Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1813685
Self-learning and Simulation in the 21st Century: From Textbooks to ChatGPT
Authors
Abstract
The growth of the digital age has corresponded with decreased operative experience and concern for low readiness for practice among surgical trainees, allowing for rapidly advancing technology to attempt to fill this educational need, often through independent study. Online platforms provide an accessible, convenient space for trainees and faculty to obtain e-Learning materials, including operative videos, educational podcasts, recorded lectures, and interactive content. Social media continues to grow as a space for dissemination of such materials and for live and ongoing discussion along the continuum from medical students to expert surgeons. More recently, artificial intelligence–based tools are being studied and implemented as methods for self-assessment for surgical trainees for clinical acumen, board examination preparation, and automated review of intraoperative video. Simulation remains an integral component of the independent development of technical skills with ongoing advancement in physical models and the integration of artificial intelligence and extended reality tools. Surgical education will continue to evolve and benefit from the integration of these technologies into traditional learning methods.
Publication History
Article published online:
04 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB. et al. General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg 2013; 258 (03) 440-449
- 2 Thelen AE, Marcotte KM, Diaz S. et al. Variation in competence of graduating general surgery trainees. J Surg Educ 2024; 81 (01) 17-24
- 3 Evgeniou E, Loizou P. The theoretical base of e-learning and its role in surgical education. J Surg Educ 2012; 69 (05) 665-669
- 4 Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, Keith JN, Rosenbaum ME, Kapadia MR. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ 2016; 73 (06) 1072-1076
- 5 Srinivasa K, Moir F, Goodyear-Smith F. The role of online videos in teaching procedural skills in postgraduate medical education: a scoping review. J Surg Educ 2022; 79 (05) 1295-1307
- 6 Maertens H, Madani A, Landry T, Vermassen F, Van Herzeele I, Aggarwal R. Systematic review of e-learning for surgical training. Br J Surg 2016; 103 (11) 1428-1437
- 7 Ichiuji BA, DeAngelis EJ, Corpodean F. et al. The effect of a microlearning module on knowledge acquisition in surgery clerkship students. J Surg Educ 2022; 79 (02) 409-416
- 8 Roshal JA, Lund S, L'Huillier JC. et al. Out of touch: a nationwide mixed-methods e-learning needs assessment of general surgery residents. J Surg Educ 2025; 82 (06) 103514
- 9 Yeh DD, Hwabejire JO, Imam A. et al. A survey of study habits of general surgery residents. J Surg Educ 2013; 70 (01) 15-23
- 10 Smink DS, Ortega G, Dacier BM. et al; and the PACTS Trial Group. A randomized crossover trial evaluating the impact of cultural dexterity training on surgical residents' knowledge, cross-cultural care, skills, and beliefs: The provider awareness and cultural dexterity training for surgeons (PACTS) trial. Ann Surg 2024; 280 (03) 403-413
- 11 The SCORE Portal. Web. Accessed July 25, 2025 at: https://www.surgicalcore.org/public/about
- 12 ABSITE Practice Questions. Web. Accessed July 25, 2025 at: https://truelearn.com/general-surgery/absite-exam/
- 13 Resources ABSITE. Web. Accessed July 2025 at: https://med.stanford.edu/scalpel/absite-prep.html
- 14 Hashimoto DA, Bynum IV WE, Lillemoe KD, Sachdeva AK. See more, do more, teach more: surgical resident autonomy and the transition to independent practice. Acad Med 2016; 91 (06) 757-760
- 15 Paine H, Chand M. Role of digital resources in minimally invasive colorectal surgery training. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34 (03) 144-150
