Download PDF
Semin Hear 2002; 23(4): 277-286
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-35876
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Auditory Processing Disorders: Management Approaches Past to Present

Diane Wertz, James W. Hall III, Wes Davis II
  • Department of Communicative Disorders, College of Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 December 2002 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The ultimate goal of screening and diagnostic assessment for auditory processing disorder (APD) is to determine an effective management strategy. The effectiveness and precision of treatment for APD is directly related to the specificity and accuracy of the diagnosis. Historically, confusion and vagueness in the definition and diagnosis of APD was associated with scattered management approaches with unproven or, at best, questionable therapeutic value. Although embraced by some audiologists and speech-language pathologists, the outcome of these often broad-based and rather generic management methods was not supported by any evidence. In this article, we review the evolution of APD management from the two distinct professional perspectives of audiology and speech-language pathology. Linkages between current treatment options and earlier management techniques are emphasized. The goal of this brief review is to provide the reader with a better understanding of the precursors to diverse conventional and computer-mediated therapeutic techniques that are now available.

KEYWORDS

Auditory processing disorder - history - management

REFERENCES

  • 1 Myklebust H R. Auditory Disorders in Children: A Manual for Differential Diagnosis.  New York: Grune & Stratton 1954
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Jerger J, Jerger S. Clinical validity of central auditory tests.  Scand Audiol . 1975;  4 147-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Williford J A, Bilger J M. Auditory perception with learning disabilities. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 2nd ed Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins 1978: 410-425
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Newby H A. Audiology, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1979 . 
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Davis H, Silverman S R. Hearing and Deafness, 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1970 . 
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Keith R W. Central Auditory Dysfunction.  New York: Grune and Stratton 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Northern J, Downs M. Hearing in Children.  Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Rees N S. Auditory processing factors in language disorders: the view from Procruste's bed. J Speech Hear Disord .  1973;  38 304-315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bloom L, Lahey M. Language Development and Language Disorders.  New York: Wiley 1978
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Lindamood C, Lindamood P. The Lindamood Auditory Test of Conceptualization (LAC).  Boston, MA: Teaching Resources Corp. 1971
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Orton S T. Reading, Writing, and Speech Problems in Children.  New York: W.W. Norton 1937
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Sloan C. Treating Auditory Processing Difficulties in Children.  San Diego, CA: Singular 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 13 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Issues in Central Auditory Processing Disorders: A Report from the ASHA Ad Hoc Committee on Central Auditory Processing.  Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Kelly D A. Central Auditory Processing Disorder: Strategies for Use with Children and Adolescents.  San Antonio, TX: Communication Skill Builders 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 15 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Management Guidelines for Central Auditory Processing Disorders Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association 1997
  • 16 Crandell C, Smaldino J. The importance of room acoustics. In: Tyler RS, Schum DJ, eds. Assistive Devices for Persons with Hearing Impairment Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Bellas T. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting.  From Science to Practice. San Diego, CA: Singular 1996: 128
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Finitzo-Heiber T. Classroom acoustics. In: Roeser R, Downs, eds. Auditory Disorders in School Children, 2nd ed 1988: 221-233
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Crandell C. Page ten: utilizing sound field FM amplification in the educational setting.  Hear J . 1998;  51 10-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ferre J. CAP tips.  Ed Audiol Rev . 1999;  16 28-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Katz J, Wilde L. Auditory processing disorders. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 4th ed Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins 1994: 490-502
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Hall III W J. CAPD in Y2K: an introduction to audiologic assessment and management.  Hear J . 1996;  52 35-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hall III W J, Mueller III G H. Audiologists' Desk Reference, vol. I. San Diego, CA: Singular
  • 24 Chermak G, Musiek F. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives.  San Diego, CA: Singular 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Cognitive Concepts. www.Earobics.com 1998 . 
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Scientific Learning. www.Scientificlearning.com 1998 . 
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Jerger J, Musiek F E. Report of consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children.  J Am Acad Audiol . 2000;  11 467-474
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Katz J, Johnson C D, Brandner S. Clinical and research concerns regarding the 2000 APD consensus report and recommendations.  Audiology Today . 2002;  11 14-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Jerger J, Musiek F E. On the diagnosis of auditory processing disorder.  Audiology Today . 2002;  11 19-21
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Chermak G D, Musief F E. Managing central auditory processing disorders in children and youth.  Am J Audiol . 1992;  1 61-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >