Abstract
Aim: We aimed to characterise the vascularisation patterns of hepatocellular carcinomas
in contrast-enhanced sonography in correlation to the histological differentiation
of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), and we also compared the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced
sonography in addition to B-scan sonography and power Doppler sonography. Methods: 51 hepatocellular carcinomas (21 well differentiated, 27 moderately differentiated,
3 poorly differentiated) were examined: by B-scan sonography, power Doppler sonography
and contrast-enhanced sonography using phase or pulse inversion harmonic imaging with
a low mechanical index(< 0.3) and second generation microbubble contrast medium (Optison®,
Sonovue®) as echo-enhancing agent. Lesion vascularity and the kinetics of contrast
enhancement within the lesions in the early arterial phase, arterial phase, portal
phase and late phase were analysed. The final diagnosis of a HCC was assessed after
B-scan sonography, power Doppler sonography and contrast-enhanced sonography. Results: Hypervascularisation and/or irregular tumour vascularisation could be detected in
18/48 HCCs (37.5 %) by power Doppler sonography. After contrast application, 46/51
HCCs (90.2 %) were identified as hyperechoic lesions during the early arterial or
arterial phase with no correlation to histological differentiation. In the portal
phase and late phase, the echogenicity of HCCs after contrast application was variable.
A hypoechoic appearance was noted in 17/51 HCCs (33.3 %) in the portal phase and in
21/51 HCCs (41.2 %) in the late phase. Moderately differentiated HCCs were more often
hypoechoic than well differentiated HCCs (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced sonography is highly efficient for the detection of tumour vascularity
in HCCs. The majority of HCCs - regardless of histological differentiation - can be
characterised as hypervascular lesions in the early arterial and arterial phase with
irregular tumour vessels using contrast-enhanced sonography. In addition to B-scan
sonomorphology, contrast-enhanced sonography may offer helpful information in patients
with liver cirrhosis and focal liver lesions.
Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Beschreibung des Vaskularisationsmusters von Karzinomen der Leber bei der kontrastmittelverstärkten
Sonographie in Korrelation zum histologischen Differenzierungsgrad dieser hepatozellulären
Karzinome (HCC). Der diagnostische Nutzen der Kontrastmittel-Sonographie als Ergänzung
zu B-Bild-Sonographie und Power-Doppler-Sonographie wurde ebenfalls untersucht. Methode: Untersucht wurden 51 hepatozelluläre Karzinome (21 gut differenzierte, 27 mäßig differenzierte,
3 undifferenzierte) mittels B-mode-Sonographie, Power-Doppler-Sonographie und kontrastmittelverstärkter
Sonographie mit Phasen- oder Puls-Inversions-Technik mit niedrigem mechanischem Index
(< 0,3). Kontrastmedium waren die Kontrastmittel der zweiten Generation, Optison®
und Sonovue®. Vaskularisierung der Lebertumoren sowie die Kinetik der Kontrastverstärkung
innerhalb der Läsionen während der frühen arteriellen Phase, der arteriellen, portalvenösen
und der späten Phase wurden analysiert. Die endgültige Diagnose „HCC” wurde nach der
Auswertung von B-Bild-Sonographie, Power-Doppler- und kontrastmittelverstärkter Sonographie
gestellt. Ergebnisse: Hypervaskularisation und/oder irreguläre Vaskularisierung der Tumoren wurde bei 18/48
hepatozellulären Karzinomen (HCC) durch Power-Doppler festgestellt. Nach Kontrastmittelapplikation
konnten 46/51 HCC als echoreiche Läsionen in der frühen arteriellen oder der arteriellen
Phase identifiziert werden. Eine Korrelation zum histologischen Differenzierungsgrad
wurde hierbei nicht festgestellt. In der portalvenösen und der späten Phase nach Kontrastmittelgabe
war die Echogenität der Karzinome uneinheitlich. Bei 17/51 (33,3 %) der hepatozellulären
Karzinome fand sich ein echoarmes Muster in der portalvenösen Phase, bei 21/51 (41,2
%) in der späten Phase. Mäßig differenzierte HCC waren häufiger echoarm als gut differenzierte
(p = 0,04). Schlussfolgerung: Die kontrastmittelverstärkte Sonographie ist eine hocheffiziente Methode zur Feststellung
der Vaskularisation von hepatozellulären Karzinomen. Die Mehrzahl der HCC zeigt sich
bei dieser Untersuchung typischerweise als in der früharteriellen und der arteriellen
Phase hypervaskularisierte Tumoren mit einem unregelmäßigen Verteilungsmuster der
Tumorgefäße. Dieser Befund steht nicht in Beziehung zum histologischen Differenzierungsgrad.
