Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2007; 20(2): 125-132
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-977491
Copyright © 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Rectal Prolapse

David P. O'Brien1  IV 
  • 1Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 May 2007 (online)

ABSTRACT

Despite the innovation of more than 100 surgical procedures for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse, no one procedure is best and applicable to all patients. Traditionally, procedures have been divided into abdominal and perineal approaches. The application of the laparoscopic approach to colon and rectal disease has allowed an additional less invasive method of therapy to treat rectal prolapse successfully. In comparison with conventional approaches, laparoscopy has achieved similar functional results and recurrence rates while reducing postoperative pain and hospital length of stay.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Corman M L. Rectal prolapse, solitary rectal ulcer, syndrome of the descending perineum, and rectocele. Colon and Rectal Surgery. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2004: 1408
  • 2 Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, Muller J M. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;  (2) CD003145
  • 3 Delaney C P, Kiran R P, Senagore A J, Brady K, Fazio V W. Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.  Ann Surg. 2003;  238 67-72
  • 4 Madoff R D, Mellgren A. One hundred years of rectal prolapse surgery.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;  42 441-450
  • 5 Broden B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1968;  11 330-347
  • 6 Shorvon P J, McHugh S, Diamant N E, Somers S, Stevenson G W. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.  Gut. 1989;  30 1737-1749
  • 7 Hull T L. Rectal prolapse: abdominal approach.  Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2003;  16 259-262
  • 8 Madiba T E, Baig M K, Wexner S D. Surgical management of rectal prolapse.  Arch Surg. 2005;  140 63-73
  • 9 Halligan S, Sultan A, Rottenberg G, Bartram C I. Endosonography of the anal sphincters in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;  10 79-82
  • 10 Woods R, Voyvodic F, Schloithe A C, Sage M R, Wattchow D A. Anal sphincter tears in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.  Colorectal Dis. 2003;  5 544-548
  • 11 Dvorkin L S, Chan C L, Knowles C H et al.. Anal sphincter morphology in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;  47 198-203
  • 12 Spencer R J. Manometric studies in rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;  27 523-525
  • 13 Farouk R, Duthie G S, MacGregor A B, Bartolo D C. Rectoanal inhibition and incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 743-746
  • 14 Broden G, Dolk A, Holmstrom B. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: a possible explanation for continence improvement.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988;  3 23-28
  • 15 Williams J G, Wong W D, Jensen L, Rothenberger D A, Goldberg S M. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 209-216
  • 16 Sainio A P, Voutilainen P E, Husa A I. Recovery of anal sphincter function following transabdominal repair of rectal prolapse: cause of improved continence?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;  34 816-821
  • 17 Hiltunen K M, Matikainen M. Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;  7 8-10
  • 18 Farouk R, Duthie G S, Bartolo D C, MacGregor A B. Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyogram.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 439-440
  • 19 Schultz I, Mellgren A, Dolk A, Johansson C, Holmstrom B. Continence is improved after the Ripstein rectopexy. Different mechanisms in rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 300-306
  • 20 Poen A C, de Brauw M, Felt-Bersma R J, de Jong D, Cuesta M A. Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests.  Surg Endosc. 1996;  10 904-908
  • 21 Kairaluoma M V, Kellokumpu I H. Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse.  Scand J Surg. 2005;  94 207-210
  • 22 Womack N R, Williams N S, Holmfield J H, Morrison J F. Pressure and prolapse-the cause of solitary rectal ulceration.  Gut. 1987;  28 1228-1233
  • 23 Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Wexner S D. Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;  39 899-905
  • 24 Speakman C T, Madden M V, Nicholls R J, Kamm M A. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 1431-1433
  • 25 McKee R F, Lauder J C, Poon F W, Aitchison M A, Finlay I G. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;  174 145-148
  • 26 Allen-Mersh T G, Turner M J, Mann C V. Effect of abdominal Ivalon rectopexy on bowel habit and rectal wall.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;  33 550-553
  • 27 Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Gosselin A et al.. Constipation after rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Where is the obstruction?.  Dig Dis Sci. 1993;  38 1801-1808
  • 28 Wassef R, Rothenberger D A, Goldberg S M. Rectal prolapse.  Curr Probl Surg. 1986;  23 397-451
  • 29 Marceau C, Parc Y, Debroux E, Tiret E, Parc R. Complete rectal prolapse in young patients: psychiatric disease a risk factor of poor outcome.  Colorectal Dis. 2005;  7 360-365
  • 30 Glasgow S C, Birnbaum E H, Kodner I J, Fleshman J W, Dietz D W. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49 1052-1058
  • 31 Schultz I, Mellgren A, Nilsson B Y, Dolk A, Holmstrom B. Preoperative electrophysiologic assessment cannot predict continence after rectopexy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;  41 1392-1398
