Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2006; 38(2): 83-90
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-933512
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag

Zahnimplantate zur Abstützung von orthodontischen Zahnbewegungen: Bestimmung der Insertionsstelle und der Insertionsrichtung

Implants for Tooth Movement: Determining Implant Location and Orientation[1] W. M. Smalley1
  • 1Department of Orthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 June 2006 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die skelettale Verankerung von orthodontischen Kräften an osseointegrierten Zahnimplantaten kann von unschätzbarem Wert für die Korrektur von Zahnfehlstellungen bei teilbezahnten Patienten sein. Die Implantate können nach der KFO-Behandlung zur prothetischen Versorgung weiter verwendet werden. Es wird eine Technik zur Bestimmung der richtigen Implantatposition und Implantatangulation beschrieben. Die optimale Position der vorhandenen Zähne und der Implantate werden an einem Setupmodell, das auch ein prothetisches Waxup umfasst, festgelegt. Die beschriebene Technik ermöglicht eine leichte Übertragung der im Setup festgelegten Implantatposition auf das Malokklusionsmodell und die Herstellung einer chirurgischen Bohrschablone für die Implantatinsertion.

Abstract

Skeletal anchorage provided by osseointegrated implants can be invaluable to correct malocclusions of partially edentulous patients. The same implants can support prosthetic replacement teeth if they are in the correct position. A technique is described to determine the location and orientation of these implants. The optimal position of the existing teeth is determined by an orthodontic setup, and the position of implants by a diagnostic waxing of the prosthetic replacement teeth. This technique facilitates the transfer of implant locations from the orthodontic setup and diagnostic waxing casts to the initial dental casts, to permit the fabrication of an implant placement guide.

Schlüsselwörter

Implantate - Verankerung orthodontischer Kräfte

Key words

implants - orthodontic anchorage

1 Der englischsprachige Originalartikel ist erschienen im Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1995.

Literatur

  • 1 Roberts W E, Smith R K, Zilbermann Y, Mozsary P G, Smith R S. Osseous adaptation to continuos loading of rigid endossoeus implants.  A J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1984;  86 95-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Roberts W E, Helm F R, Marshall K J, Gongloff R K. Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and othopedic anchorage.  Angle Orthod. 1989;  59 247-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Turley P K, Kenn C, Schur J, Stefanac J, Gray J, Hennes J, Poon L C. Orthodontic force application to titanium endosseous implants.  Angle Orthod. 1988;  58 151-162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ödman J, Lekholm U, Jemt T, Branemark P -I, Thilander B. Osseointegated titanium implants - a new approach in orthodontic treatment.  Eur J Orthod. 1988;  10 98-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kraut R A, Hammer H S, Wheeler J J. Use of endosteal implants as orthodontic anchorage.  Compendium. 1988;  9 796-801
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Van Roekel N B. Use of Branemark system implants for orthodontic anchorage: report of a case.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;  4 341-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Roberts W E, Marshall K J, Moszsary P G. Rigid endosseous implant utilized as anchorage to protract molars and close an atrophic extraction site.  Angle Orthod. 1990;  60 135-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Linder-Aronson S, Nordenram A, Anneroth G. Titanium implant anchorage in orthodontic treatment: an experimental investigation in onkeys.  Eur J Orthod. 1990;  12 414-419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Higuchi K W, Slack J M. The use of titanium fixtures for intaoral anchorage to facilitate orthodontic tooth movement.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;  6 338-344
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Haandes H R, Stenvik A, Sterrmer B -O, Tryti T, Faehn O. The efficacy of two-stage titanium implants as orthodontic anchorage in the preprosthodontic correction of third molars in adults - a report of three cases.  Eur J Orthod. 1991;  13 287-292
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wehrbein H, Dietrich P. Endosseous titanium implants during and after orthodontic load - an experimental study in the dog.  Cln Oral Impl Res. 1993;  4 76-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ödman J, Lekholm U, Jent T, Thilander B. Osseointegrated implants as orthodontic anchorage in the treatment of partially edentulous adult patients.  Eur J Orthod. 1994;  16 187-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Smalley W M, Shapiro P A, Hohl T H, Kokich V G, Bronemark P-I. Osseointegrated titanium implants for maxillofacial protraction in monkeys.  Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;  84 285-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Blustein R, Jackson R, Rotskoff K, Coy R E, Godar D. Use of splint material in the placement of implants.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;  1 47-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Edge M J. Surgical placement guide for use with osseointegrated implants.  J Prosthet Dent. 1987;  57 719-722
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Engelman M J, Sorenson J A, Moy P. Optimum placement of osseointegrated implnts.  J Prosthet Dent. 1988;  59 467-473
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Burns D R, Crahtree D G, Bell D H. Template for positioning and angulation of intraosseous implants.  J Prosthet Dent. 1988;  59 479-483
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Johnson C M, Lewandowski J A, McKinney J F. A surgical template for aligned placement of osseointegrated implant.  J Prosthet Dent. 1988;  59 684-688
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cowan P W. Surgical templates for the placement of osseointegrated implants.  Quintessence Int. 1990;  21 391-396
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Orenstein I H. The surgical template: a prescription for impant success.  Implant Dent. 1991;  2 182-184
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Perel M S. Stabilized template for implant insertion.  Dent Implantol Update. 1991;  2 85-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Neidlinger J, Lilien B A, Kalant D C. Surgical implant stent: a design modification and simplified fabrication technique.  J Prosthet Dent. 1993;  69 70-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lima Verde M AR, Morgano S M. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis.  J Prosthet Dent. 1993;  69 276-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lazzara R J. Effect of implant position on implant restoration design.  J Esthet Dent. 1993;  5 265-269
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 McGivney G P, Haughton V, Strandt J A, Eichholz J E, Lubar D M. A comparison of computer-assisted tomography and data-gathering modalities in prosthodontics.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;  1 55-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schwarz M S, Rothman S LG, Rhoades M L, Chafetz N. Computed tomography. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. Part 1 and Part 2.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;  2 137-141 142-148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rothman S LG, Chafetz N, Rhoades M L, Schwarz M S. Ct in the preoperative assessment of the mandible and maxilla for endosseous implant surgery.  Radiology. 1988;  168 171-176
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schwarz M S, Rothman S LG, Chafetz N, Rhoades M. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery.  Dent Clin North Am. 1989;  33 565-597
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

1 Der englischsprachige Originalartikel ist erschienen im Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1995.

Prof. Dr. Ward M. Smalley

Department of Orthodontics and Restorative Dentistry SM 46 · School of Dentistry · University of Washington

Seattle WA 98195

USA

Email: wsmalley@u.washington.edu

      >