Download PDF
Cent Eur Neurosurg 2007; 68(3): 133-138
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-984462
Original Article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Radiographic Analysis of Fusion Progression Following One-Level Cervical Fusion With or Without Plate Fixation

Radiologische Analyse der Fusion nach mono-zervikaler Fusion mit und ohne PlattenfixierungA. Nabhan 1 , D. Pape 1 , 2 , T. Pitzen 1 , W.-I. Steudel 1 , F. Bachelier 2 , J. Jung 2 , F. Ahlhelm 3
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
  • 2Department of Orthopedic, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
  • 3Department of Neuroradiology, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
30 July 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using bone graft or a cage with plate fixation is an accepted technique for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative disc disease. It is, however, debatable whether a plate is really necessary to increase the progress of fusion. Thus, the aim of this randomized and controlled prospective study was to evaluate whether ACDF with a cage and anterior plate fixation results in a greater progress of fusion compared with ACDF using a stand-alone cage.

Methods: 37 candidates for ACDF were treated either with a stand-alone cage (study group) or with a cage+plate fixation (control group). 19 patients were randomized to be stabilized with a stand-alone cage and 18 patients were treated with a cage and additional anterior plate fixation. The progress of cervical fusion over time was compared by radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Follow-up examinations pre- and postoperatively were done using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain. Radiographic assessment of fusion using an RSA-control was done after one, six and twelve weeks, as well as after six months, and one and two years postoperatively. Mann-Whitney test for unpaired values was used to determine the statistical differences in residual intervertebral motion.

Results: Three-dimensional analysis of segmental motion (left-right, cranio-caudal, and posterior-anterior) did not reveal any statistical differences between both groups at any examination time postoperatively (p>0.05). The VAS score did not differ between the groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Anterior plate fixation did not demonstrate an improvement in the progress of fusion in one-level ACDF.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die anteriore zervikale Diskektomie und Fusion ist eine etablierte Behandlungstechnik bei symptomatischen degenerativen Halswirbelsäulenerkrankungen mit entsprechender OP-Indikation. Die Fusion kann mit einem Cage als Bandscheibenersatz und zusätzlicher ventraler Plattenosteosynthese bzw. auch ohne zusätzliche Verplattung durchgeführt werden. Trotzdem ist es umstritten, ob eine zusätzliche Plattenosteosynthese die Fusionsprogression des behandelten Segments beschleunigt. Das Ziel dieser prospektiven, randomisierten und kontrollierten Studie war es zu untersuchen, ob die zusätzliche Plattenosteosynthese zu einer beschleunigten Fusion bei mono-segmentalen Fusion führt.

Methoden: 37 Patienten wurden entweder mit „alleinstehendem” Cage (19 Patienten) oder mit zusätzlicher Plattenosteosynthese (18 Patienten) behandelt. Zur Beurteilung der funktionellen Stabilität wurde die Röntgenstereometrische Analyse (RSA) verwendet. Dadurch konnten postoperative segmentale Bewegungen des fusionierten Segments dreimensional mit einer Genauigkeit von <=0,4 mm bestimmt werden. Verlaufsuntersuchungen erfolgten 1 Woche, 6 und 12 Wochen sowie 6, 12 und 24 Monate postoperativ. Für die klinische Beurteilung des Therapieerfolgs (Nuchalgie, Brachialgie) wurde die Visuelle Schmerzanalogskala (VAS) gewählt. Die statistische Signifikanz konnte mit dem Mann-Whitney-u-Test ermittelt werden.

Ergebnisse: Seitens der radiologischen Befunde konnte zu keinem Untersuchungszeitpunkt ein Unterschied hinsichtlich der segmentalen Restbeweglichkeit des fusionierten Segments festgestellt werden. Klinisch bestand ebenfalls zu keinem Zeitpunkt ein Unterschied zwischen den untersuchten Behandlungsgruppen.

Zusammenfassung: Bei der mono-segmentalen zervikalen Fusion wird die Fusionsgeschwindigkeit durch die zusätzliche Plattenosteosynthese nicht beschleunigt.

Key words

spine - bone - fusion - implants - clinical study - radiostereometric analysis

Schlüsselwörter

Wirbelsäule - Knochen - Fusion - Implantate - klinische Studie - Röntgenstereometrische Analyse

