Zusammenfassung
Anliegen Die Arbeit vergleicht die Wirksamkeit tagesklinischer und vollstationärer akutpsychiatrischer
Behandlung im einjährigen Follow-up-Zeitraum. Methode Patienten aus dem deutschen Projektzentrum der EDEN-Studie und deren Bezugspersonen
wurden drei und zwölf Monate nach Entlassung aus der Indexbehandlung untersucht. Ergebnis In varianzanalytischen Modellen erwies sich die tagesklinische Behandlung auf keinem
der untersuchten Parameter als der vollstationären unterlegen. Schlussfolgerung Die Äquivalenz in der Nachhaltigkeit der Behandlung ist damit in der untersuchten
Einrichtung belegt.
Abstract
Objective To compare the effectiveness of acute psychiatric day-hospital treatment and inpatient
treatment with respect to a one-year follow-up. Method Within a randomised controlled trial, patients and relatives were assessed at different
levels of outcome three months and 12 months after patients' discharge using the Brief
Psychiatric Rating Scale (24-Item-Version), the Manchester Assessment of Quality of
Life (MANSA), the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule (GSDS), the Berlin Inventory
for the Assessment of Needs (BeBI), and the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire (IEQ).
Using estimation and test of contrasts in linear models of analysis of variance with
structured covariance matrix, analyses conducted included data of all n = 191 patients
having been included into the German centre of the study. Results With respect to all measures, day-hospital treatment proved to be at least as effective
as inpatient care. Conclusion The study supports earlier findings that showed no differences in long-term effectiveness
of acute psychiatric day-hospital treatment as compared to inpatient treatment.
Literatur
1 Hickey T, Moran R, Walsh D. Psychiatric Day Care - An underused option? The purposes
and functions of psychiatric day hospitals and day centres: A study in two Health
Boards. Dublin; Health Research Board 2003
2
Horvitz-Lennon M, Normand S LT, Gaccione P, Frank R G.
Partial versus full hospitalization for adults in psychiatric distress: A systematic
review of the published literature.
Am J Psychiatry.
2001;
158
676-685
3
Kallert T W, Schützwohl M, Kiejna A, Nawka P, Priebe S, Raboch J.
Efficacy of psychiatric day hospital treatment: Review of research findings and design
of a European multi-centre study.
Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy.
2002;
2
55-71
4 Kallert T W, Schützwohl M.
Randomisierte kontrollierte Studien zur Effektivität tagesklinischer akutpsychiatrischer
Behandlung: Eine Ergebnisübersicht. In: Eikelmann B, Reker T (Hrsg) Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie in der Tagesklinik.
Grundlagen und Praxis. Stuttgart; Kohlhammer 2004: 65-72
5
Marshall M, Crowther R, Almarez-Serrano A. et al .
Systematic reviews of effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders.
(1) Acute day hospital versus admission; (2) Vocational rehabilitation; (3) Day hospital
versus outpatient care.
Health Technol Assess.
2001;
5 (21)
1-75
6 Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano A. et al .Day hospital versus admission
for acute psychiatric disorders (Cochrane Review). Oxford; The Cochrane Library, Update
Software 2003
Issue 3
7
Schene A H.
The effectiveness of psychiatric partial hospitalization and day care.
Curr Opin Psych.
2004;
17
303-309
8 Kallert T W, Priebe S, Schützwohl M, Briscoe J, Glöckner M. and the EDEN-study group
.
The role of acute day hospital treatment for mental health care: Research context
and practical problems of carrying out the international multi-centre EDEN-study. In: Kirch W (Hrsg) Public Health in Europe. 10 years EUPHA. Berlin; Springer 2004:
153-172
9
Kallert T W, Matthes C, Glöckner M, Eichler T, Koch R, Schützwohl M.
Akutpsychiatrische tagesklinische Behandlung: Ein effektivitätsgesichertes Versorgungsangebot?.
Psychiat Prax.
2004;
31
409-419
10
Schützwohl M, Glöckner M, Matthes C, Eichler T, Kallert T W.
Die Belastung der engsten Bezugspersonen akut psychisch Erkrankter in den ersten vier
Behandlungswochen tagesklinischer und vollstationärer Behandlung. Ergebnis einer randomisierten
kontrollierten Untersuchung.
Psychiat Prax.
2005;
32
281-288
11
Kallert T W, Schönherr R, Schnippa S, Matthes C, Glöckner M, Schützwohl M.
Direkte Kosten akutpsychiatrischer tagesklinischer Behandlung: Ergebnisse aus einer
randomisierten kontrollierten Studie.
