Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1807256
Gallium-68 Citrate PET/CT for Diagnosis and Treatment Response Assessment of Infections—Prospective Study
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Material and Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- Limitations of the Study
- Conclusion
- References
Abstract
Objective
This article aims to assess the presence of skeletal and soft tissue infections before or after treatment and to assess treatment response in Ga-68 citrate positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan positive patients.
Materials and Methods
A prospective study was conducted for 43 patients. The eligibility criteria included those patients clinically suspected of infections who underwent a Ga-68 citrate PET/CT. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy and lactation. Patients with suspicion of infection or treatment failure underwent a Ga-68 citrate PET/CT between January 2020 and November 2021. Among these, eight patients underwent a follow-up scan posttreatment to assess their treatment response. The Institutional Review Board (IRB No.12511) approved the study.
Results
Forty-three patients underwent a diagnostic Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan. The scan interpretation was based on visual comparison of uptake of Ga-68 citrate in the region of interest, which was compared with the normal side/adjacent soft tissue/blood pool. The semiquantitative parameter maximum standardized uptake value was retrospectively analyzed as well. PET/CT findings were correlated with tissue diagnosis, clinical symptoms, biochemical parameters like C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and total leukocyte count, and other imaging modalities with a statistically significant association with CRP (p = 0.001). Tissue diagnosis was considered the gold standard and out of the 43 patients included in the study, 27 had a tissue diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy were calculated at 100, 87.5, 100, 95, and 96.3%, respectively.
Conclusion
Ga-68 citrate is a promising tool to assess the presence of bone and soft tissue infections before or after treatment.
#
Introduction
For decades, nuclear medicine has been at the forefront of infection imaging and has explored the utility of Ga-67 citrate for diagnosing various infections. Ga-67 citrate has been well-known for decades as the imaging agent for detecting infections.[1] It has been used for the diagnosis of various clinical conditions such as pyrexia of unknown origin, autoimmune-related inflammations, sarcoidosis, pancreatitis, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, osteomyelitis, pulmonary Wegener's granulomatosis, and chronic bronchial asthma.[2] However, due to its various drawbacks, it has slowly become unpopular. Compared with Ga-68, Ga-67 has a much longer half-life of 78 hours and emits high-energy gamma radiations ranging from 92 to 300 KeV.[1] [3] [4] Due to slow uptake, delayed imaging of up to 72 hours is required.[2] The high energy of the radiation gives it unfavorable imaging characteristics and high radiation exposure to the patients. Ga-67 imaging uses a gamma camera, and planar imaging often misses deep-seated lesions and requires supplementation by acquisition with single-photon emission tomography. The effective dose of Ga-68 per unit of administered activity is 2.6 × 10–2 mSv/MBq, while Ga-67 is 1.1 × 10–1 mSv/MBq.[5] Ga-67 requires a cyclotron for production, making the tracer much more expensive than Ga-68, produced via an onsite Ge-68/Ga-68 generator. Ga-68 is a positron emitter, and images are acquired via positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) acquisition,[3] which gives the advantage of anatomical imaging.[6] A shorter half-life, lower radiation dose, better imaging characteristics, and lower cost make Ga-68 citrate a better choice for an imaging agent.[7] [8] Several studies have investigated the ability of Ga-68 citrate to differentiate between infection and aseptic inflammation and assess treatment response.[9] [10]
Ga-68 citrate is a radiopharmaceutical explored in the recent past and showed promising results. Ga-68 citrate follows a similar mechanism of uptake as Ga-67 citrate.[11] Areas of infection have an abundance of leukocytes. Gallium in plasma is bound tightly to iron transport protein transferrin (TF) and enters the cell through the TF receptor, thus accumulating in infectious foci. Macrophages also have high expression of TF receptors. There is increased capillary permeability at sites of infections, and gallium leaks from the vascular epithelium at these sites. It is also taken up directly by the pathogen itself. It then binds to lactoferrin (LF), which is present in the leukocytes. The gallium-bound LF then binds to the activated macrophages present at the site of inflammation. Pathogens causing infection produce siderophores due to little free iron present in tissues. These siderophores have a high affinity for iron and gallium due to their similarity in their structure and properties. The gallium–siderophore complex retains itself within the cell after direct entry. It has found recent interest amongst nuclear medicine professionals due to the ease of production, the lower cost, lower radiation exposure to the patient, and better patient compliance due to shorter scan time. Conventional imaging,[12] like CT, X-rays, and ultrasonography (USG), may miss the early stages of infection when apparent structural abnormalities are lacking. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is very sensitive and has the advantage of detailed anatomy but is of limited value in patients with metallic implants and the presence of postoperative edema or aseptic inflammation.[12] F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) can be used for infection imaging but lacks specificity due to its mechanism of uptake in both inflammation and infections; it also has the disadvantage of cyclotron production. FDG is taken up by any metabolically active cell as it is a glucose analog and accumulates in the cell after phosphorylation. White blood cells (WBCs) imaging is sensitive, but the procedure is long and cumbersome[13] with a higher radiation exposure[14] to radiation personnel involved in radiopharmaceutical preparation. WBC imaging has limited value in the setting of neutropenia, a limitation which can be overcome using Ga-68 citrate. Ga-68 citrate is a generator-produced radiopharmaceutical and helps differentiate infection from aseptic inflammation.[15]
In our study, we looked at the incremental value of Ga-68 citrate in the diagnosis of infection. Our study comprised the following patient groups: (1) skull base osteomyelitis (SBO), (2) long bone infections, (3) prosthesis-related infections, (4) end-of-treatment assessment for spinal tuberculosis, and (5) soft tissue infections.
