Nuklearmedizin 2015; 54(04): 183-189
DOI: 10.3413/Nukmed-0698-14-09
Original article
Schattauer GmbH

Introduction of a metabolic joint asymmetry score derived from conventional bone scintigraphy

A new tool to differentiate psoriatic from rheumatoid arthritisEinführung einer Asymmetrie-Skala des metabolischen Gelenkbefalls abgeleitet aus der konventionellen SkelettszintigrafieEin neues Hilfsmittel zur Differenzierung von Psoriasis- und rheumatoider Arthritis
S. Ezziddin*
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
,
F. Khalaf*
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
,
M. Seidel
2   Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
,
A. Al Zreiqat
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
,
D. Wilsmann-Theis
3   Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
,
B. Simon
4   Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
,
H.-J. Biersack
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
,
A. Sabet
1   Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 20 September 2014

accepted in revised form: 18 April 2014

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Aim: Clinical differentiation of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (rA) based on the pattern of joint involvement can be difficult; the frequent form of PsA with polyarthritis of the peripheral joints may sometime resemble rA. We investigated a metabolic joint asymmetry score (MJAS), reflecting the overall asymmetric joint involvement on conventional bone scintigraphy, for differentiating PsA from rA in patients presenting with peripheral polyarthritis. Patients, methods: 106 patients (n = 61, PsA; n = 45, rA) with peripheral polyarthritis (≥ 5 joints) as well as 26 control subjects with no history of chronic joint disorders were analyzed. The intensity of articular 99mTc-MDP uptake in 40 peripheral joint pairs was scored regarding the bilateral difference of each joint based on a scale of 0–2 (no significant, moderate, and marked asymmetry, respectively). The patient's MJAS was defined as the sum of uptake difference scores of all joint pairs. The association of MJAS with the underlying condition (Psoriasis criteria, Revised Criteria of the ACR) was examined. Results: 5280 peripheral joint pairs were investigated. There was no significant difference in the total number of involved joints in PsA 15.0 ± 8.2 versus rA 17.5 ± 8.8 patients (p = 0.132), but significantly less involvement in the control group (6.7 ± 5.0, p < 0.001). MJAS was markedly higher in PsA (17.0 ± 9.6) than in rA (4.8 ± 3.9, p < 0.001), and correlated with the total number of involved joints in PsA (r = 0.516, p < 0.001), but not in rA (r = 0.078, p = 0.380). The MJAS disparity between PsA and rA persisted after exclusion of the DIP joints (14.4 ± 7.7 vs. 4.4 ± 3.3; p<0.001). Conclusions: The new reproducible semi-quantification method for the asymmetry of metabolic joint involvement permits differentiation of psoriatic from rheumatoid peripheral arthritis with MJAS being markedly higher in patients with PsA as compared to rA patients. The score may offer an effective complementary tool for characterizing patients with peripheral polyarthritis.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Die klinische Differenzierung der Psoriasis-Arthritis (PsA) von der rheumatoiden Arthritis (rA) basierend auf dem Gelenkbefallsmuster kann schwierig sein; die häufig auftretende Form der PsA mit Polyarthritis der peripheren Gelenke kann der rA ähneln. Wir untersuchten den Nutzen einer Asymmetrie-Skala für den metabolischen Gelenksbefall (MJAS), welche die Gesamtasymmetrie der Gelenkbeteiligung in der konventionellen Skelettszintigrafie reflektiert, zur Differenzierung der PsA von der rA bei Patienten mit peripherer Polyarthritis. Patienten, Methoden: 106 Patienten (n = 61, PsA; n = 45, rA) mit peripherer Polyarthritis (≥5 Gelenke) sowie 26 Kontrollen ohne chronische Gelenkerkrankung wurden eingeschlossen. Die Intensität der artikulären 99mTc-MDP-Speicherung in 40 peripheren Gelenkpaaren wurde hinsichtlich der bilateralen Differenz graduiert, pro Gelenkpaar jeweils mit einem Score von 0 bis 2 (keine signifikante, moderate oder ausgeprägte Asymmetrie). Der MJAS des Patienten definierte sich aus der Summe der Uptake-Differenz Scores aller Gelenkpaare. Die Assoziation des MJAS mit der zugrundeliegenden Erkrankung (Psoriasis criteria, Rivised Criteria of the ACR) wurde statistisch getestet. Ergebnisse: 5280 periphere Gelenkpaare wurden untersucht. Die mittlere Anzahl der betroffenen Gelenke war ähnlich hoch in PsA (15.0 ± 8.2) und rA (17.5 ± 8.8) Patienten (p = 0.132), aber deutlich niedriger in der Kontrollgruppe (6.7 ± 5.0, p < 0.001). Das mittlere MJAS war deutlich höher bei der PsA (17.0 ± 9.6) als bei der rA (4.8 ± 3.9, p < 0.001), und korrelierte mit der Anzahl der betroffenen Gelenke bei der PsA (r = 0.516, p < 0.001), nicht jedoch bei der rA (r = 0.078, p = 0.380). Die MJAS-Diskrepanz zwischen PsA und rA persistierte auch nach Ausschluss der DIP Gelenke (14.4 ± 7.7 vs 4.4 ± 3.3; p < 0.001). Schlussfolgerungen: Die reproduzierbare semiquantitative Methodik zur Erfassung der Asymmetrie der metabolischen Gelenkbeteiligung erlaubt die Differenzierung der peripheren Psoriasis von der rheumatoiden Arthritis; das MJAS ist bei der PsA deutlich höher und bietet die Möglichkeit zur komplementären Charakterisierung von Patienten mit peripherer Polyarthritis.

* Both authors contributed equally to this work.


 
  • References

  • 1 Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman A. et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62: 2569-2581.
  • 2 Bakker MF, Jacobs JW, Verstappen SM, Bijlsma JW. Tight control in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy and feasibility. Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66 (Suppl 3) iii56-60.
  • 3 Bennett RM. Management of rheumatoid arthritis. Compr Ther 1979; 5: 23-35.
  • 4 Biondi Oriente C, Scarpa R, Pucino A, Oriente P. Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Dermatological and rheumatological co-operative clinical report. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1989; 146: 69-71.
  • 5 Brockbank JE, Stein M, Schentag CT, Gladman DD. Dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis: a marker for disease severity?. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 188-190.
  • 6 Coulton BL, Thomson K, Symmons DP, Popert AJ. Outcome in patients hospitalised for psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 1989; 8: 261-265.
  • 7 Fogelman I, Boyle IT. The bone scan in clinical practice. Scott Med J 1980; 25: 45-49.
  • 8 Fournie B, Crognier L, Arnaud C. et al. Proposed classification criteria of psoriatic arthritis. A preliminary study in 260 patients. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1999; 66: 446-456.
  • 9 Grigoryan M, Roemer FW, Mohr A, Genant HK. Imaging in spondyloarthropathies. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2004; 6: 102-109.
  • 10 Gladman DD, Antoni C, Mease P. et al. Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (Suppl 2) ii14-7.
  • 11 Gladman DD, Shuckett R, Russell ML. et al. Psoriatic arthritis (PSA)--an analysis of 220 patients. Q J Med 1987; 62: 127-141.
  • 12 Gottlieb A, Korman NJ, Gordon KB. et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Section 2. Psoriatic arthritis: overview and guidelines of care for treatment with an emphasis on the biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008; 58: 851-864.
  • 13 Helliwell PS, Hetthen J, Sokoll K. et al. Joint symmetry in early and late rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis: comparison with a mathematical model. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 865-871.
  • 14 Helliwell P, Marchesoni A, Peters M. et al. A re-evaluation of the osteoarticular manifestations of psoriasis. Br J Rheumatol 1991; 30: 339-345.
  • 15 Helliwell PS, Taylor WJ. Classification and diagnostic criteria for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64 (Suppl 2) ii3-8.
  • 16 Kavanaugh AF, Ritchlin CT. Systematic review of treatments for psoriatic arthritis: an evidence based approach and basis for treatment guidelines. J Rheumatol 2006; 33: 1417-1421.
  • 17 Keat A. ABC of rheumatology. Spondyloarthropathies. BMJ 1995; 310: 1321-1324.
  • 18 McGonagle D, Conaghan PG, Emery P. Psoriatic arthritis: a unified concept twenty years on. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 1080-1086.
  • 19 Mease P. Management of psoriatic arthritis: the therapeutic interface between rheumatology and dermatology. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2006; 8: 348-354.
  • 20 Mease PJ. Psoriatic arthritis assessment and treatment update. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2009; 21: 348-355.
  • 21 Milevskaia SG, Borodulin VG. Osteoscintigraphy in the diagnosis of latent psoriatic arthritis. Vestn Dermatol Venerol 1989; 75-78.
  • 22 Moll JM, Wright V. Psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1973; 3: 55-78.
  • 23 Mrowietz U, Reich K. Psoriasis--new insights into pathogenesis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2009; 106: 11-18.
  • 24 Namey TC, Rosenthall L. Periarticular uptake of 99mtechnetium diphosphonate in psoriatics: correlation with cutaneous activity. Arthritis Rheum 1976; 19: 607-612.
  • 25 O'Neill T, Silman AJ. Psoriatic arthritis. Historical background and epidemiology. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1994; 8: 245-261.
  • 26 Palazzi C, Olivieri I, Petricca A, Salvarani C. Rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic symmetric polyarthritis? A difficult differential diagnosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2002; 20: 3-4.
  • 27 Peters BP, Weissman FG, Gill MA. Pathophysiology and treatment of psoriasis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2000; 57: 645-659.
  • 28 Radtke MA, Reich K, Beikert F, Augustin M. Psoriasis arthritis. An interdisciplinary challenge. Hautarzt 2011; 62: 779-790.
  • 29 Rahman P, Nguyen E, Cheung C. et al. Comparison of radiological severity in psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2001; 28: 1041-1044.
  • 30 Raza N, Hameed A, Ali MK. Detection of subclinical joint involvement in psoriasis with bone scintigraphy and its response to oral methotrexate. Clin Exp Dermatol 2008; 33: 70-73.
  • 31 Ritchlin CT, Kavanaugh A, Gladman DD. et al. Treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 1387-1394.
  • 32 Scarpa R, Cuocolo A, Peluso R. et al. Early psoriatic arthritis: the clinical spectrum. J Rheumatol 2008; 35: 137-141.
  • 33 Silman AJ. Epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. APMIS 1994; 102: 721-728.
  • 34 Veale D, Rogers S, Fitzgerald O. Classification of clinical subsets in psoriatic arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 1994; 33: 133-138.
  • 35 Whiting-O'Keefe QE, Fye KH, Sack KD. Methotrexate and histologic hepatic abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Am J Med 1991; 90: 711-716.
  • 36 Wittkowski KM, Leonardi C, Gottlieb A. et al. Clinical symptoms of skin, nails, and joints manifest independently in patients with concomitant psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. PLoS One 2011; 6: e20279.
  • 37 Wright V. Psoriasis and arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 1956; 15: 348-356.
  • 38 Wright V. Psoriatic arthritis; a comparative study of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and arthritis associated with psoriasis. AMA Arch Derm 1959; 80: 27-35.
  • 39 Wright V. Seronegative polyarthritis: a unified concept. Arthritis Rheum 1978; 21: 619-633.