Computed tomographic study of safe implantation corridors in rabbit lumbar vertebrae

Summary

Objectives: A study was performed to evaluate the lumbar vertebrae of domestic rabbits using computed tomography (CT) in order to identify safe corridors for implant insertion.

Methods: Computed tomography imaging of 20 adult New Zealand white rabbits was evaluated using three-dimensional multi -planar reconstruction, and safe corridors were determined. Following corridor determination, implant placement was performed, and imaging was repeated.

Results: The cranial and caudal endplates contained the majority of the vertebral bone stock, and were an average of 3.14 and 3.30 mm in length, respectively. The mean safe corridor angle was 62.9 degrees (range: 58.8–66.7), and the mean width of the corridor was 2.03 mm (range: 1.60– 2.07). Post-placement imaging revealed that 35% of the pins demonstrated errors of placement, most commonly canal impingement. Conclusions: The results of the corridor evaluation indicate that an insertion angle of approximately 60 degrees relative to the sagittal midline is appropriate for implant insertion in the lumbar vertebrae of New Zealand white rabbits. Additionally, due to the hourglass shape of rabbit vertebrae, the endplates provide maximal bone stock for implant purchase, so insertion should be attempted in these regions. However, the high percentage of errors in placement indicate the need to more clearly define entry points to access the canal, and highlight the challenges of appropriate placement in the small bones of rabbits.

Keywords

Computed tomography - implant insertion - rabbit - spine - lumbar vertebrae

• References

• 1 Fisher PG, Carpenter JW. Neurologic and musculoskeletal diseases. In Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW. editors Ferrets, rabbits, and rodents: clinical medicine and surgery. 3rd ed. St Louis, Missouri: Saunders Elsevier; 2012: 245-256.
• 2 Harcourt-Brown F. Neurological and locomotor disorders. In Harcourt-Brown F. Editor Textbook of Rabbit Medicine. 1st ed. Oxford UK, Butter-worth-Heinemann: 2002: 307-323.
• 3 Smith Baxter J. Posterior paralysis in the rabbit. J Small Anim Pract 1975; 16: 267-271.
• 4 Whittington JK, Bennett RA. Clinical technique: myelography in rabbits. J Exot Pet Med 2011; 20: 217-221.
• 5 Gruber A, Pakozdy A, Weissenbock H. et al. A retrospective study of neurological disease in 118 rabbits. J Comp Pathol 2009; 140: 31-37.
• 6 McCullough AW, Guzman DS, Keller D. et al. Medical management of multiple traumatic vertebral subluxations and fractures in a rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Exot Pet Med 2012; 21: 172-180.
• 7 Stiff AL, Roe FJC. Fracture-dislocation of lumbar spine occurring spontaneously in rabbits. J Animal Tech Assoc 1962; 12: 38-40.
• 8 Delamaide Gasper JA, Rylander H, Mans C. et al. Surgical management of vertebral synovial cysts in a rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2014; 7: 830-834.
• 9 Vernau KM, Osofsky A, LeCouteur RA. The neurological examination and lesion localization in the companion rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Vet Clinic North Am Exotic Pract 2007; 10: 731-758.
• 10 Weh M, Kraus KH. Spinal fractures luxations. In Tobias KM, Johnston SA. editors Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. 1st ed. St Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Saunders; 2012: 487-503.
• 11 Weh JM, Kraus KH. Use of a four pin and methylmethacrylate fixation in L7 and the iliac body to stabilize lumbosacral fracture-luxations: a clinical and anatomic study. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 775-782.
• 12 Voss K, Montavon PM. Tension band stabilization of fractures and luxations of the thoracolumbar vertebrae in dogs and cats: 38 cases 1993-2002. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2004; 1: 78-83.
• 13 Wheeler JL, Lewis DD, Cross AR. et al. Closed fluoroscopic-assisted spinal arch external skeletal fixation for the stabilization of vertebral column injuries in five dogs. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 442-448.
• 14 Smolders LA, Voorhout G, van de Ven R. et al. Pedicle screw-rod fixation of the canine lumbosacral junction. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 720-732.
• 15 Wong WT, Emms SG. Use of pins and methylmethacrylate in stabilization of spinal fractures and luxations. J Small Anim Pract 1992; 33: 415-422.
• 16 Wheeler JL, Cross AR, Rapoff AJ. A comparison of the accuracy and safety of vertebral body pin placement using a fluoroscopically guided versus an open surgical approach: an in vitro study. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 468-474.
• 17 Watine S, Cabassu JP, Catheland S. et al. Computed tomography study of implantation corridors in canine vertebrae. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 651-657.
• 18 Vallefuoco R, Bedu AS, Manassero M. et al. Computed tomographic study of the optimal safe implantation corridors in feline thoraco-lumbar vertebrae. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26: 372-378.
• 19 Vallefuoco R, Manassero M, Leperlier D. et al. Surgical repair of thoraco-lumbar vertebral fracture-luxations in eight cats using screws and polymethylmethacrylate fixation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27: 306-312.
• 20 Koehler CL, Stover SM, LeCouteur RA. et al. Effect of a ventral slot procedure and of smooth or positive-profile threaded pins with polymethylmethacrylate fixation on intervertebral biomechanics at treated and adjacent canine cervical vertebral motion units. Am J Vet Res 2005; 66: 678-687.
• 21 Wininger FA, Archambault N, Frey S. Frameless stereotaxy for vertebral implant guidance in dogs. Proceedings of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society 43^rdAnnual Conference. Big Sky, Montana, USA: 2016. Feb 27-Mar 5 60