The Hematoma Block versus Hematoma Plus Wrist Nerve Block in the Reduction of Distal Radius Fractures

Abstract

Background

Distal radius fractures are extremely common. Most of them can be treated conservatively, but there are still many controversies about this nonoperative treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the pain experienced during distal radius fracture reduction using the hematoma block plus a nerve block at the wrist is less than the perceived pain using an isolated hematoma block and whether the success of the closed reduction remains at least the same.

Materials and Methods

A total of 192 patients were included in a comparative study to assess whether the pain experienced during wrist fracture reduction using the hematoma block plus a nerve block at the wrist was less than using an isolated hematoma block and whether they were equally effective.

Results

The mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain at the wrist was 4.6 in the hematoma plus nerve block and 5.1 in the isolated hematoma block. The score at the fingers was 5.2 in the hematoma plus nerve block and 7.3 in the hematoma block. The success of the procedure was the same among groups.

Conclusions

The hematoma plus nerve block is more effective than the isolated hematoma block in reducing the pain during wrist fracture reduction, especially for fingers pain. The mean VAS was far from ideal and further focused research can be very useful because of the great clinical impact it can have.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic study. Prospective cohort study—Level II.

Keywords

block - distal radius - hematoma - pain - reduction - wrist

Authors' Contributions

I.J., M.A.Q., and A.L.P. researched literature, conceived the study, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. I.J. and A.L.P. were involved in protocol development and gaining ethical approval. M.A.Q., A.M.B., G.F., and A.G.T. were involved in patient recruitment. I.J. and A.L.P. were involved in data analysis. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular—Materno Infantil human research committee (CEI/CEIm 2022-116-1)

Patients' Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 04. April 2024

Angenommen: 09. Juli 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
05. August 2024

• References

• 1 Nellans KW, Kowalski E, Chung KC. The epidemiology of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2012; 28 (02) 113-125
• 2 MacIntyre NJ, Dewan N. Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis. J Hand Ther 2016; 29 (02) 136-145
• 3 Barvelink B, Reijman M, Schep NWL. et al; CAST study group. The CAST study protocol: a cluster randomized trial assessing the effect of circumferential casting versus plaster splinting on fracture redisplacement in reduced distal radius fractures in adults. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22 (01) 370
• 4 Koval K, Haidukewych GJ, Service B, Zirgibel BJ. Controversies in the management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22 (09) 566-575
• 5 Koren L, Ginesin E, Elias S, Wollstein R, Israelit S. The radiographic quality of distal radius fracture reduction using sedation versus hematoma block. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2018; 26 (02) 99-103
• 6 Bajracharya S, Singh S, Singh G, Singh M, Bajracharya T. The efficacy of the hematoma block for fracture reduction in the distal forearm fractures: a double blind randomized controlled trial. Internet J Anesthesiol 2007; 17: 275
• 7 Chong AK, Tan DM, Ooi BS, Mahadevan M, Lim AY, Lim BH. Comparison of forearm and conventional Bier's blocks for manipulation and reduction of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007; 32 (01) 57-59
• 8 Funk L. A prospective trial to compare three anaesthetic techniques used for the reduction of fractures of the distal radius. Injury 1997; 28 (03) 209-212
• 9 Liu GY, Chen ZQ, Zhang ZW. Comparative study of emergence agitation between isoflurane and propofol anesthesia in adults after closed reduction of distal radius fracture. Genet Mol Res 2014; 13 (04) 9285-9291
• 10 Löw S, Papay M, Eingartner C. Pain perception following initial closed reduction in the preoperative care of unstable, dorsally displaced distal radius fractures. J Hand Microsurg 2019; 11 (02) 111-116
• 11 Maleitzke T, Plachel F, Fleckenstein FN, Wichlas F, Tsitsilonis S. Haematoma block: a safe method for pre-surgical reduction of distal radius fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 2020; 15 (01) 351
• 12 Siebelt M, Hartholt KA, van Winden DFM. et al. Ultrasound-guided nerve blocks as analgesia for nonoperative management of distal radius fractures-two consecutive randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Trauma 2019; 33 (04) e124-e130
• 13 Tseng PT, Leu TH, Chen YW, Chen YP. Hematoma block or procedural sedation and analgesia, which is the most effective method of anesthesia in reduction of displaced distal radius fracture?. J Orthop Surg Res 2018; 13 (01) 62
• 14 Kamal RN, Shapiro LM. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons/American Society for Surgery of the Hand clinical practice guideline summary management of distal radius fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30 (04) e480-e486
• 15 Yang EI. Anesthesia. In: Wolfe SW, Kozin SH, Pederson WC, Cohen MS. eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. 8th ed.. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022: 1-16
• 16 Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS, Karam MD, Kellam JF. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (Suppl. 01) S1-S170
• 17 Kelly AM. The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain. Emerg Med J 2001; 18 (03) 205-207
• 18 Todd KH, Funk KG, Funk JP, Bonacci R. Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity. Ann Emerg Med 1996; 27 (04) 485-489
• 19 Wan Ali WAA, Soh EZF, Abdullah S, Narin Singh PSG, Ahmad AA, Sapuan J. Pain perception during the phases of manual reduction of distal end radius fracture with a periosteal block. Cureus 2021; 13 (01) e12691
• 20 Handoll HH, Madhok R, Dodds C. Anaesthesia for treating distal radial fracture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 2002 (03) CD003320
• 21 Vaughn N, Rajan N, Darowish M. Intravenous regional anesthesia using a forearm tourniquet: a safe and effective technique for outpatient hand procedures. Hand (N Y) 2020; 15 (03) 353-359
• 22 Guay J. Adverse events associated with intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier block): a systematic review of complications. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21 (08) 585-594
• 23 Lari A, Jarragh A, Alherz M, Nouri A, Behbehani M, Alnusif N. Circumferential periosteal block versus hematoma block for the reduction of distal radius and ulna fractures: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023; 49 (01) 107-113
• 24 Hoffer AJ, St George SA, Banaszek DK, Roffey DM, Broekhuyse HM, Potter JM. If at first you don't succeed, should you try again? The efficacy of repeated closed reductions of distal radius fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143 (08) 5095-5103
• 25 Kloberdanz AL, Meyer J, Kammermeier K. et al. Impact of body mass index on fracture severity, clinical, radiological and functional outcome in distal radius fractures: a retrospective observational study after surgical treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024; 144 (06) 2915-2923
• 26 Orbach H, Rozen N, Rinat B, Rubin G. Hematoma block for distal radius fractures - prospective, randomized comparison of two different volumes of lidocaine. J Int Med Res 2018; 46 (11) 4535-4538