Continuous Neural Monitoring in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Experience with 101 Patients

Abstract

The first report about lumbar spinal surgery under epidural anesthesia has been published in 1958. The aim of this study was assess to epidural anesthesia as a regional operative anesthesia in lower lumbar spine surgery and to use the opportunity of verbal interaction with the patient who is able to move her/his lower extremities voluntarily during surgery. We called this simultaneous clinical assessment process as continuous neural monitoring. Established pathologies in the patients were as follows; lumbar herniated intervertebral disc disease (n = 95), lumbar spondylolisthesis (n = 4), lumbar lamina fracture (n = 1) and lumbar dumbbell Ewing's sarcoma (n = 1). Preoperative findings, operative findings, operative complications, postoperative complications and short-term results were assessed by the surgeon-anesthesiologist team. The patients, 99 out of 101, were followed-up for more than 15 months (mean 21.2 months). Fair and failure results were assessed in 7.0 % of the patients. Even though epidural anesthesia is almost equal to general anesthesia in terms of anesthetic complications, surgical complications and surgical results in uncomplicated lumbar spinal surgery cases, it has the advantage of being able to simultaneously evaluate motor results of surgical maneuvers and/or manipulations on the neural structures. This advantage, which is not available at the same accuracy with other neurophysiologic monitoring modalities, would be valuable in complex lumbar spine surgery cases.

