Klin Padiatr 2004; 216(4): 230-235
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-44899
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

A Comparison of Efficacy Between Two Natural Exogenous Surfactant Preparations in Premature Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Vergleich der Wirkung zweier natürlicher Surfactantpräparate in der Therapie des Atemnotsyndroms FrühgeborenerM. Yalaz1 , S. Arslanoglu1 , M. Akisu1 , T. Atik1 , O. Ergun2 , N. Kultursay1
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Ege University Medical School, Izmir 35100, Turkey
  • 2Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ege University Medical School, Izmir 35100, Turkey
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 July 2004 (online)

Abstract

The mortality and various morbidity rates have been substantially reduced by means of exogenous surfactant replacement, the cornerstone in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in premature infants.
The objective of this study is to compare two natural surfactant preparations (Alveofact®, Survanta®) in terms of effectiveness and side-effects.
A total of 50 infants with RDS were given surfactant due to RDS were taken into the scope of this study. Survanta® and Alveofact® were administered to randomized infants with RDS and the results obtained during clinical observations were compared.
Second hour mean FiO2, MAP and a/APO2 values showed changes in favour of Alveofact® (n = 25) group compared to the Survanta® (n = 25) group (p < 0.05 for each parameter). However, this difference disappeared in the 6th hour. No statistical difference was established between the two groups with regard to sideeffects (pneumothorax, sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, bronchopulmonary dysplasia), duration of mechanical ventilation in survivors, duration of hospitalization in survivors and mortality before the 28th day.
It was concluded that results obtained with different surfactant preparations having dissimilar compositions were not different in terms of final impacts and side-effects.

Zusammenfassung

Die Mortalität und Morbidität Frühgeborener konnte durch den Einsatz von exogenem Surfactant in der Therapie des Atemnotsyndroms Frühgeborener (RDS) bedeutsam gesenkt werden.
Das Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, zwei natürliche Surfactantpräparationen (Alveofact® und Survanta®) hinsichtlich der Wirkung und möglicher Nebenwirkungen zu vergleichen.
Insgesamt 50 Frühgeborene mit RDS wurden mit Surfactant behandelt. Alveofact® oder Survanta® wurden nach Randomisierung Frühgeborenen mit RDS intratracheal gegeben und die klinischen Behandlungsresultate verglichen.
Die 2-Stunden-Werte nach Applikation für FiO2, mittleren Atemwegsdruck (MAP) und die alveoloarterielle Ratio des Sauerstoffpartialdrucks zeigten einen verbesserten Effekt von Alveofact® (n = 25) im Vergleich zur Survanta®-behandelten Gruppe (n = 25) an (p < 0,05 für jede Variable).
Dieser Unterschied war jedoch jenseits der 6. Stunde nicht mehr nachweisbar.
Keine statistische signifikanten Unterschiede wurden zwischen beiden Gruppen hinsichtlich der Nebenwirkungen bzw. begleitender Morbidität gefunden (Pneumothorax, Sepsis, intraventrikulärer Hämorrhagie, bronchopulmonale Dysplasie), Zeitdauer der mechanischen Beatmung, Zeitdauer des Hospitalisierung und Mortalität bis zum 28. Lebenstag.
Es wird geschlussfolgert, dass die Behandlungsresultate mit verschiedenen natürlichen Surfactantpräparationen hinsichtlich der mittelfristigen Zielvariablen sowie der Nebenwirkungen nicht different waren.

References

  • 1 American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on fetus and newborn . Surfactant replacement therapy for respiratory distress syndrome.  Pediatrics. 1999;  103 684-685
  • 2 Baroutis G, Kaleyias J, Liarou T, Papathoma E, Hatzistamatiou Z, Costalos C. Comparison of three treatmant regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.  Eur J Pediatr. 2003;  162 476-480
  • 3 Bernhard W, Mottaghian J, Gebert A, Rau G A, von der Hardt H, Poets C F. Commercial versus native surfactants. Surface activity, molecular components, and the effect of calcium.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;  162 1524-1533
  • 4 Bloom B T, Kattwinkel J, Hall R T. et al . Comparison of Infasurf® (Calf lung surfactant extract) to Survanta® (Beractant®) in the treatment and prevention of respiratory distress syndrome.  Pediatrics. 1997;  100 31-38
  • 5 Clark R H, Auten R L, Peabody J. A comparison of the outcomes of neonates treated with two different natural surfactants.  J Pediatr. 2001;  139 828-831
  • 6 Gortner L. Treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants with pulmonary surfactant.  Klin Padiatr. 1989;  201 417-424
  • 7 Gortner L. Natural surfactant for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in very premature infants: a 1992 update.  J Perinat Med. 1992;  20 409-419
  • 8 Griese M, Dietrich P, Reinhardt D. Pharmacokinetics of bovine surfactant in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.  Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;  152 1050-1054
  • 9 Hansen T, Corbet A. Disorders of the Transition. In: Taeusch HW, Ballard RA (eds). Avery's Disease of the Newborn (7th ed). WB Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 1998
  • 10 Herting E, Rauprich P, Stichtenoth G, Walter G, Johansson J, Robertson B. Resistance of different surfactant preparations to inactivation by meconium.  Pediatr Res. 2001;  50 44-49
  • 11 Martin R J, Fanaroff A A. The respiratory distress syndrome, its managements. In: Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA (eds). Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Disease of the fetus and infant. Mosby, St. Louis 1997; 810-820
  • 12 Mizuno K, Ikegami M, Chen C M, Ueda T, Jobe A H. Surfactant protein-B supplementation improves in vivo function of a modified natural surfactant.  Pediatr Res. 1995;  37 271-276
  • 13 Palta M, Weinstein M R, McGuinness G, Gabbert D, Brady W, Peters M E. A population study. Mortality and morbidity after avaibility of surfactant therapy. Newborn Lung Project.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;  148 1295-1301
  • 14 Papile L A, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants birth weight less than 1 500 g.  J Pediatr. 1978;  92 529-534
  • 15 Sandberg K L, Lindstrom D P, Sjöqvist B A, Parker R A, Cotton R B. Surfactant replacement therapy improves ventilation in homogeneity in infants with respiratory distress syndrome.  Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997;  24 337-343
  • 16 Soll R F. Natural surfactant extract versus synthetic surfactant for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; http://www.nichd.nih.gov/cochraneneonatal/
  • 17 Speer C P, Gefeller O, Groneck P. et al . Randomised clinical trial of two treatment regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995;  72 F8-F13
  • 18 Stevens P A, Schadow B. Molecular Diagnosis of Surfactant Disorders. In: Wauer RR (ed). Surfactant therapy: basic principles, diagnosis, therapy. Thieme, Stuttgart 1998; 21-33
  • 19 Wauer R R. Respiratory distress syndrome. In: Wauer RR (ed). Surfactant therapy: basic principles, diagnosis, therapy. Thieme, Stuttgart 1998; 2-20

MD Nilgun Kultursay

Ege University Medical School

Department of Pediatrics

Bornova

35100 Izmir

Turkey

Phone: +90/2 32/3 42-69 90

Fax: +90/2 32/3 42-69 90

Email: nkultur@med.ege.edu.tr

    >