Endoscopy 2005; 37(9): 827-832
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870207
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of Capsule Endoscopy and Enteroscopy with the Double-Balloon Method in Patients with Obscure Bleeding and Polyposis

T.  Matsumoto1 , M.  Esaki1 , T.  Moriyama1 , S.  Nakamura1 , M.  Iida1
  • 1Dept. of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 27 December 2004

Accepted after Revision 18 March 2005

Publication Date:
22 August 2005 (online)

Background and Study Aims: Video capsule endoscopy and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) are novel methods of enteroscopy. The aim of this investigation was to compare the value of CE and DBE in the diagnosis of small-intestinal pathology.
Patients and Methods: Thirteen patients with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin and nine patients with known gastrointestinal polyposis were examined using antegrade or retrograde DBE, and the most distal or proximal site in the explored small intestine was marked by submucosal injection of sterilized ink. The patients were then evaluated by CE. Video images obtained by CE were reviewed by an observer who was blinded to the DBE findings.
Results: DBE identified positive findings in 12 patients (54.5 %). CE identified positive findings in the area explored by DBE in eight patients (36.4 %), and in the unexplored area in 11 patients (50.0 %). The overall diagnostic yield in the area explored by DBE did not differ between the two procedures. The enteroscopic findings in the area explored by DBE were concordant in 12 of 13 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin. In patients with polyposis, the diagnoses were discordant in three patients, in whom CE failed to detect any polyp. In two of three polyposis patients with concordant positive findings, DBE detected a larger number of polyps than CE did.
Conclusions: DBE appears to be superior to CE in the diagnosis of small-intestinal polyps, whereas the value for diagnosing gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin is similar in the two procedures.

References

  • 1 Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A. et al . Wireless capsule endoscopy.  Nature. 2000;  405 17
  • 2 Pennazio M. Small-bowel endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 32-41
  • 3 Costamagna G, Shah S K, Riccioni M E. et al . A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  123 999-1005
  • 4 Voderholzer W A, Ortner M, Rogalla P. et al . Diagnostic yield of wireless capsule enteroscopy in comparison with computed tomography enteroclysis.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 1009-1014
  • 5 Liangpunsakul S, Chadalawada V, Rex D K. et al . Wireless capsule endoscopy detects small bowel ulcers in patients with normal results from state of the art enteroclysis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 1295-1298
  • 6 Hara A K, Leighton J A, Sharma V K. et al . Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT.  Radiology. 2004;  230 260-265
  • 7 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y. et al . Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 216-220
  • 8 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sugano K. et al . Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 1010-1016
  • 9 May A, Nachbar L, Wardak A. et al . Double-balloon enteroscopy: preliminary experience in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or chronic abdominal pain.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 985-991
  • 10 Miyata T, Yamamoto H, Kita H. et al . A case of inflammatory fibroid polyp causing small-bowel intussusception in which retrograde double-balloon enteroscopy was useful for the preoperative diagnosis.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 344-347
  • 11 Shinozaki S, Yamamoto H, Kita H. et al . Direct observation with double-balloon enteroscopy of an intestinal intramural hematoma resulting in anticoagulant ileus.  Dig Dis Sci. 2004;  49 902-905
  • 12 Yoshida N, Wakabayashi N, Nomura K. et al . Ileal mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma showing several ulcers scars detected using double-balloon endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1022-1024
  • 13 Nishimura M, Yamamoto H, Kita H. et al . Gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the jejunum: diagnosis and control of bleeding with electrocoagulation by using double-balloon enteroscopy.  J Gastroenterol. 2004;  39 1001-1014
  • 14 Ohyama N, Taguchi A, Shirai K. et al . Endoscopic resection of Peutz-Jeghers polyps throughout the small intestine at double-balloon enteroscopy without laparotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 140-147
  • 15 Mylonaki M, Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gut. 2003;  52 1122-1126
  • 16 Chong J, Tagle M, Barkin J S. et al . Small bowel push-type fiberoptic enteroscopy for patients with occult gastrointestinal bleeding or suspected small bowel pathology.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 2143-2146
  • 17 Pennazio M, Arrigoni A, Risio M. et al . Clinical evaluation of push-type enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 164-170
  • 18 Zaman A, Katon R M. Push enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding yields a high incidence of proximal lesions within reach of a standard endoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 372-376
  • 19 Schmit A, Gay F, Adler M. et al . Diagnostic efficacy of push-enteroscopy and long-term follow-up of patients with small bowel angiodysplasia.  Dig Dis Sci. 1996;  41 2348-2352
  • 20 Foutch P G, Sawyer R, Sanowski R A. Push-enteroscopy for diagnosis of patients with gastrointestinal bleeding of obscure origin.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 337-341
  • 21 Liangpunsakul S, Mays L, Rex D K. Performance of Given suspected blood indicator.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  12 2676-2678
  • 22 Saurin J C, Delvaux M, Gaudin J L. et al . Diagnostic value of endoscopic capsule in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: blinded comparison with video push-enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 576-584
  • 23 Lewis B S, Swain P. Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of patients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: results of a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 349-353
  • 24 Ell C, Remke S, May A. et al . The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 685-689
  • 25 Adler D G, Knipschield M, Gostout C. A prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 492-498
  • 26 Bordas M A, Feu F, Gines A. et al . Wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a comparative study with push enteroscopy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;  20 189-194
  • 27 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E. et al . Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 643-653
  • 28 Selby W. Can clinical features predict the likelihood of finding abnormalities when using capsule endoscopy in patients with GI bleeding of obscure origin?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 782-787
  • 29 Madisch A, Schimming W, Kinzel F. et al . Locally advanced small-bowel adenocarcinoma missed primarily by capsule endoscopy but diagnosed by push enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 861-864
  • 30 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M. et al . Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 66-70

T. Matsumoto, M. D.

Dept. of Medicine and Clinical Science · Graduate School of Medical Sciences · Kyushu University

Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku · Fukuoka 812-8582 · Japan

Fax: +81-92-642-5273 ·

Email: matane@intmed2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp

    >