Keywords
normative data - thumb length - central Indian adult - anthropometry
Introduction
Adequate length and mobility of thumb is mandatory for overall function of hand.[1] There is no agreement on normal length of thumb in the literature. Some reports
says the tip of the adducted thumb is expected to reach somewhere between half the
proximal phalanx or up to the skin crease of the proximal interphalangeal joint of
the index finger.[2]
[3] However, we do not have any large Indian study measuring the relative length of
the thumb in adults and more information is required for the identification of the
normal thumb length. The aim of this study was to establish a normal database of relative
normal thumb length with respect to the index finger in Indian adult population dependent
on age, gender, and hand dominance.
Materials and Methods
This prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 10 months from
January 2023 to October 2023 in the department of plastic, hand and reconstructive
surgery in central India. Institutional ethical committee permission and informed
consent from participants were taken. Five hundred normal adult hands (1,000 thumbs),
316 men and 184 women, mean age 30 years (range: 18–40 years), were included in the
study. Patients with congenital hand anomalies, past history of injuries, arthritic
changes, infection, or bone or soft tissue disease of the hand are excluded from the
study. Thumb length was measured as follows.[4]
First line was drawn along the long axis of the index finger and a dot (P1) was placed
at the distal pulp tip. A second dot (P2) was then placed at the most proximal flexion
crease over the proximal interphalangeal joint. The distance between these two dots
(P1 to P2) represents the sum of the lengths of the middle and distal phalanges.[2] Digital bones follow the Fibonacci sequence therefore the distance between P1 and
P2 must equal the length of the proximal phalanx.[5] Thus, having estimated the length of the proximal phalanx a third dot (P3) was placed
along the axis of the digit at a distance equal to the length of the proximal phalanx
from P2. The next step was to drop a perpendicular line from the tip of the adducted
thumb to the axis of the index finger. The point where these two lines meet was termed
“X.” Finally, the point where the axis of the index finger meets the proximal digital
crease was marked as “D” ([Figs. 1] and [2]). All measurements were made using calibrated tape with the hand placed flat; palm
facing upward and fingers/thumb were adducted.
Fig. 1 Line diagram showing various lines and points to calculate the thumb–proximal phalanx
(TPP) and thumb–digital crease (TDC) indices.
Fig. 2 Clinical photograph with digital markings to calculate the thumb–proximal phalanx
(TPP) and thumb–digital crease (TDC) indices.
Once all the dots and lines were marked the distance between X and P3 (T1), the distance
between X and D (T2), distance between P2 and P3 (PP, the length of the index proximal
phalanx), and the distance between P2 and D (DC, the distance between the proximal
digital crease and proximal interphalangeal crease of the index finger) were measured
to calculate the two indices.
-
Thumb–proximal phalanx index (TPP index = T1/PP), indicates how the distal tip of
the adducted thumb extends along the proximal phalanx of the index finger.
-
Thumb–digital crease index (TDC index = T2/DC), indicates how the distal tip of the
adducted thumb lies between the proximal digital crease and proximal interphalangeal
crease of the index finger.
The data was analyzed using SPSS version 20 and expressed in mean and standard deviation
and calculated for different age, gender, laterality, and hand dominance.
Results
Our study sampled 500 participants (1,000 thumbs); their demographics like gender,
age, and hand dominance are shown in [Table 1].
