The Medicare Audiologist Access and Services Act of 2019 (H.R. 4056) is bipartisan
legislation introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives on July 25, 2019, by
Reps. Tom Rice (R-SC), Matt Cartwright (D-PA), Mark Meadows (R-NC), Ralph Norman (R-SC),
Mike Kelly (R-PA), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Brad Schneider (D-IL), Ann Kuster (D-NH),
Gus Bilirakis (R-FL), and Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE). The bill, if passed, would
enhance federal benefits for hearing and vestibular/balance health by providing Medicare
beneficiaries direct access to both diagnostic and therapeutic services provided by
audiologists.
Specifically, this legislation would: 1) give audiologists additional opportunities
under Medicare with reclassification as “practitioners,” 2) allow for direct access
by Medicare patients to audiologists, and 3) expand covered audiological services
beyond diagnosis to include treatment. It is exciting that our three largest national
organizations representing audiology—the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
(ASHA), the American Academy of Audiology (the Academy) and the Academy of Doctors
of Audiology (ADA)—came together to collaboratively endorse this bill.
The opportunity for patients with Medicare to directly access audiologists for diagnostic
and treatment services would certainly improve hearing health care for these beneficiaries.
There are also, however, many audiologists who assess and treat patients with balance
disorders. In fact, 24 percent of the membership of the American Academy of Audiology
identify themselves as routinely performing vestibular/balance assessments.
THE AUDIOLOGY SCOPE OF PRACTICE
The diagnostic activities (e.g., caloric testing and rotational testing) associated
with vestibular and balance assessment have specific CPT codes and documented national
payment rates. For both the Academy and ASHA, the assessment and treatment of vestibular/balance
disorders is also clearly stated as being within audiologists’ scope of practice (SOP).
The Academy’s SOP states that: “Audiologists also are involved in the treatment of
persons with vestibular disorders. They participate as full members of balance treatment
teams to recommend and carry out treatment and rehabilitation of impairments of vestibular function.” Similarly, the ASHA SOP states that: “If
the audiologist can document appropriate training for new and emerging clinical or
technological procedures that fall under the heading of auditory, balance and other related disorders, then such innovations and advances may be incorporated into the Audiology Scope of Practice.”
Therefore, since vestibular/balance treatment clearly falls within the audiology SOP
and, if H.R. 4056 passes, this should allow/encourage appropriately educated and trained
audiologists to perform (and be reimbursed by Medicare) for vestibular rehabilitation.
One question to consider is that, with the successful passage of H.R. 4056, will academic
audiology programs need to adjust for these national changes, or are students already
being appropriately educated and trained to deliver vestibular rehabilitation?
The Accreditation Commission for Audiology Education (ACAE) and the Council on Academic
Accreditation (CAA) are the two bodies that accredit graduate programs that prepare
individuals to enter professional practice in audiology.
The Diagnosis and Management section in the Curriculum Standards of the ACAE standards
from 2016 states that students from the institution will be able to:
“(1) Diagnose, triage, treat, and manage auditory vestibular/balance conditions and
disease for patients over the lifespan…”
Likewise, curriculum standards from CAA (Section 3.1.6A) state that students will
be able to:
“-perform assessment for vestibular rehabilitation;
-develop and implement treatment plans using appropriate data…”
So, it appears that our scope of practice encompasses audiologists engaging in assessment,
as well as the treatment, of those with vestibular/balance disorders. There is also
alignment among our relevant accreditation-body requirements and scope-of-practice
documents regarding treating patients with balance impairments.
EDUCATION AND TRAINING STANDARDS
However, with only a quarter (reportedly) of audiologists engaged in the assessment
and treatment of those with vestibular/balance disorders, this seems like a good time
to ask our accrediting bodies to review and possibly update the minimal education
and training standards specifically related to performing vestibular rehabilitation.
Perhaps, as for physical therapists, a subspecialty certification (or perhaps a micro-credential)
in vestibular/balance could eventually be developed for audiologists by our national
organizations.
If you do not feel like you are adequately educated or trained to perform vestibular
rehabilitation, then, of course, you should not do so (remember, regardless of how
it is worded in our code of ethics documents: Do No Harm). Short courses are available
specifically to educate/train audiologists, physical therapists, and others to enhance
their knowledge of both the diagnosis and treatment of those with vestibular/balance
disorders.
Our professional meetings frequently have presentations that focus on the vestibular/balance
part of our SOP, so attend a few of them. You could also arrange to work with a colleague
with expertise in this unique aspect of the field of audiology until you are comfortable
performing these vestibular/balance services. Our audiology training programs should
be preparing us to become lifelong learners—and this is an area that has evolved since
many of us graduated and became audiologists.
A NEW ERA IN AUDIOLOGY
This increasing collaboration and coordination among our major professional organizations
to move legislation forward that would allow us to practice at the top of our license
represents a new era in audiology. The fact that we have been largely viewed by payers
as only diagnosticians has limited our ability to use to the full extent the rehabilitative
services we have to offer our patients.
There is no question that the passage of H.R. 4056 would allow audiologists to be
more consistently compensated for therapeutic services, but we must ensure that we
are adequately prepared.
Devin L. McCaslin, PhD
Deputy Editor-in-Chief
Robert F. Burkard, PhD
Neil T. Shepard, PhD