Download PDF
Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2005; 48(2): 77-84
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-830225
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Impact of Intraoperative MRI on the Surgical Results for High-Grade Gliomas

H.  Hirschberg1, 2 , E.  Samset2 , P.  K.  Hol2 , T.  Tillung2 , K.  Lote3
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
  • 2Intervention Center, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
  • 3The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 May 2005 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective: The impact of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) on the surgical procedure, patient outcome and median survival for a series of patients harbouring high-grade gliomas forms the basis of this study. Their outcome has been compared to a matched cohort of patients operated in a conventional manner to determine if the use of intraoperative MRI can be shown to improve the results of surgery and prognosis for this type of patient. Materials and Methods: 32 microsurgical open craniotomies, performed in the intraoperative iMRI scanner for grade IV supratentorial gliomas, with follow-up periods of more than 2 months, were analyzed for this study. A group of 32 primary high-grade glioma patients (no recurrent tumors) were matched for age, preoperative clinical grade, gender and histology and operated during a corresponding time interval in a conventional manner acted as controls. Results: All 64 patients were examined and analyzed for the occurrence of postoperative increased neurological morbidity or death. No complications directly related to the intraoperative scanning procedures were observed and no intraoperative death occurred in either group. The average operating time in the intraoperative scanner was 5.1 hours and was significantly longer than in the conventional OR (3.4 hours). The mean overall survival time for the 32 patients in the study group was 14.5 months (95 % confidence interval 12.0 - 16.6) compared to 12.1 months (95 % confidence interval 10.2 - 14.1) for the matched control group. Conclusion: Although iMRI is an effective way of imaging residual tumor, this study could not demonstrate an increased efficacy of surgery utilizing this technique for patients harbouring grade IV gliomas compared to more conventional methods. No statistical significance was noted between the two groups (p = 0.14). The complication rate was within the range reported for other series, in both control as well as the study group.

