Download PDF
Radiologie up2date 2005; 5(3): 245-256
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870360
Pädiatrische Radiologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Diagnostik und Therapie von Invaginationen bei Kindern

Diagnosis and Therapy of Intussusception in ChildrenHeinz-Jakob  Langen1 , Gundula  Staatz2
  • 1Radiologische Abteilung Missionsärztliche Klinik Würzburg
  • 2Klinik für Radiologische Diagnostik der RWTH Aachen
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 September 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Zusammenfassung

Die Invagination ist eine der häufigsten Ursachen für ein akutes Abdomen im Kindesalter. Mit diesem Krankheitsbild wird auch der kinderradiologisch wenig erfahrene Radiologe konfrontiert. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, die typischen sonographischen Bilder der Invagination zu vermitteln und einen praktischen Leitfaden für die Therapie an die Hand zugeben. Denn auch mit geringer sonographischer Erfahrung ist die Diagnose im Ultraschall leicht zu stellen und - unter Beachtung gewisser Regeln - mit einem Einlauf oder Insufflation von Luft einfach zu behandeln.

Abstract

Intussusception is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen in children. Even radiologists who are unfamiliar with pediatric radiology encounter this problem. This paper discusses the typical sonographic indicators of intussusception and provides a practical guide for therapy. Diagnosing intussuception is easy, even for those with little experience in pediatric sonography. Taking a few rules into consideration, intussusception can be treated easily with hydrostatic or pneumatic reduction.

Key words

Intussusception, diagnosis; therapy, ultrasound, children, infants, gastrointestinal tract

Literatur

  • 1 Navarro O, Daneman A. Intussusception. Part 3: Diagnosis and management of those with an identifiable or predisposing cause and those that reduce spontaneously.  Pediatr Radiol. 2004;  34 305-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Staatz G, Alzen G, Heimann G. Darminfektion, die häufigste Invaginationsursache im Kindesalter: Ergebnisse einer 10-jährigen klinischen Studie.  Klin Pädiatr. 1998;  210 61-64
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Harms H K, Hecker W Ch. Invagination. In: Schulte, Spranger (Hrsg. ) Lehrbuch der Kinderheilkunde. Stuttgart; Gustav Fischer 1988: 305
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Del-Pozo G, Albillos J C, Tejedor D, Calero R, Rasero M, De-la-Calle U, Lopez-Pacheco U. Intussusception in children: Current concepts in diagnosis and enema reduction.  Radiographics. 1999;  19 299-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Danemann A, Navarro O. Intussusception. Part 1: A review of diagnostic approaches.  Pediatr Radiol. 2003;  33 79-85
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Franken E A, Kao S C, Smith W L, Sato Y. Imaging of the acute Abdomen in infants and children.  Am J Roentgenol. 1989;  153 921-928
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Del-Pozo G, Albillos J C, Tejedor D. Intussusception. US findings with pathologic correlation - the crescent-in-doughnut sign.  Radiology. 1996;  199 688-692
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Feinstein K A, Myers M, Fernbach S K, Bhisitkul D N. Peritoneal fluid in children with intussusception: its sonographic detection and relationship to successful reduction.  Abdom Imagin. 1993;  18 277-279
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Alzen G, Berthold L D, Moritz D. Diagnosis and Clinical Signs of Small Bowel Intussusception.  Radiology. 2002;  225(Suppl. 1) 618
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fishman M C, Borden S, Cooper A. The dissection sign of nonreducible ileocolic intussusception.  Am J Roentgenol. 1984;  143 5-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Daneman A, Navarro O. Intussusception. Part 2: An update on the evolution of management.  Pediatr Radiol. 2004;  34 97-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Royal S A. Hypovolemic shock after air reduction of intussusception.  Pediatr Radiol. 2001;  31 184-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Franken E A Jr, Smith W L, Chernish S M, Campbell J B, Fletcher B D, Goldman H S. The use of glucagon in hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: a double-blind study of 30 patients.  Radiology. 1983;  146 687-689
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hsiao J Y, Kao H A, Shih S L. Intravenous glucagon in hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: a controlled study of 63 patients.  Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1988;  29 242-247
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Katz M E, Kolm P. Intussusception reduction 1991: an international survey of pediatric radiologists.  Pediatr Radiol. 1992;  22 318-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shiels W E, Kirks D R, Keller G L, Ryckman F R, Daugherty C C, Specker B L, Summa D W. Colonic perforation by air and liquid enemas: comparison study in young pigs.  Am J Roentgenol. 1993;  160 931-935
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Reihhardt D (Hrsg). Therapie der Krankheiten im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Springer 1997: 772-773
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Barr L L, Stansberry S D, Swischuk L E. Significance of age, duration, ostruction and the dissection sign in intussusception.  Petiatr Radiol. 1990;  20 454-456
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gonzalez-Spinola J, Del Pozo G, Tejedor D, Blanco A. Intussusception: the accuracy of ultrasound-guided saline enema and the usefulness of a delayed attempt at reduction.  J Pediatr Surg. 1999;  34 1016-1020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sandler A D, Ein S H, Connolly B, Daneman A, Filler R M. Unsucccessful air-enema reduction of intussusception: is a second attempt worthwhile?.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1999;  15 214-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kohng P L, Peh W C, Lam C H, Chan K L, Dheng W, Lam W W, Ai V H, Saing H, Tam P K, Leong L L, Low L C. Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of childhood intussusception: technique and demonstration.  Radiographics. 2000;  20 1818
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Alzen G, Schmitz-Rode T. Neue Techniken zur Behandlung der Invagination. In: Günther RW, Gockel HP (Hrsg) Jahrbuch der Radiologie 1992. Zülpich; Biemann 1992: 143-151
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Schmitz-Rode T, Müller-Leisse C, Alzen G. Comparative examination of various rectal tubes and contrast media for the reduction of intussusceptions.  Pediatr Radiol. 1991;  21 341-345
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Daneman A, Alton D J, Ein S, Wesson D, Superina R, Thomer P. Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children-a comparison of perforation with barium and air.  Pediatr Radiol. 1995;  25 81-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Zheng J Y, Frush D P, Guo J Z. Review of pneumatic reduction of intussusception: evolution not revolution.  J Pediatr Surg. 1994;  29 93-97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gu L, Wong S, Gu A. Perforations during attempted intussusception reduction: 14 patients from 9028 examinations over a 20-year period.  J Intervent Radiol. 1993;  2 36-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bramson R T, Blickman J G. Perforation during hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: proposed mechanism and review of the literature.  J Pediatr Surg. 1992;  27 589-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Maoate K, Beasley S W. Perforation during gas reduction of intussusception.  Pediatr Surg Int. 1998;  14 168-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Heinz-Jakob Langen

Radiologische Abteilung, Missionsärztliche Klinik

Salvatorstr. 7 · 97067 Würzburg

Phone: +49(0)931/7912506

Fax: +49(0)931/7912519

Email: hj.langen@missioklinik.de

      >