Als Ergänzung zur B-Bild-Sonomorphologie kann die kontrastmittelverstärkte Sonographie
nützliche Informationen bei Patienten mit Leberzirrhose und fokalen Leberveränderungen
bieten.
Key words
Contrast-enhanced sonography - hepatocellular carcinoma - ultrasound contrast agent
- phase inversion harmonic imaging - low mechanical index - second generation ultrasound
contrast media - Sonovue® - Optison® - liver cirrhosis
Schlüsselwörter
Kontrastmittelverstärkte Sonographie - hepatozelluläres Karzinom - Ultraschallkontrastmittel
- Phaseninversionstechnik - niedriger mechanischer Index - Ultraschallkontrastmittel
der zweiten Generation - Sonovue® - Optison® - Leberzirrhose
Reference
1
Bosch F X, Ribes J, Borras J.
Epidemiology of primary liver cancer.
Semin Liver Dis.
1999;
19
271-285
2
Collier J, Sherman M.
Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Hepatology.
1998;
27
273-278
3
Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet J M. et al, EASL Panel of Experts on HCC .
Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000
EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver.
J Hepatol.
2001;
35
421-430
4
Choi B I.
The current status of imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Liver Transpl.
2004;
10 (2 Suppl 1)
S20-S25
5
Burns P N, Wilson S R, Simpson D H.
Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal
masses with microbubble contrast.
Invest Radiol.
2000;
35
58-71
6
Wilson S R, Burns P N, Muradali D. et al .
Harmonic hepatic US with microbubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved
characterization of hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastasis.
Radiology.
2000;
215
153-161
7
Isozaki T, Numata K, Kiba T. et al .
Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors by using contrast enhancement patterns at
US.
Radiology.
2003;
229
798-805
8
Furuse J, Nagase M, Ishii H. et al .
Contrast enhancement patterns of hepatic tumours during the vascular phase using coded
harmonic imaging and Levovist to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from other
focal lesions.
Br J Radiol.
2003;
76
385-392
9
Jang H J, Lim H K, Lee W J. et al .
Ultrasonographic evaluation of focal hepatic lesions: comparison of pulse inversion
harmonic, tissue harmonic, and conventional imaging techniques.
J Ultrasound Med.
2000;
19
293-299, quiz 301 - 302
10
Dietrich C F.
Characterisation of focal liver lesions with contrast enhanced ultrasonography.
Eur J Radiol.
2004;
51 Suppl
S9-S17
11
Bernatik T, Becker D, Neureiter D. et al .
Detection of liver metastases - comparison of contrast - enhanced ultrasound using
first versus second generation contrast agents.
Ultraschall Med.
2003;
24
175-179
12
Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L. et al .
EFSUMB Study Group. Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January
2004.
Ultraschall Med.
2004;
25
249-256
13
Seitz K, Mauch M, Vasilakis D. et al .
Giant haemangioma of the liver - clinical and diagnostic problems - a case report.
Ultraschall Med.
2003;
24
413-417
14
Strobel D, Krodel U, Martus P. et al .
Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced color Doppler sonography in the differential
diagnosis of liver tumors.
J Clin Ultrasound.
2000;
28
1-13
15
Strobel D, Hoefer A, Martus P. et al .
Dynamic contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography improves the differential diagnosis
of liver lesions.
Int J Colorectal Dis.
2001;
16
247-256
16
Schneider M.
SonoVue, a new ultrasound contrast agent.
Eur Radiol.
1999;
9 Suppl 3
S347-S348
17
Quaia E, Stacul F, Bertolotto M. et al .
Characterization of focal liver lesions with pulse inversion harmonic imaging (PIHI)
using a second generation US contrast agent.
Acad Radiol.
2002;
9 Suppl 2
S376-S379
18
Strobel D, Raeker S, Martus P. et al .
Phase inversion harmonic imaging versus contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography
for the characterization of focal liver lesions.
nt J Colorectal Dis.
2003;
18
63-72
19
Hohmann J, Skrok J, Puls R. et al .
Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced low MI real time ultrasound
and SonoVue.
Rofo.
