J Am Acad Audiol 2019; 30(09): 820-821
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.309ceu
JAAA CEU Program
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

JAAA CEU Program

Volume 30, Number 9 (October 2019)
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 May 2020 (online)

 

Questions refer to Aithal et al, “Eustachian Tube Dysfunction and Wideband Absorbance Measurements at Tympanometric Peak Pressure and 0 daPa,” 781–791.

Learner Outcomes:

Readers of this article should be able to:

  • Understand the pattern of wideband absorbance (WBA) at ambient pressure (WBA0) and at tympanometric peak pressure (WBATPP) in ears with negative middle ear pressure.

  • Consider application of WBA technology during assessment of eustachian tube function in children.

CEU Questions:

  1. A single measurement of normal resting middle ear pressure (MEP):

    • is always indicative of normal eustachian tube function.

    • can describe the effects of altered MEP on sound transmission through the middle ear.

    • does not provide indication of pressure regulation function of the eustachian tube.

  2. The limitation of Toynbee and Valsalva tests is:

    • They do not provide serial determination of middle ear pressure.

    • It is not possible to control relative amounts of overpressure or underpressure generated.

    • They do not indicate the dynamics of the tubal function.

  3. Compensated negative middle ear pressure is:

    • Negative ear canal pressure equal to the positive shift in the middle ear pressure.

    • Positive ear canal pressure equal to the negative shift in the middle ear pressure.

    • Negative ear canal pressure equal to the negative shift in the middle ear pressure.

  4. WBA0 of the eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) group demonstrated a peak in the frequencies between:

    • 2.5 and 4 kHz

    • 0.8 and 1.5 kHz

    • 0.25 and 2 kHz

  5. WBATPP of both control and ETD groups was highest between:

    • 0.25 and 1 kHz

    • 1 and 4 kHz

    • 3 and 8 kHz

  6. In all the three ETD groups, the difference between WBATPP and WBA0 was largest between:

    • 0.25 and 1.25 kHz

    • 1 and 4 kHz

    • 4 and 8 kHz

  7. The frequency region that is optimal for detecting negative middle ear pressure (NMEP) is:

    • 1 to 4 kHz

    • 2 to 4 kHz

    • 0.8 to 2 kHz

  8. If the ear canal pressure differs from the MEP, sound transmission is reduced in the:

    • low frequencies.

    • mid frequencies.

    • high frequencies.

  9. In ears with otitis media with effusion and NMEP, WBATPP

    • was restored to near normal values.

    • remained significantly low in the low to mid frequencies.

    • was better than WBATPP in the ETD group.

  10. During evaluation of ETD,

    • measuring WBA0 alone is adequate.

    • measuring WBATPP alone is adequate.

    • measuring and comparing both WBA0 and WBATPP should be done.


No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).