Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1813233
Patient journey and treatment pattern in myasthenia gravis: real-world data from the Brazilian public health system
Authors
The study “Patient Journey and Treatment Pattern in Myasthenia Gravis: Real-World Data from the Brazilian Public Health System” [1] represents an important step toward understanding myasthenia gravis (MG) within Brazil's public healthcare network. Drawing on data from more than 13,000 patients treated through the Brazilian Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde – SUS) between 2010 and 2023, the authors provide an unprecedented overview of the clinical characteristics, management strategies, and healthcare utilization patterns of this patient population.
The steady increase in MG admissions and outpatient encounters mirrors the global rise in disease prevalence.[2] [3] [4] This likely reflects better recognition, improved diagnostic tools, and longer patient survival, but it also exposes the mounting pressure MG places on healthcare systems. The authors report that nearly one-third of patients experienced exacerbations, and about 10% required hospitalization for myasthenic crisis—a reminder that disease control remains elusive for many. The increase in case fatality, from 0.76% in 2011 to 1.9% in 2023, underscores the need for stronger preventive strategies and earlier intervention.[5] [6] These data align with recent population-based studies showing that, despite therapeutic progress, mortality from MG continues to vary widely across regions and healthcare contexts.
The treatment patterns described reflect both the limitations and the realities of MG management within the SUS. Azathioprine and pyridostigmine remain the cornerstones of therapy, but frequent dose changes, treatment switches, and prolonged dependence on intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) suggest persistent difficulty achieving symptom stability. Such reliance on older agents likely stems from restricted access to newer immunotherapies and delays in treatment escalation.[7] [8] Similar patterns have been reported internationally, where a subset of patients continues to experience refractory disease despite standard care.[9] The use of IVIg as an initial or chronic therapy further emphasizes the severity of illness in this cohort and the lack of sustainable disease control in some cases.[10] [11]
These findings call attention to the urgent need to modernize MG treatment in Brazil's public sector. Equally important are systemic strategies such as structured referral pathways, standardized monitoring protocols, and early identification of refractory cases. Together, these measures could reduce hospitalizations, improve quality of life, and lessen the economic burden of care.
This study highlights the magnitude and challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG) within the SUS. However, due to the characteristics of the SUS database, essential diagnostic information is lacking, such as serum antibody data (anti-AChR, anti-MuSK, anti-titin, and anti-LRP4), as well as neurophysiological studies.[12]
Regarding therapy, the data are incomplete, as there is no record of corticosteroid use—the main treatment following pyridostigmine.[7] Information on thymectomy is also absent, despite its established role in the management of selected patients, as demonstrated in the MGTX trial.[13]
These findings reinforce the urgent need to update the current SUS treatment protocol (LOTS), which remains outdated and does not adequately include corticosteroid therapy, as illustrated in Table 1 of the article.
In essence, the study fills a long-standing knowledge gap in Brazilian MG research. It also serves as a reminder that the benefits of modern therapies must reach patients equitably across different healthcare settings.
Conflict of Interest
There is no conflict of interest to declare.
-
References
- 1 Andrade R, Marques Junior W, Vasconcelos L. et al. Patient journey and treatment pattern in myasthenia gravis: real-world data from the Brazilian public health system. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2025; 83 (09) : s00451811720.
- 2 Dresser L, Wlodarski R, Rezania K, Soliven B. Myasthenia gravis: epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (11) 2235
- 3 Mishra AK, Varma A. Myasthenia gravis: a systematic review. Cureus 2023; 15 (12) e50017
- 4 Beghi E, Antozzi C, Batocchi AP. et al. Prognosis of myasthenia gravis: a multicenter follow-up study of 844 patients. J Neurol Sci 1991; 106 (02) 213-220
- 5 Wendell LC, Levine JM. Myasthenic crisis. Neurohospitalist 2011; 1 (01) 16-22
- 6 Zhang C, Wang F, Long Z. et al. Mortality of myasthenia gravis: a national population-based study in China. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2023; 10 (07) 1095-1105
- 7 Ministério da Saúde (Brasil). Protocolos clínicos e diretrizes terapêuticas da miastenia grave. Brasília: CONITEC; 2020. . Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/composicao/conitec
- 8 Narayanaswami P, Sanders DB, Thomas L. et al; PROMISE-MG Study Group. Comparative effectiveness of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil for myasthenia gravis (PROMISE-MG): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23 (03) 267-276
- 9 Qi CZ, Hughes T, Gelinas D. et al. Real-world utilization patterns of intravenous immunoglobulin in adults with generalized myasthenia gravis in the United States. J Neurol Sci 2022; 443: 120480
- 10 Guo Y, Tian X, Wang X, Xiao Z. Adverse effects of immunoglobulin therapy. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1299
- 11 DeHart-McCoyle M, Patel S, Du X. New and emerging treatments for myasthenia gravis. BMJ Med 2023; 2 (01) e000241
- 12 El-Wahsh S, Ramanathan S, Reddel S. Clinical utility of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and management of Myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol 2025; 407: 578718
- 13 Wolfe GI, Kaminski HJ, Aban IB. et al; MGTX Study Group. Long-term effect of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in patients with non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis: 2-year extension of the MGTX randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18 (03) 259-268
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Received: 20 October 2025
Accepted: 23 October 2025
Article published online:
25 January 2026
© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua Rego Freitas, 175, loja 1, República, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01220-010, Brazil
Rosana Herminia Scola. Patient journey and treatment pattern in myasthenia gravis: real-world data from the Brazilian public health system. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2025; 83: s00451813233.
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1813233
-
References
- 1 Andrade R, Marques Junior W, Vasconcelos L. et al. Patient journey and treatment pattern in myasthenia gravis: real-world data from the Brazilian public health system. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2025; 83 (09) : s00451811720.
- 2 Dresser L, Wlodarski R, Rezania K, Soliven B. Myasthenia gravis: epidemiology, pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (11) 2235
- 3 Mishra AK, Varma A. Myasthenia gravis: a systematic review. Cureus 2023; 15 (12) e50017
- 4 Beghi E, Antozzi C, Batocchi AP. et al. Prognosis of myasthenia gravis: a multicenter follow-up study of 844 patients. J Neurol Sci 1991; 106 (02) 213-220
- 5 Wendell LC, Levine JM. Myasthenic crisis. Neurohospitalist 2011; 1 (01) 16-22
- 6 Zhang C, Wang F, Long Z. et al. Mortality of myasthenia gravis: a national population-based study in China. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2023; 10 (07) 1095-1105
- 7 Ministério da Saúde (Brasil). Protocolos clínicos e diretrizes terapêuticas da miastenia grave. Brasília: CONITEC; 2020. . Available from: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/composicao/conitec
- 8 Narayanaswami P, Sanders DB, Thomas L. et al; PROMISE-MG Study Group. Comparative effectiveness of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil for myasthenia gravis (PROMISE-MG): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23 (03) 267-276
- 9 Qi CZ, Hughes T, Gelinas D. et al. Real-world utilization patterns of intravenous immunoglobulin in adults with generalized myasthenia gravis in the United States. J Neurol Sci 2022; 443: 120480
- 10 Guo Y, Tian X, Wang X, Xiao Z. Adverse effects of immunoglobulin therapy. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1299
- 11 DeHart-McCoyle M, Patel S, Du X. New and emerging treatments for myasthenia gravis. BMJ Med 2023; 2 (01) e000241
- 12 El-Wahsh S, Ramanathan S, Reddel S. Clinical utility of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and management of Myasthenia gravis. J Neuroimmunol 2025; 407: 578718
- 13 Wolfe GI, Kaminski HJ, Aban IB. et al; MGTX Study Group. Long-term effect of thymectomy plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in patients with non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis: 2-year extension of the MGTX randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18 (03) 259-268