#
Material and Methods
Study Subjects
A prospective study was conducted for 43 patients. The eligibility criteria included those patients clinically suspected of infections who underwent a Ga-68 citrate PET/CT. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy and lactation. Patients with suspicion of infection or treatment failure underwent a Ga-68 citrate PET/CT between January 2020 and November 2021. Among these, eight patients underwent a follow-up scan posttreatment to assess their treatment response. The Institutional Review Board (IRB No.12511) approved the study.
#
[68Ga] Citrate PET/CT Imaging
Ga-68 was eluted from the Ge-68/Ga-68 generator with hydrogen chloride after labeling with buffer citrate solution for 10 minutes and passing through the Waters cartridge. Each patient received an intravenous dose of 3 to 5 mCi/111 to 185 MBq of Ga-68 citrate. Ga-68 citrate was administered intravenously with an uptake time of 60 minutes. A CT scan with contrast when needed was performed first with the following parameters: tube current of 110 mAs, tube voltage of 130 kV, and slice thickness of 3 to 5 mm. Subsequently, PET images were obtained through the same region, with each bed position lasting 2 minutes and a total of three beds. Processing of the images was performed using iterative reconstruction followed by a PET scan for the area of interest 1 hour post-intravenous administration of Ga-68 citrate, following which PET imaging for the area of interest was performed. The interpretation was based on a visual assessment of Ga-68 citrate tracer uptake in the region that is suspected of infection, and the tracer uptake in the scan was correlated with clinical, biochemical, microbiological, and other radiological parameters.
#
Imaging Interpretation
Visual interpretation of images was performed based on uptake of the tracer in the area of suspicion. The visual comparison was made with the normal side/adjacent soft tissue/blood pool. Image interpretation was performed by at least two experienced nuclear medicine physicians.
CT images were viewed and interpreted in detail by an experienced radiologist for anatomical correlation. Almost all patients with diagnosis of SBO additionally underwent MRI as well.
Semiquantitative analysis using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was performed retrospectively, due to which data of 12 patients could not be retrieved. The SUVmax was compared with the opposite normal side soft tissue/bone or the blood pool uptake.
#
Histopathological Examination
Among the 43 patients, 27 patients underwent tissue diagnosis in the form of biopsy or pus culture.
#
Statistical Analysis
For continuous data, the descriptive statistics mean and standard deviation were reported. All categorical variables were represented as numbers and percentages. The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests (less cell count) were used to find the association between categorical variables. All tests were two-sided at α = 0.05 level of significance. All analyses were done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software Version 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, New York, United States).
#
#
Results
A total of 43 patients with suspicion of infection or treatment failure who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Among these, eight patients had a follow-up scan posttreatment to assess treatment response. The median duration of follow-up was 3 to 6 months. The mean age of males (72%) was 54.8 years and that of females (28%) was 51 years (concise patient profile is provided in [Table 1]).
Patient Profile
Among the 43 patient patients (clinical details in [Table 2]), the provisional/proven diagnosis included 18 patients with SBO, 7 patients with long bone osteomyelitis, 12 patients with an infected prosthesis, 1 patient with a posttreatment assessment of spinal tuberculosis, and 5 patients with soft tissue infection that included: right pyelonephritis with prostatic abscess, to evaluate surgical bypass graft site infection of the left femoral-posterior tibial artery, to evaluate infective etiology for an abdominal aortic aneurysm, to evaluate infective etiology for saccular aneurysm of the abdominal aorta below the superior mesenteric artery, and to differentiate between an infective versus hemorrhagic cysts in a patient with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) with persistent fever.
Sl. no. |
Diagnosis |
Pretreated (surgical/medical) |
Ga-68 citrate PET/CT (based on visual assessment) |
SUVmax (ROI)/SUVmax (blood pool or normal side) |
Correlating parameters with Ga-68 citrate PET/CT findings |
Final diagnosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. |
? SBO |
No treatment |
Positive |
6.21 / 4.09 (normal side) |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
2. |
? Left knee infected implant, k/c/o rheumatoid arthritis |
No treatment |
Negative |
3.32 / 5.12 (blood pool) |
Pus culture: negative |
True negative |
3. |
Right SBO, DM |
Surgery |
Positive |
9.2 / 9.02 (opposite side) |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
4. |
Left SBO with cranial nerve palsies. Left vagal and hypoglossal nerve palsy, DM, HTN |
Surgery |
Positive |
6.83 / 5.32 (normal side) |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
5. |
Prostatic abscess, right pyelonephritis with prostatic abscess, DM, diabetic nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy, HTN |
No treatment |
Positive |
17.98 (prostate) / 10.54 (blood pool) |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
6. |
? SBO, right lower motor neuron palsy, DM |
No treatment |
Positive |
– |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
7. |
Left SBO with CN palsies, DM. HTN |
Surgery |
Positive |
7.44 / 5.58 (normal side) |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
8. |
Central SBO |
Medical |
Negative |
2.3 / 8.50 (blood pool) |
Clinical doing well and continued to clinically do well at 1-month follow-up |
Negative[a] |
9. |
Right femur fracture, post-intermedullary nailing 1 year ago |
Medical |
Negative |
8.39 / 7.72 (blood pool) |
No other investigations / blood tests, as the patient was lost to follow-up |
Inconclusive |
10. |
? SBO, DM |
No treatment |
