Download PDF
Semin Plast Surg 2004; 18(2): 79-87
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-829042
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

Grant W. Carlson1
  • 1Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 June 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Several trends have influenced autologous breast reconstruction in the last decade. The development of the skin-sparing mastectomy has markedly improved the aesthetic results of autologous breast reconstruction. Modifications have included purse-stringing periareolar incisions and vertical reduction pattern incisions. The increasing use of postmastectomy has had a negative impact on transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction. Delayed reconstruction may be the best option when adjuvant radiation is planned. Careful anatomic studies of the blood supply to the abdominal wall and critical outcome analyses have resulted in many refinements in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Careful patient selection is critical to avoid complications. Obesity, tobacco smoking, a history of chest wall radiation, and abdominal scars are known risk factors for wound complications. TRAM flap reconstruction should be considered a two-stage procedure regardless of nipple reconstruction. The first stage is building the foundation and framework of the breast. The second stage is essential for final adjustments to the volume, contour, and position of the breast mound.

KEYWORDS

Skin sparing mastectomy - radiation - TRAM flap

REFERENCES

  • 1 Cronin T, Gerow F. A new “natural feel” prothesis. In: Transactions of the Third International Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Amsterdam; Excerpta Medica 1963
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Spear S L, Mardini S, Ganz J C. Resource cost comparison of implant-based breast reconstruction versus TRAM flap breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  112 101-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Clough K B, O'Donoghue J M, Fitoussi A D, Nos C, Falcou M C. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 1702-1709
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Clough K B, O'Donoghue J M, Fitoussi A D, Nos C, Falcou M C. Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107 1710-1716
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kroll S S, Ames F, Singletary S E, Schusterman M A. The oncologic risks of skin preservation at mastectomy when combined with immediate reconstruction of the breast.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;  172 17-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Toth B, Lappert P. Modified skin incisions for mastectomy: the need for plastic surgical input in preoperative planning.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  87 1048-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Carlson G W, Grossl N, Lewis M M, Temple J R, Styblo T M. Preservation of the inframammary fold: what are we leaving behind?.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;  98 447-450
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Carlson G W, Styblo T M, Lyles R H et al.. Local recurrence after skin-sparing mastectomy: tumor biology or surgical conservatism?.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;  10 108-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kroll S S, Khoo A, Singletary S E et al.. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 421-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Simmons R M, Fish S K, Gayle L et al.. Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomies.  Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;  6 676-681
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bleicher R J, Hansen N M, Giuliano A E. Skin-sparing mastectomy.  Cancer. 2003;  98 2316-2321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Overgaard M, Hansen P S, Overgaard J et al.. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  337 949-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ragaz J, Jackson S M, Le N et al.. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer.  N Engl J Med. 1997;  337 956-962
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer .In: NIH Consensus Statement. Bethesda, MD; National Institutes of Health 2000
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Schuster R H, Kuske R R, Young V L, Fineberg B. Breast reconstruction in women treated with radiation therapy for breast cancer: cosmesis, complications, and tumor control.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  90 445-452 , discussion 453-454
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Spear S L, Majidian A. Immediate breast reconstruction in two stages using textured, integrated-valve tissue expanders and breast implants: a retrospective review of 171 consecutive breast reconstructions from 1989 to 1996.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 53-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dowden R V. Selection criteria for successful immediate breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  88 628-634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tran N V, Evans G R, Kroll S S et al.. Postoperative adjuvant irradiation: effects on tranverse rectus abdominis muscle flap breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  106 313-317 , discussion 318-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rogers N E, Allen R J. Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  109 1919-1924
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Tran N V, Chang D W, Gupta A, Kroll S S, Robb G L. Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  108 78-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hartrampf C R, Scheflan M, Black P W. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;  69 216-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hartrampf Jr C R, Bennett G K. Autogenous tissue reconstruction in the mastectomy patient. A critical review of 300 patients.  Ann Surg. 1987;  205 508-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lejour M, Dome M. Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  87 1054-1068
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kroll S S, Schusterman M A, Reece G P, Miller M J, Robb G, Evans G. Abdominal wall strength, bulging, and hernia after TRAM flap breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  96 616-619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Suominen S, Asko-Seljavaara S, Kinnunen J, Sainio P, Alaranta H. Abdominal wall competence after free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap harvest: a prospective study.  Ann Plast Surg. 1997;  39 229-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kind G M, Rademaker A W, Mustoe T A. Abdominal-wall recovery following TRAM flap: a functional outcome study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  99 417-428
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Edsander-Nord A, Jurell G, Wickman M. Donor-site morbidity after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a prospective and objective study.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102 1508-1516
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Schusterman M A, Kroll S S, Miller M J et al.. The free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: one center's experience with 211 consecutive cases.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32 234-241 , discussion 241-242
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Grotting J C, Urist M M, Maddox W A, Vasconez L O. Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  83 828-841 , discussion 842-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Arnez Z M, Bajec J, Bardsley A F, Scamp T, Webster M H. Experience with 50 free TRAM flap breast reconstructions.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  87 470-478 , discussion 479-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Allen R J, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  32 32-38
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Futter C M, Webster M H, Hagen S, Mitchell S L. A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 2000;  53 578-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Blondeel N, Vanderstraeten G G, Monstrey S J et al.. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.  Br J Plast Surg. 1997;  50 322-330
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Kroll S S. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  106 576-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Watterson P A, Bostwick III J, Hester Jr T R, Bried J T, Taylor G I. TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10-year clinical experience with 556 patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  95 1185-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Restifo R J, Thomson J G. The preconditioned TRAM flap: preliminary clinical experience.  Ann Plast Surg. 1998;  41 343-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ozgentas H E, Shenaq S, Spira M. Study of the delay phenomenon in the rat TRAM flap model.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  94 1018-1024 , discussion 1025-1026
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Moon H K, Taylor G I. The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  82 815-832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kroll S S, Netscher D T. Complications of TRAM flap breast reconstruction in obese patients.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;  84 886-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Chang D W, Youssef A, Cha S, Reece G P. Autologous breast reconstruction with the extended latissimus dorsi flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110 751-759 , discussion 760-761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Losken A, Carlson G W, Jones G E, Culbertson J H, Schoemann M, Bostwick III J. Importance of right subcostal incisions in patients undergoing TRAM flap breast reconstruction.  Ann Plast Surg. 2002;  49 115-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Paige K T, Bostwick III J, Bried J T, Jones G. A comparison of morbidity from bilateral, unipedicled and unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  101 1819-1827
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 McCraw J B, Horton C E, Grossman J A, Kaplan I, McMellin A. An early appraisal of the methods of tissue expansion and the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap in reconstruction of the breast following mastectomy.  Ann Plast Surg. 1987;  18 93-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Carlson G W, Losken A, Moore B et al.. Results of immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy.  Ann Plast Surg. 2001;  46 222-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Harris 2nd N R, Webb M S, May Jr J W. Intraoperative physiologic blood flow studies in the TRAM flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  90 553-558 , discussion 559-561
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Clugston P A, Lennox P A, Thompson R P. Intraoperative vascular monitoring of ipsilateral vs. contralateral TRAM flaps.  Ann Plast Surg. 1998;  41 623-628
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Clugston P A, Gingrass M K, Azurin D, Fisher J, Maxwell G P. Ipsilateral pedicled TRAM flaps: the safer alternative?.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;  105 77-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Rogers N E, Allen R J. Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  109 1919-1924 , discussion 1925-1926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Grant W CarlsonM.D. F.A.C.S. 

Wadley R. Glenn Professor of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine

1365B Clifton Road, NE

Atlanta, GA 30322

      >