- 16 Peponis T, Ubl DS, Habermann EB. et al. Trends and distribution of IPAAs in the United States: becoming harder to find in colon and rectal surgery residency training?. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67 (08) 1040-1047
- 17 Crawshaw BP, Steele SR, Lee EC. et al. Failing to prepare is preparing to fail: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial to determine the impact of a preoperative instructional video on the ability of residents to perform laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (01) 28-34
- 18 Ahmet A, Gamze K, Rustem M, Sezen KA. Is video-based education an effective method in surgical education? A systematic review. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (05) 1150-1158
- 19 Youssef SC, Aydin A, Canning A, Khan N, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P. Learning surgical skills through video-based education: a systematic review. Surg Innov 2023; 30 (02) 220-238
- 20 Zeller MP, Sterling EK, Shah MM, Lee S, D'Adamo CR, Feinman M. Novel surgical video-based education resource for surgical case preparation among medical students: results from a randomized controlled trial. Global Surg Educ 2024; 3 (01) 98
- 21 Shariff U, Kullar N, Haray PN, Dorudi S, Balasubramanian SP. Multimedia educational tools for cognitive surgical skill acquisition in open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17 (05) 441-450
- 22 Piskin E, Çolakoğlu MK, Bal A, Oter V, Bostanci EB. Evaluation of the quality, educational value and utility of the videos on YouTube for laparoscopic low anterior resection. Am Surg 2022; 88 (09) 2380-2387
- 23 Celentano V, Browning M, Hitchins C, Giglio MC, Coleman MG. Training value of laparoscopic colorectal videos on the World Wide Web: a pilot study on the educational quality of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy videos. Surg Endosc 2017; 31 (11) 4496-4504
- 24 Yamamoto T, Goto K, Kitano S. et al. Current insights on social media as a tool for the dissemination of research and education in surgery: a narrative review. Surg Today 2024; 54 (10) 1113-1123
- 25 Chan KS, Shelat VG. We asked the experts: emerging role of YouTube surgical videos in education and training. World J Surg 2021; 45 (02) 417-419
- 26 Caldwell KE, Zarate-Rodriguez JG, Fox JC, Yaeger L, Wise PE. Listen up: a systematic review of the utilization and efficacy of podcasts for medical education. Global Surg Educ 2024; 3 (01) 107
- 27 Grock A, Akuzawa H. With great podcasts comes great responsibility. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (06) e2415614
- 28 Ebrahim S, Dorsamy E, Phillip JL, Naidoo R, Van Wyk JM. A scoping review of online teaching in undergraduate surgical training. Indian J Surg 2024; 86 (04) 696-705
- 29 Wexner SD, Petrucci AM, Brady RR, Ennis-O'Connor M, Fitzgerald JE, Mayol J. Social media in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19 (02) 105-114
- 30 Dr. Glaucomflecken x NEJM. YouTube. Accessed June 2025 at: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI8Ak-hj5dgGcHFuJGumlt33U8hgxSxzE
- 31 Docimo Jr S, Jacob B, Seras K, Ghanem O. Closed Facebook groups and COVID-19: an evaluation of utilization prior to and during the pandemic. Surg Endosc 2021; 35 (09) 4986-4990
- 32 Li H, Han Z, Wu H. et al. Artificial intelligence in surgery: evolution, trends, and future directions. Int J Surg 2025; 111 (02) 2101-2111
- 33 Low YS, Jackson ML, Hyde RJ. et al. Answering real-world clinical questions using large language model, retrieval-augmented generation, and agentic systems. Digit Health 2025; 11: 20 552076251348850
- 34 Siu AHY, Gibson D, Mu X. et al. Employing large language models for surgical education: an in-depth analysis of ChatGPT-4. J Med Educ 2023; 22 (01) e137753
- 35 Emile SH, Horesh N, Freund M. et al. How appropriate are answers of online chat-based artificial intelligence (ChatGPT) to common questions on colon cancer?. Surgery 2023; 174 (05) 1273-1275
