Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2014; 111(04): 662-669
DOI: 10.1160/TH13-04-0289
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Haemodialysis impairs clopidogrel but not aspirin responsiveness in patients with end-stage renal disease

Results of a pilot study
Patrik Htun
1   Zentralklinikum Augsburg, Zentrale Notaufnahme und Medizinische Klinik IV, Augsburg, Germany
,
Tatiana Kan
2   Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
,
Eda Mueller
2   Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Kardiologie, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
,
Cosima Pohle
3   KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V., KfH-Nierenzentrum Berlin, Germany
,
Ralf Schindler
4   Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie und Intensivmedizin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Humbold-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
,
Tobias Geisler
5   Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
,
Meinrad Gawaz
5   Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
,
Wolfgang Bocksch
5   Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
,
Suzanne Fateh-Moghadam
5   Medizinische Klinik III, Abteilung für Kardiologie und Kreislauferkrankungen, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 11 April 2013

Accepted after major revision: 26 October 2013

Publication Date:
01 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin (ASA) and clopidogrel (Clp) is the standard treatment to reduce ischaemic coronary events, but in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) the efficacy of Clp remains unclear. Patients with ESRD are at higher risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) and also their post-interventional outcome is worse compared to patients with normal renal function. Little is known about the influence of haemodialysis (HD) on ASA and Clp responsiveness. To assess the effect of HD on ASA- and Clp-responsiveness in patients with documented CAD and ESRD, 31 patients with ESRD (mean age 66.5 ± 1.8 years, 23 male ) on DAPT were evaluated for their ASA and Clp responsiveness with the Verify Now System (Accumetrics Inc.) We measured the antiplatelet effect in all ESRD patients at three time points: T1: just before HD; T2: directly after HD; T3: steady state on a HD free day one week after T1. In our study at baseline 10 (32.3%) patients were ASA-low responder (ASA-LR) and 14 (45.2%) patients Clp-low responder (Clp-LR). There was a significant difference in the PRU values before ( T1) and immediately after HD (T2) [PRU T1=234 (169; 274) vs PRUT2= 247 (199; 278); pT1,2=0.036; ]. Results were shown as median ARU T1 (25th, 75th percentile) or median PRU T1 (25th, 75th percentile). Hence HD seems to impair responsiveness to Clp, resulting in an increase of 6.5 % Clp-LR. No significant differences in the ARU values at the different time-points were found.

Keywords

Aspirin low responder - clopidogrel low responder - end stage renal disease - haemodialysis - antiplatelet therapy
 

