Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2017; 30(01): 28-36
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-06-0086
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Comparison of osteotomy technique and jig type in completion of distal femoral osteotomies for correction of medial patellar luxation

An in vitro study
Matteo Olimpo
1   Struttura Didattica Speciale Veterinaria, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
,
Lisa A. Piras
1   Struttura Didattica Speciale Veterinaria, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
,
Bruno Peirone
1   Struttura Didattica Speciale Veterinaria, University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy
,
Derek B. Fox
2   Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA
› Author Affiliations
Financial Support This study was partially supported by Intrauma S.r.l. who provided all bone plates and financial assistance for manufacturing of the models.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 10 June 2016

Accepted: 13 October 2016

Publication Date:
26 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objectives: Femoral osteotomies are frequently completed to correct malalignment associated with patellar luxation. The objectives of this study were to compare the use of: 1) two different types of jig; and 2) different types of osteotomy in the realignment of canine femoral bone models which possessed various iterations of angular deformity.

Methods: Models of canine femora possessing distal varus, external torsion and a combination of varus and torsion underwent correction utilizing two alignment jigs (Slocum jig and Deformity Reduction Device) and either a closing wedge ostectomy (CWO) or an opening wedge osteotomy (OWO). Post-correctional alignment was evaluated by radiographic assessment and compared between groups.

Results: The use of the Slocum jig resulted in frontal plane overcorrection when used with CWO in models of femoral varus, and when used with OWO in models of femoral varus and external torsion when compared to other techniques. The Deformity Reduction Device tended to realign the frontal plane closer to the post-correction target value in all angulation types. The use of both jigs resulted in undercorrection in the transverse plane in models with varus and torsion.

Clinical significance: Jig selection and osteotomy type may lead to different post-correctional alignment results when performing distal femoral osteotomies. Whereas OWO allows accurate correction when used with either jig to address frontal plane deformities, the Deformity Reduction Device can be utilized with both CWO and OWO to correct torsion-angulation femoral deformities to optimize frontal plane alignment.

 
  • References

  • 1 Johnson JA., Austin C., Breur GJ.. Incidence of canine appendicular muscluloskeletal disorders in 16 veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through. 1989; Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 56-69.
  • 2 Ness MG., Abercromby RH., May C.. et al. A survey of orthopaedic conditions in small animal veterinary practice in Britain. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 9: 43-52.
  • 3 Gibbons SE., Macias C., Tonzing MA.. et al. Patellar luxation in 70 large breed dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 3-9.
  • 4 DeAngelis M., Hohn RB.. Evaluation of surgical correction of canine patellar luxation in 142 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970; 156: 587-594.
  • 5 Hulse DA.. Medial patellar luxation in the dog. In: Bojrab MJ.. editor. Disease Mechanisms in Small Animal Surgery Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1993: 808-817.
  • 6 Roush JK.. Canine patellar luxation. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 855-858.
  • 7 Towle HA., Griffon DJ., Thomas MW.. et al. Pre- and postoperative radiographic and computed tomographic evaluation of dogs with medial patellar luxation. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 265-272.
  • 8 Swiderski JK., Palmer RH.. Long-term outcome of distal femoral osteotomy for treatment of combined distal femoral varus and medial patellar luxation: 12 cases (1999-2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 231: 1070-1075.
  • 9 Roch SP., Gemmill TJ.. Treatment of medial patellar luxation by femoral closing wedge ostectomy using a distal femoral plate in four dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2008; 48: 152-158.
  • 10 Peruski AM., Kowaleski MP., Pozzi A.. et al. Treatment of medial patellar luxation and distal femoral varus by femoral wedge osteotomy in dogs: 30 cases (2000-2005). Proceedings of the 2nd World Veterinary Orthopaedic Congress 2006. February 25-March 4 Keystone, Colorado, USA: 240.
  • 11 Hans EC., Kerwin SC., Elliott AC.. et al. Outcome following surgical correction of grade 4 medial patellar luxation in dogs: 47 stifles (2001-2012). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2016; 52: 162-169.
  • 12 Swiderski JK., Radecki SV., Park RD.. et al. Comparison of radiographic and anatomic femoral varus angle measurements in normal dogs. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 43-48.
  • 13 Dudley RM., Kowaleski MP., Drost WT.. et al. Radiographic and computed tomographic determination of femoral varus and torsion in the dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2006; 47: 546-552.
  • 14 Slocum B., Slocum TD.. Alignment problems of the hindlimb. Proceedings of the 10th ESVOT Congress 2000. March 23-26 Munich, Germany: 60-62.
  • 15 Palmer RH.. Controversies in the management of patellar luxation. Proceedings of the BVOA Spring Scientific Meeting 2008. April 2 Birmingham, England: 30-34.
  • 16 Palmer RH.. Patellar luxation: simple to the complex. Proceedings of the 34th World Small Animal Veterinary Association Congress 2009. July 21-24. Sao Paulo, Brazil.:
  • 17 Soparat C., Wangdee C.Chuthatep, et al.. Radiographic measurement for femoral varus in Pomeranian dogs with and without medial patellar luxation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25: 197-201.
  • 18 Bruecker KA.. Femoral corrective osteotomy for the correction of medial patellar luxation - surgical technique. Proceedings of the 13th ESVOT Congress 2006. September 7-10 Munich, Germany: 34.
  • 19 Weh JL., Kowaleski MP., Boudrieau RJ.. Combination tibial plateau leveling osteotomy and transverse corrective osteotomy of the proximal tibia for the treatment of complex tibial deformities in 12 dogs. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 670-686.
  • 20 Panichi E., Cappellari F., Olimpo M.. et al. Distal femoral osteotomy using a novel deformity reduction device. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29: 426-432.
  • 21 Balfour RJ., Boudrieau RJ., Gores BR.. T-plate fixation of distal radial closing wedge osteotomies for treatment of angular limb deformities in 18 dogs. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 207-217.
  • 22 Panichi E., Cappellari F., Peirone B.. Deformity reduction device (DRD JIG): a new device for deformity corrections. Proceedings of the 3rd World Veterinary Orthopedic Congress 2010. September 15-18 Bologna, Italy: 2010: 597-598.
  • 23 Jackson GM., Wendelburg KL.. Evaluation of the effect of distal femoral elevation on radiographic measurement of the anatomic lateral distal femoral angle. Vet Surg 2012; 41: 994-1001.
  • 24 Miles JE.. Femoral rotation unpredictably affects radiographic anatomical lateral distal femoral angle measurements. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2016; 29: 156-158.
  • 25 Tomlinson JL., Fox DB., Cook JL.. et al. Measurement of femoral angles in four dog breeds. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 593-598.
  • 26 Hauptman J., Prieur WD., Butler HC.. et al. The angle of inclination of the canine femoral head and neck. Vet Surg 1979; 8: 74-77.
  • 27 Kowaleski MP.. Computed tomographic planning of distal femoral osteotomy. Proceedings of the 3rd World Veterinary Orthopedic Congress 2010. September 15-18 Bologna, Italy: 496-497.
  • 28 Petazzoni M., Urizzi A., Verdonck B.. et al. Fixin internal fixator: concept and technique. Vet Comp Orthop Tramatol 2010; 23: 250-253.
  • 29 Krackow KA.. Approaches to planning lower extremity alignment for total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy about the knee. Adv Orthop Surg 1983; 7: 69-88.