- 36 Roshal JA, Silvestri C, Sathe T, Townsend C, Klimberg VS, Perez A. GPT-4 as a board-certified surgeon: a pilot study. Med Sci Educ 2025; 35 (03) 1557-1566
- 37 Beaulieu-Jones BR, Berrigan MT, Shah S, Marwaha JS, Lai S-L, Brat GA. Evaluating capabilities of large language models: performance of GPT-4 on surgical knowledge assessments. Surgery 2024; 175 (04) 936-942
- 38 Sathe TS, Roshal J, Naaseh A, L'Huillier JC, Navarro SM, Silvestri C. How I GPT it: development of custom artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots for surgical education. J Surg Educ 2024; 81 (06) 772-775
- 39 Hla DA, Hindin DI. Generative AI & machine learning in surgical education. Curr Probl Surg 2025; 63: 101701
- 40 Feldman J, Hochman KA, Guzman BV, Goodman A, Weisstuch J, Testa P. Scaling note quality assessment across an academic medical center with AI and GPT-4. NEJM Catal Innov Care Deliv 2024; 5 (05) 0283
- 41 Grüter AAJ, Van Lieshout AS, van Oostendorp SE. et al. Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2023; 37 (06) 4279-4297
- 42 Hu Y-Y, Mazer LM, Yule SJ. et al. Complementing operating room teaching with video-based coaching. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (04) 318-325
- 43 Awshah S, Bowers K, Eckel DT. et al. Current trends and barriers to video management and analytics as a tool for surgeon skilling. Surg Endosc 2024; 38 (05) 2542-2552
- 44 Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Witkowski ER. et al. Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg 2019; 270 (03) 414-421
- 45 Komatsu M, Kitaguchi D, Yura M. et al. Automatic surgical phase recognition-based skill assessment in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using multicenter videos. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27 (01) 187-196
- 46 Brian R, Murillo A, Gomes C, Alseidi A. Artificial intelligence and robotic surgical education. Global Surg Educ 2024; 3 (01) 60
- 47 Zendejas B, Ruparel RK, Cook DA. Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2016; 30 (02) 512-520
- 48 Scott DJ, Bergen PC, Rege RV. et al. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191 (03) 272-283
- 49 Nepomnayshy D, Whitledge J, Fitzgibbons S. et al. Advanced laparoscopic skills: understanding the relationship between simulation-based practice and clinical performance. Am J Surg 2019; 218 (03) 527-532
- 50 Clanahan JM, Han BJ, Klos CL, Wise PE, Ohman KA. Use of simulation for training advanced colorectal procedures. J Surg Educ 2024; 81 (05) 758-767
- 51 Egle JP, Malladi SVS, Gopinath N, Mittal VK. Simulation training improves resident performance in hand-sewn vascular and bowel anastomoses. J Surg Educ 2015; 72 (02) 291-296
- 52 Steinhagen E, Stein SL, Ofshteyn A. et al; OPTIONN Expert Consensus Panel. Optimal pouch training: investigating operative and nonoperative needs study. Dis Colon Rectum 2025; 68 (06) 764-775
- 53 Sankaranarayanan G, Parker L, De S, Kapadia M, Fichera A. Simulation for colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 31 (05) 566-569
- 54 Dagash H, Lakhoo K. A low-cost stoma simulator. Pediatr Surg Int 2020; 36 (05) 655-656
- 55 The Simsei Simulation Program. Web. Simsei Simulation. Accessed at: https://simsei.com/program
- 56 Watson EGR, Zhang TY, Ong HI, Proud DM, Mohan HM. Surgical trainee education in benign anorectal disease: a scoping review. Surg Open Sci 2025; 26 (26) 119-127
- 57 Noda K, Kitada T, Suzuki Y, Colvin HS, Hata T, Mizushima T. A novel physical colonoscopy simulator based on analysis of data from computed tomography colonography. Surg Today 2017; 47 (09) 1153-1162
- 58 Ritter EM, Scott DJ. Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 2007; 14 (02) 107-112
- 59 Jones MW, Deere MJ, Harris JR, Chen AJ, Henning WH. Fabrication of an inexpensive but effective colonoscopic simulator. JSLS 2017; 21 (02) e2017
- 60 Finocchiaro M, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Hernansanz A. et al. Training simulators for gastrointestinal endoscopy: current and future perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13 (06) 1427
