Carotid Intervention 3: The Evidence for Cerebral Protection

ABSTRACT

Carotid stenting is a safe alternative option to conventional carotid endarterectomy in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients considered poor candidates for surgery or who choose not to have open surgery. During the stenting procedure, however, distal embolization may occur with neurological sequelae. To reduce the incidence of this, several cerebral-protection devices (CPDs) have been developed. Different types of CPDs are now commercially available: distal occlusion balloons, distal filters, and proximal protection devices with or without reversal of flow. But complications can occur with their use and are usually associated with an inability to cross the lesion, failure to capture the emboli, vasospasm, and vessel wall injury. Because protection devices are currently the focus of interest by manufacturers and physicians, several trials are going on worldwide to analyze the characteristics of each of them and to evaluate their efficacy in reducing the rate of distal embolization.

KEYWORDS

Cerebral embolization - balloon occlusion - filters - flow reversal

REFERENCES

• 1 Zahn R, Roth E, Ischinger T et al.. Carotid artery stenting in clinical practice: results from the Carotid Artery Stenting (CAS) registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).  Z Kardiol. 2005;  94 163-172
• 2 Theron J G, Payelle G G, Coskun O, Huet H F, Guimaraens L. Carotid artery stenosis: treatment with protected balloon angioplasty and stent placement.  Radiology. 1996;  201 627-636
• 3 Ohki T.. The dark side of embolic protection devices. Endovascular Today September 2003
• 4 Wholey M H, Al-Mubarak N, Wholey M H. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry.  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;  60 259-266
• 5 Cremonesi A, Castriota F, Manetti R et al.. Impact of cerebal protection devices on early outcome of carotid stenting.  J Endovasc Ther. 2002;  9 786-792
• 6 Boltuch J, Sabeti S, Amighi J et al.. Procedure-related complications and early neurological adverse events of unprotected and protected carotid stenting: temporal trends in a consecutive patient series.  J Endovasc Ther. 2005;  12 538-547
• 7 Veith F J, Amor M, Ohki T et al.. Current status of carotid bifurcation angioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders.  J Vasc Surg. 2001;  33 S111-S116
• 8 Ohki T, Veith F J. Carotid artery stenting: utility of cerebral protection devices.  J Invasive Cardiol. 2001;  13 47-55
• 9 Perona F. Carotid artery stenting performed without cerebral protection systems. Presented at: Society of Interventional Radiologists 2006 Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
• 10 Henry M, Amor M, Henry I et al.. Carotid stenting with cerebral protection: first clinical experience using the PercuSurge GuardWire system.  J Endovasc Surg. 1999;  6 321-331
• 11 Al-Mubarak N, Roubin G S, Vitek J J et al.. Effect of distal-balloon protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting.  Circulation. 2001;  104 1999-2002
• 12 Theron J, Courtheoux P, Alachkar F et al.. New triple coaxial catheter system for carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;  11 869-877
• 13 Henry M, Henry I, Klonaris G et al.. Benefits of cerebral protection during carotid stenting with the PercuSurge Guard Wire system: midterm results.  J Endovasc Ther. 2002;  9 1-13
• 14 Gray W A. ARCHER trials: final one-year results. American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session March 7, 2004 New Orleans, LA;
• 15 Brott T G, Roberts J. Carotid revascularization in 2004: a look at the most recent data from historic and ongoing CEA and CAS trial. Endovascular Today September 2004
• 16 Grube E, Colombo A, Hauptamm E et al.. Initial multicenter experience with a novel distal protection filter during carotid artery stent implantation.  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;  58 139-146
• 17 Bosiers M, Peeters P, Verbist J et al.. Belgian experience with Filter Wire EX in the prevention of embolic events during carotid stenting.  J Endovasc Ther. 2003;  10 695-701
• 18 Macdonald S. The evidence for cerebral protection: an analysis and summary of the literature.  Eur J Radiol. 2006;  60 20-25
• 19 Macdonald S. Is there any evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Experimental data.  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006;  47 127-136
• 20 Tubler T, Schluter M, Dirsch O et al.. Balloon-protected carotid artery stenting: relationship of periprocedural neurological complication with the size of particulate debris.  Circulation. 2001;  104 2791-2796
• 21 Muller-Hulsbeck S, Jahnke T, Liess C et al.. Comparison of various cerebral protection devices used for carotid artery stent placement: an in vitro experiment.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;  14 613-620
• 22 Reimers B, Corvaja M, Moshiri S et al.. Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting.  Circulation. 2001;  104 12-15
• 23 Parodi J C, La Mura R, Ferreira L M et al.. Initial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting with three cerebral protection devices.  J Vasc Surg. 2000;  32 1127-1136
• 24 Whitlow P L, Lylyk P, Londero H et al.. Carotid artery stenting protected with an emboli containment system.  Stroke. 2002;  33 1308-1314
• 25 Kindel M, Spiller P. Transient occlusion of an Angioguard protection system by massive embolization during angioplasty of a degenerated aortocoronary saphenous vein graft.  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;  55 501-504
• 26 Ohki T, Roubin G S, Veith F J et al.. Efficacy of a filter device in prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty and stenting: an ex vivo analysis.  J Vasc Surg. 1999;  30 1034-1044
• 27 Parodi J C, Schonholz C, Ferreira L M et al.. “Seat Belt and Air Bag” technique for cerebral protection during carotid stenting.  J Endovasc Ther. 2002;  9 20-24
• 28 Muller-Hulsbeck S, Stolzmann P, Liess C et al.. Vessel wall damage caused by cerebral protection devices: ex vivo evaluation in porcine carotid arteries.  Radiology. 2005;  235 454-460
• 29 Satler L F. Algorithm for difficult distal protection system retrieval in carotid stenting.  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;  67 312-313
• 30 Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H et al.. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature.  Stroke. 2003;  34 813-819
• 31 Coggia M, Goeau-Brissonniere O, Duval L J et al.. Embolic risk of the different stages of carotid bifurcation balloon angioplasty: an experimental study.  J Vasc Surg. 2000;  31 550-557
• 32 Moody D M, Brown W R, Challa V R et al.. Brain microemboli associated with cardiopulmonary bypass: a histological and magnetic resonance imaging study.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;  59 1304-1307
• 33 Sztriha L K, Voros E, Sas K et al.. Favorable early outcome of carotid artery stenting without protection devices.  Stroke. 2004;  35 2862-2866
• 34 Qureshi A I, Luft A R, Janardhan V et al.. Identification of patients at risk for periprocedural neurological deficits associated with carotid angioplasty and stenting.  Stroke. 2000;  31 376-382
• 35 Lovblad K O, Pluschke W, Ramonda L et al.. Diffusion-weighted MRI for monitoring neurovascular interventions.  Neuroradiology. 2000;  42 134-138
• 36 Jaeger H J, Mathias K D, Drescher R et al.. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;  22 1251-1259