Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2003; 24(6): 465-470
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41175
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Analysis of 3D Kinematics Concerning Three Different Clubs in Golf Swing

C.  I.  Egret1 , O.  Vincent1 , J.  Weber2 , F.  H.  Dujardin2 , D.  Chollet1
  • 1C.E.T.A.P.S. Laboratory, UPRES JE 2318, University of Sports Sciences, Boulevard Siegfried, Mont-Saint Aignan, France
  • 2G.R.H.A.L. Laboratory, Rouen University Hospital - Charles Nicolle, France
Further Information

Publication History

January 23, 2003

Publication Date:
07 August 2003 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Although many professionals have produced books or videotapes which offer a novel approach to the game, a review of the scientific literature reports limited research evaluating the actual biomechanics of the golf swing in comparison with other sports. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of kinematic pattern in golf swing using three different clubs: driver, five-iron, pitching-wedge. These three golf clubs have been chosen for their available range of ball flight. The measures of kinematic data during swing were established with the optoelectronic system VICONTM (Oxford’s MetricsTM , Oxford, UK) with five cameras operating at 50 frames per second. Clubhead speed was measured using a swing made detector (Bell-Tronics, Ltd, Covington, USA). Seven right-handed male golfers with a high level of skill participated in the study. The results showed that there was an identical timing (movement time and proportion for each phase of the swing) between the three clubs tested, but the kinematics and the clubhead speed were different depending on the three different clubs used.

Key words

Golf swing - kinematic - driver - five-iron - pitching-wedge

References

  • 1 Adlington G S. Proper swing technique and biomechanics of golf.  Clin Sports Med. 1996;  15 9-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bechler J R, Jobe F W, Pink M, Perry J, Ruwe P. Electromyographic analysis of the hip and knee during the golf swing.  Clin J Sports Med. 1995;  5 162-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Budney D R, Bellow D G. On the swing mechanics of a matched set of golf clubs.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 1982;  53 185-192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Burden A M, Grimshaw P N, Wallace E S. Hip and shoulder rotations during the golf swing of sub-10 handicap players.  J Sports Sci. 1998;  16 165-176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cochran A, Stobbs J (ed). The Search for the Perfect Swing. Philadelphia; JB Lippincott Co 1968
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Gatt C J, Pavol M J, Parker R D, Grabiner M D. Three-dimensional knee joint kinetics during a golf swing, influences of skill level and footwear.  Am J Sports Med. 1998;  26 285-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hetu F E, Christie C A, Faigenbaum A D. Effects of conditioning on physical fitness and club head speed in mature golfers.  Percept Mot Skills. 1998;  86 811-815
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jorgensen T. On the dynamics of the swing of a golf club.  Am J Phys. 1970;  38 644-651
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kaneko Y, Sato F. The optimization of golf swing and its application to the golfclub design. In: Proceedings of XIV International Symposium on International Society of Biomechanics Paris; 1993: 652-653
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Kao J T, Pink M, Jobe F W, Perry J. Electromyographic analysis of the scapular muscles during a golf swing.  Am J Sports Med. 1995;  23 19-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Leadbetter D. The golf Swing. London; Collins & Willow 1990
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Milburn P D. Summation of segmental velocities in the golf swing.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;  14 60-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Nagao N, Sawada Y. A kinematic analysis in golf swing concerning driver shot and n°9 iron shot.  J Sports Med. 1973;  13 4-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Neal R J, Abernethy B, Moran M J. The influence of club length and shot distance on the temporal characteristics of the swings of expert and novice golfers. In: Cochran AJ (ed) Science and Golf: Proceedings of the First World Scientific Congress of Golf. London; E&FN Spon 1990: 36-42
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Pink M, Perry J, Jobe F W. Electromyograhic analysis of the trunk in golfers.  Am J Sports Med. 1993;  21 385-388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Richards J, Farrell M, Kent J, Kraft R. Weight transfer patterns during the golf swing.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 1985;  4 361-365
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Toski B. The dentist and recreation golf.  Dent Econ. 1970;  60 34-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Watkins R G, Uppal G S, Perry J, Pink M, Dinsay J M. Dynamic electromyographic analysis of trunk musculature in professional golfers.  Am J Sports Med. 1996;  24 535-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Williams K R, Jones J, Snow B. Ground reaction forces during the golf swing in relation to hitting performance.  J Biomech. 1988;  21 869
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yu-Ching L, Der-Chia L, Tzyy-Yuang S. The effects of golf shaft and clubhead on the velocity of clubhead and club. In: Blackwell JR (ed) Proceedings of XIX International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. San Francisco; Exercise of Sport Science Department 2001: 367-370
    Google Scholar

C. Egret

University of Rouen · Faculty of Sports Sciences · CETAPS Laboratory

Boulevard Siegfried · 76821 Mont Saint Aignan · France ·

Phone: +33 232 10 77 93

Fax: +33 232 10 77 93

Email: Claire_egret@yahoo.fr

      >