Download PDF
Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2007; 50(6): 328-334
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-993163
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Young Adults - An Ultrasonographic and Neurophysiological Study

E. Polykandriotis 1 , W. Premm 1 , R. E. Horch 1
  • 1Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Erlangen Medical Center, Erlangen, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 January 2008 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: The carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is by far the most frequent compression neuropathy and encompasses 45% of all non-traumatic nerve lesions. Women are affected twice as often as men and manifestation usually occurs over the age of 30; 76% of all patients become symptomatic between the age of 40-70 years. In young adults typical diagnostic clues suggestive of a CTS, may be absent leading to misdiagnosis and late treatment.

Patients and Methods: 30 patients suffering from CTS were subdivided in 2 groups according to age. Patients under the age of 35 were allocated in group A whereas patients over 35 years old were included in group B. The two groups were compared to each other in terms of demographics, clinical signs, electrodiagnosis and ultrasonography of the carpal tunnel. All patients were subjected to a decompression procedure of the median nerve and postoperative alleviation of the symptoms was considered as confirmation of the presence of a CTS. Two characteristic clinical cases of young adults suffering from CTS are demonstrated.

Results: The female to male ratio was higher in group A (7:1) than in group B (3:1). Only two (25%) of the patients in group A had a positive Tinel sign but in 7 patients (87.5%) the Phalen test could be readily evoked. In group B a Tinel sign was present in 45% whereas a positive Phalen test was present in 86%. A positive Tinel sign was associated with a distal motor latency beyond 4 ms in the two patients from group A. A distal motor latency was present in 95.2% of the patients in group B. In ultrasound there was an average decrease of 0.557 mm in the thickness of the median nerve throughout its course in the carpal tunnel in group B. In group A, ultrasonography revealed no significant changes in nerve diameter.

Discussion: The value of electrophysiological studies as a diagnostic tool in CTS still remains controversial. In young adults phenomena leading to impaired nerve conduction like axonal demyelination of the median nerve might occur later due to a higher regenerative potential. However, symptomatic patients may be strongly hindered in their everyday activities and occupation and should be readily referred to a hand specialist in spite of a negative work-up.

Key words

carpal tunnel syndrome - young adults - ultrasonography - electrodiagnostic tests

References

  • 1 Eversmann W. Entrapment and compression neuropathics. In: DP G (ed). Operative Hand Surgery. New York: Churchill-Livingstone 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Martyn CN, Hughes RA. Epidemiology of peripheral neuropathy.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;  62 310-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wright P. Carpal tunnel and ulnar tunnel syndromes and stenosing tenosynovitis. In: AH C (ed). Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book Co 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Krom MC de, Knipschild PG, Kester AD, Thijs CT, Boekkooi PF, Spaans F. Carpal tunnel syndrome: prevalence in the general population.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;  45 373-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kuschner SH, Ebramzadeh E, Johnson D, Brien WW, Sherman R. Tinel's sign and Phalen's test in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Orthopedics. 1992;  15 1297-1302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Jablecki CK, Andary MT, Floeter MK, Miller RG, Quartly CA, Vennix MJ, Wilson JR. Practice parameter: Electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome. Report of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.  Neurology. 2002;  58 1589-1592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Smith RJ. Anomalous muscle belly of the flexor digitorum superficialis causing carpal tunel syndrome. Report of a case.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;  53 1215-1216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC, Krom M de, Franklin G, Franzblau A, Gray R, Gerr F, Hagberg M, Hales T, Katz JN, Pransky G. Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies.  Am J Public Health. 1998;  88 1447-1451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lew HL, Date ES, Pan SS, Wu P, Ware PF, Kingery WS. Sensitivity, specificity, and variability of nerve conduction velocity measurements in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;  86 12-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Szabo RM, Slater  Jr  RR, Farver TB, Stanton DB, Sharman WK. The value of diagnostic testing in carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1999;  24 704-714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Strickland JW, Idler RS, Creighton JC. Carpal tunnel syndrome.  Indiana Med. 1991;  84 802-803
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ochoa J, Fowler TJ, Gilliant RW. Anatomical changes in peripheral nerves compressed by a pneumatic tourniquet.  J Anat. 1972;  113 433-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Blumenthal S, Herskovitz S, Verghese J. Carpal tunnel syndrome in older adults.  Muscle Nerve. 2006;  34 78-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kummel BM, Zazanis GA. Shoulder pain as the presenting complaint in carpal tunnel syndrome.  Clin Orthop. 1973;  92 227-230
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gerr F, Letz R. Clinical diagnostic tests for carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2000;  25 778-779
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Louis DS, Hankin FM. Symptomatic relief following carpal tunnel decompression with normal electroneuromyographic studies.  Orthopedics. 1987;  10 434-436
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Cioni R, Passero S, Paradiso C, Giannini F, Battistini N, Rushworth G. Diagnostic specificity of sensory and motor nerve conduction variables in early detection of carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Neurol. 1989;  236 208-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Treatment of the carpal tunnel syndrome. endoscopic versus open technique. In: Congress of the FESSH federation of the European societies for surgery of the hand. Dublin Irland 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Melvin JL, Schuchmann JA, Lanese RR. Diagnostic specificity of motor and sensory nerve conduction variables in the carpal tunnel syndrome.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1973;  54 69-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wiesler ER, Chloros GD, Cartwright MS, Smith BP, Rushing J, Walker FO. The use of diagnostic ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;  31 726-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Hasenohrl K, Schmidauer C. The role of sonography and MR tomography in the diagnosis and therapeutic control fo the carpal tunnel syndrome.  Röfo. 1993;  159 138-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 El-Karabaty H, Hetzel A, Galla TJ, Horch RE, Lucking CH, Glocker FX. The effect of carpal tunnel release on median nerve flattening and nerve conduction.  Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;  45 223-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Buitrago-Tellez CH, Horch R, Allmann KH, Stark GB, Langer M. Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of the carpal tunnel and carpal bones.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 1060-1064
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Horch RE, Allmann KH, Laubenberger J, Langer M, Stark GB. Median nerve compression can be detected by magnetic resonance imaging of the carpal tunnel.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  41 76-82 , ; discussion 82-83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Brown MG, Rothenberg ES, Keyser B, Woloszyn TT, Wolford A. Results of 1236 endoscopic carpal tunnel release procedures using the Brown technique.  Contemp Orthop. 1993;  27 251-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Chow JC. The Chow technique of endoscopic release of the carpal ligament for carpal tunnel syndrome: four years of clinical results.  Arthroscopy. 1993;  9 301-314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cartotto RC, MacCabe S, Mackinnon SE. Two devastating complications of carpal tunnel surgery.  Ann Plast Surg. 1992;  28 472-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nath RK, Mackinnon SE, Weeks PM. Ulnar nerve transection as a complication of two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a case report.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1993;  18 896-898
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Arner M, Hagberg L, Rosen B. Sensory disturbances after two-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release: a preliminary report.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1994;  19 548-551
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Murphy  Jr  RX, Jennings JF, Wukich DK. Major neurovascular complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1994;  19 114-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Van Heest A, Waters P, Simmons B, Schwartz JT. A cadaveric study of the single-portal endoscopic carpal tunnel release.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 1995;  20 363-366
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lowry  Jr  WE, Follender AB. Interfascicular neurolysis in the servere carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study.  Clin Orthop. 1988;  227 251-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pfeffer GB, Gelberman RH, Boyes JH, Rydevik B. The history of carpal tunnel syndrome.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1988;  13 28-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Braun R. Tendon transfer for severe carpal tunnel syndrome. In: Gelberman R (ed). Operative nerve repair and reconstruction. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1992: 927-937
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Buck-Gramcko D. Motorische Ersatzoperationen bei Medianuslähmungen. In: Buck-Gramcko D, Nigst H (eds). Motorische Ersatzoperationen der oberen Extremität. Stuttgart: Hippokrates 1991: 54-68
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Bach AD, Arkudas A, Tjiawi J, Polykandriotis E, Kneser U, Horch RE, Beier JP. A new approach to tissue engineering of vascularized skeletal muscle.  J Cell Mol Med. 2006;  10 716-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Horch RE. Future perspectives in tissue engineering.  J Cell Mol Med. 2006;  10 4-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Chow C. Indication for the endoscopic treatment of the carpal tunnel syndrome. In: Symposium “Endoskopische Therapic des Karpaltunnelsyndromes” des Arbeitskreises Handchirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädic und Traumatologic DGOT, Düsseldorf 1994
    Google Scholar

Correspondence

Prof. Dr. med. R. E. Horch

Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery

University of Erlangen

Krankenhausstr. 12

91054 Erlangen

Germany

Phone: +49/9131/853 32 77

Fax: +49/9131/853 93 27

Email: raymund.horch@uk-erlangen.de

      >