Table 1
Demographic details of population
|
Age (Y)
(n)
|
Gender
|
Hand dominance
|
|
Male
|
Female
|
Right
|
Left
|
|
N (%)
|
N (%)
|
N (%)
|
N (%)
|
|
18–20
|
38 (12.0)
|
23 (12.5)
|
59 (12.5)
|
2 (6.9)
|
|
21–30
|
144 (45.6)
|
77 (41.8)
|
204 (43.3)
|
17 (58.6)
|
|
31–40
|
134 (42.4)
|
84 (45.4)
|
208 (44.2)
|
10 (34.5)
|
|
Total
|
316
|
184
|
471
|
29
|
Overall mean TPP and TDC index was 0.69 and 0.38. The mean TPP and TDC index was 0.68
and 0.38 in males, and 0.69 and 0.40 in females. For dominant hand the mean TPP and
TDC index was 0.68 and 0.37, respectively, while for the nondominant hand it was 0.71
and 0.43. The mean TPP and TDC index was 0.68 and 0.37 for the right thumb and 0.69
and 0.39 for the left thumb, respectively ([Table 2]). Mean TPP and TDC index for different age groups is shown in [Table 3]. There was no statistical difference in both the indices in age group from 18 to
40 years. The difference between the right and left hands, gender, and hand dominance
was not statistically significant for both the indices. The descriptive statistics
of all the participants is shown in [Table 4].
Table 2
Mean TPP and TDC indices according to laterality, gender, and hand dominance
|
Index, mean ± SD
|
Laterality
|
Gender
|
Hand dominance
|
|
Right
|
Left
|
Male
|
Female
|
Dominant
|
Nondominant
|
|
TPP index
|
0.689 ± 0.075
|
0.695 ± 0.085
|
0.688 ± 0.082
|
0.699 ± 0.076
|
0.688 ± 0.075
|
0.713 ± 0.054
|
|
TDC index
|
0.378 ± 0.099
|
0.399 ± 0.110
|
0.38 ± 0.098
|
0.40 ± 0.112
|
0.379 ± 0.099
|
0.432 ± 0.082
|
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; TDC, thumb–digital crease; TPP, thumb–proximal
phalanx.
Note: TDC, the distance between the proximal digital crease and proximal interphalangeal
crease of the index finger; TPP, length of the proximal phalanx of the index finger.
Table 3
Mean TPP and TDC indices according to age groups
|
Age group
|
Gender
|
TPP index
|
TDC index
|
|
Right
|
Left
|
Right
|
Left
|
|
Mean (SD)
|
Mean (SD)
|
Mean (SD)
|
Mean (SD)
|
|
18–20
|
F
|
0.67 (0.08)
|
0.69 (0.09)
|
0.35 (0.12)
|
0.36 (0.12)
|
|
M
|
0.69 (0.08)
|
0.70 (0.09)
|
0.35 (0.08)
|
0.41 (0.10)
|
|
20–30
|
F
|
0.70 (0.08)
|
0.71 (0.07)
|
0.40 (0.10)
|
0.40 (0.13)
|
|
M
|
0.68 (0.08)
|
0.68 (0.08)
|
0.37 (0.10)
|
0.39 (0.11)
|
|
30–40
|
F
|
0.69 (0.08)
|
0.70 (0.07)
|
0.41 (0.10)
|
0.43 (0.11)
|
|
M
|
0.69 (0.07)
|
0.70 (0.10)
|
0.37 (0.09)
|
0.39 (0.10)
|
Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; SD, standard deviation; TDC, thumb–digital crease;
TPP, thumb–proximal phalanx.
Note: TDC, the distance between the proximal digital crease and proximal interphalangeal
crease of the index finger; TPP, length of the proximal phalanx of the index finger.
Table 4
Descriptive statistics
|
Age (y)
|
Right hand
|
Left hand
|
TPP index
|
TDC index
|
|
T1
|
T2
|
PP
|
DC
|
T1
|
T2
|
PP
|
DC
|
Right
|
Left
|
Right
|
Left
|
|
18
|
22.00
|
3.00
|
39.00
|
18.00
|
20.00
|
2.00
|
38.00
|
16.00
|
0.47
|
0.43
|
0.05
|
0.10
|
|
40
|
44.00
|
21.00
|
56.00
|
31.00
|
46.00
|
22.00
|
57.00
|
33.00
|
1.00
|
1.38
|
0.83
|
1.05
|
|
Mean ± SD
|
32.38 ± 4.16
|
8.71 ± 2.24
|
46.95 ± 3.48
|
23.09 ± 2.23
|
32.62 ± 4.34
|
9.12 ± 2.37
|
47.01 ± 3.60
|
23.10 ± 2.42
|
0.68 ± 0.07
|
0.69 ± 0.085
|
0.37 ± 0.09
|
0.39 ± 0.11
|
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; TDC, thumb–digital crease; TPP, thumb–proximal
phalanx.