2003;
175
835-843
20
Albrecht T, Hohmann J, Oldenburg A. et al .
Detection and characterisation of liver metastases.
Eur Radiol.
2004;
14 Suppl 8
P25-33
21
Rickes S, Ocran K W, Gerstenhauer G. et al .
Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for liver metastases of adenocarcinomas and neuroendocrine
tumours at conventional ultrasound, unenhanced power Doppler sonography and echo-enhanced
ultrasound.
ig Dis.
2004;
22
81-86
22
von Herbay A, Vogt C, Willers R. et al .
Real-time imaging with the sonographic contrast agent SonoVue: differentiation between
benign and malignant hepatic lesions.
J Ultrasound Med.
2004;
23
1557-1568
23
Brannigan M, Burns P N, Wilson S R.
Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US.
Radiographics.
2004;
24
921-935
24
Giorgio A, Ferraioli G, Tarantino L. et al .
Contrast-enhanced sonographic appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with
cirrhosis: comparison with contrast-enhanced helical CT appearance.
JR Am J Roentgenol.
2004;
183
1319-1326
25
Nicolau C, Catala V, Vilana R. et al .
Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma using SonoVue, a second generation ultrasound
contrast agent: correlation with cellular differentiation.
Eur Radiol.
2004;
14
1092-1099
26
Monzawa S, Omata K, Shimazu N. et al .
Well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma: findings of US, CT, and MR imaging.
Abdom Imaging.
1999;
24
392-397
27
Kim K A, Lee W J, Lim H K. et al .
Small hepatocellular carcinoma: ultrasonographic findings and histopathologic correlation.
Clin Imaging.
2003;
27
340-345
28
Tanaka S, Kitamura T, Fujita M. et al .
Color Doppler flow imaging of liver tumors.
JR Am J Roentgenol.
1990;
154
509-514
29
Nino-Murcia M, Olcott E W, Jeffrey R B Jr. et al .
liver lesions: pattern-based classification scheme for enhancement at arterial phase
CT.
Radiology.
2000;
215
746-751
30
Choi B I, Kim T K, Han J K. et al .
Power versus conventional color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of
vasculature in liver tumors.
Radiology.
1996;
200
55-58
31
Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R, Paolicchi A. et al .
Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver:
comparison of power Doppler imaging and conventional color Doppler sonography.
Eur Radiol.
1997;
7
1410-1415
32
Ding H, Kudo M, Onda H. et al .
Hepatocellular carcinoma: depiction of tumor parenchymal flow with intermittent harmonic
power Doppler US during the early arterial phase in dual-display mode.
Radiology.
2001;
220
349-356
33
Fracanzani A L, Burdick L, Borzio M. et al .
Contrast-enhanced Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma
and premalignant lesions in patients with cirrhosis.
Hepatology.
2001;
34
1109-1112
34
Suzuki Y, Fujimoto Y, Hosoki Y. et al .
Clinical utility of sequential imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma by contrast-enhanced
power Doppler ultrasonograpy.
Eur J Radiol.
2003;
48
214-219
35
Kim E A, Yoon K H, Lee Y H. et al .
Focal hepatic lesions: contrast-enhancement patterns at pulse-inversion harmonic US
using a microbubble contrast agent.
orean J Radiol.
2003;
4
224-233
36
von Herbay A, Donner A, Jung G. et al .
Contrast-enhanced sonography using Levovist is decisive for staging and therapeutic
schedule in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Med Klin.
2004;
99
89-92
37
Ignee A, Weiper D, Schuessler G. et al .
Sonographic characterisation of hepatocellular carcinoma at time of diagnosis.
Z Gastroenterol.
2005;
43
289-294
38
Forsberg F, Liu J B, Burns P N. et al .
Artifacts in ultrasonic contrast agent studies.
J Ultrasound Med.
1994;
13
357-365
39
Dill-Macky M J, Burns P N, Khalili K. et al .
Focal hepatic masses: enhancement patterns with SH U 508A and pulse-inversion US.
Radiology.
2002;
222
95-102
Deike Strobel, M.D.
Department of Medicine I, Division of ultrasound diagnostics, Friedrich-Alexander
University of Erlangen-Nuernberg
Ulmenweg 18
91054 Erlangen
Phone: ++49/91 31/8 53 52 61
Fax: ++49/91 31/8 53 52 52
Email: deike.strobel@med1.imed.uni-erlangen.de