Positive |
7.69 / 6.93 (blood pool) |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
11. |
Left chronic hip arthritis, to rule out infection / secondary to spondyloarthritis |
Medical |
Positive |
6.24 / 5.68 (blood pool) |
ESR and CRP: high |
Positive[a] |
12. |
Surgical graft site infection 1 month prior (MRSA) - post left femoral-posterior tibial artery bypass graft, to rule out residual / recurrent infection |
Medical |
Negative |
2.35 / 6.0 (blood pool) |
Pus culture: negative |
True negative |
13. |
Right femur shaft and proximal femur nonunion implant in situ, to look for infectious cause |
Surgery |
Negative |
2.07 / 7.77 (blood pool) |
Pus culture: negative |
True negative |
14. |
Right humerus, chronic OM, DM, posttreatment |
Medical |
Negative |
– |
CRP: low Clinically has full range of movement, no bony tenderness, with occasional pain |
Negative[a] |
15. |
Nonhealing ulcer, right forearm. History of both bone fracture post-RTA, ? implant-related osteomyelitis |
Medical |
Negative |
– |
Pus culture, biopsy: negative |
True negative |
16. |
L4–5 infective tubercular spondylodiscitis |
Medical |
Negative |
– |
MRI: negative CRP: low |
Negative[a] |
17. |
Abdominal aortic aneurysm ? infective cause |
No treatment |
Negative |
– |
Pus culture: negative |
True negative |
18. |
SBO with TM joint involvement, DM, HTN, CKD 4 |
Surgery |
Positive |
13.65 / 3.34 (normal side) |
Biopsy: positive |
True positive |
19. |
RTA 2004, post-IM nail right femur, implant exit in 2005 due to infection. H/o debridement surgeries in 2007, 2009, and 2013 |
Medical |
Positive |
5.03/1.44 (normal side) |
ESR and CRP: high - Clinical: ROM restricted and pain and discharging pus |
Positive[a] |
20. |
Saccular aneurysm of abdominal aorta below SMA on CT. To rule out infective etiology. CKD 4 |
No treatment |
Negative |
– |
Biopsy: negative |
True negative |
21. |
Chronic OM right ankle with implant in situ, HIV stage 3 |
Medical |
Positive |
3.52/0.3 (normal side) |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
22. |
Left femur, acute on chronic OM |
Surgery |
Positive |
6.73 / 2.79 (normal side) |
Biopsy and pus culture positive |
True positive |
23. |
Left SBO, DM, HTN, CKD on HD |
No recent treatment |
Positive |
5.3 / 4.46 (normal side) |
MRI + |
Positive[a] |
24. |
Right distal femur infective nonunion Diabetes mellitus-II |
Surgery |
Positive |
5.47 / 6.34 (blood pool) |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
25. |
Left forearm both bone infected nonunion and implant failure status post-left forearm both bone ORIF-2017 |
No recent treatment |
Positive |
3.38 / 2.06 (normal side) |
Pus culture: positive |
True positive |
26. |
Post-bilateral knee replacement with chronic right knee pain -to look for focus of infection |
No recent treatment |
Positive |
7.28 / 1.09 (normal side) |
CRP, ESR: high |
Positive[a] |
27. |
Chronic SBO, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease |
Surgery |
Positive |
– |
Biopsy and pus culture: positive |
True positive |
28. |
ADPKD and persistent fever, to rule out infection or hemorrhage |
No treatment |
Positive |
– |
Biopsy and pus culture: negative |
False positive |
29. |
SBO, DM |
Surgery |
Positive |
– |
Biopsy positive |
True positive |
30. |
Chronic osteomyelitis of right femur, to look for acute on chronic OM |
Medical |
Negative |
– |
CRP, TLC, and ESR: normal |
Negative[a] |
31. |
Central SBO and left temporomandibular joint involvement - secondary to left malignant otitis externa DM, HTN |
Surgery |
Positive |
– |
Biopsy positive |
True positive |
32. |
Central SBO with left 9, 10, 11, 12 cranial palsies HTN |
No treatment |
Positive |
– |
Biopsy and pus culture positive |
True positive |
33. |
Right Austin Moore prosthesis with? loosening / infection |
No recent treatment |
Negative |
3.48 / 5.16 (blood pool) |
CRP and ESR: low |
Positive[a] |
34. |
Suspected skull base osteomyelitis |
No treatment |
Positive |
12.26 / 4.51 (blood pool) |
Clinical: Left ear pain, blood-stained discharge, and hearing loss for 3 months |
Positive[a] |
35. |
Right knee prosthetic joint infection |
Medical |
Positive |
6.49 / 2.00 (normal side) |
ESR: high CRP: normal |
Positive[a] |
36. |
Recurrent skull base osteomyelitis |
Medical |
Positive |
6.39 / 1.79 (normal side) |
CRP: high, MRI: positive |
Positive[a] |
37. |
Lower backache with right knee pain, post-TKR done elsewhere. To look for infection. |
No treatment |
Negative |
1.60 / 4.0 (blood pool) |
CRP and TLC: low |
Negative[a] |
38. |
Malignant otitis externa with suspected skull base osteomyelitis |
No treatment |
Negative |
3.18/3.80 (normal side) |
TLC: low Clinical symptoms improved |
Negative[a] |
39. |
Periprosthetic fracture, post-right THR. To rule out infection |
No recent treatment |
Positive |
6.68 / 5.62 (normal side) and 6.92 blood pool |
CRP, ESR, TLC: high |
Positive[a] |
40. |
Post-bilateral TKR. ? Right knee infection |
No recent treatment |
Positive |
9.25 / 5.05 blood pool |
Biopsy positive |
True positive |
41. |
Skull base osteomyelitis |
Surgery |
Positive |
10.12 / 5.28 (normal side) |
Biopsy and pus culture positive |
True positive |
42. |
Skull base osteomyelitis |
Surgery |
Positive |
5.63 / 3.03 (normal side) |
Biopsy positive |
True positive |
43. |
Periprosthetic joint infection of left hip, status post-debridement, and implant removal, c/o pain |
Surgery |
Negative |
2.65 / 8.58 (blood pool) |
Biopsy negative |
True negative |
Abbreviations: ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; CN, cranial nerve; C/o, complaints of; CKD, chronic kidney disease; CRP, C-reactive protein; DM, diabetes mellitus type 2; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; H/o, history of; HD, hemodialysis; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HTN, hypertension; IM, intramedullary; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; OM, osteomyelitis; ORIF, open reduction and internal fixation; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography; ROI, region of interest; ROM, range of movement; RTA, road traffic accident; SBO, skull base osteomyelitis; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; THR, total hip replacement; TKR, total knee replacement; TLC, total leukocyte count.