Note: DC, the distance between the proximal digital crease and proximal interphalangeal
crease of the index as measured along its axis (i.e., the distance between P2 and
D); PP, the length of the index proximal phalanx (distance between P2 and P3); T1,
the distance between X and P3; T2, the distance between X and D.
Discussion
Our prospective observational study has captured the normative data for thumb length
in central Indian adult population. Moreover, it shows that the relative normal thumb
length is independent of gender, laterality, or hand dominance. The tip of a normal
adducted thumb extends to 69% of the length of the proximal phalanx of the index finger
and 38% of the distance between the two proximal creases of the index finger.
Thumb function depends on the adequate length and mobility; thus, one must know the
ideal thumb length for reconstruction. Generally, there is no objective and reliable
method for the thumb length assessment. One can compare it with the contralateral
thumb, however, when the opposite thumb is absent or abnormal as a result of a congenital
defect, trauma, or infective pathology this may not be possible. We have evaluated
relative thumb length in adults using two simple clinical parameters (TPP and TDC
indices) that can help quantify thumb length and serve as a guide for reconstruction.
A study on normative data for relative thumb length in pediatric population has reported
that these relative lengths remain constant throughout from infancy into adulthood
and there was no significant difference from age 1 through 18 years.[6]
[7] Our study also indicated that these relative lengths did not demonstrate significant
differences in adult population.
Estimation of thumb length by estimating the TPP index is better because it uses the
bony landmark such as length of the proximal phalanx. The TDC index uses skin creases
as reference points, which are likely to be variable. However, use of TDC index may
be required in situations where the length of the proximal phalanx cannot be obtained
due to partial amputation of the index finger. One study showed that anthropometric
measurements for calculation of relative thumb length can be taken from dorsal or
palmer sides of the hand, without affecting the results.[8] Other studies have also measured the relative thumb length using similar clinical
indices and reported TPP index (0.80–0.69) and TDC index (0.41–0.60) which is comparable
with our study.[4]
[6]
[8]
[9]
Estimation of normal thumb length is useful in the diagnosis of congenital hand malformations,
planning the treatment, and evaluation of thumb reconstructions by different methods.
These normative data help in determining the length of reconstructed thumb. This is
particularly helpful if bilateral thumb defects are present.[10]
[11] Normative data of thumb length is also useful in the estimation of stature and gender
of human remains as a part of any medicolegal investigation. Many studies have shown
association between stature and gender with the length of thumb.[12]
[13] Additional value of normative data for thumb length can be used to ascertain vertical
occlusal dimension in edentulous patients.[14]
Thumb length can be calculated using radiographs of hand, plain Xerox photocopy of
hand, or measurement using Vernier caliper.[9]
[10]
[15] However, taking radiographs of normal hand is unethical, Xerox photocopy of hand
or measurement using Vernier caliper the compressibility of skin over these anatomic
landmarks cannot be avoided, so there may be some degrees of errors in measurement.
We have used simple clinical measurements to create normative data for thumb length
which does not require any costly equipment and can be done in outpatient clinic without
need for any imaging.
Limitations of the study include that our findings are not supported radiologically,
nonuniform small sample size, and the inherent problem with normative data is to determine
individual normative data. Furthermore, the normative values and ranges should be
interpreted in the context of limitations associated with instrument and techniques
used for collecting normative data.
Conclusion
The tip of a normal adducted thumb extends to 69% of the length of the proximal phalanx
of the index finger and 38% of the distance between the two proximal creases of the
index finger. Relative normal thumb length is independent of gender, laterality, or
hand dominance.
