Keywords
acute respiratory distress syndrome - acute lung injury - anti-coagulants - heparin
- alveolar macrophages
Introduction
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality
(30–40%) in critically ill patients.[1]
[2] Defined by non–heart-failure-related acute respiratory failure and inflammation,
ARDS can arise from various local and systemic insults.[3] It is characterized by bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, increased endothelial permeability
and oedema.[4] Although lung protective ventilation strategy and prone position have produced a
major breakthrough in supportive care of ARDS patients, an effective pharmacological
therapy for ARDS is not available yet.
Even though neutrophil influx and activation within the lungs contribute to the induction
of ARDS, increasing evidence suggests that alveolar macrophages are critical to the
initiation and maintenance of the inflammatory response and to the resolution phase.[5]
[6] More specifically, lung inflammation during ARDS is deeply correlated to the alveolar
macrophages phenotype, function and cell–cell interactions.[6]
[7] Due to their plasticity, macrophages can be proinflammatory (M1) or anti-inflammatory
activated (M2) depending on environmental signals. At the initial acute phase of ARDS,
classically activated macrophages (M1) release early response cytokines such as tumour
necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) or inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), stimulating
the cells of the alveoli and recruiting neutrophils to the alveolar space, amplifying
the inflammatory response and promoting the elimination of pathogens. At the resolution
phase, alternative macrophages (M2) are activated releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines
such as interleukin 10 (IL-10) or arginase 1 and promoting tissue remodeling.[5]
[7]
ARDS is also associated with pulmonary activation of coagulation mediated by the tissue
factor (TF) pathway. Exposure to proinflammatory cytokines causes alveolar macrophages
and alveolar epithelial cells to produce TF, the key mediator of coagulation in severe
infections.[8] Pulmonary coagulation is evident in increased markers of thrombin generation, soluble
TF and factor VIIa activity found in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) from ARDS
patients, together with increased release of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1)
resulting in decreased fibrinolytic activity.[9]
[10]
[11]
Previous findings indicate that anti-coagulants may help restore the coagulation cascade
and treat ARDS; however, in experimental models of acute lung injury (ALI) and in
ARDS patients, the beneficial effects of systemic anti-coagulants were outweighed
by systemic bleeding.[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18] Local administration of nebulized anti-coagulants to the lungs might reduce the
risk of systemic bleeding and might be more effective than intravenous administration.[19] Preclinical studies with animal models of direct and indirect ALI have found that
local administration of nebulized heparin improved pulmonary coagulopathy.[20] Intravenous anti-thrombin combined with nebulized heparin and tissue plasminogen
activator restored gas exchange but not inflammation in a model of burn and smoke
inhalation injured sheep.[21] In a phase I trial of nebulized heparin to ARDS patients, the activation of pulmonary
coagulation was reduced without producing systemic bleeding.[22]
[23] In addition, nebulized heparin decreased the duration of mechanical ventilation
in burn inhalation injured patients.[24]
Besides its anti-coagulant effects, intravenously administered heparin showed anti-inflammatory
effects, ameliorating lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung injury in rats via the
inhibition of the nitric oxide synthase expression and transforming growth factor
beta (TGF-β)/Smad pathway.[25] Heparin was also found to inhibit the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κ≡) pathway in
monocytes treated with LPS.[26]
[27] Furthermore, data recently obtained by our group showed that after LPS injury in
human alveolar macrophages heparin limited the expression of TNF-α and IL-6, while
in human alveolar type II cells heparin inhibited the NF-κ≡ pathway and their effectors
IL-6, MCP-1 and IL-8.[28]
Since alveolar macrophages play an important role in the development and resolution
of ARDS, modulating the inflammatory response and the coagulation cascade in lungs,
and heparin exhibits both anti-inflammatory and anti-coagulant properties, the hypothesis
of this work was that nebulized heparin could attenuate ARDS through the involvement
of alveolar macrophages. Accordingly, the current study aimed to assess the effects
of nebulized heparin in a rat model of ALI induced by intratracheal instillation of
LPS with special regard to the role that alveolar macrophages might have in limiting
the coagulation and the inflammatory response. More in details, we postulated that:
(1) in lungs, nebulized heparin decreases procoagulant markers and inflammation in
terms of lung neutrophil influx, oedema, proinflammatory cytokines and histopathology;
(2) in alveolar macrophages, nebulized heparin reduces the effectors of TGF-β and
NF-κ≡ pathways and the expression of procoagulant genes.
Materials and Methods
Animals
We studied 64 pathogen-free male Sprague-Dawley rats (8 weeks old; 250–300 g; Charles
River, Chatillon-sur-Chalaronne, France) housed in 12-hour light–dark-cycle, air-conditioned
(23°C and 60% relative humidity) quarters with free access to standard food pellets
(A04; Panlab, Barcelona, Spain) and tap water. The Animal Research Ethics Committee
of the Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB) approved the study.
Experimental Design
Rats were sedated with sevoflurane and randomized to four experimental groups (16
animals/group). [Fig. 1] illustrates the experimental design. ALI was induced by intratracheal instillation
of LPS (Escherichia coli 055: B5, 10 µg/g body weight) (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO).[29] Heparin (Vister, Parke-Davis, Linate, Milan, Italy) was nebulized through Aeroneb
system (Philips Healthcare) at constant oxygen flow (2 L/min). Rats in the LPS/Hep
group received two doses of 1,000 IU/kg nebulized heparin, administered 4 and 8 hours
after LPS instillation. Rats in the Hep/LPS/Hep group received three doses of nebulized
heparin: one dose 30 minutes before LPS instillation and one dose 4 and 8 hours after
LPS instillation. Rats in the LPS/saline group received nebulized saline solution
(0.9% NaCl) 4 and 8 hours after LPS instillation. Rats in the control group received
only saline solution, by tracheal instillation at the time of ALI induction in the
other animals and by nebulizer 4 and 8 hours afterwards. Animals were anesthetized
(90 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine) and exsanguinated 24 hours after LPS instillation.
BALF, lung tissue and blood were collected for further analyses; BALF and lung homogenate
were obtained from eight animals in each group, and the lungs for histological examination
and lung wet/dry weight ratio were obtained from the remaining eight animals in each
group.
Fig.1 Experimental design. (a) Treatment group and (b) pre-treatment group.
Obtaining and Processing Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid
The left main bronchus was tied with a string at the hilum. BALF from all animal groups
was obtained from the right lung by connecting a syringe to the cannula placed in
the trachea and then gently flushing through it 5 mL sterile 0.9% NaCl solution with
1-mM Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) five times. BALF volume recovery was always
greater than 85%. BALF was spun at 800 × g for 10 minutes and the supernatant was
stored at –80°C for subsequent analysis. Cells were counted using a haemocytometer
(Neubauer, Marienfeld, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany), and slides were prepared by cytocentrifugation
(Shandon Cytospin 4, Thermo Electron Corporation, Marietta, OH) and Diff-Quick staining
(Panreac Quimica SAU; Castellar del Vallès, Spain). For each rat, approximately 500
cells were counted.
Lung Wet/Dry Weight Ratio
To assess oedema, the left lung was dissected immediately after exsanguination and
the wet weight was recorded. The lung was then placed in an incubator at 80°C for
48 hours, the dry weight recorded and the lung wet-to-dry weight ratio was measured.
Histological Examination
The right lungs were removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. Two independent experts
blinded to treatment analysed 4-µm sections excised of lung stained with haematoxylin
and eosin (H&E). The entire surface of the lung was analysed for inflammation and
damage, and was scored as follows: normal lung (0), haemorrhage (on a 0–1 scale),
peribronchial infiltration (on a 0–1 scale), interstitial oedema (on a 0–2 scale),
pneumocyte hyperplasia (on a 0–3 scale) and intra-alveolar infiltration (on a 0–3
scale).
Cytokine and Protein Measurements
Total protein concentration in BALF was quantified using the Micro BCA Protein Assay
Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). IL-6, GRO-κC, TNF-α and IL-10 in lung homogenate were
determined by multiplex assay following the manufacturer's protocol (Luminex, Merck
Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). PAI-1 in lung homogenate was determined by uniplex
assay (Luminex, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). Levels of TF, fibrin degradation
products (FDPs), and thrombin-anti-thrombin complexes (TATc) in lung homogenate were
measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (USCN Life Sciences, Hubei, China).
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
Blood (0.3 mL) was collected from the abdominal aorta in tubes containing 11-mM sodium
citrate 24 hours after LPS instillation. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)
was measured according to standard protocols (Echevarne Laboratories, Spain).
Isolation of Alveolar Macrophages
BALF pellet from all animal groups was seeded in Petri dishes with RPMI 1640 Medium
supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL
streptomycin (Gibco, Langley, OK), for 1 hour at 37°C. The supernatant was discarded
and purified attached alveolar macrophages were cryopreserved in 500 µL of TRIzol
reagent (Ambion, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madrid, Spain).
Alveolar macrophages' purity was assessed by Diff-Quick staining and immunofluorescence.
To perform immunofluorescence, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated
for 2 hours in a blocking solution (3% FBS and 1% bovine serum albumin in phosphate
buffered saline [PBS]). Cells were then incubated overnight with a mouse anti-rat
CD68 antibody (1:100) (Acris Antibodies, Rockville, MD), washed with PBS1X and incubated
at 37°C for 1 hour with a goat anti-mouse IgG-FITC antibody (1:500) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Dallas, TX). Cells were finally washed with PBS 1X and incubated 5 minutes with HOECHST
(1:1,000) (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA).
RNA Extraction and Real-Time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from isolated alveolar macrophages using chloroform, isopropanol
and ethanol. The optical density at 260 nm and the ratio 260 nm/280 nm were measured
to determine the RNA purity (spectrophotometer ND-1000, Nanodrop, Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Wilmington, DE). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with a reverse transcriptase
core kit (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium), using an Alpho-SC (Analytik Jena AG, Jena,
Germany) thermocycler. DNA was amplified in a real-time polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) system (7500 Real-Time PCR System, Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Madrid, Spain) using SYBR green (Kapa Biosystems, Cultek, Mataró, Spain) and the corresponding
rat primers ([Table 1]). Data were corrected by ΔΔCt method and shown as target gene expression relative
to Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and fold over saline group.
Table 1
Rat primers
Gene
|
Forward primer
|
Reverse primer
|
GAPDH
|
5′ CTGTGCTTTCCGCTGTTTTC 3′
|
5′ TGTGCTGTGCTTATGGTCTCA 3′
|
TNF-α
|
5′ AACTCCCAGAAAAGCAAGCA 3′
|
5′ CGAGCAGGAATGAGAAGAGG 3′
|
iNOS
|
5′ CTTGGAGCGAGTTGTGGATT 3′
|
5′ GGTGGGAGGGGTAGTGATG 3′
|
IL-10
|
5′ CATCCGGGGTGACAATAA 3′
|
5′ TGTCCAGCTGGTCCTTCT 3′
|
Arginase-1
|
5′ GGGAAGACACCAGAGGAGGT 3′
|
5′ TGATGCCCCAGATGACTTTT 3′
|
TGF-β
|
5′ TGCTTCAGCTCCACAGAGAA 3′
|
5′ TGGTTGTAGAGGGCAAGGAC 3′
|
Smad 2
|
5′ ACTCGTGGGGGAAGAAAAGT 3′
|
5′ CATGCTGCACTGCTTTGAAT 3′
|
Smad 3
|
5′ GACCAGGCATTTTGAGGAAA 3′
|
5′ AGACCACAGCACCCCATAAG 3′
|
IRAK1
|
5′ TACAAAGTGATGGACGCCCT 3′
|
5′ GGTGCCAGGCTGTAATGATG 3′
|
P-Selectin
|
5′ AGGTTGGCAATGGTTCACTC 3′
|
5′ ACCATTGGGAGCTACACCTG 3′
|
CCL-2
|
5′ GCTGCTACTCATTCACTGGC 3′
|
5′ GGTGCTGAAGTCCTTAGGGT 3′
|
TF
|
5′ ACAATCTTGGAGTGGCAACC 3′
|
5′ TGGGACAGATAGGACCCTTG 3′
|
PAI-1
|
5′ AGGGGCAGCAGATAGACAGA 3′
|
5′ CACAGGGAGACCCAGGATAA 3′
|
Plasminogen
|
5′ AAACGAAAGGGACTCCAGGT 3′
|
5′ TCTCGAAGCAAACCAGAGGT 3′
|
Note: Table of the primers used for the real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Statistical Analysis
Before starting the experiments, a power analysis was performed using the Gpower 3
program. The analysis indicated that 44 animals were needed to detect large effects
(0.5) with 85% power using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test between factors with
α at 0.05. We used 20 extra animals to perform further investigational assessments.
