Nuklearmedizin 2018; 57(03): 92-99
DOI: 10.3413/Nukmed-0929-17-09
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH

Diagnostic and prognostic value of additional SPECT/CT in sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients

Diagnostischer und prognostischer Stellenwert eines ergänzenden SPECT/CT Wächterlymphknotenszintigraphie (SLN) bei Mammakarzinompatientinnen
Susanne Stanzel
1   Medical University of Graz, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine
,
Birgit Pernthaler
1   Medical University of Graz, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine
,
Thomas Schwarz
1   Medical University of Graz, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine
,
Vesna Bjelic-Radisic
2   Medical University of Graz, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
,
Stefan Kerschbaumer
1   Medical University of Graz, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine
,
Reingard M Aigner
1   Medical University of Graz, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 15 September 2017

accepted in revised form: 06 March 2018

Publication Date:
05 June 2018 (online)

Summary

The aim of the study was to demonstrate the diagnostic and prognostic value of SPECT/CT in sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) in patients with invasive breast cancer. Methods: 114 patients with invasive breast cancer with clinically negative lymph nodes were included in this retrospective study as they were referred for SLNM with 99mTc-nanocolloid. Planar image acquisition was accomplished in a one-day or two-day protocol depending on the schedule of the surgical procedure. Low dose SPECT/CT was performed after the planar images. The sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was considered false negative if a primary recurrence developed within 12 months after SLNB in the axilla from which a tumor-free SLN had been removed. Results: Between December 2009 and December 2011, 114 patients (pts.) underwent SLNM with additional SPECT/CT. Planar imaging identified in 109 pts. 139 SLNs, which were tumor-positive in 42 nodes (n = 41 pts.). SPECT/CT identified in 81 pts. 151 additional SLNs, of which 19 were tumor-positive and led to therapy change (axillary lymph node dissection) in 11 pts. (9.6 %). Of overall 61 tumor-positive SLNs (n = 52 pts.) SPECT/CT detected all, whereas planar imaging detected only 42 of 61 (P < 0.0001). No patient had lymph node metastasis within 12 months after SLNB in the axilla from which a tumor-free SLN had been removed resulting in a false-negative rate of 0 %. The local relapse rate was 1.8 % leading to a 4-year disease-free survival rate of 90 %. Conclusion: Among patients with breast cancer, the use of SPECT/CT-aided SLNM correlated due to a better anatomical localization and identification of planar not visible SLNs with a higher detection rate of SLNs. This led to therapeutic consequences and an excellent false-negative and 4-year disease-free survival rate.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Ziel dieser Studie war es, den diagnostischen und prognostischen Wert des SPECT/CT bei der Detektion von Wächterlymphknoten (SLN) bei Mammakarzinompatientinnen zu analysieren. Methodik: 114 Patientinnen mit invasivem Mammakarzinom, klinisch negativem Lymphknotenstatus und Wächterlymphknotenszintigraphie (SLNM) mit 99mTc-Nanokolloid wurden eingeschlossen. Die planare Bildaquisition erfolgte je nach Operationsplanung entweder in einem 1- oder 2-Tages-Protokoll. Die SPECT/CT (low dose)-Aufnahmen folgten im Anschluss an die planaren Aufnahmen. Die Wächterlymphknotenbiopsie (SLNB) wurde als falsch negativ angesehen, wenn sich ein primäres Rezidiv innerhalb von 12 Monaten nach SLNB in der Axilla entwickelte, von wo ein tumorfreier SLN entfernt wurde. Ergebnisse: Zwischen Dezember 2009 und Dezember 2011 wurde bei 114 Patientinnen (Pat.) ein SLNM mit ergänzendem SPECT/CT durchgeführt. Die planare Szintigraphie detektierte bei 109 Pat. 139 SLNs, von welchen 42 tumorpositiv waren (n = 41 Pat.). SPECT/CT detektierte bei 81 Pat. 151 zusätzliche SLNs, von welchen 19 tumorpositiv waren und bei 11 Pat. (9.6 %) zu einer Therapieänderung (axilläre Lymphknotendissektion) führten. Von insgesamt 61 tumorpositiven SLNs (n = 52 Pat.) detektierte SPECT/CT alle, während die planare Szintigraphie nur 42 von 61 (P < 0.0001) detektierte. Keine Patientin hatte eine Lymphknotenmetastase in der Axilla innerhalb von 12 Monaten nach SLNB, von welcher ein tumorfreier SLN entfernt wurde, was zu einer Falsch-negativen-Rate von 0 % führte. Die Lokalrezidivrate betrug 1.8 %, was zu einer 4-Jahres-krankheitsfreien Überlebensrate von 90 % führte. Schlussfolgerungen: Bei Mammakarzinompatientinnen führte das ergänzende SPECT/CT zu einer deutlich besseren Identifikation und anatomischen Zuordnung des SLN, dies vor allem bei den planar nicht sichtbaren SLNs. Dies führte zur konsekutiven Änderung des Therapieregimes und einer exzellenten Falschnegativen und 4-Jahres-krankheitsfreien Überlebensrate.

