Endoscopy 2008; 40(5): 432-436
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995691
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure modalities

M.  Ryou1 , D.  G.  Fong1 , R.  D.  Pai1 , D.  W.  Rattner2 , C.  C.  Thompson1
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
  • 2Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 4 September 2007

accepted after revision 12 March 2008

Publication Date:
11 April 2008 (online)

Background and study aims: Transluminal closure is fundamental to the safe introduction of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) into humans. Suture, staples, and clips have been used. We aimed to evaluate the acute strength of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure techniques in an ex vivo porcine model by assessing air leak pressures.

Patients and methods: The following closure modalities were assessed with at least five samples per arm: conventional open/laparoscopic suturing techniques including full-thickness interrupted sutures, double-layer sutures, and purse-string sutures, as well as endoscopic clips and endoscopic staples. Historical values for transgastric closures with hand-sewn interrupted sutures, endoscopic clips, and a prototype endoscopic suture device were used from our laboratory’s prior study.

Results: Using Kruskal-Wallis analysis, the overall comparisons were significant (P = 0.0038 for gastrotomy closure; P = 0.0018 for colotomy closure). Post hoc paired comparisons revealed that the difference between all closure arms versus negative control were significant. Significance could not be established among the various closure arms. However, trends suggested hand-sewn double-layer sutures, endoscopic staples, and both hand-sewn and endoscopically-placed purse-string sutures produced the strongest closures. Furthermore, endoscopic clips appeared sufficient for colotomy closure when ideally placed.

Conclusions: Suture (both hand-sewn and endoscopically deployed) appears to produce the strongest closures in both stomach and colon, with the important caveats that (1) a continuous through-thickness suture track be avoided, such as in the full-thickness closure, or (2) suture holes be buried, such as in the purse-string configuration. When suture tracks are full-thickness, they can serve as leak sites. Staples and clips can produce comparable closures, but only under ideal conditions.

References

  • 1 ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery . White Paper, October 2005.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 199-203
  • 2 Fong D G, Pai R D, Thompson C C. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in the porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 312-318
  • 3 Pai R D, Fong D G, Bundga M E. et al . Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 428-434
  • 4 Rolanda C, Lima E, Pego J M. et al . Third-generation cholecystectomy by natural orifices: transgastric and transvesical combined approach (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 111-117
  • 5 Tsin D A, Sequeria R J, Giannikas G. Culdolaparoscopic cholecysetectomy during vaginal hysterectomy.  JSLS. 2003;  7 171-172
  • 6 Hu B, Chung S C, Sun L C. et al . Endoscopic suturing without extracorporeal knots: a laboratory study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 266-270
  • 7 Swain P. Endoscopic suturing: now and incoming.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;  17 505-520
  • 8 Kalloo A N, Singh V K, Jagannath S B. et al . Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 114-117
  • 9 Wagh M S, Merrifield B F, Thompson C C. Endoscopic transgastric abdominal exploration and organ resection: initial experience in the porcine model.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 892-896
  • 10 Kaehler G F, Langner C, Suchan K L. et al . Endoscopic full-thickness resection of the stomach: an experimental approach.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 519-521
  • 11 Ryou M, Pai R, Sauer J. et al . Evaluating an optimal gastric closure method for transgastric surgery.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 677-680
  • 12 Kaehler G, Grobholz R, Langner C. et al . A new technique of endoscopic full-thickness resection using a flexible stapler.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 86-89
  • 13 Baker R S, Foote J, Kemmeter P. et al . The science of stapling and leaks.  Obes Surg. 2004;  14 1290-1298
  • 14 Magno P, Giday S A, Chung S S. et al . A new stapler-based full-thickness transgastric access closure: results from an animal pilot trial.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 876-880
  • 15 Merrifield B F, Wagh M S, Thompson C C. Peroral transgastric organ resection: a feasibility study in pigs.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 693-697
  • 16 Fritscher-Ravens A, Patel K, Ghanbari A. et al . Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the mediastinum: long-term survival animal experiments in transesophageal access, including minor surgical procedures.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 870-875
  • 17 Raju G S, Ahmed I, Brining D. et al . Endoluminal closure of large perforations of colon with clips in a porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 640-646
  • 18 Raju G S, Ahmed I, Xiao S Y. et al . Controlled trial of immediate endoluminal closure of colon perforations in a porcine model by use of a novel clip device (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 989-997

C. C. Thompson, MD

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

75 Francis St.

Boston, MA 02115

USA

Fax: +1-617-525-8266

Email: ccthompson@partners.org

    >