Keywords acute pancreatitis - computed tomography - fatty liver - psoas muscle area - sarcopenia
Introduction
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory condition of the pancreas having various
etiologies.[1 ] The incidence rate of the disease is on the rise ranging from 13 to 45 cases per
100,000 people with a gradual increase in hospitalization rate. AP generally follows
a mild course, but in 20% of the patients, the disease has a moderately severe to
severe course, which is associated with significant morbidity. Severe AP has 10 to
20% mortality.[2 ]
[3 ]
Sarcopenia is defined as generalized progressive loss of the skeletal muscle mass.
It is termed primary in cases of sarcopenia due to aging and secondary in cases due
to chronic illnesses.[4 ] Computed tomography (CT) imaging is an important method of accurately quantifying
skeletal muscle parameters and detecting sarcopenia. Abdominal CT is performed in
almost all patients of moderately severe to severe AP at admission and during hospitalization.
These CT scans can delineate the parameters like psoas muscle area (PMA) and psoas
muscle attenuation, which are indicators of sarcopenia. A recent study reported the
association of sarcopenia with worse CT severity scores and larger pancreatic necrosis.[5 ] Sarcopenia in patients of AP is associated with decreased overall survival, prolonged
hospitalization, and higher postoperative complication rate.[5 ]
Hepatic steatosis is seen in cases of alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases.
It is seen frequently in gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary diseases, including
patients of AP due to the sharing of various factors like ethanol use, diabetes mellitus
type II, obesity, and dyslipidemia contributing to its cause.[6 ] A few previous studies have reported association between fatty liver and severity
of AP.[4 ]
[6 ]
[7 ] There is limited literature on the association between fatty liver and other clinical
outcome of the AP.
This study aimed to investigate the impact of hepatic steatosis and psoas muscle mass
and density on the severity and outcomes of AP.
Materials and Methods
Subjects and Study Design
The institute ethics committee approved this single-center retrospective study and
the need to obtain informed written consent was waived. Consecutive patients of AP
who underwent CT scans between January 2019 and December 2022 were considered for
inclusion. Patients who had a baseline CT scan within 2 weeks of pain onset (baseline
CT in our center is usually performed between 5 and 7 days) and a follow-up CT scan
within 2 months of initial CT scan were considered for inclusion ([Fig. 1 ]). Patients with chronic pancreatitis, acute on chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatitis
due to pancreatic cancer were excluded.
Fig. 1 Flow diagram showing the patients' recruitment.
Baseline Parameters
The age, gender, cause of AP, and severity of AP (based on revised Atlanta classification
[RAC]) were assessed.
CT Evaluation
The CT images of the patients were retrieved from the radiology database. CT scans
were evaluated by two radiologists (2 years of posttraining experience and a 3rd-year
radiology resident) in consensus. The baseline CT scans were assessed for the features
of AP and graded according to the modified CT severity index (CTSI) scoring.[8 ] Liver attenuation was evaluated. In normal patients, the liver has a high attenuation
compared to the spleen but hepatic steatosis leads to a reversal of spleen-to-liver
attenuation difference. The attenuation of the liver and spleen in Hounsfield units
(HU) was assessed by placing five regions of interest (ROIs) of ≥ 1 cm2 on the liver involving different segments and three ROIs on the spleen. These calculations
were done on portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT ([Fig. 2 ]). The mean hepatic and splenic attenuation was calculated by taking the arithmetic
mean of these values. The spleen-to-liver attenuation difference was calculated by
subtracting the liver HU value from the splenic HU. Fatty liver was defined when spleen-to-liver
attenuation difference was more than 20 HU.[9 ]
[10 ]
Fig. 2 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans of a 46-year-old male patient
with acute necrotizing pancreatitis. (A ) Baseline CECT shows spleen-to-liver attenuation difference of 1 Hounsfield units
(HU). (B ) Follow-up CECT of the same patient obtained after 20 days shows spleen-to-liver
attenuation difference of 35 HU suggesting fatty change in the liver.
Sarcopenia was evaluated by calculating PMA and psoas muscle attenuation on a CT section
at the lower border of the L3 vertebra ([Figs. 3 ] and [4 ]). The areas of both psoas muscles were manually measured by radiologists by outlining
the psoas muscle and the total PMA was given by adding the two (in square cm). Muscle
attenuation was calculated by drawing two ROIs (one in each psoas muscle), measuring
≥ 1 cm2 . Mean attenuation was calculated by taking the arithmetic mean of these values of
the right and left sides and represented in HU values.
Fig. 3 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans of a 49-year-old female with acute
necrotizing pancreatitis. Psoas muscle area was calculated by drawing closed polygons
around both the right and left psoas muscle at the lower border of the L3 vertebra.
(A ) and (B ) show coronal and axial images of the baseline CECT of the patient. The mean psoas
muscle area at baseline CECT was 4.31 cm2 . (C ) and (D ) show coronal and axial images of follow-up CECT of the same patient obtained after
18 days. The mean psoas muscle area was reduced to 4.06 cm2 .
Fig. 4 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scans of the same patient as in [Fig. 3 ]. Psoas muscle attenuation was calculated by drawing regions of interest (ROIs) in
both the right and left psoas muscles at the lower border of the L3 vertebra. (A ) shows an axial image of the baseline CECT scan. The mean psoas muscle attenuation
was 34.4 Hounsfield units (HU). (B ) shows an axial image of a follow-up CECT scan obtained after 18 days. The mean psoas
muscle attenuation was reduced to 32.5 HU.
The same calculations were then repeated on the follow-up scan.
Clinical Outcomes
Length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of ICU stay,
surgery, and mortality were recorded.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using IBM Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences Statistics, version 29, and MedCal, version 23. The categorical variables
were reported as proportion and percentages. The continuous variables were expressed
as mean with standard deviation. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square
test or Fischer's exact test. Quantitative variables were compared using the Student's
t -test or Mann–Whitney U test. Paired quantitative variables were compared using paired t -tests. The correlation was measured using Pearson's or Spearman's correlation based
on the data distribution. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were plotted
to assess the area under the curve (AUC). Multivariable analysis was performed using
linear or logistic regression. All statistical analyses were carried out at a 5% level
of significance and a two-tailed p -value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Baseline Characteristics
One hundred and ninety-eight patients met the inclusion criteria ([Fig. 1 ]). There were 143 (72.2%) males and 55 (27.8%) females. The mean age was 37.9 (± 12.4)
years. The major causes of AP were alcohol (45.5%) and gallstones (41.9%). Among the
198 patients, 83 (41.9%) had moderately severe and 115 (58.1%) had severe AP. The
mean CTSI was 8.8 ± 1.6. The mean interval between the two CT scans in our study was
30 days (± 13.5 days).
Twenty-four (12.1%) patients had fatty liver at baseline CT and 58 (29.3%) patients
had fatty liver on follow-up CT (p < 0.001). The mean attenuation difference at the baseline scan was –10.2 (± 12.3)
HU and on the follow-up scan was –18.8 (± 21.7) HU with a mean difference of 8.47
HU, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). PMA in baseline CT was 13.9 (± 5.5) mm2 and on follow-up CT was 11.2 (± 4.6) mm2 with a mean difference of 2.64 mm2 , which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean attenuation of psoas muscle on baseline CT was 49.2 (± 8.2) HU
and on follow-up was 47.1 (± 12.1) HU with a mean difference of 2.09 HU, which was
statistically significant (p < 0.001).
The mean hospital stay was 37.6 (± 22.9) days. Out of these patients, 100 patients
(50.5%) required ICU admission. The mean ICU stay was 7.9 (± 12.2) days. Of the 198
patients, 30 (15.2%) underwent surgery and 56 (28.3%) succumbed to the disease ([Table. 1 ]).
Table 1
Patient characteristics
Parameter
Frequency (%)
Male
143 (72.2)
Female
55 (27.7)
Mean age (± SD) in years
37.9 (± 12.4)
Etiology
Alcohol
90 (45)
Gallstones
83 (42)
Idiopathic
13 (6.5)
Post ERCP
6 (3)
Drug induced
4 (2)
Hypercalcemia
2 (1)
RAC severity
Moderately severe
83 (42)
Severe
115 (58)
Mean interval between two CT scans (± SD) in days
30 (± 13.5)
Mean CTSI (± SD)
8.8 (± 1.6)
Fatty liver at baseline
24 (12)
Fatty liver at follow-up
58 (29)
Mean spleen to liver attenuation difference at baseline (± SD)
10.2 (± 12.3)
Mean spleen to liver attenuation difference at follow-up (± SD)
18.8 (± 21.7)
Mean psoas muscle area at baseline
13.9 mm2 (± 5.5)
Mean psoas muscle area at follow-up
11.2 mm2 (± 4.6)
Mean psoas muscle attenuation at baseline (± SD)
49.2 HU (± 8.2)
Mean psoas muscle attenuation at follow-up (± SD)
47.1 HU (± 12.1)
Mean length of hospital stay (± SD) in days
37.6 (± 22.9)
Number of patients admitted in ICU
100 (50)
Mean length of ICU stay (± SD) in days
7.9 (± 12.2)
Surgery
30 (15)
Mortality
56 (28)
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; CTSI, computed tomography severity index;
ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; HU, Hounsfield units; ICU, intensive
care unit; RAC, revised Atlanta classification; SD, standard deviation.
Association with Outcomes ([Tables 2 ]
[3 ]
[4 ])
Table 2
Association of fatty liver with outcomes
Outcomes
p -Value
Fatty liver at baseline
RAC severity
0.919
Length of hospital stay
0.598
ICU stay
0.872
Length of ICU stay
0.671
Surgery
0.058
Mortality
0.792
Fatty liver at follow-up
RAC severity
0.342
Length of hospital stay
0.542
ICU stay
0.392
Length of ICU stay
0.506
Surgery
0.385
Mortality
0.121
Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; RAC, revised Atlanta classification.
Table 3
Association of spleen to liver attenuation difference with outcomes
Outcomes
p -Value
Spleen to liver attenuation difference at baseline
RAC severity
0.072
ICU stay
0.796
Surgery
0.724
Mortality
0.893
Spleen to liver attenuation difference at follow-up
RAC severity
0.007
ICU stay
0.351
Surgery
0.456
Mortality
0.144
Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; RAC, revised Atlanta classification.
Table 4
Association of psoas muscle area with outcomes
Outcomes
p -Value
Psoas muscle area at baseline
RAC severity
0.270
ICU stay
0.003
Surgery
0.119
Mortality
0.043
Psoas muscle area at follow-up
RAC severity
0.588
ICU stay
0.536
Surgery
0.733
Mortality
0.807
Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; RAC, revised Atlanta classification.
Fatty Liver
Fatty liver at baseline or follow-up CT was not associated with clinical outcomes.
However, the spleen-to-liver attenuation difference at follow-up CT scans was significantly
associated with the severity of AP (p = 0.007).
Psoas Muscle Parameters
PMA at baseline was significantly associated with ICU stay (p = 0.003) and mortality (p = 0.043). Psoas muscle attenuation at baseline was associated with the severity of
the disease (p = 0.023) and mortality (p < 0.001). Psoas muscle attenuation on follow-up was associated with the severity
of AP (p = 0.023), ICU stay (p = 0.001), surgery (p = 0.007), and mortality (p < 0.001).
Multivariate Analysis
Length of hospital stay: The only factor significantly associated with length of hospitalization
was the PMA at baseline CT (p = 0.036).
ICU admission: Age (p = 0.042), PMA at baseline CT (p = 0.001), PMA at follow-up CT (p = 0.045), and psoas muscle attenuation at follow-up CT were significantly associated
with ICU admission.
Length of ICU stay: The length of ICU stay was significantly associated with PMA at
baseline CT (p = 0.003), psoas muscle attenuation at baseline (p = 0.017), and at follow-up CT (p = 0.001).
Surgery: Surgery was significantly associated with PMA at baseline (p = 0.018), PMA at follow-up (p = 0.046), and psoas muscle attenuation at follow-up CT (p = 0.015).
Mortality: PMA at baseline CT (p = 0.019), psoas muscle attenuation at baseline CT (p = 0.032), and RAC severity of AP (p = 0.026) were significantly associated with mortality.
Correlation ([Tables 5 ] and [6 ])
Table 5
Association of psoas muscle attenuation with outcomes
Outcomes
p -Value
Psoas muscle attenuation at baseline
RAC severity
0.023
ICU stay
0.073
Surgery
0.967
Mortality
0.001
Psoas muscle attenuation at follow-up
RAC severity
0.023
ICU stay
0.001
Surgery
0.007
Mortality
0.001
Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; RAC, revised Atlanta classification.
Table 6
Correlation of attenuation difference and psoas muscle indices with outcomes
Parameters
Length of hospital stay
Length of ICU stay
Pearson's coefficient
p -Value
Pearson's coefficient
p -Value
Liver AD at baseline CT
0.064
0.373
0.041
0.563
Liver AD at follow-up CT
–0.069
0.332
–0.119
0.096
PMA at baseline CT
0.129
0.070
0.193
0.007
PMA at follow up CT
0.011
0.872
0.042
0.557
PM attenuation at baseline CT
–0.084
0.239
–0.252
0.001
PM attenuation at follow-up
–0.139
0.050
–0.319
0.001
Abbreviations: AD, attenuation difference; CT, computed tomography; ICU, intensive
care unit; PMA, psoas muscle area; PM, psoas muscle.
There was no significant correlation between spleen-to-liver attenuation difference
at baseline or on follow-up CT scans with length of hospital and length of ICU stay.
There was a significant positive correlation between PMA at baseline with length of
ICU stay (correlation coefficient = 0.193, p = 0.007). There was a significant negative correlation between psoas muscle attenuation
at baseline (correlation coefficient = 0.252, p < 0.001) and at follow-up CT scans with length of ICU stay (correlation coefficient = 0.319,
p < 0.001).
ROC Curves ([Fig. 5 ])
Fig. 5 Receiver operating characteristic curves for the severity of acute pancreatitis,
intensive care unit (ICU) stay, surgery, and mortality.
Severity: The AUC was the largest (0.624 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.552–0.692])
for psoas muscle attenuation at follow-up CT scan followed by psoas muscle attenuation
at baseline CT (0.609 [95% CI: 0.537–0.678]).
ICU stay: The AUC was the largest (0.674 [95% CI: 0.603–0.739]) for psoas muscle attenuation
at follow-up CT scan followed by PMA at baseline CT (0.632 [95% CI: 0.560–0.700]).
Surgery: The AUC was the largest (0.654 [95% CI: 0.583–0.721]) for psoas muscle attenuation
at follow-up CT scan followed by PMA at baseline CT (0.582 [95% CI: 0.510–0.652]).
Mortality: The AUC was the largest (0.692 [95% CI: 0.622–0.756]) for psoas muscle
attenuation at follow-up CT scan followed by psoas muscle attenuation at baseline
CT (0.668 [95% CI: 0.597–0.734]).
Discussion
The present study investigated the effect of the presence of fatty liver and sarcopenia
(PMA and psoas muscle attenuation) on the outcomes of the patients of AP. The analysis
of these parameters is an evolving technique and can be easily obtained from abdominal
CT images. CT is an integral imaging modality used in patients of AP for diagnosis
and follow-up.
Our study suggested no association between the presence of fatty liver with the severity
and outcomes of AP. This was contradictory to various studies done in the past, which
recommend fatty liver to be an independent risk factor predicting the severity and
mortality in AP.[11 ]
[12 ]
[13 ]
The mean PMA in our study was 13.9 ± 5.5 mm2 at baseline scan and 11.2 ± 4.6 mm2 on follow-up scans. It was lower as compared to a similar study done in the Chinese
population in 2023 with a mean PMA of 15.28 mm2 .[14 ] The PMAs in the present study were lower as compared to a large sample of healthy
patients from India who had no other comorbidities.[15 ] The mean difference in PMA between baseline and follow-up CT in our study was 2.64 mm2 (p < 0.001), which suggested a decrease in PMA throughout the disease. It was similar
to the findings of a study from New Zealand.[16 ]
In our study, the presence of ICU stay and mortality were significantly associated
with PMA at baseline CT. It was contradictory to the abovementioned Chinese study
that reported no association between ICU stay and PMA. Also, there was no association
between PMA and the severity of the disease in the Chinese study.[14 ] There is no previous study that has evaluated the association of PMA with mortality
in AP.
In our study, the mean psoas muscle attenuation was 49.2 ± 8.2 HU on the baseline
scan and 47.1 ± 12.1 HU on the follow-up scan. It was significantly higher as compared
to a recently conducted multicenter study in Europe, which recorded a mean muscle
attenuation of 29.35 ± 4.16 HU in severe AP.[17 ] A Chinese study in 2021 on patients of AP calculated a mean muscle attenuation of
38.24 ± 3.92, which was lower than our study.[3 ] These findings were replicated again in another study in 2023 in the similar Chinese
population, which showed a mean muscle attenuation of 36.07 ± 3.94 HU.[18 ] The higher psoas muscle attenuation in our study compared to these Chinese studies
can be because of different patient characteristics. These studies included only severe
AP patients while our study included patients of varying severities of AP (moderate
as well as severe AP).
Our study suggested a significant association between psoas muscle attenuation at
baseline CT with the severity of the disease as well as mortality. The muscle attenuation
on follow-up CT was associated significantly with the severity of AP, presence of
ICU stay, surgery, and mortality. A similar observation was reported by another European
study, which suggested the association of low muscle attenuation with the severity
of the disease.[17 ] The association between muscle attenuation with increased mortality was similar
to a multicenter Dutch study in 2017 by van Grinsven et al who found a distinct association
between muscle attenuation and mortality in AP patients (p = 0.001).[19 ] Zhou et al in 2021 reported a similar association between low muscle attenuation
and mortality in AP patients.[3 ] The association between the need for ICU admission and increased mortality with
low muscle attenuation was also noted in the United States-based study by Trikudanathan
et al in 2021.[20 ]
Low muscle attenuation usually results from increased fatty infiltration of the muscle,
which is known as myosteatosis or increased water infiltration representing muscle
edema. Skeletal muscles are an important source of leptin, which not only prevents
deposition of lipids in peripheral tissues but is also an anti-inflammatory agent.
The reduced muscle attenuation impairs skeletal muscle function along with reduced
leptin production. The disturbance in the inflammatory environment due to cytokines
imbalance explains this association between low muscle attenuation and severity and
mortality in AP.[21 ] The effect of leptin as an anti-inflammatory agent has been studied in animal models
where exogenous supplementation of leptin reduced expression of proinflammatory factors
and nitric oxide, which resulted in reduced severity in AP.[22 ]
Our study also reported a significant attenuation difference between baseline and
follow-up CT.
The other school of thought suggests that severe inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)
in AP patients results in myosteatosis. The release of multiple proinflammatory agents
in AP provides high oxidative stress on the muscle mitochondria resulting in altered
fatty acid metabolism resulting in fat deposition. This fatty deposition thus results
in low muscle attenuation as the disease progresses.[23 ] It is also supported by a recent study in patients of colorectal cancer, which suggested
an association between host SIRS and reduced muscle attenuation and myosteatosis.[24 ]
Our study has a few limitations which need to be acknowledged. First, this was a retrospective
study with no set timing for the acquisition of CT. Second, the scans were evaluated
by two radiologists in consensus and the intra- and interobserver agreement were not
assessed. Third, anthropometric parameters were not available for patients. So, we
could not calculate the psoas muscle index. Finally, the impact of edema on psoas
muscle parameters in our results as well as the previous studies is still unknown.
In conclusion, our study did not find the association of fatty liver with outcomes
of AP. However, PMA indices are associated with clinical outcomes. Larger prospective
well-planned studies may confirm as well as supplement the findings reported by us.