References

  • 1 Barlocher CB, Barth A, Krauss JK, Binggeli R, Seiler RW. Comparative evaluation of microdiscectomy only, autograft fusion, polymethylmethacrylate interposition, and threaded titanium cage fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: a prospective randomized study in 125 patients.  Neurosurg Focus. 2002;  15 E4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Blumenthal SL, Gill K. Can lumbar spine radiographs accurately determine fusion in postoperative patients? Correlation of routine radiographs with a second surgical look at lumbar fusions.  Spine. 1993;  18 1186-1189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis cervical for cervical radiculopathy.  J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1993;  75 1298-1307
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Caspar W, Geisler FH, Pitzen T, Johnson TA. Anterior cervical plate stabilisation in one- and two level degenerative disease: overtreatment or benefit?.  J Spinal Disord. 1998;  11 1-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Chen JF, Wu CT, Lee Sc, Lee ST. Use of a polymethylmethacrylate cervical cage in the treatment of single-level cervical disc disease.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  3 24-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC. Treatment of multilevel cervical fusion with cage.  Surg Neurol. 2004;  62 378-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cloward RD. Treatment of acute fractures and fracture dislocation of cervical spine by vertebral body fusion: A report of 11 cases.  J Neurosurg. 1961;  18 205-209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Emery SE, Fischer JR, Bohlman HH. Three level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiographic and clinical results.  Spine. 1998;  22 2622-2624
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hwang SL, Lin CL, Lieu AS, Lee KS, Kuo TH, Hwang YF, Su YF, Howng SL. Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;  1 160-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Johnsson R, Stromqvist B, Axelsson P, Selvik G. Influence of spinal immobilization on consolidation of posterolateral lumbosacral fusion. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric and radiographic analysis.  Spine. 1992;  17 16-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Karrholm J. Roentgen stereophotogrammetry: review of orthopedic applications.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;  60 491-503
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Karrholm J, Hansson LI, Selvik G. Mobility of the lateral malleolus: A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;  56 479-483
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Karrholm J, Jonsson H, Nilsson KG, Soderqvist I. Kinematics of successful knee prostheses during weight-bearing: three-dimensional movements and positions of screw axes in the Tricon-M and Miller-Galante designs.  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994;  2 50-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lang P, Chafetz N, Genant HK, Morris JM. Lumbar spinal fusion. Assessment of functional stability with magnetic resonance imaging.  Spine. 1990;  15 581-588
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Langley GB, Sheppeard H. The Visual Analogue Scale: its use in pain measurement.  Rheumatol Int. 1985;  5 145-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lowey GL, MacDonough RF. The significance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fixation. Patients with 2- to 7-year follow-up.  Spine. 1998;  15 181-186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Majd ME, Vadhva M, Holt RT. Anterior cervical recostruction using titanium cage with anterior plating.  Spine. 1999;  24 1604-1610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Panjabi MM, Isomi T, Wagner JL. Loosening at the screw-vertebra junction in multilevel anterior cervical plate constructs.  Spine. 1999;  15 2383-2388
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pape D, Adam F, Fritsch E, Muller K, Kohn D. Primary lumbosacral stability after open posterior and endoscopic anterior fusion with interbody implants: A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.  Spine. 2000;  25 2514-2518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Pointillart V, Cernier A, Vital JM. et al . Anterior discectomy without interbody fusion for cervical disc herniation.  Eur Spine J. 1995;  4 45-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pompili A, Canitano S, Caroli F, Caterino M, Crecco M, Raus L. et al . Asymptomatic esophageal perforation caused by late screw migration after anterior cervical plating: report of a case and review of relevant literature.  Spine. 2002;  27 499-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Price DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual and simple numerical rating scales.  Pain. 1994;  56 217-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ragnarsson JI, Eliasson P, Karrholm J, Lundstrom B. The accuracy of measurements of femoral neck fractures. Conventional radiography versus roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;  63 152-156
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ryu SI, Michelle M, Daniel K. A prospective randomized study comparing a cervical carbon fiber cage to the Smith-Robinson technique with allograft and plating: up to 24 months follow-up.  Eur Spin J. 2005;  25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Samartzis D, Shen FH, Lyon C, Philips M, Goldberg EJ, An HS. Does rigid instrumentation increase fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?.  Spine J. 2004;  4 636-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Selvik G, Alberius P, Aronson AS. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric system: construction, calibration and technical accuracy.  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1983;  24 343-352
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Selvik G. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.  Acta Radiol. 1990;  31 113-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Shad A, Leach JC, Teddy PJ, Cadoux-Hudson TA. Use of the Solis cage and local autologous bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: early technical experience.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;  2 116-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Simmons E, Bhalla S. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.  J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. 1996;  51 225-237
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Song KJ, Lee KB. A preliminary study of the use of cage and plating for single-segment fusion in degenerative cervical spine disease.  J Clin Neurosci. 2006;  13 181-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tancredi A, Agrillo A, Delfini R, Fiume D, Frati A, Rinaldi A. Use of carbon fiber cages for treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathy.  Surg Neurol. 2004;  61 221-226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Thalgott JS, Xiongsheng C, Giuffre Jm. Single-stage anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages, local bone graft, and anterior plating.  Spine J. 2003;  3 294-300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Thome C, Leheta O, Krauss JK, Zevgaridis D. A prospective randomized comparison of the rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliac crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy.  J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;  4 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Van Jonbergen HP, Spruit M, Anderson PG, Pavlov PW. Anterior cervical interbody fusion with a titanium box cage: early radiological assessment of fusion and subsidence.  Spine J. 2005;  5 645-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Whitecloud T. Management of radiculopathy and myelopathy by the anterior approach. In Cervical Spine Research Society (eds) The Cervical Spine. Philadelphia: Lippincott 1983 pp. 411-424
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Whitecloud TS, LaRoocca SH. Fibular strut graft in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine.  Spine. 1976;  1 33-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Yen CP, Hwang TY, Wagner CJ, Howng SL. Fracture of anterior cervical plate -report of two cases.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005;  147 665-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Zevgaridis D, Thome C, Krauss JK. Prospective controlled study of rectangular titanium cage fusion compared with iliac crest autograft fusion in anterior cervical discectomy.  Neurosurg Focus. 2002;  15 E2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Zoega B, Kärrholm J, Lind B. Plate fixation adds stability to two-level anterior fusion in the cervical spine: a randomised study using radiostereometry.  Eur Spine J. 1998;  7 302-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Correspondence

Dr. A. Nabhan

Department of Neurosurgery

University of Saarland

66421 Homburg

Germany

Phone: +49/6841/162 4429

Fax: +49/6841/162 4439

Email: dr_a_nabhan@hotmail.com

      >