One-way ANOVA with Fisher's protected least-squares differences (PLSD) test as post
hoc analysis was used for multigroup comparisons (StatView 5.0.1; Abacus Concept,
Berkeley, CA). Results are reported as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was set
at p < 0.05.
Results
Cellular and Histological Response
Compared with control rats, animals in the LPS-instilled groups had higher total neutrophil
counts in BALF; nebulized heparin limited the increase in neutrophils ([Fig. 2a]). There were no major differences in total macrophage counts among groups ([Fig. 2b]). Compared with the LPS/saline group, only heparin pre-treatment led to a decrease
in the total number of cells in BALF (Sal/Sal: 16.8 ± 7.7, LPS/Sal: 45.7 ± 5.7, LPS/Hep:
40.8 ± 6.8, Hep/LPS/Hep: 31.1 ± 3.3; p < 0.05 vs. LPS/Sal group). The total concentrations of BALF proteins ([Fig. 2d]) and the wet-to-dry ratio ([Fig. 2c]) were significantly greater in LPS-instilled animals than in control animals, suggesting
increased permeability of the alveolocapillary barrier. Nebulized heparin markedly
reduced total BALF proteins and the wet-to-dry ratio. Histological analysis of lung
tissue detected evidence of lung injury (haemorrhage, interstitial oedema, peribronchial
and intra-alveolar infiltration, and alveolar pneumocyte hyperplasia) in LPS-instilled
rats; lung injury was considerably reduced only in the Hep/LPS/Hep rats ([Fig. 3]).
Fig. 2 Bronchoalveolar lavage analysis and wet/dry weight ratio. Absolute (a) neutrophil (PMN) and (b) alveolar macrophage (AM) cell counts in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of rats
24 hours after the induction of the injury. (c) Wet/dry weight ratio and (d) protein concentration in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Data are presented as
mean ± SEM. ANOVA followed by the post hoc Fisher's PLSD test were used. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.
Fig. 3 Lung tissue analysis. (a–d) Representative images of haematoxylin and eosin staining lung tissue sections and
(e) histological score in animals 24 hours after induction of the injury. Original magnification
×200. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ANOVA followed by the post hoc Fisher's PLSD
test were used. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.
Coagulation Effects
LPS instillation increased lung-tissue levels of TF, TATc, FDP and PAI-1 compared
with control animals ([Fig. 4a–d] respectively). Nebulized heparin reduced lung TF, but TATc and FDP levels decreased
only in the Hep/LPS/Hep group. PAI-1 levels were not altered after heparin nebulization
([Fig. 4d]). Heparin had no effects on systemic coagulation, as no changes were observed in
the aPTT (data not shown).
Fig. 4 Coagulant effectors and cytokines. (a) Tissue factor (TF), (b) thrombin–anti-thrombin complexes (TATc), (c) fibrin degradation products (FDPs), (c) plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 activity (PAI-1), (e) IL-6, (f) TNF-α, (g) GRO-κC and (h) IL-10 concentrations were measured in lung homogenate of animals 24 hours after
induction of the injury. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ANOVA followed by the post
hoc Fisher's PLSD test were used. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.
Inflammatory Response
In lung homogenates, concentrations of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6, TNF-α and
GRO-κC diminished in both groups of animals nebulized with heparin compared with the
LPS group ([Fig. 4e–g] respectively). Levels of IL-10 were higher in all the rat groups compared with control
([Fig. 4h]).
Macrophage pathway
Alveolar macrophages were isolated from BALF (98% purity; [Supplementary Material 1]). [Fig. 5] reports the gene expression of M1 proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α [[Fig. 5a]] and iNOS [[Fig. 5b]]) and M2 regulatory and reparative markers (IL-10 [[Fig. 5c]] and arginase-1 [[Fig. 5d]]) from alveolar macrophages. Nebulized heparin–deactivated alveolar macrophages
stimulated with LPS; TNF-α, iNOS and arginase-1 expression significantly decreased
in both LPS/Hep and Hep/LPS/Hep rats, but IL-10 expression significantly decreased
only in the Hep/LPS/Hep group.
