Evaluation of a Hearing-Loss Prevention Program

ABSTRACT

Hearing-loss prevention programs, like other health promotion programs, benefit from an evaluation process to determine their effectiveness. A thorough evaluation not only helps to ensure that a program is accomplishing its goals but also can identify areas that need to be revised or strengthened. By documenting that a program is meeting its goals and objectives, administrators can demonstrate to funding agencies that the program is worthy of investment, both now and in the future. Evaluations also can be used to assist other programs in development: lessons learned along the way can be documented and shared. For these reasons, evaluation is an essential part of all educational programs. However, evaluation is not always emphasized in health promotion programs because of the time, resources, and expertise required to carry out the process in a systematic way. This article describes the processes and procedures employed to evaluate the Dangerous Decibels hearing-loss prevention program. These experiences convinced us that a thorough evaluation is not only necessary but also is key to developing a successful and sustainable program.

KEYWORDS

Hearing-loss prevention - program evaluation - health promotion - formative evaluation - summative evaluation

REFERENCES

• 1 Chermak G D, Peters-McCarthy E. The effectiveness of an educational hearing conservation program for elementary school children.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1991;  22 308-312
• 2 Blair J C, Hardegree D, Benson P V. Necessity and effectiveness of a hearing conservation program for elementary students.  Journal of Educational Audiology. 1996;  4 12-16
• 3 Chermak G D, Curtis L, Seikel J A. The effectiveness of an interactive hearing conservation program for elementary school children.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1996;  27 29-39
• 4 Bennett J A, English K. Teaching hearing conservation to school children: comparing the outcomes and efficacy of two pedagogical approaches.  Journal of Educational Audiology. 1999;  7 29-33
• 5 Lass N J, Woodford C M, Lundeen C et al.. A hearing-conservation program for a junior high school.  Hearing J. 1987;  40 32-40
• 6 Knobloch M J, Broste S K. A hearing conservation program for Wisconsin youth working in agriculture.  J Sch Health. 1998;  68 313-318
• 7 Lewis D A. A hearing conservation program for high-school-level students.  Hear J. 1989;  42 19-24
• 8 Lerman Y, Feldman Y, Shnaps R et al.. Evaluation of an occupational health educational program among 11^th grade students.  Am J Ind Med. 1998;  34 607-613
• 9 Lukes E, Johnson M. Hearing conservation: community outreach programs for high school students.  AAOHN J. 1998;  46 340-343
• 10 Matyas M L, Triana E M. Planning an Effective Program Evaluation: A Short Course for Project Directors (CD-ROM). Bethesda, MD; American Physiological Society 2001
• 11 Black D R, Gobler N S, Sciacca J P. Peer helping/involvement: an efficacious way to meet the challenge of reducing alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use among youth.  J Sch Health. 1998;  68 87-93
• 12 Cialdini R B, Kallgren C A, Reno R R. A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In: Zanna M Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY; Academic Press 1991: 201-234
• 13 Foshee V A, Bauman K E, Arriaga X B, Helms R W, Koch G G, Linder G F. An evaluation of safe dates, an adolescent dating violence prevention program.  Am J Public Health. 1998;  88 45-50
• 14 Folmer R L, Griest S E, Martin W H. Hearing conservation education programs for children: a review.  J Sch Health. 2002;  72 51-57
• 15 Folmer R L. The importance of hearing conservation instruction.  J Sch Nurs. 2003;  19 140-148

2 Only the questionnaires for grade 4 are listed in Appendices [A-C]. Questionnaires for grade 7 are available by contacting the author.