a Positive or negative based on combination parameters, without a gold standard.
#
Ga-68 Citrate PET/CT and Other Infective Parameter Assessment
Results were concluded based on an association between the Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan findings and other parameters such as biopsy, pus culture, biochemical infective markers, MRI findings, and clinical outcome. Inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and total leukocyte count (TLC) were also evaluated.
Tissue diagnosis was considered the gold standard and 27/43 had a tissue diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy were calculated at 100, 87.5, 100, 95, and 96.3%, respectively. Out of the 16 patients who did not have a tissue diagnosis, Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan interpretation was based on visual assessment, clinical symptoms, and correlation with biochemical markers like CRP, ESR, TLC, and other imaging modalities.
Positive Ga-68 citrate scan findings for infection had a statistically significant association with inflammatory markers CRP (p = 0.001), which was high in 75% (n = 25/33) patients. Tissue diagnosis with biopsy and pus culture in 85% (n = 17/20) and 56% (n = 14/25) patients, respectively, were suggestive of infection and showed statistically significant association with Ga-68 citrate scan findings with a p-value of 0.016 for biopsy and p-value of 0.009 for pus culture. Only 16 (predominantly consisting of SBO patients) out of 43 patients underwent an MRI scan, 15 of whom had findings positive for infection on both MRI and Ga-68 citrate PET/CT. But statistically significant association (p = 0.06) could not be evaluated due to the small number of patients that underwent an MRI scan.
Out of the 43 patients included in the study, 18 patients were treatment naive, and 25 patients had received treatment prior to imaging. Among the 18 treatment-naive patients, 11 patients had biopsy correlation, of which, 7 were true positives, 3 were true negatives, and 1 patient was false positive. Among the 25 pretreated patients, 16 had tissue biopsy, of which 12 were true positives and 4 were true negatives. It is noteworthy that there were no false negatives among the patients who had a biopsy.
Our study evaluated 18 (41%) patients with suspected SBO ([Fig. 1]) and 7 (16%) patients with long bone osteomyelitis ([Fig. 2]). Out of the 18 patients with SBO, 16 had a Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan that was positive for infection. Of these 16, 13 patients had tissue diagnosis suggestive of infection, of which 9 patients had both biopsy and pus cultures positive for infection, 4 patients had biopsy suggestive of osteomyelitis, 2 patients had an MRI with findings suggestive of osteomyelitis, and 1 patient who clinically presented with left ear pain and mucopurulent blood-stained discharge had a positive Ga-68 citrate scan.




Six patients underwent Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan for diagnosis of suspected long bone osteomyelitis, and one patient with chronic hip arthritis to look for any focus of infection. Four had a positive scan, of which three had a positive biopsy and pus culture, confirming the scan findings, and one had high inflammatory markers. Three had a negative Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan, of which one patient had a negative pus culture and biopsy, and the other two patients had a normal CRP, which, as per our study, showed significant association with Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan findings.
Twelve patients were evaluated for suspected prosthesis-related infections, of which 7 (58%) were joint prostheses and 5 (42%) were long bone prostheses. Of the 12 patients, 7 had a Ga-68 citrate scan findings suggestive of infection and 5 patients had tissue diagnosis suggestive of infection (2 patients had a positive biopsy and 3 had a positive pus culture), and good association was found with raised inflammatory markers (6/7 patients had raised ESR and CRP levels). Among the patients with negative Ga-68 citrate PET/CT (n = 5), two were true negative with negative pus culture growth and three patients who did not have tissue confirmation had normalized CRP and TLC levels.
Five patients were evaluated for soft tissue-related infections. Three had a negative scan, and the findings were confirmed with a pus culture. Two patients had a positive scan; one patient had a positive pus culture and the other had a negative one, which was a false positive scan finding (clinical details in [Table 3] and [Fig. 3]). The patient who had a false positive scan was a gentleman with ADPKD and persistent fever, a Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan was performed to rule out infection or hemorrhage, Ga-68 citrate avidity was noted in areas corresponding to hyperdense cysts in both the kidneys and was further advised for USG-guided aspiration from the target lesions for further confirmation, which was performed and confirmed as hemorrhage with no infective growth in the culture. This was regarded as a false positive finding.
Patient profile |
35 y, M |
History |
ADPKD (autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease) and persistent fever, dysuria, flank pain for 14 days, to rule out infection or hemorrhage in the renal cyst |
Nonenhanced CT scan findings |
Nonenhanced CT scan showed bilateral enlarged kidneys with multiple hyperdense cysts in both the kidneys—which was likely hemorrhagic in nature |
Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan findings |
Ga-68 citrate imaging was done to rule out hemorrhagic cyst versus and infected cyst and showed multiple cysts with Ga-68 citrate avidity in bilateral kidneys, which were hyperdense on the CT images |
USG-guided FNAB findings |
A USG-guided FNAB was performed, and the hemorrhagic aspirate was sent for culture, which was negative for any infective growth |
Biochemical parameters |
CRP: 155 mg/L WBC: 14,500/cumm |
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; CRP, C-reactive protein; FNAB, fine-needle aspiration biopsy; PET, positron emission tomography; USG, ultrasonography.


#
Semiquantitative Assessment
Semiquantitative assessment with SUVmax from the region of interest was retrospectively assessed. The SUVmax was compared with the opposite normal side soft tissue/bone or the blood pool uptake. A positive Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scans presented with a mean SUVmax of 7.79 ± 3.58 (range: 3.38–17.98) for a confidence level of 95%. A negative Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scans presented with a mean SUVmax of 2.65 ± 0.48 (range: 1.60–3.48). The overall population, including both positive and negative groups, presented with a mean SUVmax of 6.59 ± 1.348 (range: 1.60–17.98) for a confidence level of 95%.
#
Follow-Up Patient Results
Eight patients with SBO had a follow-up scan to assess their treatment response ([Fig. 4]). Complete metabolic response was defined by the absence of residual Ga-68 citrate activity in the region of prior infection as compared with the pretherapy Ga-68 citrate scan. Incomplete treatment response was defined as residual activity in the region of prior infection but with a decrease in the area involved. Failure of treatment was defined as an increase in Ga-68 citrate activity with new areas of activity/involvement.


Four patients (clinical details mentioned in [Table 4]) had good treatment responses, one with SBO and three with long bone chronic osteomyelitis. A good correlation was noted with inflammatory marker CRP, which had normalized during follow-up imaging. Three patients (clinical details mentioned in [Table 5]: Sl. no. 1–3) with SBO who had undergone surgical debridement and antibiotic treatment had incomplete treatment responses. Two of them had an MRI, which showed evidence of residual infection. Inflammatory markers showed a declining trend but had not normalized during the time of follow-up imaging. One patient (clinical detail mentioned in [Table 5]: Sl. no. 4) with left SBO had treatment failure, which was picked up on the follow-up scan and correlated with MRI findings and rising inflammatory markers. New areas of involvement were noted, and he was found to have bilateral SBO, indicating treatment failure with disease progression.
Treatment response |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sl. no. |
Clinical detail |
First Ga-68 citrate scan finding |
Other parameters s/o infection |
Treatment detail |
Second Ga-68 citrate scan finding |
Other parameters in agreement with scan findings |
1. |
SBO |
Positive for SBO with extensions |
Positive pus culture and biopsy, high ESR, and CRP, MRI s/o infection |
Surgical debridement |
Negative |
CRP, TLC normalized |
2. |
Chronic osteomyelitis – right ankle |
Positive for right ankle osteomyelitis, with associated soft tissue thickening and edema |
Positive pus culture and biopsy, high ESR, CRP, and TLC |
Medical management with antibiotics |
Negative |
ESR, CRP showed declining trend with normal TLC |
3. |
Chronic osteomyelitis – left femur |
Positive for left femur osteomyelitis with diffuse cortical thickening and remodeling |
Positive pus culture and biopsy, high ESR, CRP, and TLC |
Surgical debridement with washout |
Negative |
ESR, CRP showed declining trend |
4. |
Chronic osteomyelitis – right distal femur ([Fig. 2]) |
Positive for osteomyelitis in the right distal femur with fracture involving the distal metadiaphyseal region |
Positive pus culture and biopsy, high ESR, CRP, and TLC |
Surgical debridement with washout |
Negative |
ESR normalized |
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SBO, skull base osteomyelitis; s/o, suggestive of; TLC, total leukocyte count.
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; SBO, skull base osteomyelitis; s/o, suggestive of; TLC, total leukocyte count.
Ga-68 citrate could localize in a broad spectrum of bacteria, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative (details in [Table 6]). Two species of fungi, that is, Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans, were also noted in tissue diagnosis of patients with a positive Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan (details in [Table 6]).
#
#
Discussion
Among the limited studies on the utility of Ga-68 citrate in the diagnosis of infection, it has been best documented in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis. SBO[16] is a disease with significant morbidity and mortality risks and occurs mostly in patients with diabetes mellitus or with immunocompromised status. The two variants of SBO are lateral SBO and central SBO (CSBO). Patients present with unrelenting otalgia that is disproportionate to the clinical signs, persistent purulent otorrhea, granulation tissue at the bony cartilaginous junction of the external auditory canal, and facial nerve paralysis. CSBO patients present with persistent headache, with nocturnal increase in intensity. Both varieties of SBO lead to eventual development of lower cranial nerve paralysis and vascular thrombosis. It is crucial for the surgeon to identify suitable sites for biopsy and debridement, as identification of the pathogen guides the clinician to initiate appropriate antimicrobial therapy. As per literature[17] there is usually a delay of 70 days in diagnosis of SBO. In addition, the decision on its continuation/cessation to prevent relapse is equally important and challenging. MRI studies may be useful, but may be limited in identifying the active disease, as it solely relies on anatomical changes.
In our study, 81% of the SBO patients had tissue diagnosis suggestive of infection. Our study found good utility of Ga-68 citrate PET/CT in diagnosing SBO and in treatment response evaluation, which is often a challenge for the surgeon as a repeat biopsy is often invasive due to the proximity of critical structures. Treatment is most often surgical so a functional imaging modality like Ga-68 citrate with no physiological brain activity can be used as a reliable guide to plan surgical extent and assess intracranial involvement; this is a known drawback of F-18 FDG as a functional tracer in SBO as it has high physiological uptake in the brain. It also gives confidence to the treating physician on whether to continue or discontinue long-term antibiotics based on imaging findings.
Diagnostic biopsy of long bone osteomyelitis and prosthesis-related infections are not always successful with a sensitivity of 50%.[18] [19] MRI is a sensitive modality but is often limited in the setting of early infections, postoperative edema, and metallic implants.[12] F-18 FDG, a commonly used tracer for malignancies, often shows falsely high uptake at prosthetic implant sites due to adverse reactions from the metallic debris.[20] F-18 FDG can also show falsely FDG uptake in regions of periprosthetic seroma,[21] adding to the nonspecificity. Tseng et al[15] compared the utility of Ga-68 citrate PET/CT and F-18 FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of lower limb prosthesis-related infections and found Ga-68 citrate PET/CT had a higher specificity (88% vs. 38%) and promising results in being able to differentiate between aseptic inflammation from an infective focus. Our study found that Ga-68 citrate PET/CT had a specificity of 87.5%, which is similar to that of the abovementioned study by Tseng et al. Such a high specificity makes Ga-68 citrate a promising tracer for differentiating infection from aseptic inflammation. In our study, patients who were evaluated for long bone osteomyelitis, had good correlation between the scan findings and tissue diagnosis (75% true positives) and the rest had raised inflammatory markers. Among those with negative scan findings 40% were true negatives and the rest were likely negative due to normalized CRP level, a statistically significant marker of infection in this study. The criteria for interpreting prosthesis-related infection were similar to those used in the study by Tseng et al[15] in which specific uptake of the radiotracer in the bone prosthesis interface and radiotracer uptake around the prosthetic soft tissue, rather than the uptake intensity was considered positive.
The utility of Ga-68 citrate PET/CT in diagnosing soft tissue infections is challenging due to the high blood pool uptake, this was noted in our patient population wherein one patient had a false positive scan ([Fig. 3]). A small cohort study[22] compared the utility of Ga-68 citrate PET/CT with F-18 FDG PET/CT for diagnosing soft tissue infection and found that F-18 FDG was superior in diagnosing soft tissue infections and was attributed to the high blood pool activity of Ga-68 citrate and its limited utility in delayed imaging due to the short half-life of the tracer. The utility of Ga-68 citrate in the diagnosis of brain infection, especially in postsurgical cases where symptoms might persist due to either residual infection/postoperative edema should be further explored since this tracer does not have physiological accumulation in the brain unlike F-18 FDG. A case study[23] reported a patient with tuberculous granuloma of the central nervous system and explained the utility of the tracer in diagnosing brain infection due to the lack of physiological biodistribution in the brain.
End-of-treatment response after 2 years of antitubercular therapy (ATT) for spinal tuberculosis was assessed in one patient ([Fig. 5]). The patient was symptom-free and a Ga-68 citrate scan was performed to decide whether to stop ATT. The patient initially underwent an MRI scan, which showed residual inflammatory changes and residual edema involving the L4-L5 vertebral bodies. A Ga-68 citrate PET/CT scan was performed 2 days later, which showed no tracer uptake in the previously involved region, which enhanced the clinician's confidence in decision-making to stop ATT. A study done by Vorster et al[24] studied 13 patients who were previously diagnosed with tuberculosis and underwent a Ga-68 citrate PET/CT to look at the utility of Ga-68 citrate PET/CT in the detection of extrapulmonary sites, bone being one of the sites. Other sites included the lymph nodes, pleura, spleen, and gastrointestinal tract. Eighty percent more lesions were detected on Ga-68 citrate PET than on CT. Treatment response assessment evaluation done in eight patients showed good correlation with Ga-68 scan findings, biopsy, and CRP levels. It helped in guiding patient management plans and repeating biopsies from specific regions of highest uptake for culture-sensitive antibiotic therapy planning in refractory cases of SBO. Ga-68 citrate is a versatile tool for diagnosing a variety of pathogens and can contribute significantly to the need for specific diagnosis in this era of antimicrobial resistance.


We initially performed a 30-minute imaging protocol for the first 15 patients, sufficient to visualize the disease process, but there was high blood pool activity. Delayed imaging of 90 minutes was additionally done for one patient, which showed minimal degradation of image quality. Following this, a 60-minute protocol was performed and was sufficient to visualize the pathological process, giving enough time to improve the background-to-target ratio due to blood pool clearance, hence a 60-minute protocol was finalized. Several studies have looked at various uptake times and have noted that Ga-68 citrate can detect lesions within 30 minutes, and after that, an increase in the intensity of uptake in the lesions by 60 minutes due to blood pool clearance.[25] Another study[26] noted that the quality of images significantly deteriorated by 120 minutes.
#
Limitations of the Study
We could not acquire delayed images with Ga-68 citrate due to the short half-life of the tracer. The radionuclide has less sensitivity for soft tissue infection due to the high blood pool activity of the tracer. The other limitations were small sample size, single-center experience, and interobserver variability in the scan interpretation. A comparison with F-18 FDG PET/CT was not performed; hence, we cannot comment on the additional advantages of one over the other.
#
Conclusion
In conclusion, Ga-68 citrate is a promising tool for assessing the presence of infections, especially skeletal for diagnosis and treatment response assessment, significantly impacting clinical decision-making in accurately treating patients, especially useful in SBO patients, where planning the extent of surgery and decision on continuation of antibiotic treatment is challenging because clinical signs often persist despite adequate treatment response.
