Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925226
BI-RADS update: Mammographie, Brustultraschall und Kernspinmammographie
BI-RADS update: Mammography, Breast Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the BreastPriv.-Doz. Dr. Andreas Saleh
Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf · Moorenstr. 5 · 40225 Düsseldorf
Phone: 0211 811-8896, 0211 811-7752
Fax: 0211 811-6145
Email: saleh@uni-duesseldorf.de
Publication History
Publication Date:
02 March 2006 (online)
Dieser Artikel ist ein Erratum zum Beitrag A. Saleh, K. D. Kurz, U. Mödder: BI-RADS update: Mammographie, Brustultraschall und Kernspinmammographie in der Radiologie up2date, 5. Jahrgang, Dezember 2005, S. 285 - 316 In der Arbeit A. Saleh, K. D. Kurz, U. Mödder: BI-RADS update: Mammographie, Brustultraschall und Kernspinmammographie der Radiologie up2date, 5. Jahrgang, Dezember 2005, S. 285 - 316, wurden versehentlich die Tabelle 3 sowie die Literaturliste unvollständig abgedruckt. Wir bitten diese Fehler zu entschuldigen und drucken hier nochmals die korrekte Tabelle und die fehlenden Literaturverweise ab:
| Beurteilungskategorie | Erklärung | Konsequenz | Abbildungen |
| 0 | Beurteilung unvollständig | weitere Bildgebung zur Gesamtbeurteilung erforderlich | |
| 1 | negatives Mammogramm | turnusgemäße Früherkennungsmammographie | |
| 2 | gutartiger Befund | Abb. 7, 8, 11, 16, 19 | |
| 3 | wahrscheinlich gutartiger Befund | Verlaufskontrolle in kurzem (6 Monate) Intervall | Abb. 9, 17 |
| 4a | geringgradig malignomsuspekter Befund | histologische Klärung | Abb. 1, 9 |
| 4b | mittelgradig malignomsuspekter Befund | histologische Klärung | Abb. 5, 14 |
| 4c | hochgradig malignomsuspekter Befund | histologische Klärung | Abb. 2, 6, 12, 18, 20 |
| 5 | hochgradiger Verdacht auf Bösartigkeit | Abb. 3, 4, 10, 13, 21, 23, 24 | |
| 6 | histologisch gesichertes Malignom | angemessene Behandlung |
Literatur
- 58 Baez E, Strathmann K, Vetter M. et al . Likelihood of malignancy in breast lesions characterised by ultrasound with a combined diagnositc score. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005; 31 179-184
- 59 Orel S G, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan D C. BI-RADS categorziation as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology. 1999; 211 845-850
- 60 Lacquement M A, Mitchell D, Hollingsworth A B. Positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system. J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 189 34-40
- 61 Tan Y Y, Wee S B, Tan M PC, Chong B K. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS categorization in an asian population. Asian J Surg. 2004; 27 186-191
- 62 Nunes L W, Schnall M D, Orel S G. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology. 2001; 219 484-494
- 63 Daniel B L, Yen Y F, Glover G H. et al . Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology. 1998; 209 499-509
- 64 Kuhl C K, Schmutzler R K, Leutner C C. et al . Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology. 2000; 215 267-279
- 65 Liberman L, Morris E A, Bentson C L. et al . Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary experience in high-risk women. Cancer. 2003; 98 377-388
- 66 Sadowski E A, Kelcz F. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 21 556-564
- 67 Stoutjesdikk M J, Boets C, Jager G J. et al . Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93 1095-1102
- 68 Kriege M, Brekelmans C TM, Boets C. et al . Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351 427-437
Priv.-Doz. Dr. Andreas Saleh
Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf · Moorenstr. 5 · 40225 Düsseldorf
Phone: 0211 811-8896, 0211 811-7752
Fax: 0211 811-6145
Email: saleh@uni-duesseldorf.de
Literatur
- 58 Baez E, Strathmann K, Vetter M. et al . Likelihood of malignancy in breast lesions characterised by ultrasound with a combined diagnositc score. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005; 31 179-184
- 59 Orel S G, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan D C. BI-RADS categorziation as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology. 1999; 211 845-850
- 60 Lacquement M A, Mitchell D, Hollingsworth A B. Positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system. J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 189 34-40
- 61 Tan Y Y, Wee S B, Tan M PC, Chong B K. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS categorization in an asian population. Asian J Surg. 2004; 27 186-191
- 62 Nunes L W, Schnall M D, Orel S G. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology. 2001; 219 484-494
- 63 Daniel B L, Yen Y F, Glover G H. et al . Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. Radiology. 1998; 209 499-509
- 64 Kuhl C K, Schmutzler R K, Leutner C C. et al . Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology. 2000; 215 267-279
- 65 Liberman L, Morris E A, Bentson C L. et al . Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary experience in high-risk women. Cancer. 2003; 98 377-388
- 66 Sadowski E A, Kelcz F. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 21 556-564
- 67 Stoutjesdikk M J, Boets C, Jager G J. et al . Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93 1095-1102
- 68 Kriege M, Brekelmans C TM, Boets C. et al . Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351 427-437
Priv.-Doz. Dr. Andreas Saleh
Institut für Diagnostische Radiologie
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf · Moorenstr. 5 · 40225 Düsseldorf
Phone: 0211 811-8896, 0211 811-7752
Fax: 0211 811-6145
Email: saleh@uni-duesseldorf.de