Semin Hear 2000; 21(4): 327-342
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-13468
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

PERSPECTIVES OF THE DEAF COMMUNITY ON EARLY IDENTIFICATION AND INTERVENTION: A CASE FOR DIVERSITY AND PARTNERSHIPS

Roslyn G. Rosen
  • Gallaudet University, Washington, D.C
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

ABSTRACT

The deaf community considers early identification of deafness in infants very important. However, without deaf-friendly intervention measures, early identification may not achieve its intended goals. This article provides an overview of basic human rights, the deaf child as a visual being, and the importance of partnerships among families and deaf and hearing professionals. Results of a survey regarding perceptions of the deaf community regarding early identification and intervention pose vital implications for planning and implementing programs for this population. Reasons are given for the involvement of deaf adults and the focus on language acquisition as paramount priorities.

REFERENCES

  • 1 WFD. Resolution of the Thirteenth World Congress of the World Federation of the Deaf in Brisbane, Australia, July 25(31), 1999. WFD News 1999 12: 21
  • 2 Holcomb T. Early intervention/late results: the need to ``depathologize'' the service model.  Semin Hear . 1999;  20 269-277
  • 3 United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted by the UN General Assembly, 20 November 1989
  • 4 Euronet. Recognition of the rights of the child in the charter of fundamental rights. Unpublished paper. European Children's Network (Euronet) to the drafting group for an EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, 2000
  • 5 World NGO Summit on Disability. Beijing declaration on the rights of people with disabilities in the new century. Beijing, China, March 2000
  • 6 Johnson R, Liddel S, Erting C. Unlocking the curriculum: principles for achieving access in deaf education. Gallaudet Research Institute Working Paper 89-3. Washington, DC; 1989
  • 7 Parasnis I. Cultural and Language Diversity and the Deaf Experience.  Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998
  • 8 UNESCO. The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education; Adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality, Salamanca, Spain, June 1994 . 
  • 9 United Nations. The Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities, adopted by the UN General Assembly, December 20, 1993 . 
  • 10 Aquiline C. World Federation of the Deaf: towards a policy on Deaf education. Presentation at the International Congress of Educators of the Deaf, Sydney, Australia, July 2000
  • 11 Gorman C. Sounds of silence. Time Magazine, January 2000
  • 12 Yoshinaga-Itano C. Earlier identification for earlier intervention. Presentation at the International Congress on Education of the Deaf, Sydney Australia, July 2000
  • 13 Padden C, Humphrey T. Deaf in America: Voices from a Culture.  Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1988
  • 14 National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management. What are the obstacles to implementing statewide universal newborn hearing screening programs? National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management at Utah State University: frequently Asked Questions. 1999. Http://infanthearing.org/resources/obstacles (14 July 2000)
  • 15 Shorris E. The last word: can the world's small languages be saved?. Harper's Magazine August 2000;301. No.1803, p. 301
  • 16 Rosen R. The politics of deafness: advocacy and agendas in the United States. Parallel Views: Education and Access for Deaf People in France and the United States Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press 1994
  • 17 Rosen S. Baby deaf?.  <~>Forging partnerships between doctors and educators. NAD Broadcaster . 1977;  19 1-6
  • 18 Bell T. Universal newborn hearing screening bills.  NAD Broadcaster . 2000;  22 1-6
  • 19 Allen T. Indicators of Cochlear Implant Use: A Chartbook [technical report]. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute; 2000; (in press)
  • 20 Gallaudet University. Press release. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University; 2000
  • 21 Gallaudet Research Institute. Cochlear Implants and Deaf Culture. In: Research at Gallaudet, Spring 2000 issue. Gallaudet Research Institute, Washington, DC; 2000
  • 22 Mahshie S. A first language: whose choice is it?. Washington, DC: Pre-College Programs, Gallaudet University; 1997
  • 23 Carver R, Sam A. Deaf Child Care in Canada: A Deaf-friendly Vision for the 21st Century. Ottawa: Canadian Association of the Deaf; 2000
  • 24 Carver R. The Canadian deaf community: the past, the present and the millennium beyond. Keynote address at the Canadian Deaf Festival, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, July 12, 2000
    >