CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Coloproctology 2024; 44(04): e234-e241
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800889
Original Article

Evaluation of the Relationship Between Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Colonoscopy: The Importance of Early Diagnosis

1   Department of Medicine, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Dehon, Tubarão, SC, Brazil
,
Helena Caetano Gonçalves e Silva
1   Department of Medicine, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Dehon, Tubarão, SC, Brazil
,
Giulia Goulart
2   R2 of Internal Medicine, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
 

Abstract

Objective The present study evaluated the relationship between the incidence of colorectal cancer and colonoscopy in Santa Catarina from 2018 to 2022.

Methods Observational study of ecological type, which includes all confirmed cases of CRC in the state of Santa Catarina from 2018 to 2022, across health macro-regions. The data were obtained from SINAN, through TABNET/DATASUS. The variables gender, age group, race, type of care, average cost per hospitalization, days of stay, deaths, and mortality rates were evaluated.

Results In the period from 2018 to 2022, there were more than 28,000 cases of CRC in the state of Santa Catarina, with the Grande Oeste region being responsible for the highest incidence throughout the studied period. The main age group is between 70 and 79 years old; As for gender, most cases are predominantly male; about race, white ethnicity is predominant; the nature of service is, for the most part, elective; the average value per hospital stay is 2,355.41; total hospital stay days are 120,924; the number of deaths is 1553 and the mortality rate is (5.44/100.00). Regarding colonoscopy, the largest number of colonoscopies performed was in Grande Florianópolis.

Conclusion There is a high incidence of CRC cases in the state of Santa Catarina. Males and those aged 70 to 79 are the most affected by CRC in Santa Catarina. The Grande Oeste region has a higher incidence of cases compared with other health macro-regions.


#

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is an invasive malignant neoplasm that develops in the colon and rectum mucosa and is mostly classified as adenocarcinoma. Early-stage CRC often presents as an intestinal polyp, which can take up to 10 years to evolve into CRC.[1] Advanced cancer stages show signs and symptoms such as rectal bleeding, palpable or visible abdominal or rectal mass through radiological exams, unexplained anemia, weight loss, and changes in bowel habits.[2]

CRC is the third most common cancer in Brazil for both sexes, following non-melanoma skin cancer, prostate cancer in men, and breast cancer in women. According to the National Cancer Institute (INCA), there are over 40,000 CRC cases annually in the country, with 17,000 deaths from colon and rectal cancer in 2020.[3]

Globally, CRC is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death, with ∼18 million new cases and 881,000 deaths in 2018.[4] According to the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), CRC is the third most common cancer among men and women and the second leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States, with 147,950 new cases and 53,200 deaths in 2020.[5] [6]

Preventive measures for CRC include physical exercise, maintaining a healthy weight, avoiding excessive alcohol and red and processed meat consumption, not smoking, and increasing fiber intake.[7] However, due to difficulties in implementing lifestyle changes, secondary prevention through screening tests has proven to be the most effective method to reduce CRC mortality.[8]

Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for CRC screening and prevention.[9] This procedure allows for the removal of precursor polyps, reducing CRC incidence by 69% and mortality by 68%. Survival varies according to cancer stage, being over 90% in localized cases and less than 15% in advanced cases.[10]

Colonoscopy is a comfortable and safe procedure for the patient,[7] as it can be performed on an outpatient basis with rare adverse events. The perforation rate is 0.005% to 0.085%, and the post-colonoscopy bleeding rate is 0.001–0.687%.[10] A study conducted in Japan showed that the rates of hemorrhage, perforation, and fatal events related to colonoscopy were 0.0059%, supporting the safety of the exam.[11]

Screening colonoscopy for individuals aged 50 to 75 is recommended with an evidence grade A and should be repeated every 10 years.[1] However, in 2021, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended starting CRC screening at age 45 for average-risk individuals due to the increasing incidence of CRC at younger ages.[6] [12] This change was also supported by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and the American Cancer Society.[1] [6]

Regions with higher Human Development Index (HDI) have a higher prevalence of malignant colon and rectum tumors, such as the Southern region of Brazil. According to INCA, 70% of cancer cases in the country from 2023 to 2025 will be in the South and Southeast regions, with CRC prevalence in the South being 26.46 per 100,000 inhabitants.[13] This can be explained by greater exposure to risk factors such as sedentarism, obesity, a diet rich in red meat, smoking, greater availability of screening tests, and higher life expectancy compared with states with lower HDI.[4]

Early diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer positively impact patient prognosis and survival, achievable through effective, safe exams with few side effects and high therapeutic power like colonoscopy. This study evaluated the relationship between colorectal cancer incidence and colonoscopy in Santa Catarina from 2018 to 2022 to verify the efficacy of secondary prevention in the state's macro-regions. This study is justified to understand the distribution of cases in Santa Catarina, the profile of cases, their relationship with performed colonoscopies, and mortality, allowing a better understanding of cancer behavior in the state and the distribution and access to early detection and treatment services. The main objective is to evaluate the relationship between colorectal cancer and colonoscopy in Santa Catarina from 2018 to 2022.


#

Methods

An observational study with an ecological design was conducted, including all confirmed CRC cases in Santa Catarina from 2018 to 2022, through the health macro-regions. All confirmed CRC cases in Santa Catarina from 2018 to 2022 described in SINAN/DATASUS were included in the study through the studied variables. Additionally, data on colonoscopies from all state macro-regions were included. Cases with incomplete notification fields and those considered ignored by the database were excluded. Data were obtained from SINAN via TABNET/DATASUS at: https://datasus.saude.gov.br/informacoes-de-saude-tabnet/ . Data collection involved analyzing all described variables of confirmed CRC cases and colonoscopies, allowing the study's planned analyses. Studied variables included sex, age group, race/color, type of care, average cost per hospitalization, days of stay, deaths, and mortality rate.

As it was an ecological study using secondary data sources, informed consent was not required. The study presents minimal risk to participants, with no intentional interventions or modifications to participants' physiological, psychological, or social variables. Participants' benefits will be indirect, including seeking and clarifying information on colorectal cancer incidence in Santa Catarina from 2018 to 2022, comparing it with the number of performed colonoscopies.

Considering the study involved population aggregates, it does not fall under the terms of CNS Resolution 466/2012 and 510/2016 for evaluation by the Ethics Committee on Research Involving Human Beings – UNISUL. The authors acknowledge the content of CNS Resolutions 466/2012 and 510/2016, which serve as a reference for any necessary decisions for the study's execution.

The collected data were recorded in spreadsheets of the Microsoft Excel 2021 program (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA), and the calculations were performed using this tool. Descriptive epidemiology was used for data presentation, with qualitative variables expressed by absolute and percentage frequencies. For the calculation of incidence rates, data from the general population for the studied years and absolute numbers obtained, both from DATASUS, were used, divided by the population of the municipality, and multiplied by the constant 100,000.


#

Results

It is observed that, in the period from 2018 to 2022, there were more than 28,000 cases of CRC in Santa Catarina. The highest incidence is in the Grande Oeste region (676.46/100,000), while the lowest incidence is in the Grande Florianópolis region (134.22/100,000), as shown in [Table 1].

Table 1

Prevalence rate of colorectal cancer cases in the health macroregions of the state of Santa Catarina during the studied period

Variables

Morb CID-10

SUL

PLANALTO NORTE E NORDESTE

MEIO OESTE E SERRA CATARINENSE

GRANDE OESTE

GRANDE FLORIANOPOLIS

FOZ DO RIO ITAJAI

ALTO VALE DO ITAJAI

Total

Type

n (Prev.)

n (Prev.)

n (Prev.)

n (Prev.)

n (Prev.)

n (Prev.)

n (Prev.)

n (Prev.)

Malignant neoplasm of the colon

1928(189,26)

1990 (138,33)

4838 (524,76)

5437 (676,46)

1650 (134,22)

1212 (165,63)

1537 (138,66)

18592,00

Neopl malig junction rectum anus anal canal

1122 (110,14)

1186 (82,44)

2514 (272,69)

2645 (329,09)

852 (69,31)

591 (80,76)

1035 (93,37)

9945,00

Age group

0 a 4 years

5 (7,61)

5 (4,83)

1 (1,53)

3 (3,98)

1 (1,91)

8 (11,18)

23,00

5 a 9 years

7 (11)

3 (5,96)

5 (6,93)

