Computerized Surgical Planning in Gender Affirming Facial Surgery

Abstract

Computerized Surgical Planning (CSP) is a surgical tool that enables precise bony changes through the creation of custom cutting guides and/or custom plates. CSP has been shown to be a safe and effective tool in gender affirming facial surgery as well, specifically with regard to frontal sinus setback, zygomatic remodeling, genioplasty, and mandibular angle and body reshaping. CSP aids in trainee education, improves symmetry, reduces operative time, and can produce idealized results during complex revisions. Overall, CSP is a valuable tool in the field of gender affirming facial surgery that helps surgeons achieve optimal aesthetic and safety outcomes for patients.

Keywords

gender affirming facial surgery - computerized surgical planning - facial feminization

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. Mai 2024

• References

• 1 Townsend A, Tepper OM. Virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional printing in rhinoplasty. Semin Plast Surg 2022; 36 (03) 158-163
• 2 Alberti C. Three-dimensional CT and structure models. Br J Radiol 1980; 53 (627) 261-262
• 3 Canfield Scientific, Inc. Vectra. 3D. Anywhere. 2023. Accessed April 17, 2024 at: https://www.canfieldsci.com/imaging-systems/vectra-h1-3d-imaging-system/
• 4 Jones EA, Huang AT. Virtual surgical planning in head and neck reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2023; 56 (04) 813-822
• 5 Alperovich M. Commentary: virtual surgical planning and patient-specific implants in facial feminization surgery. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022; 24 (S2): S20-S23
• 6 Vyas K, Gibreel W, Mardini S. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) in craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2022; 30 (02) 239-253
• 7 Thakker JS, Pace M, Lowe I, Jung P, Herford AS. Virtual surgical planning in maxillofacial trauma. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019; 27 (02) 143-155
• 8 Cho RS, Lopez J, Musavi L. et al. Computer-assisted design and manufacturing assists less experienced surgeons in achieving equivalent outcomes in cranial vault reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (07) 2034-2038
• 9 Hammoudeh JA, Howell LK, Boutros S, Scott MA, Urata MM. Current status of surgical planning for orthognathic surgery: traditional methods versus 3d surgical planning. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3 (02) e307
• 10 Bly RA, Chang SH, Cudejkova M, Liu JJ, Moe KS. Computer-guided orbital reconstruction to improve outcomes. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (02) 113-120
• 11 Toto JM, Chang EI, Agag R, Devarajan K, Patel SA, Topham NS. Improved operative efficiency of free fibula flap mandible reconstruction with patient-specific, computer-guided preoperative planning. Head Neck 2015; 37 (11) 1660-1664
• 12 Andrew TW, Baylan J, Mittermiller PA. et al. Virtual surgical planning decreases operative time for isolated single suture and multi-suture craniosynostosis repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018; 6 (12) e2038
• 13 Chim H, Wetjen N, Mardini S. Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2014; 28 (03) 150-158
• 14 Myers PL, Nelson JA, Rosen EB, Allen Jr RJ, Disa JJ, Matros E. Virtual surgical planning for oncologic mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (09) e3672
• 15 Deschamps-Braly JC. Facial gender confirmation surgery: facial feminization surgery and facial masculinization surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (03) 323-331
• 16 Alper DP, Almeida MN, Hu KG. et al. Quantifying facial feminization surgery's impact: focus on patient facial satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023; 11 (11) e5366
• 17 Chou DW, Bruss D, Tejani N, Brandstetter K, Kleinberger A, Shih C. Quality of life outcomes after facial feminization surgery. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022; 24 (S2): S44-S46
• 18 Tawa P, Brault N, Luca-Pozner V. et al. Three-dimensional custom-made surgical guides in facial feminization surgery: prospective study on safety and accuracy. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (11) NP1368-NP1378
• 19 Sharaf B, Kuruoglu D, Bite U, Morris JM. Point of care virtual surgical planning and 3d printing in facial feminization surgery. Semin Plast Surg 2022; 36 (03) 164-168
• 20 Alnaif N, Zhou M, Galli R, Azzi AJ, Alamri A, Gilardino M. The role of preoperative computed tomography in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (02) 424-428
• 21 Cheng H, Clymer JW, Po-Han Chen B. et al. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2018; 229: 134-144
• 22 Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M. Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg 2018; 153 (04) e176233
• 23 Gray R, Nguyen K, Lee JC. et al. Osseous transformation with facial feminization surgery: improved anatomical accuracy with virtual planning. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (05) 1159-1168
• 24 Ousterhout DK. Feminization of the forehead: contour changing to improve female aesthetics. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987; 79 (05) 701-713
• 25 Dang BN, Hu AC, Bertrand AA. et al. Evaluation and treatment of facial feminization surgery: part I. forehead, orbits, eyebrows, eyes, and nose. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (05) 503-510
• 26 Louis M, Qiu CS, Travieso R, Marano D, Coon D. Computer-aided planning and execution in facial gender surgery: approaches, concepts, and implementation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022; 10 (05) e4330
• 27 Dang BN, Hu AC, Bertrand AA. et al. Evaluation and treatment of facial feminization surgery: part II. lips, midface, mandible, chin, and laryngeal prominence. Arch Plast Surg 2022; 49 (01) 5-11
• 28 Nguyen JD, Duong H. Anatomy, Head and Neck: Alveolar Nerve. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023