- 61 Mascagni P, Spota A, Pizzicannella M. et al. Democratizing flexible endoscopy training: noninferiority randomized trial comparing a box-trainer vs a virtual reality simulator to prepare for the fundamental of endoscopic surgery exam. J Am Coll Surg 2022; 234 (06) 1201-1210
- 62 Ritter EM, Taylor ZA, Wolf KR. et al. Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual skills exam. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (01) 413-420
- 63 Carr S, Flanagan J, Heriot A, Warrier S, Mohan H. Educational strategies used in the teaching of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): a scoping review. Global Surg Educ 2025; 4 (01) 50
- 64 Garijo PD, Pera M, Bravo R. et al. Education and training on transanal minimally invasive surgery and transanal total mesorectal excision: a narrative review. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2025; 10: 14
- 65 Medical Simulators - General Surgery. Web. Surgical Science. Accessed July 2025 at: https://surgicalscience.com/medical-specialities/general-surgery/
- 66 SimNow. Web. Accessed July 2025 at: https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/products-and-services/da-vinci/digital/simnow
- 67 Nassar AK, Al-Manaseer F, Knowlton LM, Tuma F. Virtual reality (VR) as a simulation modality for technical skills acquisition. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 71: 102945
- 68 FAQs. Web. Accessed July 2025 at: https://www.flsprogram.org/about-fls/faq/
- 69 To G, Hawke JA, Larkins K. et al. A systematic review of the application of 3D-printed models to colorectal surgical training. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27 (04) 257-270
- 70 Hertz P, Bertelsen CA, Houlind K. et al. Developing a phantom for simulating robotic-assisted complete mesocolic excision using 3D printing and medical imaging. BMC Surg 2024; 24 (01) 72
- 71 Oxford K, Walsh G, Bungay J, Quigley S, Dubrowski A. Development, manufacture and initial assessment of validity of a 3-dimensional-printed bowel anastomosis simulation training model. Can J Surg 2021; 64 (05) E484-E490
- 72 Habermann AC, Timmerman WR, Cohen SM, Burkhardt BW, Amendola MF. Clinical applications of 3D printing in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39 (01) 127
- 73 Bangeas P, Drevelegas K, Agorastou C. et al. Three-dimensional printing as an educational tool in colorectal surgery. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2019; 11 (01) 29-37
- 74 Jerí-McFarlane S, García-Granero Á, Ochogavía-Seguí A. et al. 3D-reconstruction printed models could enhance understanding of Crohn's disease complex perianal fistulas?. ANZ J Surg 2025
- 75 Chen Y, Bian L, Zhou H. et al. Usefulness of three-dimensional printing of superior mesenteric vessels in right hemicolon cancer surgery. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 11660
- 76 Tremosa L. Beyond AR vs. VR: What is the Difference between AR vs. MR vs. VR vs. XR? Web. Accessed July 2025 at: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/beyond-ar-vs-vr-what-is-the-difference-between-ar-vs-mr-vs-vr-vs-xr
- 77 Westergaard G, Desir A, Barker J. et al. Validity of a virtual reality-based straight coloanal anastomosis simulator. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2025; 20 (03) 545-560
- 78 Atraszkiewicz D, Shakir T, Lingam G, Rafaih AB, Chand M. Exploring the roles of extended reality technologies in advancing colorectal surgical training. Frontline Gastroenterol 2025; 16 (06) 495-502
- 79 García-Granero Á, Jerí-McFarlane S, Torres-Marí N. et al. 3D-reconstruction printed models and virtual reality improve teaching in oncological colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 29 (01) 24
- 80 Jarry C, Varas J, Inzunza M. et al. Design and validation of a simulation-based training module for ileo-transverse intracorporeal anastomosis. Surg Endosc 2025; 39 (02) 1397-1405