Key words

Intra-operative Monitoring - Epidural Anesthesia - Surgery - Spine - Lumbar

References

• 1 Escobar R JL, Castillo R. Continuous epidural anaesthesia for laminectomy.  Anesth Analg. 1958;  37 328-335
• 2 Matheson D. Epidural anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy and spinal fusion.  Can Anaes Soc J. 1960;  7 149-157
• 3 Scoville W B. Epidural anesthesia and lateral position for lumbar disc operations.  Surg Neurol. 1977;  7 163-164
• 4 Rifat K, Orselli A, Nikllewicz R, Mornireli G. Epidural anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery: Review of 1235 cases. Eighth World Congress of Anaesthesiologists. Manila, Philippines: (Abstract) 1984 Vol. II
• 5 Greenberg P E. Epidural anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery.  Journal of Spinal Disorders. 1988;  1 139-143
• 6 Meyer R J. Spinal fusion under epidural anaesthesia without sedation. (Letter).  Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 1993;  21 899-900
• 7 Reynolds A F, Dautenhahn D L, Fagraeus L, Pollay M. Safety and efficacy of epidural analgesia in spine surgery.  Annals of Surgery. 1986;  203 225-227
• 8 Holland N R, Kostuik J P. Continuous electromyographic monitoring to detect nerve root injury during thoracolumbar scoliosis surgery.  Spine. 1997;  22 2547-2550
• 9 Noordeen M H, Lee J, Gibbons C E, Taylor B A, Bentley G. Spinal cord monitoring in operations for neuromuscular scoliosis.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;  79 53-57
• 10 Padberg A M, Russo M H, Lenke L G, Bridwell K H, Komanetsky R M. Validity and reliability of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular spinal deformity surgery.  J Spinal Disord. 1996;  9 150-158
• 11 Castello P H, Place H M, Hemler D E, Shannon S R, Simonds G R, Simmons T J. Quantification of lumbar nerve root decompression using somatosensory-evoked potentials.  J Spinal Disord. 1995;  8 444-450
• 12 Phillips 2nd L H, Jane J A. Electrophysiologic monitoring during tethered spinal cord release.  Clin Neurosurg. 1996;  43 163-174
• 13 Chatrian G E, Berger M S, Wirch A L. Discrepancy between intraoperative SSEP's and postoperative function. Case report.  J Neurosurg. 1988;  69 450-454
• 14 Schubert A, Todd M M, Luerssen T G, Hicks G E. Loss of intraoperative evoked responses during dorsal column surgery associated with isolated postoperative sensory deficit.  J Clin Monit. 1987;  3 277-281
• 15 Whittle I R, Johnston I H, Besser M. Recording of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.  J Neurosurg. 1986;  64 601-612
• 16 Meyer P R Jr, Cotler H B, Gireesan G T. Operative neurological complications resulting from thoracic and lumbar spine internal fixation.  Clin Orthop. 1988;  237 125-131
• 17 Ginsburg H H, Shetter A G, Raudzens P A. Postoperative paraplegia with preserved intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Case report.  J Neurosurg. 1985;  63 296-300
• 18 McTaggart Cowan R A. Somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal surgery.  Can J Anaesth. 1998;  45 387-392
• 19 Macri S, De Monte A, Greggi T, Parisini P, Zanoni A, Merlini L. Intra-operative spinal cord monitoring in orthopaedics.  Spinal Cord. 2000;  38 133-139
• 20 Donchin Y, Katz A. Emotional reactions during lumbar extradural anaesthesia.  Anaesthesia. 1980;  35 822-824
• 21 Loo C C, Thomas E, Tan H M, Yeo S W, Sio T H. Sedation for the conduct of lumbar epidural anaesthesia: a study using subanaesthetic dose of ketamine in combination with midazolam.  Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1997;  26 200-204
• 22 Ong B Y, Pickering B G, Palahniuk R J, Cumming M. Lorazepam and diazepam as adjuncts to epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.  Can Anaesth Soc J. 1982;  29 31-34
• 23 Ryhanen P, Helkala E L, Ihalainen O, Hollmen A, Rantakyla S, Merila M, Tuohino V, Horttonen L. Effects of anaesthesia on the psychological function of patients.  Ann Clin Res. 1978;  10 318-322
• 24 Feldman H S, Covino B G. Comparative motor-blocking effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amino amide local anesthetic, in the rat and dog.  Anesth Analg. 1988;  67 1047-1052
• 25 Feldman H S, Dvoskin S, Arthur G R, Doucette A M. Antinociceptive and motor-blocking efficacy of ropivacaine and bupivacaine after epidural administration in the dog.  Reg Anesth. 1996;  21 318-326
• 26 Tuttle A A, Katz J A, Bridenbaugh P O, Quinlan R, Knarr D. A double-blind comparison of the abdominal wall relaxation produced by epidural 0.75 % ropivacaine and 0.75 % bupivacaine in gynecologic surgery.  Reg Anesth. 1995;  20 515-520
• 27 Zaric D, Axelsson K, Nydahl P A, Philipsson L, Larsson P, Jansson J R. Sensory and motor blockade during epidural analgesia with 1 %, 0.75 %, and 0.5 % ropivacaine - a double-blind study.  Anesth Analg. 1991;  72 509-515
• 28 Zaric D, Nydahl P A, Philipsson L, Samuelsson L, Heierson A, Axelsson K. The effect of continuous lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine (0.1 %, 0.2 %, and 0.3 %) and 0.25 % bupivacaine on sensory and motor block in volunteers: a double-blind study.  Reg Anesth. 1996;  21 14-25
• 29 Kakiuchi M. Reduction of blood loss during spinal surgery by epidural blockade under normotensive general anesthesia.  Spine. 1997;  22 889-894
• 30 McNulty S E, Weiss J, Azad S S, Schaefer D M, Osterholm J L, Seltzer J L. The effect of the prone position on venous pressure and blood loss during lumbar laminectomy.  J Clin Anesth. 1992;  4 220-225
• 31 Mori A, Sakuragi T, Horie T, Dan K. Inhibition by sedatives of compensatory vasoconstriction during lumbar epidural anesthesia.  Masui. 1994;  43 195-200
• 32 Mahan K T, Wang J. Spinal morphine anesthesia and urinary retention.  J Am Pediatr Med Assoc. 1993;  83 607-614
• 33 Pertek J P, Haberer J P. Effects of anesthesia on postoperative micturition and urinary retention.  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1995;  14 340-351
• 34 Stricker K, Steiner W. Postoperative urinary retention.  Anaesthesist. 1991;  40 287-290
• 35 Joshi G P, McCarroll S M, O'Rourke K. Postoperative analgesia after lumbar laminectomy: epidural fentanyl infusion versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine.  Anesth Analg. 1995;  80 511-514
• 36 Rainov N G, Gutjahr T, Burkert W. Intra-operative epidural morphine, fentanyl, and droperidol for control of pain after spinal surgery. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind trial.  Acta Neurochir Wien. 1996;  138 33-39
• 37 Schmidek H H, Cutler S G. Epidural morphine for control of pain after spinal surgery: a preliminary report.  Neurosurgery. 1983;  13 37-39
• 38 Sepehrnia A, Van Ouwerkerk W J. Analgesic effect of epidural morphine in lumbar disc surgery.  Neurosurg Rev. 1996;  19 227-230
• 39 Shaw B A, Watson T C, Merzel D I, Gerardi J A, Birek A. The safety of continuous epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia in pediatric spine surgery.  J Pediatr Orthop. 1996;  16 374-377
• 40 Teddy P J, Adams C B, Briggs M, Janous M A, Kerr J H. Extradural diamorphine in the control of pain following lumbar laminectomy.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;  44 1074-1078
• 41 Davis R A. A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs.  J Neurosurg. 1994;  80 415-421
• 42 Kardaun J W, White L R, Shaffer W O. Acute complications in patients with surgical treatment of lumbar herniated disc.  J Spinal Disord. 1990;  3 30-38
• 43 Ramirez L F, Thisted R. Complications and demographic characteristics of patients undergoing lumbar discectomy in community hospitals.  Neurosurgery. 1989;  25 226-230
• 44 Stolke D, Sollmann W P, Seifert V. Intra- and postoperative complications in lumbar disc surgery.  Spine. 1989;  14 56-59
• 45 Seelig W, Nidecker A. Pain following operations of the lumbar spine. The failed back surgery syndrome.  Z Orthop. 1989;  127 346-353
• 46 Silver D J, Dunsmore R H, Dickson C M. Spinal anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery: review of 576 operations.  Anesth Analg. 1976;  55 550-554
• 47 Fischer R S, Raudzens P, Nunemacher M. Efficacy of intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring.  J Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;  12 97-109