Key words

Glioma - MRI - intraoperative imaging - neuronavigation

References

  • 1 Bricolo A, Turazzi S, Cristofori L. et al . Experience in “radical” surgery of supratentorial gliomas in adults.  J Neurosurg Sci. 1990;  34 297-298
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Franklin C I. Does the extent of surgery make a difference in high grade malignant astrocytoma.  Australas Radiol. 1992;  36 44-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Simpson J R, Horton J, Scott C. et al . Influence of location and extent of surgical resection on survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Results of three consecutive Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials.  Int J Radiat Oncol BioI Phys. 1993;  26 239-244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Albert F K, Forsting M, Sartor K, Adams H P, Kunze S. Early postoperative magnetic resonance imaging after resection of malignant glioma. Objective evaluation of residual tumor and its influence on regrowth and prognosis.  Neurosurgery. 1994;  34 45-60
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Kowalczuk A, Macdonald R L, Amidei C. et al . Quantitative imaging study of extent of surgical resection and prognosis of malignant astrocytomas.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  41 1028-1038
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney D R, Gokaslan Z L, Shi W, DeMonte F, Lang F F, McCutcheon I E, Hassenbusch S J, Holland E, Hess K, Michael C, Miller D, Sawaya R. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival.  J Neurosurg. 2001;  95 190-198
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Wirtz C R, Bonsanto M M, Knauth M. et al . Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging to update interactive navigation in neurosurgery. Method and preliminary experience.  Comput Aided Surg. 1997;  2 172-179
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lunsford L D, Kondziolka D, Bissonette D J. Intraoperative imaging of the brain.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1996;  66 58-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hammoud M A, Ligon B L, el Souki R. et al . Use of intraoperative ultrasound for localizing tumors and determining the extent of resection. A comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.  J Neurosurg. 1996;  84 737-741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hirschberg H, Samset E. Intraoperative image directed dye marking of tumor margins.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1999;  42 123-127
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Stummer W, Stocker S, Wagner S, Stepp H, Fritsch C, Goetz C, Goetz A E, Kiefmann R, Reulen H J. Intraoperative detection of malignant gliomas by 5-arninolevulinic acid-induced porphyrin fluorescence.  Neurosurgery. 1998;  42 518-526
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Albayrak B, Samdani A F, Black P M. Intra-operative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery.  Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004;  146 543-557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Black P McL, Moriarty T, Alexander E R. et al . Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  41 831-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wirtz C R, Knauth M, Staubert A, Bonsanto M M, Sartor K, Kunze S, Tronnier V M. Clinical evaluation and follow-up results for intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  46 1112-1120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schulder M, Carmel P W. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: impact on brain tumor surgery.  Cancer Control. 2003;  10 115-124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Trantakis C, Winkler D, Lindner D, Strauss G, Nagel C, Schneider J P, Meixensberger J. Clinical results in MR-guided therapy for malignant gliomas.  Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;  85 65-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Glioma surgery evaluated by intraoperative low field magnetic resonance imaging.  Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;  85 55-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Johannesen T B, Watne K, Lote K, Norum J, Henning R, Tvera K, Hirschberg H. Intracavity fractionated balloon brachytherapy in glioblastoma.  Acta Neurochiurgica. 1999;  141 127-133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Johannesen T B, Norum J, Lote K, Olson J A, Scheie D, Tvera K, Hirschberg H. A cost minimising analysis of standard radiotherapy and two experimental therapies in glioblastoma.  Radiother Oncol. 2002;  62 227-231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Samset E, Hirschberg H. Neuro-navigation in intra-operative MRI.  Computer Aided Surgery. 1999;  4 200-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Samset E, Talsma A, Kintel M, Elle O J, Hirschberg H, Fosse E. A virtual environment for surgical image guidance in intraoperative MRI.  Comput Aided Surg. 2002;  7 187-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dietrich J, Schneider J P, Schulz T. et al . Intraoperative appearance of the resection area in brain-tumor operations in an open 0.5 MRT.  Radiologe. 1998;  38 935-942
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Knauth M, Aras N, Wirtz C R. et al . Surgically induced intracranial contrast enhancement. Potential source of error in intraoperative MRI.  AJNR Am J NeuroradioI. 1999;  20 1547-1553
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hirschberg H. Interactive image directed neurosurgery; use of the Laitinen stereoadaptor for patient registration.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 1996;  39 08-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gumprecht H, Lumenta C B. Intraoperative imaging using a mobile computed tomography scanner.  Minim Invas Neurosurg. 2003;  46 317-322
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Swanson K R, Alvord Jr E C, Murray J D. Virtual brain tumours (gliomas) enhance the reality of medical imaging and highlight inadequacies of current therapy.  Br J Cancer. 2002;  86 14-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Swanson K R, Bridge C, Murray J D, Alvord Jr E C. Virtual and real brain tumors: using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion.  J Neurol Sci. 2003;  216 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Hall W A, Martin A J, Liu H, Nussbaum E S, Maxwell R E, Truwit C L. Brain biopsy using high-field strength interventional magnetic resonance imaging.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 807-813
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sutherland G R, Kaibara T, Louw D, Hoult D I, Tomanek B, Saunders J. A mobile high-field magnetic resonance imaging system for neurosurgery.  Neurosurg Focus. 1999;  6 Article 6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Schulder M, Semas T J, Carmel P W. Cranial surgery and navigation with a compact intraoperative MRI system.  Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2003;  85 79-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Knauth M, Egelhof T, Roth S U, Wirtz C R, Sartor K. Monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles: possible solution to the problem of surgically induced intracranial contrast enhancement in intraoperative MR imaging.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;  22 99-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Varallyay P, Nesbit G, Muldoon L L, Nixon R R, Delashaw J, Cohen N, Petrillo A, Rink D, Neuwelt E A. Comparison of two superparamagnetic viral-sized iron oxide particles ferumoxides and ferumoxtran 10 with a gadolinium chelate in imaging intracranial tumors.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;  23 510-519
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Hirschberg H, Unsgaard G. Incorporation of ultrasonic imaging in an optically coupled frameless stereotatic system.  Acta Neurochirurgica (Suppl). 1997;  68 75-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Gronningsaeter A, Kleven A, Ommedal S, Aarseth T E, Lie T, Lindseth F, Lango T, Unsgard G. SonoWand, an ultrasound-based neuronavigation system.  Neurosurgery. 2000;  47 1373-1379
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Stummer W, Novotny A, Stepp H, Goetz C, Bise K, Reulen H J. Fluorescence-guided resection of glioblastoma multiforme by using 5-arninolevulinic acid-induced porphyrins: a prospective study in 52 consecutive patients.  J Neurosurg. 2000;  93 003-1013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Henry Hirschberg, M. D., Ph. D. 

Department of Neurosurgery · Rikshospitalet

0027 Oslo

Norway ·

Phone: +47-230-74323

Email: hirschberg@laser.bli.uci.edu

      >