Thromb Haemost 2010; 104(05): 1063-1070
DOI: 10.1160/TH10-06-0351
New Technologies, Diagnostic Tools and Drugs
Schattauer GmbH

Evolution of untreated calf deep-vein thrombosis in high risk symptomatic outpatients: The blind, prospective CALTHRO study

Gualtiero Palareti
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Benilde Cosmi
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Gianfranco Lessiani
2   Fisiopatologia Vascolare, Casa di Cura Villa Serena, Città Sant’Angelo, Pescara, Italy
,
Giuseppina Rodorigo
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Giuliana Guazzaloca
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Carlotta Brusi
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Lelia Valdré
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Eleonora Conti
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Michelangelo Sartori
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
,
Cristina Legnani
1   Department of Angiology and Blood Coagulation “Marino Golinelli”, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 15 April 2010

Accepted after de novo submission: 21 June 2010

Publication Date:
24 November 2017 (online)

Summary

The natural history of calf deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is still uncertain and it is debated whether it warrants to be diagnosed and treated. We aimed to investigate the complication rate of untreated isolated calf DVT (ICDVT). Symptomatic outpatients were prospectively managed with serial compression ultrasonography (SCUS). Those without proximal DVT and with likely pre-test clinical probability (PCP) or altered D-dimer received immediate subsequent complete examination of calf deep veins (CCUS) by a different operator. The result of CCUS was kept blind both to the managing doctor and the patient and disclosed after three months. Primary outcome was the rate of venous thromboembolism at three months. We examined 431 subjects (196 males; median age 68.0 years) in whom five outcomes were recorded (1.2%; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.4–2.7). If CCUS results had been available, outcomes would have been recorded in 3/424 patients (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.2–2.1) with two events in subjects negative at both serial and complete CUS. ICDVT was diagnosed in 65 subjects (15.3%; 95% CI: 12–19); of whom 59 remained uneventful (one was lost to follow-up). A significant higher rate of outcomes was recorded in subjects with than without ICDVT (5/64; 7.8%; 95% CI: 3–17 vs. 3/351; 0.8%; 95% CI: 0–2; p=0.003). However, after excluding two events picked at serial CUS in subjects with ICDVT, the difference became barely significant (3/64; 4.7%; 95% CI: 1–13; p=0.049). Thrombotic evolution of untreated ICDVT in high-risk subjects may be relevant. Larger studies are needed to address this issue.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lensing AWA, Prandoni P, Brandjes D. et al. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 342-345.
  • 2 Cogo A, Lensing AWA, Koopman MMW. et al. Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 1998; 316: 17-20.
  • 3 Birdwell BG, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL. et al. The clinical validity of normal compression ultrasonography in outpatients suspected of having deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 1-7.
  • 4 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J. et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-1798.
  • 5 Bernardi E, Prandoni P, Lensing AW. et al. D-dimer testing as an adjunct to ultra-sonography in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. The Multicentre Italian D-dimer Ultrasound Study Investigators Group. Br Med J 1998; 317: 1037-1040.
  • 6 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ. et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353: 190-195.
  • 7 Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC. et al. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism – A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 589-602.
  • 8 Lennox AF, Delis KT, Serunkuma S. et al. Combination of a clinical risk assessment score and rapid whole blood D-dimer testing in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic patients. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30: 794-803.
  • 9 Dryjski M, ObrienIrr MS, Harris LM. et al. Evaluation of a screening protocol to exclude the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis among emergency department patients. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34: 1010-1014.
  • 10 Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Douketis J. et al. Management of suspected deep venous thrombosis in outpatients by using clinical assessment and D-dimer testing. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 108-111.
  • 11 Kraaijenhagen RA, Piovella F, Bernardi E. et al. Simplification of the diagnostic management of suspected deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 907-911.
  • 12 Anderson DR, Kovacs MJ, Kovacs G. et al. Combined use of clinical assessment and d-dimer to improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (the EDITED Study). J Thromb Haemost 2003; 01: 645-651.
  • 13 Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M. et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1227-1235.
  • 14 Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS. The post-thrombotic syndrome: current knowledge, controversies, and directions for future research. Blood Rev 2002; 16: 155-165.
  • 15 Zierler BK. Ultrasonography and diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2004; 109: I9-I14.
  • 16 Bernardi E, Camporese G, Buller HR. et al. Serial 2-point ultrasonography plus D-dimer vs whole-leg color-coded Doppler ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2008; 300: 1653-1659.
  • 17 Gibson NS, Schellong SM, Kheir DY. et al. Safety and sensitivity of two ultrasound strategies in patients with clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis: a prospective management study. J Thromb Haemost 2009; 07: 2035-2041.
  • 18 Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 454S-545S.
  • 19 Lagerstedt CI, Olsson CG, Fagher BO. et al. Need for long-term anticoagulant treatment in symptomatic calf-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1985; 02: 515-518.
  • 20 Righini M, Paris S, LeGal G. et al. Clinical relevance of distal deep vein thrombosis – Review of literature data. Thromb Haemost 2006; 95: 56-64.
  • 21 El Kheir D, Buller H. One-time comprehensive ultrasonography to diagnose deep venous thrombosis: is that the solution?. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 1052-1053.
  • 22 Palareti G, Agnelli G, Imberti D. et al. Do italian vascular centers look for isolated calf deep vein thrombosis? Analysis of isolated calf deep vein thromboses included in the ‘‘Master‘’ Registry. Int Angiol 2008; 27: 482-488.
  • 23 Elias A, Mallard L, Elias M. et al. A single complete ultrasound investigation of the venous network for the diagnostic management of patients with a clinically suspected first episode of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs. Thromb Haemost 2003; 89: 221-227.
  • 24 Schellong SM, Schwarz T, Halbritter K. et al. Complete compression ultra-sonography of the leg veins as a single test for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis – A prospective clinical outcome study. Thromb Haemost 2003; 89: 228-234.
  • 25 Stevens SM, Elliott G, Chan KJ. et al. Withholding anticoagulation after a negative result on duplex ultrasonography for suspected symptomatic deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 985-991.
  • 26 Subramaniam RM, Heath R, Chou T. et al. Deep venous thrombosis: Withholding anticoagulation therapy after negative complete lower limb US findings. Radiology 2005; 237: 348-352.
  • 27 Flanc C, Kakkar VV, Clarke MB. The detection of venous thrombosis of the legs using 125-I-labelled fibrinogen. Br J Surg 1968; 55: 742-747.
  • 28 Kakkar VV, Howe CT, Flanc C. et al. Natural history of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1969; 02: 230-232.
  • 29 Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107: I22-I30.