4 (5,73)

19,00

10 a 14 years

6 (9,82)

1 (1,08)

3 (5,28)

1 (1,39)

1 (2,14)

5 (7,18)

17,00

15 a 19 years

6 (9,67)

74 (75,88)

17 (28,35)

43 (54,92)

7 (14,08)

11 (14,96)

158,00

20 a 29 years

45 (28,73)

111 (47,68)

141 (98,36)

299 (232,01)

127 (66,26)

30 (24,78)

48 (26,92)

801,00

30 a 39 years

209 (122,73)

240 (100,52)

352 (250,26)

214 (163,15)

179 (82,39)

119 (94,98)

176 (91,87)

1489,00

40 a 49 years

349 (256,04)

453 (219,46)

929 (738,80)

711 (661,52)

325 (178,96)

291 (282,02)

303 (193,91)

3361,00

50 a 59 years

702 (512,30)

755 (438,05)

1673 (1419,32)

1844 (1772,19)

543 (359,57)

453 (525,97)

631 (459,62)

6601,00

60 a 69 years

969 (1009,77)

863 (744,69)

2269 (2749,00)

2681 (3626,35)

648 (591,94)

499 (853,63)

680 (737,24)

8609,00

70 a 79 years

622 (1288,45)

494 (893,10)

1531 (3309,05)

1767 (4449,42)

389 (703,55)

333 (1203,25)

535 (1158,38)

5671,00

80 years or more

130 (598,20)

180 (712,70)

436 (1996,70)

563 (2995,96)

239 (933,30)

69 (569,97)

171 (774,11)

1788,00

Gender

Male

1642 (325,47)

1699 (236,77)

4084 (890,09)

4377 (1085,62)

1337 (222,28)

934 (259,56)

1455 (263,26)

15528,00

Female

1408 (273,82)

1477 (204,86)

3268 (705,66)

3705 (924,94)

1165 (185,56)

869 (233,65)

1117 (200,98)

13009,00

Race

White

2843,00

2963,00

7095

7600

2297

1569

2361

26728,00

Black

120,00

41,00

23

67

81

23

44

399,00

Brown

46,00

149,00

126

95

99

195

132

842,00

Yellow

4,00

11,00

30

222

13

8

6

294,00

Indigenous

0,00

0,00

0

5

0

0,00

2

7,00

Source: TABNET/DATASUS.


It is noted that, in Santa Catarina, the type of care for CRC is mostly elective (16,885 cases), except in the Planalto Norte e Nordeste regions and Alto Vale do Itajaí, where care is urgent (2,340 and 1,887 cases, respectively), as shown in [Table 2].

Table 2

Profile of colorectal cancer cases by type of care, average hospitalization cost, days of stay, deaths, and mortality rate in the state of Santa Catarina during the studied period

Type of care

SUL

PLANALTO NORTE E NORDESTE

MEIO OESTE E SERRA CATARINENSE

GRANDE OESTE

GRANDE FLORIANOPOLIS

FOZ DO RIO ITAJAI

ALTO VALE DO ITAJAI

Total

Elective

2102

836

4354

6445

1462

1001

685

16885

Urgent

948

2340

2998

1637

1040

802

1887

11652

Average hospitalization cost

2018

2596,76

3105,74

2189,47

1549,77

2273,09

5192,07

3703,52

2413,69

2019

2512,51

2590,83

1942,32

1589,88

2213,87

4635,15

3831,36

2368,2

2020

3462,9

3767,12

1986,48

1422,67

2527,94

4218,51

3857,99

2488,4

2021

3511,87

3665,46

1879,6

1397,61

2359,53

2879,15

3892,27

2320,13

2022

3297,78

3581,27

1960,25

1430,43

2494,67

2025,89

3146,51

2202,28

Total

2927,26

3307,73

1990,26

1471,1

2400,68

3256,45

3648,2

2355,41

Hospital stay days

2018

3146

4029

4457

4057

4434

1045

1907

23075

2019

2991

4103

4078

3803

4904

1584

2240

23703

2020

1703

3833

4428

4021

5037

1101

1916

22039

2021

1898

3026

4907

4748

4694

1659

2112

23044

2022

1882

3826

6537

5504

5873

2686

2755

29063

Total

11620

18817

24407

22133

24942

8075

10930

120924

Deaths

2018

46

48

44

30

60

15

34

277

2019

43

54

48

20

65

19

36

285

2020

32

71

40

17

84

15

43

302

2021

41

54

40

32

80

30

48

325

2022

33

66

64

31

84

30

56

364

Total

195

293

236

130

373

109

217

1553

Mortality rate

2018

5,4

8,35

3,62

2,17

14,18

10,07

9,14

5,57

2019

4,98

6,94

3,7

1,57

12,62

8,12

7,16

5,22

2020

7,46

11,99

2,89

1,12

18,22

6,12

9,13

5,92

2021

8,99

9,91

2,61

1,77

15,21

7,83

9,02

5,62

2022

7,35

9,62

3,32

1,48

14,56

3,79

8,07

5,04

Total

6,39

9,23

3,21

1,61

14,91

6,05

8,44

5,44

Source: TABNET/DATASUS.


In [Table 3], it is noted that the highest number of colonoscopies performed was in Grande Florianópolis (n = 22,723), while the Meio Oeste e Serra Catarinense region had the lowest number of colonoscopies performed (n = 9,847).

Table 3

Profile of patients who underwent colonoscopy in the state of Santa Catarina during the studied period

Procedure

SUL

PLANALTO NORTE E NORDESTE

MEIO OESTE E SERRA CATARINENSE

GRANDE OESTE

GRANDE FLORIANOPOLIS

ss

ALTO VALE DO ITAJAI

Total

COLONOSCOPY

10986

20808

9847

15217

22723

12531

11586

103698

Type

Elective

10910

20399

9721

13798

22300

12498

11497

101123

Urgent

75

409

126

1419

423

32

89

2573

Gender

Male

3962

7955

4115

6008

8040

4221

4587

38888

Female

7024

12853

5732

9209

14683

8310

6999

64810

Age group

Under 1 year

7

2

4

8

7

3

4

35

1 a 4 years

1

2

8

4

1

2

18

5 a 9 years

5

1

3

1

3

13

10 a 14 years

7

10

6

9

1

6

5

44

15 a 19 years

55

106

44

70

140

60

67

542

20 a 24 years

108

232

96

206

325

167

148

1282

25 a 29 years

199

310

155

290

519

275

258

2006

30 a 34 years

268

522

227

429

659

418

322

2845

35 a 39 years

468

864

392

629

1038

697

586

4674

40 a 44 years

693

1238

572

906

1533

973

812

6727

45 a 49 years

864

1739

793

1352

1956

1195

1111

9010

(CONTINUE)

50 a 54 years

1422

2622

1236

1964

3108

1716

1600

13668

55 a 59 years

1687

3251

1540

2414

3480

1858

1949

16179

60 a 64 years

1751

3565

1614

2255

3488

1854

1744

16271

65 a 69 years

1513

2991

1348

1991

3057

1604

1446

13950

70 a 74 years

1149

1922

1004

1391

1953

1022

877

9318

75 a 79 years

516

909

540

841

965

459

436

4666

80 years or more

273

522

265

457

493

224

216

2450

Source: TABNET/DATASUS.



#

Discussion

In the present study, it was observed that the highest incidence of CRC is in the Grande Oeste region, followed by the Meio Oeste e Serra Catarinense region, while Grande Florianópolis was the macro-region with the lowest incidence of CRC. A Brazilian study conducted in Aracaju, Sergipe,[13] indicated that, between 1996 and 2015, there were only 1,322 cases of CRC in the municipality. These findings corroborate the fact that states with higher HDI have more cases of colorectal neoplasia due to greater exposure to risk factors such as a diet rich in red meat, smoking, and a sedentary lifestyle, in addition to the presence of more diagnostic resources and greater access to health services. Given this fact, it is assumed that the studies converge regarding HDI and the development of CRC, especially as they pertain to urban centers and reference points in their states.

When observing the age variable, it is noted that there is a higher incidence in the age group between 70 and 79 years, except in Grande Florianópolis, where the highest incidence is in the age group of 80 years or older. Although the absolute number of cases is higher in other age groups, the incidence rate allows for such comparability. Furthermore, it is important to highlight a considerable increase in incidence from the age of 40 in the Meio Oeste and Serra Catarinense and Grande Oeste. A meta-analysis written by Kolb and collaborators[14] showed that the rates of advanced colorectal neoplasia in individuals aged 45 to 49 were similar to the rates found in individuals aged 50 to 59 (3.6% and 4.2%, respectively). A study conducted by Anderson and collaborators,[15] showed that the risk of developing CRC was similar among individuals aged 40 to 49 and those aged 50 to 59. Various studies indicate an increase in CRC incidence in adults under 50, highlighting the importance of initiating screening at earlier ages. Although there is a slight age difference, it is observed that the age groups for developing CRC are very close, ranging between 40 and 60 years. This information suggests that regardless of the age group, starting at 40 years old, it is necessary to pay attention to the emergence of CRC and possible investigations to identify cases early. Some age groups have unique characteristics related to the disease, emphasizing the importance of the physician's attention during anamnesis to risk factors and the likelihood of disease development in the patient.

When observing the sex variable, it is noted that there is a higher incidence of colorectal neoplasia in males across all health macro-regions of Santa Catarina. A global systematic analysis[16] showed that in 2019, men accounted for ∼57.2% of CRC cases. A review article[17] has shown that men have 1.5 times higher chances of developing CRC compared with women, across all age groups. It is suggested that men are more exposed to risk factors such as alcoholism and smoking, and they tend to seek medical services less often, which justifies these findings. Another hypothesis is the difficulty in accepting invasive examinations, especially in this specialty, which makes men more vulnerable compared with women.

In [Table 2], when analyzing the average cost per hospitalization, it is noteworthy that 2020 was the year with the highest average hospitalization cost in Santa Catarina. When examining the variable of hospital stay days, it is observed that 2022 had the highest number of hospital days in the state. These findings differ from the international literature, as highlighted by a systematic review conducted in China,[18] that during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021, the average hospitalization days for CRC-related surgeries were significantly higher compared with the average days during the same period in 2019. Additionally, a study conducted in Australia[19] estimated that a 6-month delay in CRC diagnosis led to an increase of 1.6 million dollars in healthcare costs during the year 2020. It is hypothesized that the COVID-19 pandemic caused diagnostic delays, consequently leading to an increase in advanced cancer cases, which raised healthcare expenditures and resulted in longer hospitalization periods. However, such a global pattern was not observed in the macroregions of Santa Catarina. Therefore, the importance of early diagnosis and prevention of CRC is emphasized once again.

When observing deaths, it is noted that from 2018 to 2022, there were 1,553 deaths in Santa Catarina, with the highest number of deaths occurring in the Grande Florianópolis region, totaling 373 deaths, and the lowest number in the Foz do Rio Itajaí region, with 109 deaths. Additionally, it should be highlighted that 2022 had the highest number of deaths, with 364 deaths. A study by Goodarzi and colleagues[20] showed that ∼60% of CRC deaths worldwide occur in countries with high or very high HDI. Furthermore, a study conducted in Mato Grosso[21] showed that from 2005 to 2016, only 1,492 deaths from CRC were recorded in the state. Considering this, the hypothesis is raised that Grande Florianópolis has the highest number of deaths due to its high HDI. Meanwhile, in regions with lower HDI, underreporting of cases and a lack of diagnostic resources are observed, resulting in fewer deaths accurately attributed to the disease. Additionally, it should be noted that regions with higher HDI exhibit more risk factors such as inadequate diet rich in red and processed meat, smoking, and physical inactivity.

When analyzing the mortality rate, it is noted that the highest rate was in Grande Florianópolis (14.91/100,000), while the Grande Oeste region had the lowest mortality rate (1.61/100,000). Additionally, it is important to highlight that 2020 had the highest mortality rate (5.92/100,000). A study conducted in England[22] showed that in 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a 16% increase in deaths from CRC in the country compared with the pre-pandemic period. A study conducted in Japan,[23] indicated that the risk of mortality in patients diagnosed with CRC in 2020 and 2021 was significantly higher than in 2018. It is observed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a decrease in referrals for colonoscopies, imaging tests, and diagnoses, as well as an increase in inadequate, interrupted, delayed, or abandoned treatments for colorectal cancer, which resulted in a rise in mortality from this cancer.

When observing the number of colonoscopies performed, it is highlighted that the highest number of colonoscopies was in Grande Florianópolis, while the Meio Oeste e Serra Catarinense regions had the lowest number of colonoscopies. It is hypothesized that Florianópolis has more health resources and, consequently, greater access, to a higher number of health services and hospitals, making it a state reference for Santa Catarina for the performance of these exams. Furthermore, this may explain the higher number of cases in individuals aged 80 and older in Grande Florianópolis, as there is greater use of colonoscopy as a preventive measure for CRC.

When examining the variable of sex, it is noted that in all macroregions of Santa Catarina, most of the individual's undergoing colonoscopy are female. According to Ribeiro,[24] there is a predominance of female patients undergoing colonoscopy, accounting for 59%. A retrospective study conducted in Nigeria[25] indicated that many patients undergoing colonoscopy were male, representing 62.2%. It is observed that there are studies that both align with and diverge from the present study. However, it is noted once again that in Brazil, women are more concerned about their health and seek medical services more often than men. This finding may also explain the higher number of CRC cases among males in the state of Santa Catarina.

When examining age groups, it is highlighted that there is a higher concentration of colonoscopies performed in the age group of 55 to 64 years in Santa Catarina. According to Batista,[26] the average age of patients undergoing colonoscopy is 52 years. Another study conducted in Ethiopia[27] indicated that the average age of patients was 43 years. It is observed that in Santa Catarina, patients undergoing colonoscopy are of a higher age compared with other locations, and they do not follow the recommendations to start CRC screening at age 50, which may lead to an increase in cases of colorectal neoplasia in the state.


#

Conclusion

It is concluded that the state of Santa Catarina had 28,537 cases of CRC during the studied period. It is noted that there is a higher incidence in the age group between 70 and 79 years. In all health macroregions, there is a predominance of cases among male individuals and those of white ethnicity. The highest incidence of CRC in the state was in the Grande Oeste region (676.46/100,000), followed by the Meio Oeste e Serra Catarinense regions (524.76/100,000), while Grande Florianópolis had the lowest incidence of CRC (134.22/100,000). The average hospitalization cost during the analyzed period is R$ 2,355.41, the total number of hospital days is 120,924, the number of deaths is 1,553, and the mortality rate is 5.44/100,000 inhabitants. Regarding colonoscopy, the highest number of procedures was performed in Grande Florianópolis, while the Meio Oeste e Serra Catarinense regions had the lowest number of colonoscopies. Predominantly, the nature of care was elective, and the patient's undergoing colonoscopy were mostly female and in the age group of 55 to 64 years.

CRC is a serious public health issue, especially in regions with higher HDI and among male individuals. Therefore, early screening with colonoscopy should be encouraged to prevent this neoplasm, which is increasingly affecting younger populations.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, no funding sources, and the study was not preregistered.

Authors' Contributions

TGS and KSM: Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing of the articles, and final version to be published. All authors agree and take responsibility for the content of this version of the manuscript to be published.


Data Availability

Not applicable.


Research Funding

The research was conducted with the researchers' funding.


  • References

  • 1 Gupta S. Screnning for colorretal cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36 (03) 393-414
  • 2 Cubiella J., Marzo-Castillejo M., Mascort-Roca J.J.. et al; Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria y Asociación Española de Gastroenterología. Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 41 (09) 585-596 (English Edition)
  • 3 Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 21]. Estatísticas de câncer. Available from: https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/numeros/
  • 4 Baidoun F, Elshiwy K, Elkeraie Y. et al. Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology: Recent Trends and Impact on Outcomes. Curr Drug Targets 2021; 22 (09) 998-1009
  • 5 Shaukat A, Kahi CJ, Burke CA, Rabeneck L, Sauer BG, Rex DK. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116 (03) 458-479
  • 6 Jain S, Maque J, Galoosian A, Osuna-Garcia A, May FP. Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23 (04) 474-493
  • 7 Saito Y, Oka S, Kawamura T. et al. Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Endosc 2021; 33 (04) 486-519
  • 8 Ladabaum U, Dominitz JA, Kahi C, Schoen RE. Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology 2020; 158 (02) 418-432
  • 9 Hultcrantz R. Aspects of colorectal cancer screening, methods, age and gender. J Intern Med 2021; 289 (04) 493-507
  • 10 Kim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25 (02) 190-204
  • 11 Yoshida N, Mano Y, Matsuda T. et al. Complications of colonoscopy in Japan: An analysis using large-scale health insurance claims data. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36 (10) 2745-2753
  • 12 Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM. et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021; 325 (19) 1965-1977
  • 13 Moura AR, Marques AD, Dantas MS. et al. Trends in the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer in a brazilian city. BMC Res Notes 2020; 13 (01) 560
  • 14 Kolb JM, Hu J, DeSanto K. et al. Early-Age Onset Colorectal Neoplasia in Average-Risk Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2021; 161 (04) 1145-1155.e12
  • 15 Anderson JC, Robinson CM, Butterly LF. Young adults and metachronous neoplasia: risks for future advanced adenomas and large serrated polyps compared with older adults. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91 (03) 669-675
  • 16 Sharma R, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Rabu R. et al; GBD 2019 Colorectal Cancer Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7 (07) 627-647
  • 17 Rawla P, Sunkara T, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Prz Gastroenterol 2019; 14 (02) 89-103
  • 18 Mazidimoradi A, Hadavandsiri F, Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54 (01) 171-187
  • 19 Degeling K, Baxter NN, Emery J. et al. An inverse stage-shift model to estimate the excess mortality and health economic impact of delayed access to cancer services due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 17 (04) 359-367
  • 20 Goodarzi E, Beiranvand R, Naemi H, Momenabadi V, Khazaei Z. Worldwide incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer and human development index (hdi): an ecological study. World Cancer Research J 2019; 6: e1433
  • 21 Caló Rdos S. Souza RAG de, Alves MR, Carvalho AE de, Galvão ND. Desenvolvimento socioeconômico e mortalidade por câncer colorretal em uma unidade federativa da Amazônia Legal, de 2005 a 2016. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. [ Internet ]. 2022 [cited 2024 Jan 12];25(suppl 1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720220006.supl.1.1
  • 22 Maringe C, Spicer J, Morris M. et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21 (08) 1023-1034
  • 23 Miyamori D, Kamitani T, Yoshida S. et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mortality among patients with colorectal cancer in Hiroshima, Japan: A large cancer registry study. Cancer Med 2023; 12 (21) 20554-20563
  • 24 Borges J, Ribeiro ES, De Sousa Martins F. et al. Perfil Epidemiológico de 702 Pacientes Submetidos à Endoscopia Digestiva Baixa no Serviço de Endoscopia do Hospital Geral César Calls. Gastroenterol Endosc Dig 2012; 31 (02) 57-59
  • 25 Musa Y, Abdulkadir YM, Manko M. et al. A 10-year review of colonoscopy at aminu kano teaching hospital, Kano Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2021; 24 (07) 1072-1076
  • 26 Batista de Sousa J, Marques Silva S, Bianca de Lacerda Fernandes M. et al. Colonoscopias realizadas por médicos residentes em hospital universitário: análise consecutiva de 1000 casos. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig Artigo Original. 2012; 25 (01) 9-12
  • 27 Gudissa FG, Alemu B, Gebremedhin S, Gudina EK, Desalegn H. Colonoscopy at a tertiary teaching hospital in Ethiopia: a five-year retrospective review. PAMJ Clinical Medicine 2021;5.

Address for correspondence

Giovana Goulart
Department of Medicine, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina
Avenida Senador Galotti, 879, apto 403. Bairro Mar Grosso – CEP: 88790-000 Laguna/SC
Brazil   

Publication History

Received: 20 July 2024

Accepted: 24 October 2024

Article published online:
18 December 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

  • References

  • 1 Gupta S. Screnning for colorretal cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2022; 36 (03) 393-414
  • 2 Cubiella J., Marzo-Castillejo M., Mascort-Roca J.J.. et al; Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria y Asociación Española de Gastroenterología. Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 41 (09) 585-596 (English Edition)
  • 3 Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Mar 21]. Estatísticas de câncer. Available from: https://www.gov.br/inca/pt-br/assuntos/cancer/numeros/
  • 4 Baidoun F, Elshiwy K, Elkeraie Y. et al. Colorectal Cancer Epidemiology: Recent Trends and Impact on Outcomes. Curr Drug Targets 2021; 22 (09) 998-1009
  • 5 Shaukat A, Kahi CJ, Burke CA, Rabeneck L, Sauer BG, Rex DK. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116 (03) 458-479
  • 6 Jain S, Maque J, Galoosian A, Osuna-Garcia A, May FP. Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23 (04) 474-493
  • 7 Saito Y, Oka S, Kawamura T. et al. Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Endosc 2021; 33 (04) 486-519
  • 8 Ladabaum U, Dominitz JA, Kahi C, Schoen RE. Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology 2020; 158 (02) 418-432
  • 9 Hultcrantz R. Aspects of colorectal cancer screening, methods, age and gender. J Intern Med 2021; 289 (04) 493-507
  • 10 Kim SY, Kim HS, Park HJ. Adverse events related to colonoscopy: Global trends and future challenges. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25 (02) 190-204
  • 11 Yoshida N, Mano Y, Matsuda T. et al. Complications of colonoscopy in Japan: An analysis using large-scale health insurance claims data. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36 (10) 2745-2753
  • 12 Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM. et al; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021; 325 (19) 1965-1977
  • 13 Moura AR, Marques AD, Dantas MS. et al. Trends in the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer in a brazilian city. BMC Res Notes 2020; 13 (01) 560
  • 14 Kolb JM, Hu J, DeSanto K. et al. Early-Age Onset Colorectal Neoplasia in Average-Risk Individuals Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2021; 161 (04) 1145-1155.e12
  • 15 Anderson JC, Robinson CM, Butterly LF. Young adults and metachronous neoplasia: risks for future advanced adenomas and large serrated polyps compared with older adults. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91 (03) 669-675
  • 16 Sharma R, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Rabu R. et al; GBD 2019 Colorectal Cancer Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7 (07) 627-647
  • 17 Rawla P, Sunkara T, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors. Prz Gastroenterol 2019; 14 (02) 89-103
  • 18 Mazidimoradi A, Hadavandsiri F, Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54 (01) 171-187
  • 19 Degeling K, Baxter NN, Emery J. et al. An inverse stage-shift model to estimate the excess mortality and health economic impact of delayed access to cancer services due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2021; 17 (04) 359-367
  • 20 Goodarzi E, Beiranvand R, Naemi H, Momenabadi V, Khazaei Z. Worldwide incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer and human development index (hdi): an ecological study. World Cancer Research J 2019; 6: e1433
  • 21 Caló Rdos S. Souza RAG de, Alves MR, Carvalho AE de, Galvão ND. Desenvolvimento socioeconômico e mortalidade por câncer colorretal em uma unidade federativa da Amazônia Legal, de 2005 a 2016. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. [ Internet ]. 2022 [cited 2024 Jan 12];25(suppl 1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-549720220006.supl.1.1
  • 22 Maringe C, Spicer J, Morris M. et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer deaths due to delays in diagnosis in England, UK: a national, population-based, modelling study. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21 (08) 1023-1034
  • 23 Miyamori D, Kamitani T, Yoshida S. et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mortality among patients with colorectal cancer in Hiroshima, Japan: A large cancer registry study. Cancer Med 2023; 12 (21) 20554-20563
  • 24 Borges J, Ribeiro ES, De Sousa Martins F. et al. Perfil Epidemiológico de 702 Pacientes Submetidos à Endoscopia Digestiva Baixa no Serviço de Endoscopia do Hospital Geral César Calls. Gastroenterol Endosc Dig 2012; 31 (02) 57-59
  • 25 Musa Y, Abdulkadir YM, Manko M. et al. A 10-year review of colonoscopy at aminu kano teaching hospital, Kano Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract 2021; 24 (07) 1072-1076
  • 26 Batista de Sousa J, Marques Silva S, Bianca de Lacerda Fernandes M. et al. Colonoscopias realizadas por médicos residentes em hospital universitário: análise consecutiva de 1000 casos. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig Artigo Original. 2012; 25 (01) 9-12
  • 27 Gudissa FG, Alemu B, Gebremedhin S, Gudina EK, Desalegn H. Colonoscopy at a tertiary teaching hospital in Ethiopia: a five-year retrospective review. PAMJ Clinical Medicine 2021;5.