Fig. 5 Activation of alveolar macrophages. Gene expression of proinflammatory (M1): (a) TNF-α, (b) iNOS and alternative (M2), (c) IL-10, (d) arginase-1 mediators in alveolar macrophages isolated from BALF of animals 24 hours
after induction of the injury. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ANOVA followed by
the post hoc Fisher's PLSD test were used. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.
[Fig. 6] reports the expression of genes involved in proinflammatory and coagulation pathways
analysed in alveolar macrophages. LPS had no effect on TGF-β expression ([Fig. 6a]) but increased the expression of Smad 3 ([Fig. 6b]) and Smad 2 ([Fig. 6c]). Nebulized heparin diminished the increase in Smad 3 expression in both groups,
but diminished the increase in Smad 2 expression only in the Hep/LPS/Hep group. LPS
increased the expression of IRAK1 ([Fig. 6d]), p-selectin ([Fig. 6e]) and CCL-2 ([Fig. 6f]) in alveolar macrophages; CCL-2 and p-selectin expression were lower in the Hep/LPS/Hep
group. LPS increased expression in alveolar macrophages of TF ([Fig. 6g]), PAI-1 ([Fig. 6h]) and plasminogen ([Fig. 6i]), but only pre-treatment with nebulized heparin mitigated the increase in plasminogen
expression.
Fig. 6 Inflammatory and coagulation pathways of alveolar macrophages. Gene expression of TGF-β pathway: (a) TGF-β, (b) Smad 2 and (c) Smad 3, NF-κ≡ pathway, (d) IRAK-1, (e) p-selectin and (f) CCL-2 and coagulation pathway, (g) TF, (h) PAI-1 and (i) plasminogen in alveolar macrophages isolated from BALF of animals 24 hours after
induction of the injury. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. ANOVA followed by the post
hoc Fisher's PLSD test were used. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001; ***p < 0.0001.
Discussion
The pathogenesis of ARDS involves both proinflammatory and procoagulant mediators,
and the breakdown of the epithelial and endothelial barrier results in pulmonary oedema
and infiltration of neutrophils in the alveolar space. In this rat model of LPS-induced
ALI, administrating nebulized heparin diminished recruitment of neutrophils into the
lung and attenuated pulmonary coagulopathy and inflammation without producing systemic
bleeding. Part of this positive effect of heparin might be ascribed to the alveolar
macrophages, in which the expression of markers of TGF-β effectors, NF-κ≡ and coagulation
pathways was decreased after heparin nebulization.
Administering anti-coagulants directly to the lungs allows higher dosages and increases
local efficacy without producing systemic bleeding.[19] We tested the effects of two nebulized heparin treatment regimens. Rats in the LPS/Hep
group received two doses after ALI induction, while rats in the Hep/LPS/Hep group
received an additional dose before LPS. Although the prophylactic pre-treatment plus
treatment (Hep/LPS/Hep) model can help elucidate mechanisms, the treatment (LPS/Hep)
model better reflects the clinical situation. Heparin reduced the number of neutrophils
and their recruitment in both groups. Furthermore, heparin diminished lung permeability,
reducing the concentration of BALF proteins and oedema in both groups. However, only
in the pre-treatment group, heparin decreased the number of total BALF cells and lung
injury.
In the first stages of ALI/ARDS, proinflammatory mediators inhibit natural anti-coagulant
factors and induce procoagulant activity.[18] In our ALI model, heparin nebulization decreased pulmonary coagulation and inflammation.
Previous studies showed that nebulized heparin could reduce pulmonary coagulopathy
in an animal model of endotoxemia[20] or pneumonia,[30] although heparin did not produce any changes on inflammation. This result could
be attributed to the different timing and dosage of heparin. In Hofstra et al's experimental
model,[20] heparin was given every 6 hours, while in our model the time interval between each
heparin nebulization was 4 hours (heparin biological lifetime is ∼1.5 hours), although
we administrated fewer doses (three to the pre-treatment group and two to the treatment
group).
Alveolar macrophages play important roles in both the development and resolution of
ALI/ARDS.[5]
[6]
[7] In our ALI model, the expression of both proinflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory
(M2) markers in alveolar macrophages increased after LPS administration, with a predominant
activation of the proinflammatory M1 phenotype. Heparin attenuated the response of
alveolar macrophages during ALI, reducing M1 (TNF-α, iNOS) and M2 (IL-10, arginase-1)
markers to basal levels.
It has been shown that heparin anti-inflammatory effect could be produced by the inhibition
of NF-κ≡ nuclear translocation into the lung,[18]
[26] reducing the expression of TNF-α and IL-6.[25]
[28]
[31] This is consistent with our results. Nebulized heparin decreased proinflammatory
cytokines in lung tissue and the expression of NF-κ≡ effectors in alveolar macrophages.
Moreover, some studies described that heparin ameliorated lung injury induced by LPS
in rats via the inhibition of nitric oxide synthase expression and the TGF-β/Smad
pathway.[25] In our model, heparin was also able to reduce the expression of TGF-β effectors
in alveolar macrophages.
The expression of TF by inflammatory cells such as macrophages acts as one of the
primary initiators of thrombosis.[32] Also, the release of TNF-α and IL-1β results in an increased TF expression. During
ARDS, it is known that alveolar macrophages increase their PAI-1 activity, inhibiting
fibrin degradation and promoting clots formation.[10] In our LPS model, higher levels of TF, TATc, PAI-1 and plasminogen were found, mimicking
clinical ARDS.[10]
[33] Nebulized heparin decreased TF and TATc in lung tissue. It is known that TF expression
on the monocytes surface induces their interaction with platelets and endothelial
cells through the union of p-selectin.[34] Nebulized heparin significantly reduced p-selectin in alveolar macrophages. Furthermore,
heparin was able to reduce plasminogen in alveolar macrophages, indicating that heparin
may increase fibrinolysis through these cells. Accordingly, we ascertained that alveolar
macrophages promote the deposition of thrombus and formation of clots, confirming
that they are one of the main actors in the link between inflammation and coagulation.
This study has some limitations. First, LPS administration is a common ALI model that
mimics human ARDS only in part, because this model cannot reflect the heterogeneous
aetiology and management of ARDS. Second, the dose of heparin was chosen from previous
studies based on the efficacy of the nose exposure system, the evaporative water loss
during nebulization and the biological lifetime, and we cannot know whether lower
doses would have similar effects. Third, our Hep/LPS/Hep group received an additional
dose of heparin compared with the LPS/Hep group; since the early administration of
heparin before LPS instillation might have reduced the development of the injury,
it is not possible to know whether the differences between these two groups were due
to the timing of administration or to the total dose administered; moreover, 24 hours
may not have been long enough to detect some important histological changes in the
LPS/Hep group.
Our experimental model focused on the acute phase of lung injury. A prolonged treatment
of nebulized heparin and its effect in a late phase of ARDS need additional studies
to determine its long-term effects.
Conclusion
In our rat model of ALI, nebulized heparin was effective in attenuating pulmonary
coagulopathy and inflammation. Some of the effects of heparin seem to be related with
alveolar macrophages. Preclinical data need to be transferred to clinical studies
to confirm the potential benefit of nebulized heparin in ARDS patients. A better understanding
of the mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of ARDS might open new fields for the
treatment of this disease.
What Is Known on This Topic
What Is Known on This Topic
-
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with pulmonary activation
of coagulation and inflammation. Previous studies suggest that anti-coagulants may
help restore the coagulation cascade and treat ARDS.
-
It has been shown that nebulized heparin was able to improve pulmonary coagulopathy
in animal models of acute lung injury (ALI) and in ARDS patients without producing
systemic bleeding.
-
In vitro findings recently indicated that heparin may exert its effects through alveolar
macrophages.
What This Paper Adds
-
Our data confirmed that heparin nebulized directly into the lungs reduced pulmonary
coagulopathy in a rat model of LPS-induced ALI without producing systemic bleeding.
We also demonstrated that nebulized heparin significantly ameliorated lung injury,
decreasing inflammation, permeability and neutrophils infiltration.
-
We ascertained that heparin may act on alveolar macrophages limiting the inflammatory
response through the reduction of TGF-β effectors, NF-κ≡ and coagulation pathways.
-
In our rat model of ALI, nebulized heparin was effective in attenuating pulmonary
coagulopathy and inflammation. Some of the effects of heparin seem to be related with
alveolar macrophages. Preclinical data need to be transferred to clinical studies
to confirm the potential benefit of nebulized heparin in ARDS patients.