  • References

  • 1 Renal Data System: USRDS 2002 Annual Data report. Bethesda.. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. 2002
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Renal Data System: USRDS 2000 Annual Data report. Bethesda. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. 2000
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Herzog CA, Ma JZ, Collins AJ. Poor long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction among patients on long-term dialysis.. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 799-805.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Huber K, Schrör K. High on-treatment platelet reactivity-why should we be concerned?. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 789-791.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cattaneo M. High on-treatment platelet reactivity - definition and measurement.. Thromb Haemost 2013; 109: 792-798.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sibbing D, von Beckerath O, Schomig A. et al. Impact of body mass index on platelet aggregation after administration of a high loading dose of 600 mg clopi-dogrel before percutaneous coronary intervention.. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 203-205.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Angiolillo DJ, Ferndandez-Ortiz A, Bernardo E. et al. Platelet function profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease on combined aspirin and clopidogrel treatment.. Diabetes 2005; 54: 2430-2435.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Geisler T, Grass D, Bigalke B. et al. The Residual Platelet Aggregation after Deployment of Intracoronary Stent (PREDICT) score.. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 54-61.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Geisler T, Kapp M, Goehring-Frischholz K. et al. Residual platelet activity is increased in clopidogrel- and ASA-treated patients with coronary stenting for acute coronary syndromes compared with stable coronary artery disease.. Heart 2008; 94: 743-747.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fernando H, Dart AM, Peter KH. et al. Proton pump inhibitors, genetic polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel therapy.. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 933-944.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Park SH, Kim W, Park CS. et al. A comparison of clopidogrel responsiveness in patients with versus without chronic renal failure.. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 1292-1295.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Woo JS, Kim W, Lee SR. et al. Platelet reactivity in patients with chronic kidney disease receiving adjunctive cilostazol compared with a high-maintenance dose of clopidogrel: Results of platelet inhibition according to clopidogrel dose in patients with chronic kidney disease (PIANO-2 CKD) randomized study.. Am Heart J 2011; 162: 1018-1025.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Panagiotou A. et al. Prevalence of inadequate platelet inhibition by clopidogrel in patients receiving haemodiaysis.. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 59: 469-471.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sibbing D, Byrne RA, Bernlocher I. et al. High platelet reactivity and clinical outcome-fact and fiction.. Thromb Haemost 2011; 106: 191-202.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Latif F, Kleiman NS, Cohen DJ. et al. EVENT Investigator (Evaluation of Drug Eluting Stents and Ischemic Events) registry.. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 37-45.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Machecourt J, Danchin N, Lablanche JM. et al. Risk factors for stent thrombosis after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in diabetic and nondiabetic patients.. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 501-508.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E Ge L. et al. Incidence, predictors and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents.. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 293: 2126-2130.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Htun P, Fateh-Moghadam S, Bischofs C. et al. Low responsiveness to clopidogrel increases risk among CKD patients undergoing coronary intervention.. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22: 627-633.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Plakomyti TE. et al. Ticagrelor in clopidogrel-resistant patients undergoing maintenance dialysis.. Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 60: 332-333.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Price MJ. Bedside evaluation of thienopyridine antiplatelet therapy.. Circulation 2009; 119: 2625-2632.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bonello L, Tantry US, Marcucci R. et al. Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate.. JACC 2010; 56: 919-933.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Valgimigli M, Campo G, de Cesare N. et al. On behalf of Intensifying Platelet Inhibition With Tirofiban in Poor Responders to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, or Both Agents Undergoing Elective Coronary Intervention Results From the Double- Blind, Prospective, Randomized Tailoring Treatment With Tirofiban in Patients Showing Resistance to Aspirin and/or Resistance to Clopidogrel Study.. Circulation 2009; 119: 3215-3222.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Marcucci R, Gori AM, Paniccia R. et al. Cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction in acute coronary syndrome patients receiving coronary stenting are predicted by residual platelet reactivity to ADP detected by a point of care assay : a 12 - month follow up.. Circulation 2009; 119: 237-342.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Price MJ, Endemann S, Gollapudi RR. et al. Prognostic significance of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay on thrombotic events after drug-eluting stent implantation.. Eur J Heart 2008; 29: 992-1000.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Breet NJ, Van Werkum JW, Bouman HJ. et al. Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation.. J Am Med Assoc 2010; 303: 754-762.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Geara AS, Ayoub I, Abi Rached J. et al. Does haemodialysis affect clopidogrel resistance as measured by VerifyNow P2Y12 test?. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 1103-1104.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Aggarwal A, Kabbani SS, Rimmer JM. et al. Biphasic effects of haemodialysis on platelet reactivity in patients with end-stage renal disease: a potential contributor to cardiovascular risk.. Am J Kidney Dis 2002; 40: 315-322.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sirolli V, Strizzi L, Di Stante S. et al. Platelet activation and platelet-erythrocyte aggregates in end-stage renal disease patients on haemodialysis.. Thromb Hae-most 2001; 86: 834-839.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gawaz MP, Mujais SK, Schmidt B. et al. Platelet-leukocyte aggregation during haemodialysis.. Kidney Int 1994; 46: 489-495.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bonomini M, Sirolli V, Stuard S. et al. Interactions between platelets and leukocytes during haemodialysis.. Artif Organs 1999; 23: 23-28.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Daugirdas JT, Bernardo AA. et al. Haemodialysis effect on platelet count and function and haemodialysis-associated thrombocytopenia.. Kidney Int 2012; 16: 147-157.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Himmelfarb J, Holbrook D, McMonagle E, Ault K. Increased reticulated platelets in dialysis patients.. Kidney Int 1997; 51: 834-839.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Linthorst GE, Folman CC, van Olden RW. et al. Plasma thrombopoietin levels in patients with chronic renal failure.. Hematol J 2002; 3: 38-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kaser A, Brandacher G, Steurer W. et al. Interleukin-6 stimulates thrombopoie-sis through thrombopoietin: role in inflammatory thrombocytosis.. Blood 2001; 98: 2720-2725.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Arazi HC, Doiny DG, Torcivia RS. et al. Impaired antiplatelet effect of aspirin, inflammation and platelet turnover in cardiac surgery.. Interact Cardiovasc Tho-rac Surg 2010; 10: 863-867.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Grooteman MP, Nube MJ. Impact of the type of dialyser on the clinical outcome in chronic haemodialysis patients: does it really matter?. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004; 19: 2965-2970.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 MacLeod AM, Campbell M, Cody JD. et al. Cellulose, modified cellulose and synthetic membranes in the haemodialysis of patients with end-stage renal disease.. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; CD003234.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Schindler R, Boenisch O, Fischer C. et al. Effect of the haemodialysis membrane on the inflammatory reaction in vivo.. Clin Nephrol 2000; 53: 452-459.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Tanrikulu AM, Ozben B, Koc M. et al. Aspirin resistance in patients with chronic renal failure.. J Nephrol 2011; 24: 636-646.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Tantry US, Bliden KP, Gurbel P. et al. Resistance to antiplatelet drugs. Current status and future research.. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2005; 6: 2027-2045.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Small DS, Wrishko RE, Ernest 2nd CS. et al. Prasugrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in subjects with moderate renal impairment and end-stage renal disease.. J Clin Pharm Ther 2009; 34: 585-594.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD. et al. Cytochrome P450 genetic polymorphisms and the response to prasugrel: relationship to pharmacokinetic, pharmacody-namic and clinical outcomes.. Circulation 2009; 119: 2553-2560.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH. et al. TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators: Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Alexopoulos D, Panagiotou A, Xanthopoulou I. et al. A. Antiplatelet effects of Prasugrel vs double clopidogrel in patients on haemodialysis and with high on-treatment platelet reactivity.. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9: 2379-2385.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 James S, Budaj A, Aylward P. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndromes in relation to renal function Results from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) Trial.. Circulation 2010; 122: 1056-1067.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar