J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2025; 86(S 01): S1-S576
DOI: 10.1055/s-0045-1803841
Presentation Abstracts
Podium Presentations
Poster Presentations

Reclassification of Historic Cases of Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma Using Contemporary Diagnostic Understanding—A 24-Year Experience

Blake M. Lindsay
1   Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
,
Peta-Lee Sacks
1   Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
,
Jamie Brown
2   SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
,
Minh Anh Nguyen
3   Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
,
Ruta Gupta
3   Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
,
Peter Earls
2   SydPath, St Vincent's Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
,
Larry Kalish
1   Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
,
Richard Harvey
1   Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
,
Raewyn Campbell
1   Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, St Vincent’s Centre for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
› Institutsangaben
 
 

    Introduction: Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy of the nasal and paranasal sinus epithelium, characterized by its rapid progression and poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, understanding the molecular and histopathological characteristics of SNUC remains challenging. Diagnosis of SNUC is effectively one of exclusion, if the features on pathology do not meet the diagnostic criteria of another sinonasal carcinoma. Modern understanding of newly described neoplasms (e.g., NUT midline carcinoma) and more recently understood subsets of SNUC (e.g., SMARCB1 deficient sinonasal carcinoma) would suggest that cases previously labeled as SNUC may in fact have an alternative diagnosis based on current pathology criteria.

    Aim: This study re-evaluates historic tissue samples from patients diagnosed with SNUC in Sydney, Australia, over a span of 24 years, utilizing modern diagnostic criteria and methods. We aim to better understand SNUC by stratifying existing cases into contemporarily understood sinonasal carcinoma subsets or alternative newly described diagnoses to better understand patients’ clinical treatment options, response to treatment and overall prognosis.

    Methods: Archival tumor tissue specimens of adult patients diagnosed with SNUC were collected (n = 23) from our institutions and were subjected to comprehensive histopathological re-review and immunohistochemical analysis. Additionally, molecular profiling using next-generation sequencing was performed in instances where the final diagnosis remained unclear. Pathology data were correlated with patients’ presentation, treatment course and clinical outcomes. The re-evaluation of historic tissue samples not only enhances our understanding of SNUC but also highlights the importance of revisiting archived specimens using contemporary diagnostic tools.

    Conclusion: This study underscores the value of retrospective analysis in rare cancers such as SNUC and related newly discovered differential diagnoses. Moving forward, continued efforts in collaborative research and data sharing will be essential to validate these findings and translate them into clinical practice, ultimately improving outcomes for patients with this challenging malignancy.


    Die Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

    Publikationsverlauf

    Artikel online veröffentlicht:
    07. Februar 2025

    © 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

    Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany