The Evolution of Skull Base Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis Spanning Nearly 125 Years

Abstract

Introduction Skull base surgery has evolved from fundamental elements into a distinct multidisciplinary specialty. Using bibliometrics, we appraised the literature pertaining to skull base surgery since 1900 and studied the emergence of the specialty as a scholarly field.

Methods We queried Web of Science for all content from past presidents of the North American Skull Base Society (N = 31) and their self-identified forebears, influences, contemporaries, and trainees (N = 115). Statistical and bibliometric analyses were performed using various Python packages on article metadata.

Results Our query returned 28,167 articles. The most pertinent works (N = 15,529), identified algorithmically through an analysis of terms in titles, were published between 1900 and 2024 by 15,286 authors. The field exploded in the latter half of the 20th century, concurrently with increased interdisciplinary and international collaboration, and contemporaneously with the formation of centers of excellence and influential societies. Since 1950, prolific contributors to the field from neurosurgery, otolaryngology, radiology/radiation oncology, plastic surgery, and ophthalmology have increasingly subspecialized in skull base topics. The proportion of female authors in the corpus has grown from <1% in 1980 to 17% in 2023. We identify the articles that comprise the historical roots of modern skull base surgery, map the emergence of fundamental terminology within the corpus, and identify the authors who stand as key nodes of collaboration and influence.

Conclusion The field of skull base surgery was born from pioneering individuals with training in varied disciplines. The coalescence of skull base surgery into a distinct and diversified subspecialty has been powered by dedicated collaborative efforts on a global scale.

Keywords

skull base - cranial base surgery - bibliometrics - trends - publications

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. Mai 2024

Angenommen: 03. Juli 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Juli 2024

• References

• 1 Goodrich JT. A millennium review of skull base surgery. Childs Nerv Syst 2000; 16 (10–11): 669-685
• 2 Phan K, Mobbs RJ. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery, neurosurgery and orthopedics: guidelines for the surgeon scientist. J Spine Surg 2015; 1 (01) 19-27
• 3 Sathish M, Eswar R. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in spine surgery-how good are they in methodological quality? A systematic review. Global Spine J 2021; 11 (03) 378-399
• 4 Briner RB, Denyer D. Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012
• 5 Kurland DB, Cheung ATM, Kim NC. et al. A century of evolution in spine surgery publications: a bibliometric analysis of the field from 1900 to 2023. Neurosurgery 2023; 93 (05) 1121-1143
• 6 bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 2017; 11 (04) 959-975
• 7 Kurland DB, Lau D, Kim NC, Ames C. A bibliometric analysis of patient-reported outcome measures in adult spinal deformity, and the future of patient-centric outcome assessments in the era of predictive analytics. Semin Spine Surg 2023; 35 (02) 101032
• 8 Yang SD, Seu M, Qiao JB, Tsiang JTH, Pecoraro N, Germanwala AV. Posters presented at North American Skull Base Society 2016-2018: what factors influence their publication?. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 84 (06) 531-537
• 9 Ajlan A, Basindwah S, Yaghmoor W. et al. The 100 most cited articles in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a bibliometric analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 171: e363-e381
• 10 Zhang M, Singh H, Almodovar-Mercado GJ, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Required reading: the most impactful articles in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2016; 92: 499-512.e2
• 11 Patel A, Abdelsalam A, Shariff RK. et al. Bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited articles on stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial meningiomas. Br J Neurosurg 2023; 37 (05) 1088-1093
• 12 Behmer Hansen RT, Palma SD, Blocher Iii WA. et al. A decade of global skull base researchers: authorship trends from 3,295 abstracts in the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base . J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 85 (01) 44-56
• 13 Xiao Y, Yu W, Zheng J. et al. Bibliometric insights in advances of chordoma: global trends and research development in the last decade. Orthop Surg 2023; 15 (10) 2505-2514
• 14 Chang C, Tang K, Gao Y, Dai J, Dai C. Bibliometric analysis of the global research trends and hotspots in chordoma from 2000 to 2020. PLoS One 2022; 17 (12) e0279181
• 15 Gao J, Huang R, Yin H, Song D, Meng T. Research hotspots and trends of chordoma: a bibliometric analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12: 946597
• 16 Doglietto F, Prevedello DM, Jane Jr JA, Han J, Laws Jr ER. Brief history of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery–from Philipp Bozzini to the First World Congress of Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (06) E3
• 17 Malis LI. Base of skull: history and philosophy. Skull Base Surg 1992; 2 (02) 69-75
• 18 Maroon JC. Skull base surgery: past, present, and future trends. Neurosurg Focus. Published online 2005. Accessed 8 July 2024 at: https://scholar.archive.org/work/afnqx6cvmfb2lgl3mf2zuxh2im/access/wayback/https://thejns.org/downloadpdf/journals/neurosurg-focus/19/1/foc.2005.19.1.2.pdf
• 19 Husain Q, Patel SK, Soni RS, Patel AA, Liu JK, Eloy JA. Celebrating the golden anniversary of anterior skull base surgery: reflections on the past 50 years and its historical evolution. Laryngoscope 2013; 123 (01) 64-72
• 20 Francis HW, Papel I, Lina I. et al. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Johns Hopkins: the first 100 years (1914-2014). Laryngoscope 2015; 125 (09, Suppl 9): S1-S35
• 21 Donald PJ. History of skull base surgery. Skull Base Surg 1991; 1 (01) 1-3
• 22 Cote DJ, Wiemann R, Smith TR, Dunn IF, Al-Mefty O, Laws ER. The expanding spectrum of disease treated by the transnasal, transsphenoidal microscopic and endoscopic anterior skull base approach: a single-center experience 2008-2015. World Neurosurg 2015; 84 (04) 899-905
• 23 Priola SM, Raffa G, Abbritti RV. et al. The pioneering contribution of italian surgeons to skull base surgery. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (3–4): 523-528
• 24 Prevedello DM, Doglietto F, Jane Jr JA, Jagannathan J, Han J, Laws Jr ER. History of endoscopic skull base surgery: its evolution and current reality. J Neurosurg 2007; 107 (01) 206-213
• 25 Parikh KA, Khan N, Sorenson JM, Gienapp AJ, Robertson JH, Michael II LM. The development of skull base surgery as a discipline: remembrances of Dr Jon H. Robertson. Neurosurgery 2024; (e-pub ahead of print)
• 26 Sekhar LN, Juric-Sekhar G, Qazi Z. et al. The future of skull base surgery: a view through tinted glasses. World Neurosurg 2020; 142: 29-42
• 27 Pangal DJ, Cote DJ, Ruzevick J. et al. Robotic and robot-assisted skull base neurosurgery: systematic review of current applications and future directions. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52 (01) E15
• 28 North American Skull Base Society (NASBS). Accessed 31 January 2024 at: https://www.nasbs.org/about/
• 29 A Winning Team: William F. House, MD, and William E. Hitselberger, MD. Accessed 2 February 2024 at: https://bulletin.entnet.org/home/article/21246213/a-winning-team-william-f-house-md-and-william-e-hitselberger-md-online-exclusive
• 30 Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (46) 16569-16572
• 31 Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics 2006; 69 (01) 131-152
• 32 Xu RF, Varady NH, Chen AF. Trends in gender disparities in authorship of arthroplasty research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102 (23) e131
• 33 Sing DC, Jain D, Ouyang D. Gender trends in authorship of spine-related academic literature-a 39-year perspective. Spine J 2017; 17 (11) 1749-1754
• 34 Zadeh Lab, University of Toronto. Accessed 18 February 2024 at: https://www.zadehlab.com/
• 35 North American Skull Base Society. NASBS Board of Directors. Accessed 22 February 2024 at: https://www.nasbs.org/nasbs-board-of-directors/
• 36 University of Michigan Health. Faculty profile. Accessed 22 February 2024 at: https://www.uofmhealth.org/profile/465/erin-lynn-mckean-md
• 37 Skull Base Study Group. International Congress. Traumatology of the Skull Base: Anatomy, Clinical and Radiological Diagnosis, Operative Treatment. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1983
• 38 Abbasi A, Hossain L, Leydesdorff L. Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. J Informetr 2012; 6 (03) 403-412
• 39 Todeschini R, Baccini A. Handbook of Bibliometric Indicators: Quantitative Tools for Studying and Evaluating Research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2016
• 40 Uddin S, Hossain L, Rasmussen K. Network effects on scientific collaborations. PLoS One 2013; 8 (02) e57546
• 41 Fujita M, Ishido K, Inoue H, Terano T. Evaluating Researchers through Betweenness Centrality Measures of Co-Author Networks from Academic Literature Database : Finding Gatekeeper Researchers in Organizational Research. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Seattle, Washington, United States. IEEE; 2018: 4313-4320
• 42 Johnson PG, Echanique KA, Chitguppi C, Lee JT, Toskala E. Gender gap among rhinology and skull base surgeons. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 12 (10) 1303-1306
• 43 Behmer Hansen RT, Behmer Hansen RA, Gold JL. et al. A decade of global skull base researchers: gender data from over 2,700 abstract authors in the Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base . J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2022; 85 (01) 57-66
• 44 WORLDSymposium™ 2024 program. Mol Genet Metab 2024; 141 (02) 108106
• 45 2023 Annual Meeting. NASBS. Published October 27, 2022. Accessed 29 February 2024. https://www.nasbs.org/2023meeting/
• 46 Hafner L, Peifer TP, Hafner FS. Equal accuracy for Andrew and Abubakar-detecting and mitigating bias in name-ethnicity classification algorithms. AI Soc 2023; (e-pub ahead of print)