovered normal vision several months postoperatively. The second patient’s vision improved to 4/60 by 4 months postoperatively. We discuss the probable mechanisms of optic nerve injury and also the possible reasons why sight was restored in these patients. This is a rare but serious complication following a fairly common procedure. Through this article we wish to create an awareness of this complication and also a possible way of avoiding such a disaster.


 


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


Address for correspondence:

Dr. Philip Mathew
Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute
Thrissur, Kerala
India