Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24(06): 435-444
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-01-0015
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Effects of trial repetition, limb side, intraday and inter-week variation on vertical and craniocaudal ground reaction forces in clinically normal Labrador Retrievers

B. Nordquist
1   University of California, UC Davis Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, Davis, California, USA
,
J. Fischer
1   University of California, UC Davis Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, Davis, California, USA
,
S. Y. Kim
1   University of California, UC Davis Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, Davis, California, USA
,
S. M. Stover
2   University of California, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, Davis, California, USA
,
T. Garcia-Nolen
1   University of California, UC Davis Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, Davis, California, USA
,
K. Hayashi
3   University of California, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Davis, California, USA
,
J. Liu
1   University of California, UC Davis Veterinary Medicine Teaching Hospital, Davis, California, USA
,
A. S. Kapatkin
3   University of California, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, Davis, California, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 28 January 2011

Accepted: 05 July 2011

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To document the contributions of trial repetition, limb side, and intraday and inter-week measurements on variation in vertical and craniocaudal ground reaction force data.

Methods: Following habituation, force and time data were collected for all four limbs of seven Labrador Retrievers during sets of five valid trot trials. Each set was performed twice daily (morning and afternoon), every seven days for three consecutive weeks. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of limb, trial, intraday, and inter-week factors on ground reaction force data for the thoracic and pelvic limbs.

Results: Of the four factors evaluated, variation due to trial repetition had the largest magnitude of effect on ground reaction forces. Trial within a set of data had an effect on all craniocaudal, but not vertical, ground reaction force variables studied, for the thoracic limbs. The first of five trials was often different from later trials. Some thoracic limb and pelvic limb variables were different between weeks. A limb side difference was only apparent for pelvic limb vertical ground reaction force data. Only pelvic limb craniocaudal braking variables were different between sets within a day.

Discussion and clinical significance: When controlling for speed, handler, gait, weight and dog breed, variation in ground reaction forces mainly arise from trial repetition and inter-week data collection. When using vertical peak force and impulse to evaluate treatment, trial repetition and inter-week data collection should have minimal effect of the data.