Corrigendum: The article has been updated as per corrigendum published on April 07, 2025 (DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1807752).
#
#
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
Ethical Approval
The study involved human participants and was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of the Institutional Review Board of the hospital. A written informed consent was obtained from the patient or their relative.
-
References
- 1 Fuchigami T, Ono H, Oyadomari K. et al. Development of a 68Ge/68Ga generator system using polysaccharide polymers and its application in PET imaging of tropical infectious diseases. ACS Omega 2017; 2 (04) 1400-1407
- 2 Aghanejad A, Jalilian AR, Ardaneh K, Bolourinovin F, Yousefnia H, Samani AB. Preparation and quality control of (68)Ga-citrate for PET applications. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 2015; 3 (02) 99-106
- 3 Afzelius P, Nielsen OL, Alstrup AK. et al. Biodistribution of the radionuclides (18)F-FDG, (11)C-methionine, (11)C-PK11195, and (68)Ga-citrate in domestic juvenile female pigs and morphological and molecular imaging of the tracers in hematogenously disseminated Staphylococcus aureus lesions. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 6 (01) 42-58
- 4 Roivainen A, Jalkanen S, Nanni C. Gallium-labelled peptides for imaging of inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39 (Suppl. 01) S68-S77
- 5 Rizzello A, Di Pierro D, Lodi F. et al. Synthesis and quality control of 68Ga citrate for routine clinical PET. Nucl Med Commun 2009; 30 (07) 542-545
- 6 Ambrosini V, Nanni C, Zompatori M. et al. (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in comparison with CT for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37 (04) 722-727
- 7 Roivainen A, Tolvanen T, Salomäki S. et al. 68Ga-labeled oligonucleotides for in vivo imaging with PET. J Nucl Med 2004; 45 (02) 347-355
- 8 Kumar V, Boddeti DK, Evans SG, Roesch F, Howman-Giles R. Potential use of 68Ga-apo-transferrin as a PET imaging agent for detecting Staphylococcus aureus infection. Nucl Med Biol 2011; 38 (03) 393-398
- 9 Ma LD, Frassica FJ, Bluemke DA, Fishman EKCT. CT and MRI evaluation of musculoskeletal infection. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1997; 38 (06) 535-568
- 10 Vijayanathan S, Butt S, Gnanasegaran G, Groves AM. Advantages and limitations of imaging the musculoskeletal system by conventional radiological, radionuclide, and hybrid modalities. Semin Nucl Med 2009; 39 (06) 357-368
- 11 Bernstein LR. Mechanisms of therapeutic activity for gallium. Pharmacol Rev 1998; 50 (04) 665-682
- 12 Termaat MF, Raijmakers PGHM, Scholten HJ, Bakker FC, Patka P, Haarman HJTM. The accuracy of diagnostic imaging for the assessment of chronic osteomyelitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (11) 2464-2471
- 13 de Vries EFJ, Roca M, Jamar F, Israel O, Signore A. Inflammation/Infection Taskgroup of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with (99m)Tc-HMPAO. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37 (04) 842-848
- 14 (PDF) Radiation Dose to Patients From Radiopharmaceuticals. Accessed January 28, 2025 at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226779123_Radiation_Dose_to_Patients_From_Radiopharmaceuticals
- 15 Tseng JR, Chang YH, Yang LY. et al. Potential usefulness of 68Ga-citrate PET/CT in detecting infected lower limb prostheses. EJNMMI Res 2019; 9 (01) 2
- 16 Álvarez Jáñez F, Barriga LQ, Iñigo TR, Roldán Lora F. Diagnosis of Skull Base Osteomyelitis. Radiographics 2021; 41 (01) 156-174
- 17 Mahdyoun P, Pulcini C, Gahide I. et al. Necrotizing otitis externa: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34 (04) 620-629
- 18 Senneville E, Morant H, Descamps D. et al. Needle puncture and transcutaneous bone biopsy cultures are inconsistent in patients with diabetes and suspected osteomyelitis of the foot. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48 (07) 888-893
- 19 de Lucas EM, González Mandly A, Gutiérrez A. et al. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration in vertebral osteomyelitis: true usefulness of a common practice. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28 (03) 315-320
- 20 Aro E, Seppänen M, Mäkelä KT, Luoto P, Roivainen A, Aro HT. PET/CT to detect adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: an exploratory prospective study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2018; 38 (05) 847-855
- 21 Gomez Portilla A, Onaindia E, Larrañaga M, López de Heredia E, Echenagusía V. Periprosthetic seroma with false-positive FDG PET-CT reactive nodes mistaken for metastases in a patient previously treated of metastasic melanoma. Potential source of diagnostic errors. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017; 38: 66-68
- 22 Salomäki SP, Kemppainen J, Hohenthal U. et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-citrate and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of infectious foci in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2017; 2017: 3179607
- 23 Vorster M, Sathekge M. Gallium imaging of infection and inflammation. In: Harsini S, Alavi A, Rezaei N. eds. Nuclear Medicine and Immunology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2022: 103-123
- 24 Vorster M, Maes A, van de Wiele C, Sathekge M. 68Ga-citrate PET/CT in tuberculosis: a pilot study. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 63 (01) 48-55
- 25 Kumar V, Boddeti DK, Evans SG, Angelides S. (68)Ga-citrate-PET for diagnostic imaging of infection in rats and for intra-abdominal infection in a patient. Curr Radiopharm 2012; 5 (01) 71-75
- 26 Xu T, Chen Y. Research progress of [68Ga]citrate PET's utility in infection and inflammation imaging: a review. Mol Imaging Biol 2020; 22 (01) 22-32
Address for correspondence
Publication History
Article published online:
01 April 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India
-
References
- 1 Fuchigami T, Ono H, Oyadomari K. et al. Development of a 68Ge/68Ga generator system using polysaccharide polymers and its application in PET imaging of tropical infectious diseases. ACS Omega 2017; 2 (04) 1400-1407
- 2 Aghanejad A, Jalilian AR, Ardaneh K, Bolourinovin F, Yousefnia H, Samani AB. Preparation and quality control of (68)Ga-citrate for PET applications. Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol 2015; 3 (02) 99-106
- 3 Afzelius P, Nielsen OL, Alstrup AK. et al. Biodistribution of the radionuclides (18)F-FDG, (11)C-methionine, (11)C-PK11195, and (68)Ga-citrate in domestic juvenile female pigs and morphological and molecular imaging of the tracers in hematogenously disseminated Staphylococcus aureus lesions. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 6 (01) 42-58
- 4 Roivainen A, Jalkanen S, Nanni C. Gallium-labelled peptides for imaging of inflammation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2012; 39 (Suppl. 01) S68-S77
- 5 Rizzello A, Di Pierro D, Lodi F. et al. Synthesis and quality control of 68Ga citrate for routine clinical PET. Nucl Med Commun 2009; 30 (07) 542-545
- 6 Ambrosini V, Nanni C, Zompatori M. et al. (68)Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in comparison with CT for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37 (04) 722-727
- 7 Roivainen A, Tolvanen T, Salomäki S. et al. 68Ga-labeled oligonucleotides for in vivo imaging with PET. J Nucl Med 2004; 45 (02) 347-355
- 8 Kumar V, Boddeti DK, Evans SG, Roesch F, Howman-Giles R. Potential use of 68Ga-apo-transferrin as a PET imaging agent for detecting Staphylococcus aureus infection. Nucl Med Biol 2011; 38 (03) 393-398
- 9 Ma LD, Frassica FJ, Bluemke DA, Fishman EKCT. CT and MRI evaluation of musculoskeletal infection. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1997; 38 (06) 535-568
- 10 Vijayanathan S, Butt S, Gnanasegaran G, Groves AM. Advantages and limitations of imaging the musculoskeletal system by conventional radiological, radionuclide, and hybrid modalities. Semin Nucl Med 2009; 39 (06) 357-368
- 11 Bernstein LR. Mechanisms of therapeutic activity for gallium. Pharmacol Rev 1998; 50 (04) 665-682
- 12 Termaat MF, Raijmakers PGHM, Scholten HJ, Bakker FC, Patka P, Haarman HJTM. The accuracy of diagnostic imaging for the assessment of chronic osteomyelitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (11) 2464-2471
- 13 de Vries EFJ, Roca M, Jamar F, Israel O, Signore A. Inflammation/Infection Taskgroup of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Guidelines for the labelling of leucocytes with (99m)Tc-HMPAO. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37 (04) 842-848
- 14 (PDF) Radiation Dose to Patients From Radiopharmaceuticals. Accessed January 28, 2025 at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226779123_Radiation_Dose_to_Patients_From_Radiopharmaceuticals
- 15 Tseng JR, Chang YH, Yang LY. et al. Potential usefulness of 68Ga-citrate PET/CT in detecting infected lower limb prostheses. EJNMMI Res 2019; 9 (01) 2
- 16 Álvarez Jáñez F, Barriga LQ, Iñigo TR, Roldán Lora F. Diagnosis of Skull Base Osteomyelitis. Radiographics 2021; 41 (01) 156-174
- 17 Mahdyoun P, Pulcini C, Gahide I. et al. Necrotizing otitis externa: a systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34 (04) 620-629
- 18 Senneville E, Morant H, Descamps D. et al. Needle puncture and transcutaneous bone biopsy cultures are inconsistent in patients with diabetes and suspected osteomyelitis of the foot. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48 (07) 888-893
- 19 de Lucas EM, González Mandly A, Gutiérrez A. et al. CT-guided fine-needle aspiration in vertebral osteomyelitis: true usefulness of a common practice. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28 (03) 315-320
- 20 Aro E, Seppänen M, Mäkelä KT, Luoto P, Roivainen A, Aro HT. PET/CT to detect adverse reactions to metal debris in patients with metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty: an exploratory prospective study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2018; 38 (05) 847-855
- 21 Gomez Portilla A, Onaindia E, Larrañaga M, López de Heredia E, Echenagusía V. Periprosthetic seroma with false-positive FDG PET-CT reactive nodes mistaken for metastases in a patient previously treated of metastasic melanoma. Potential source of diagnostic errors. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017; 38: 66-68
- 22 Salomäki SP, Kemppainen J, Hohenthal U. et al. Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-citrate and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of infectious foci in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2017; 2017: 3179607
- 23 Vorster M, Sathekge M. Gallium imaging of infection and inflammation. In: Harsini S, Alavi A, Rezaei N. eds. Nuclear Medicine and Immunology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2022: 103-123
- 24 Vorster M, Maes A, van de Wiele C, Sathekge M. 68Ga-citrate PET/CT in tuberculosis: a pilot study. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 63 (01) 48-55
- 25 Kumar V, Boddeti DK, Evans SG, Angelides S. (68)Ga-citrate-PET for diagnostic imaging of infection in rats and for intra-abdominal infection in a patient. Curr Radiopharm 2012; 5 (01) 71-75
- 26 Xu T, Chen Y. Research progress of [68Ga]citrate PET's utility in infection and inflammation imaging: a review. Mol Imaging Biol 2020; 22 (01) 22-32









