Int J Sports Med 2004; 25(3): 217-223
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-45253
Orthopedics & Biomechanics

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Effect of Gender on the Adaptation of Arm Coordination in Front Crawl

L. Seifert1 , L. Boulesteix1 , D. Chollet1
  • 1C.E.T.A.P.S. Laboratory UPRES JE 2318: University of Rouen, Faculty of Sports Sciences, France
Further Information

Publication History

Accepted after revision: June 10, 2003

Publication Date:
15 April 2004 (online)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the arm coordination of 14 elite men swimmers and 10 elite women swimmers at eight different velocities, from the usual 3000 m velocity to their maximal velocity (Vmax). Each stroke phase was identified by video analysis and the Index of Coordination (IdC) was established. Three modes of coordination have been identified: catch-up (IdC < 0); opposition (IdC = 0); and superposition (IdC > 0). This study shows that at a greater individually imposed swim pace (ISP) elite men spontaneously adapt by opposing their arms during sprint time (IdC = +2.57 ± 6 % at Vmax), whereas elite women (IdC = -3.88 ± 6.1 % at Vmax) adapt more slowly, remaining in catch-up coordination. Elite men favoured the increase of propulsive actions by increasing the propulsive phases (pull and push phases) and decreasing the entry + catch phase, even if the recovery phase increased. Elite women generated less propulsive actions during sprint, i. e. shorter push and pull phases and a longer entry + catch phase. The biomechanical constraints (effective velocity: EV) could explain that men switched coordination at high velocity (sprint), whilst the differences between men and women at a similar EV related more to their motor organisation than to biomechanical constraints. Anthropometric data could partially explain this difference between genders. Height (171.6 ± 5.8 cm vs. 185.5 ± 4.2 cm) and arm span (177.12 ± 6.24 cm vs. 192.75 ± 1.83 cm) were smaller in women than in men. The women catch-up coordination was not a “worse coordination” when compared with that of men, but it reflected a different motor organisation resulting from different anthropometric properties and swimming technique. Therefore, catch-up coordination could be an individual response to different constraints.

References

  • 1 Arellano R, Brown P, Cappaert J, Nelson RC. Analysis of 50-, 100- and 200-m freestyle swimmers at the 1992 Olympic Games.  J Appl Biomech. 1994;  10 189-199
  • 2 Boelk A G, Norton J P, Freeman J K, Walker A J. Relationship of swimming power to sprint freestyle performance in females.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;  29 1255
  • 3 Chatard J C, Collomp C, Maglischo E, Maglischo C. Swimming skill and stroking characteristics of front crawl swimmers.  Int J Sports Med. 1990;  11 156-161
  • 4 Chatard J C, Lavoie J M, Lacour J R. Energy cost of front-crawl swimming in women.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1991;  63 12-16
  • 5 Chengalur S N, Brown PL. An analysis of male and female Olympic swimmers in the 200-meter events.  Can J Sports Sc. 1992;  17 104-109
  • 6 Chollet D. Crawl evaluation with index of coordination. In: Chatard JC (Eds) Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX.  France: Saint Etienne 2002: 115-120
  • 7 Chollet D, Chalies S, Chatard JC. A new index of coordination for the crawl: description and usefulness.  Int J Sports Med. 2000;  21 54-59
  • 8 Costill D L, Maglischo E W, Richardson A B (eds). Swimming. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications 1992
  • 9 Grimston S K, Hay J G. Relationships among anthropometric and stroking characteristics of college swimmers.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986;  18 60-68
  • 10 Kennedy P, Brown P, Chengalur S N, Nelson R C. Analysis of male and female Olympic swimmers in the 100-m events.  Int J Sport Biomech. 1990;  6 187-197
  • 11 Keskinen K L, Komi P V. Stroking characteristics of front crawl swimming during exercise.  J Appl Biomech. 1993;  9 219-226
  • 12 Kolmogorov S V, Duplischeva O A. Active drag, useful mechanical power output and hydrodynamic force coefficient in different swimming strokes at maximal velocity.  J Biomech. 1992;  25 311-318
  • 13 Kolmogorov S V, Rumyantseva O A, Gordon B J, Cappaert J M. Hydrodynamic characteristics of competitive swimmers of different genders and performance levels.  J Appl Biomech. 1997;  13 88-97
  • 14 Lerda R, Cardelli C, Chollet D. Analysis of the interactions between breathing and arm actions in the front crawl.  J Hum Mov Stud. 2001;  40 129-144
  • 15 Letzelter H, Freitag W. Stroke length and stroke frequency variations in men’s and women’s 100-m freestyle swimming. In: Hollander AP, Huijing PA, de Groot G (Eds) Swimming Science IV. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers 1983: 315-322
  • 16 Maglischo C W, Maglischo E W, Higgins J, Hinrichs R, Luedtke D, Schleihauf R E, Thayer A. A biomechanical analysis of the 1984 US Olympic freestyle distance swimmers. In: Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K (Eds) Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois, Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 351-359
  • 17 Millet G P, Chollet D, Chalies S, Chatard J C. Coordination in front crawl in elite triathletes and elite swimmers.  Int J Sports Med. 2002;  23 99-104
  • 18 Pai Y C, Hay J G, Wilson B D. Stroking techniques of elite swimmers.  J Sports Sci. 1984;  2 225-239
  • 19 Pelayo P, Sidney M, Kherif T, Chollet D, Tourny C. Stroking characteristics in freestyle swimming and relationships with anthropometric characteristics.  J Appl Biomech. 1996;  12 197-206
  • 20 Rouard A H, Billat R P. Influences of sex and level of performance on freestyle stroke: an electromyography and kinematic study.  Int J Sports Med. 1990;  11 150-155
  • 21 Rouard A H, Schleihauf R E, Troup J P. Hand forces and phases in freestyle stroke. In: Troup JP, Hollander AP, Strasse D, Trappe SW, Cappaert JM, Trappe TA (Eds) Swimming Science VII. London: E & FN Spon 1996: 35-44
  • 22 Schleihauf R E, Higgins J R, Hinricks R, Luedtke D, Maglischo C, Maglischo E W, Thayer A. Propulsive techniques: front crawl stroke, butterfly, backstroke and breaststroke. In: Ungerechts BE, Wilke K, Reischle K (Eds) Swimming Science V. Champaign, Illinois, Human Kinetics Publishers 1988: 53-59
  • 23 Seifert L, Boulesteix L, Chollet D. Arm coordination of women and men elite swimmers in front crawl. In: Chatard JC (Eds) Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming IX.  France: Saint Etienne 2002: 173-178
  • 24 Sidney M, Paillette S, Hespel J M, Chollet D, Pelayo P. Effect of swim paddles on the intra-cyclic velocity variations and on the arm coordination of front crawl stroke. In: Blackwell JR, Sanders RH (Eds) XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco: ISBS 2001: 39-42
  • 25 Sharp R L, Troup J P, Costill D L. Relationship between power and sprint freestyle swimming.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;  14 53-56
  • 26 Simmons S EC, Tanner D A, Stager J M. Different determinants of sprint swim performance in male and female competitive swimmers.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 (Suppl 5, Abstract) 1692-1692
  • 27 Toussaint H M, Beek P J. Biomechanics of competitive front crawl swimming.  Sports Med. 1992;  13 8-24
  • 28 Toussaint H M, van der Helm F CT, Elzerman J R, Hollander A P, de Groot G, van Ingen Schenau  GJ. A power balance applied to swimming. In: Hollander AP, Huijing PA, de Groot G (Eds) Swimming Science IV. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Publishers 1983: 165-172
  • 29 Yeater R A, Martin R B, White M K, Gilson K H. Tethered swimming forces in the crawl, breast and back strokes and their relationship to competitive performance.  J Biomech. 1981;  14 527-537

M. L. Seifert

Université de Rouen · Faculté des Sciences du Sport · Laboratoire CETAPS

Boulevard Siegfried · 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan Cedex · France

Phone: +33 232 10 77 93

Fax: +33 232 10 77 93

Email: l.seifert@libertysurf.fr

    >