 
  • References

  • 1 Breslin TM, Cohen L, Sahin A. et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. JCO 2000; 20: 3480-3486.
  • 2 Buck AK, Nekolla S, Ziegler S. et al. SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 1305-1319.
  • 3 Buscombe J, Paganelli G, Burak ZE. et al. Sentinel node in breast cancer procedural guidelines. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 2154-2159.
  • 4 Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC. et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2010: 419-461.
  • 5 Gallowitsch HJ, Kraschl P, Igerc I. et al. Sentinel node SPECT-CT in breast cancer. Can we expect any additional and clinically relevant information? Nuklearmedizin 2007; 46: 252-256.
  • 6 Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV. et al. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis. JAMA 2011; 305: 569-575.
  • 7 Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM. et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220: 391-401.
  • 8 Heuser T, Rink T, Weller E. et al. Impact of the axillary nodal status on sentinel node mapping in breast cancer and its relevance for technical proceeding. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2001; 67: 125-132.
  • 9 Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T. et al. The sentinel node in breast cancer – a multicenter validation study. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 941-946.
  • 10 Krag DN. Current status of axillary lymph node dissection and sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2010; 08: 471-473.
  • 11 Kreienberg R, Albert US, Follmann M. et al. Interdisciplinary GoR level III guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of breast cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2013; 73: 556-583.
  • 12 Kuehn T, Bembenek A, Decker T. et al. Consensus Committee of the German Society of Senology. A concept for the clinical implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast carcinoma with special regard to quality assurance. Cancer 2005; 103: 451-461.
  • 13 Kuehn T, Vogl FD, Helms G. et al. Sentinel-node biopsy for axillary staging in breast cancer: results from a large prospective German multi-institutional trial. EJSO 2004; 30: 252-259.
  • 14 Nason KS, Anderson BO, Byrd DR. et al. Increased false negative sentinel node biopsy rate after preoperative chemotherapy for invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89: 2187-2194.
  • 15 Lerman H, Lievshitz G, Zak O. et al. Improved sentinel node identification by SPECT/CT in overweight patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 201-206.
  • 16 Miller AR, Thomason VE, Yeh IT. et al. Analysis of sentinel lymph node mapping with immediate pathologic review in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for breast carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2002; 1709: 243-247.
  • 17 Stoffels I, Boy C, Pöppel T. et al. Association between sentinel lymph node excision with or without preoperative SPECT/CT and metastatic node detection and disease-free survival in melanoma. JAMA 2012; 308: 1007-1014.
  • 18 van der Ploeg IM, Valdés RAOlmos, Kroon BB. et al. The Hybrid SPECT/CT as an additional lymphatic mapping tool in patients with breast cancer. World J Surg 2008; 32: 1930-1934.
  • 19 van der Ploeg IM, Valdés RAOlmos, Nieweg OE. et al. The additional value of SPECT/CT in lymphatic mapping in breast cancer and melanoma. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 1756-1760.
  • 20 Veenstra HJ, Wouters MW, Kroon BB. et al. Less false-negative sentinel node procedures in melanoma patients with experience and proper collaboration. J Surg Oncol 2011; 104: 454-457.
  • 21 Vercellino L, Ohnona J, Groheux D. et al. Role of SPECT/CT in sentinel lymph node detection in patients with breast cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2014; 39: 431-436.
  • 22 Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V. et al. Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymphnodes. Lancet 1997; 349: 1864-1867.
  • 23 von Forstner C. Der Einsatz von SPECT/CT bei der Wächterlymphknotendiagnostik. Der Nuklearmediziner 2011; 34: 59-65.
  • 24 Wallace AM, Han LK, Povoski SP. et al. Comparative evaluation of [99mTc]tilmanocept for sentinel lymph node mapping in breast cancer patients: results of two phase 3 trials. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 2590-2599.