A Physiological Comparison of Synchronous and Asynchronous Hand Cycling

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare submaximal physiological responses (oxygen uptake, ventilation, heart rate) and gross mechanical efficiency between synchronous and asynchronous hand cycling at different cadences. Thirteen non-disabled men (22.4 ± 1.6 yr) performed two submaximal exercise tests on a treadmill, using synchronous and asynchronous crank settings in counter balanced order. Tests were performed using a commercially available hand cycle unit that was attached to a hand rim wheelchair. Each test consisted of five 5-min exercise bouts at 36, 47, 55, 65, and 84 rpm. ANOVA for repeated measures showed a significant effect of crank mode (p < 0.001) and cadence (p < 0.001), as well as an interaction effect between both (p < 0.01). Physiological responses were lower, and efficiency higher, in synchronous versus asynchronous hand cycling at all cadences. Post-hoc analysis of the (overall) effect of cadence showed significantly higher physiological responses and lower efficiency at the higher (84 vs. 65 rpm and 65 vs. 55 rpm) and lower (36 vs. 47 rpm) cadences. The interaction effect indicates that the effect of crank mode was dependent on cadence, showing a larger difference between synchronous and asynchronous hand cycling at 84 vs. 65 rpm and at 36 vs. 47 rpm. It is concluded that, in contrast to previous results in arm crank ergometry, synchronous hand cycling is less strenuous and more efficient than asynchronous hand cycling.

Key words

Arm crank exercise - cadence - crank mode - gross mechanical efficiency

References

• 1 Glaser R M, Sawka M N, Brune M F, Wilde S W. Physiological responses to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry.  J Appl Physiol. 1980;  48 1060-1064
• 2 Hardison G T, Israel R G, Somes G W. Physiological responses to different cranking rates during submaximal arm ergometry in paraplegic males.  Adapt Phys Act Quart. 1987;  4 94-105
• 3 Hopman M T, van Teeffelen W M, Brouwer J, Houtman S, Binkhorst R A. Physiological responses to asynchronous and synchronous arm cranking exercise.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1995;  72 111-114
• 4 Janssen T W, Dallmeijer A J, Woude van der L HV. Physical capacity and race performance of handcycle users.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;  38 33-40
• 5 Marincek C R, Valencic V. Arm cycloergometry and kinetics of oxygen consumption in paraplegics.  Paraplegia. 1977;  15 178-185
• 6 Martel G, Noreau L, Jobin J. Physiological responses to maximal exercise on arm cranking and wheelchair ergometer with paraplegics.  Paraplegia. 1991;  29 447-456
• 7 Mossberg K, Willman C, Topor M A, Crook H, Patak S. Comparison of asynchronous versus synchronous arm crank ergometry.  Spinal Cord. 1999;  37 569-574
• 8 Mukherjee G, Samanta A. Physiological response to the ambulatory performance of hand-rim and arm-crank propulsion systems.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;  38 391-399
• 9 Oertel J, Brundig B, Henze W, Engel P. Spiroergometric field-study of wheelchair propulsion with different hand-drive systems. Woude LHV van der, Hopman MTE, Kemenade CH Biomedical Aspects of Manual Wheelchair Propulsion. The State of the Art II. Amsterdam; IOS Press 1999: 296-299
• 10 Peronnet F, Massicotte D. Table of non-protein respiratory quotient: an update.  Can J Sport Sci. 1991;  16 23-29
• 11 Powers S K, Beadle R E, Mangum M. Exercise efficiency during arm ergometry: effects of speed and work rate.  J Appl Physiol. 1984;  56 495-499
• 12 Romkes J, Groen B E, Koning de J J. Mechanical efficiency in arm cranking exercise. Woude LHV van der, Hopman MTE, Kemenade CH Biomedical Aspects of Manual Wheelchair Propulsion. The State of the Art II. Amsterdam; IOS Press 1999: 172-174
• 13 Sawka M N, Foley M E, Pimental N A, Toner M M, Pandolf K B. Determination of maximal aerobic power during upper-body exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1983;  54 113-117
• 14 Sawka M N, Glaser R M, Wilde S W, Luhrte von T C. Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise.  J Appl Physiol. 1980;  49 784-788
• 15 Seabury J J, Adams W C, Ramey M R. Influence of pedaling rate and power output on energy expenditure during bicycle ergometry.  Ergonomics. 1977;  4 226-247
• 16 Tropp H, Samuelsson K, Jorfeldt L. Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry.  Br J Sports Med. 1997;  31 41-44
• 17 Weissland T, Pelayo P, Vanvelcenaher J, Marais G, Lavoie J M, Robin H. Physiological effects of variations in spontaneously chosen crank rate during incremental upper-body exercise.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1997;  76 428-433
• 18 Wicks J R, Oldridge N B, Cameron B J, Jones N L. Arm cranking and wheelchair ergometry in elite spinal-cord-injured athletes.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;  15 224-231
• 19 Widrick J J, Freedson P S, Hamill J. Effect of internal work on the calculation of optimal pedaling rates.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;  24 376-382
• 20 Woude van der L HV, Bosmans I, Bervoets B, Veeger H E. Handcycling: different modes and gear ratios.  J Med Eng Technol. 2000;  24 242-249
• 21 Woude van der L HV, Dallmeijer A J, Janssen T WJ, Veeger H EJ. Alternative modes of manual wheelchair ambulation. An overview.  Am J Phys Rehabil Med. 2001;  80 765-777
• 22 Woude van der L HV, Groot Gd, Hollander A P, Ingen Schenau G JV, Rozendal R H. Wheelchair ergonomics and physiology testing of prototypes.  Ergonomics. 1986;  29 1561-1573