Keywords

Force plate gait analysis - ground reaction forces - dog
 

  • References

  • 1 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1987; 48: 915-918.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Brown J. et al Vertical loading rates in clinically normal dogs at a trot. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 1275-1280.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rumph PF, Lander JE, Kincaid SA. et al Ground reaction force profile from force platform gait analyses of clinically normal mesomorphic dogs at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1994; 55: 756-761.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kennedy S, Lee DV, Bertram JEA. et al Gait evaluation in hip osteoarthritic and normal dogs using a serial force plate system. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 170-177.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rumph PF, Kincaid SA, Visco DM. et al Redistribution of vertical ground reaction force in dogs with experimentally induced chronic hindlimb lameness. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 384-389.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 McLaughlin RM, Miller CW, Taves CL. et al Force plate analysis of triple pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 291-297.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tano CA, Dobson H, Miller CW. et al Force plate analysis of dogs with bilateral hip dysplasia treated with a unilateral triple pelvic osteotomy: A Long-term review of cases. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1998; 11: 85-93.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dogan S, Manley PA, Vanderby Jr R. et al Canine intersegmental hip joint forces and moments before and after cemented total hip replacement. J Biomech 1991; 24: 397-407.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Budsberg SC, Chambers JN, Van Lue SL. et al Prospective evaluation of ground reaction forces in dogs undergoing unilateral total hip replacement. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 1781-1785.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Braden TD, Olivier NB, Blaiset MA. et al Objective evaluation of total hip replacement in 127 dogs utilizing force plate analysis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 78-81.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ballagras AJ, Montgomery RD, Henderson RA. et al Pre- and postoperative force plate analysis of dogs with experimentally transected cranial cruciate ligaments treated using tibial plateau leveling osteotomy. Vet Surg 2004; 33: 187-190.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. et al Force plate analyses before and after stabilization of canine stifles for cruciate injury. Am J Vet Res 1988; 49: 1522-1524.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Conzemius MG, Evans RB, Besancon MF. et al Effect of surgical technique on limb function after surgery for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 232-236.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jevens DJ, DeCamp CE, Hauptman J. et al Use of force-plate analysis of gait to compare two surgical techniques for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1996; 57: 389-393.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Budsberg SC. Long-term temporal evaluation of ground reaction forces during development of experimentally induced osteoarthritis in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1207-1211.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bouck GR, Miller CW, Taves CL. A comparison of surgical and medical treatment of fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the canine elbow. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 177-183.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Theyse LFH, Hazewinkel HAW, van den Brom WE. Force plate analysis before and after surgical treatment of unilateral fragmented coronoid process. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2000; 13: 135-140.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vasseur PB, Johnson AL, Budsberg SC. et al Randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy of carprofen, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, in the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 206: 807-811.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Moreau M, Dupuis J, Bonneau NH. et al Clinical evaluation of a nutraceutical, carprofen and meloxicam for the treatment of dogs with osteoarthritis. Vet Rec 2003; 152: 323-329.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Millis DL, Weigel JP, Moyers T. et al Effect of deracoxib, a new COX-2 inhibitor, on the prevention of lameness induced by chemical synovitis in dogs. Vet Ther 2002; 3: 453-464.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Budsberg SC, Johnston SA, Schwarz PD. et al Efficacy of etodolac for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the hip joints in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 206-210.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Cross AR, Budsberg SC, Keefe TJ. Kinetic gait analysis assessment of meloxicam efficacy in a sodium urate-induced synovitis model in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 626-631.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kapatkin AS, Tomasic M, Beech J. et al Effects of electrostimulated acupuncture on ground reaction forces and pain scores in dogs with chronic elbow joint arthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006; 228: 1350-1354.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bertram JEA, Lee DV, Case HN. et al Comparison of the trotting gaits of Labrador Retrievers and Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 832-838.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mölsä SH, Hielm-Björkman AK, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM. Force platform analysis in clinically healthy Rottweilers: comparison with Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 701-707.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 McLaughlin Jr RM, Roush JK. Effects of increasing velocity on braking and propulsion times during force plate gait analysis in Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 159-161.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Voss K, Imhof J, Kaestner S. et al Force plate gait analysis at the walk and trot in dogs with low-grade hindlimb lameness. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 299-304.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rumph PE, Steiss JE, Montgomery RD. Effects of selection and habituation on vertical ground reaction force in Greyhounds. Am J Vet Res 1997; 58: 1206-1208.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Fancon L, Valette JP, Sanaa M. et al The measurement of ground reaction force in dogs trotting on a treadmill. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19: 81-86.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Jevens DJ, Hauptman JG, DeCamp CE. et al Contributions to variance in force-plate analysis of gait in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 612-615.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rumph PE, Steiss JE, West MS. Interweek variation in vertical ground reaction force in clinically normal Greyhounds at a trot. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 679-683.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Beraud R, Moreau M, Lussier B. Effect of exercise on kinetic gait analysis of dogs afflicted by osteoarthritis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 87-92.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wells DL. Lateralised behaviour in the domestic dog. Behav Processes 2003; 61: 27-35.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Deuel NR, Lawrence LM. Laterality in the gallop gait of horses. J Biomech 1987; 20: 645-649.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Colborne GR. Are sound dogs mechanically symmetric at trot? No, actually. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 294-301.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Colborne GR, Good L, Cozens LE. et al Symmetry of hind limb mechanics in orthopedically normal trotting Labrador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 336-344.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lister SA, Roush JK, Renberg WC. et al Ground reaction force analysis of unilateral coxofemoral denervation for the treatment of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 137-141.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Au KK, Gordon-Evans WJ, Dunning D. et al Comparison of short- and long-term function and radiographic osteoarthrosis in dogs after postoperative physical rehabilitaion and tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or lateral fabellar suture stabilization. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 173-180.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Voss K, Damur DM, Guerrero T. et al Force plate gait analysis to assess limb function after tibial tube-rosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 243-249.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Voss K, Wiestner T, Galeandro L. et al Effect of dog breed and body conformation on vertical ground reaction forces, impulses and stance times. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 106-112.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar