Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004; 8(2): 175-183
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-829489
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Three-Dimensional Volume Rendering of the Tendons of the Ankle and Foot

Robert H. Choplin1 , Joshua M. Farber1 , Kenneth A. Buckwalter1 , Shannon Swan1
  • 1Department of Radiology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 June 2004 (online)

Three-dimensional (3D) rendering is the process of creating two-dimensional (2D) images that convey the 3D relationships of an object or objects. In the past 10 years, the use of volume-rendering (VR) images has become a commonly used method of 3D display. The improved data sets that result from spiral and multidetector computed tomography, improved software, and more powerful workstations significantly improve radiologists' ability to create these images. The process by which these images are obtained is described. It is possible to simultaneously demonstrate the tendons and bones of the ankle and hindfoot using VR because of significant attenuation differences among the soft tissue, tendons, and bone: fat ∼-100, muscle ∼30, tendon ∼90, and bone ∼250 to 500 Hounsfield units. These 3D images can be helpful in the care of patients with ankle/foot deformities resulting from trauma, idiopathic disorders, and arthritis. These images present a global image that provides improved understanding of the relationships of the bones and adjacent tendons.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Calhoun P S, Kuszyk B S, Heath D G, Carley J C, Fishman E K. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method.  Radiographics. 1999;  19 745-764
  • 2 Pretorius E S, Fishman E K. Volume-rendered three-dimensional spiral CT: musculoskeletal applications.  RadioGraphics. 1999;  19 1143-1160
  • 3 Johnson P T, Heath D G, Bliss D F, Cabral B, Fishman E K. Three-dimensional CT: real-time interactive volume rendering.  Am J Roentgenol. 1996;  167 581-583
  • 4 Rosenberg Z S, Feldman F, Singson R D, Price G J. Peroneal tendon injury associated with calcaneal fractures: CT findings.  Am J Roentgenol. 1987;  149 125-129
  • 5 Rosenberg Z S, Feldman F, Singson R D. Peroneal tendon injuries: CT analysis.  Radiology. 1986;  161 743-748
  • 6 Boles M A, Lomasney L M, Demos T C, Sage R A. Enlarged peroneal process with peroneus longus tendon entrapment.  Skeletal Radiol. 1997;  26 313-315
  • 7 Chen Y J, Hsu R W, Huang T J. Hypertrophic peroneal tubercle with stenosing tenosynovitis: the results of surgical treatment.  Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1998;  21 442-446
  • 8 Vannier M W, Marsh J L, Warren J O. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation.  Radiology. 1984;  150 179-184
  • 9 Allon S M, Mears D C. Three-dimensional analysis of calcaneal fractures.  Foot Ankle. 1991;  11 254-263
  • 10 Pelc J S, Beaulieu C F. Volume rendering of tendon-bone relationships using unenhanced CT.  Am J Roentgenol. 2001;  176 973-977

Robert H ChoplinM.D. 

Department of Radiology, 0279, Indiana University

550 North University Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46202-5253

    >