  • 32 Johansen O B, Wexner S D, Daniel N, Nogueras J J, Jagelman D G. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy in the elderly.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;  36 767-772
  • 33 Madbouly K M, Senagore A J, Delaney C P et al.. Clinically based management of rectal prolapse.  Surg Endosc. 2003;  17 99-103
  • 34 Gregorcyk S G. Perineal proctosigmoidectomy: the procedure of choice for rectal prolapse.  Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2003;  16 263-269
  • 35 Altemeier W A, Culbertson W R, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J. Nineteen years' experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse.  Ann Surg. 1971;  173 993-1006
  • 36 Deen K I, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley M R. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 1994;  81 302-304
  • 37 Williams J G, Rothenberger D A, Madoff R D, Goldberg S M. Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;  35 830-834
  • 38 Agachan F, Reissman P, Pfeifer J et al.. Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse.  South Med J. 1997;  90 925-932
  • 39 Kohler A, Athanasiadis S. The value of posterior levator repair in the treatment of anorectal incontinence due to rectal prolapse-a clinical and manometric study.  Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2001;  386 188-192
  • 40 Chun S W, Pikarsky A J, You S Y et al.. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse: role of levatorplasty.  Tech Coloproctol. 2004;  8 3-8 discussion 8-9
  • 41 Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Edmond Delorme 1847-1929. On the treatment of total prolapse of the rectum by excision of the rectal mucous membranes or recto-colic.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 544-553
  • 42 Pescatori M, Interisano A, Stolfi V M, Zoffoli M. Delorme's operation and sphincteroplasty for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;  13 223-227
  • 43 Tsunoda A, Yasuda N, Yokoyama N, Kamiyama G, Kusano M. Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse: clinical and physiological analysis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1260-1265
  • 44 Felt-Bersma R J, Cuesta M A. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.  Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2001;  30 199-222
  • 45 Mollen R M, Kuijpers J H, van Hoek F. Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1283-1287
  • 46 Frykman H M, Goldberg S M. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1969;  129 1225-1230
  • 47 Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1992;  7 219-222
  • 48 Ripstein C B. Surgical care of massive rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1965;  8 34-38
  • 49 Gordon P H, Hoexter B. Complications of the Ripstein procedure.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1978;  21 277-280
  • 50 Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse.  Proc R Soc Med. 1959;  52 602-603
  • 51 Douard R, Frileux P, Brunel M et al.. Functional results after the Orr-Loygue transabdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;  46 1089-1096
  • 52 Ross A H, Thomson J P. Management of infection after prosthetic abdominal rectopexy (Wells' procedure).  Br J Surg. 1989;  76 610-612
  • 53 Athanasiadis S, Weyand G, Heiligers J, Heumuller L, Barthelmes L. The risk of infection of three synthetic materials used in rectopexy with or without colonic resection for rectal prolapse.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;  11 42-44
  • 54 Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults.  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online). 2000;  (2) CD001758
  • 55 Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Reitano M C et al.. Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse.  Dig Surg. 1999;  16 415-419
  • 56 Solomon M J, Young C J, Eyers A A, Roberts R A. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.  Br J Surg. 2002;  89 35-39
  • 57 Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T et al.. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a meta-analysis.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1930-1940
  • 58 Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy.  Br J Surg. 2004;  91 1188-1191
  • 59 Raftopoulos Y, Senagore A J, Di Giuro G, Bergamaschi R. Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 1200-1206
  • 60 Hool G R, Hull T L, Fazio V W. Surgical treatment of recurrent complete rectal prolapse: a thirty-year experience.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;  40 270-272
  • 61 Steele S R, Goetz L H, Minami S et al.. Management of recurrent rectal prolapse: surgical approach influences outcome.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;  49 440-445
  • 62 Pikarsky A J, Joo J S, Wexner S D et al.. Recurrent rectal prolapse: what is the next good option?.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;  43 1273-1276
  • 63 Delaney C P, Senagore A J. Current Therapy in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA; Elsevier Mosby 2005: 624
  • 64 Tsugawa K, Sue K, Koyanagi N et al.. Laparoscopic rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse: a safe and simple procedure without a mesh prosthesis.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2002;  49 1549-1551

David P O'Brien IVM.D. 

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

2123 Auburn Ave., Ste. 524, Cincinnati, OH 45219

Email: obriendd@uc.edu

    >