Psychiat Prax.
2005;
32
132-141
12
Creed F, Black D, Anthony P, Osborn M, Thomas P, Tomenson B.
Randomised controlled trial of day patient versus in-patient psychiatric treatment.
BMJ.
1990;
300
1033-1037
13
Creed F, Mbaya P, Lancashire S, Tomenson B, Williams B, Holme S.
Cost effectiveness of day and inpatient psychiatric treatment: results of a randomised
controlled trial.
BMJ.
1997;
314
1381-1385
14
Dick P, Cameron L, Cohen D, Barlow M, Ince A.
Day and full time psychiatric treatment: A controlled comparison.
Br J Psychiatry.
1985;
147
246-250
15
Herz M I, Endicott J, Spitzer R L, Mesnikoff A.
Day versus in-patient hospitalization: a controlled study.
Am J Psychiatry.
1971;
10
1371-1382
16
Kris E B.
Day hospitals.
Curr Ther Res.
1965;
7
320-323
17
Schene A H, Wijngaarden B van, Poelijoe N W, Gersons B PR.
The Utrecht comparative study on psychiatric day treatment and in-patient treatment.
Acta Psychiatr Scand.
1993;
87
427-436
18
Sledge W H, Tebes J, Rakfeldt J, Davidson L, Lyons L, Druss B.
Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, Part I: Clinical outcomes.
Am J Psychiatry.
1996;
153
1065-1073
19
Nienhuis F J, Giel R, Kluiter H, Rüphan M, Wiersma D.
Efficacy of psychiatric day treatment. Course and outcome of psychiatric disorders
in a randomised trial.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci.
1994;
244
73-80
20
Zwerling J, Wilder J F.
An evaluation of the applicability of the day hospital in the treatment of acutely
disturbed patients.
Isr Ann Psychiatry Related Disciplines.
1964;
2
162-185
21
Ventura J, Green M F, Shaner A, Liberman R P.
Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: „The Drift
Busters”.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res.
1993;
3
221-244
22
Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S.
Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA).
Int J Soc Psychiatry.
1999;
45
7-12
23 Wiersma D, Jong A de, Kraaijkamp H JM, Ormel J. GSDS II: The Groningen Social Disabilities
Schedule, second version: Manual, questionnaire, and rating form. Groningen; University
of Groningen, Department of Social Psychiatry 1990
24
Priebe S, Gruyters T, Heinze M, Hoffmann C.
Subjektive Evaluationskriterien in der psychiatrischen Versorgung - Erhebungsmethoden
für Forschung und Praxis.
Psychiat Prax.
1995;
22
140-144
25
Wijngaarden B van, Schene A H, Koeter M, Vázquez-Barquero J L, Knudsen H C, Lasalvia A,
McCrone P. Epsilon Study Group .
Caregiving in schizophrenia: development, internal consistency and reliability of
the Involvement Evaluation Questionnaire - European Version.
Br J Psychiatry.
2000;
39, Suppl
s21-s27
26
Bernert S, Kilian R, Matschinger H, Mory C, Roick C, Angermeyer M C.
Die Erfassung der Belastung der Angehörigen psychisch erkrankter Menschen. Die deutsche
Version des Involvement Evaluation Questionnaires (IEQ-EU).
Psychiat Prax.
2001;
28 (Suppl 2)
S97-S101
27
Schützwohl M, Jarosz-Nowak J, Briscoe J, Szajowski K, Kallert T W. and the EDEN Study
Group .
Interraterreliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS 4.0) and the Groningen
Social Disabilities Schedule (GSDS-II) in a European multi-site randomised controlled
trial on the effectiveness of psychiatric day hospitals.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res.
2003;
12
197-207
28 Winer B J, Brown D R, Michels K M. Statistical principles in experimental design. New
York; McGraw-Hill 1991
29
Sledge W H, Tebes J, Wolff N, Helminiak W.
Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, Part I: Clinical outcomes.
Am J Psychiatry.
1996;
153
1074-1083
30
Wiersma D, Kluiter H, Nienhuis F J, Rüphan M, Giel R.
Costs and benefits of hospital and day treatment with community care of affective
and schizophrenic disorders.
Br J Psychiatry.
1995;
166 (suppl 27)
52-59
Dr. sc. hum. Matthias Schützwohl
Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie am Universitätsklinikum Carl
Gustav Carus der TU Dresden
Fetscherstraße 74
01307 Dresden
eMail: matthias.schuetzwohl@mailbox.tu-dresden.de