CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 2024; 15(01): 059-104
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786336
Abstracts of presentation during ENDOCON 2024, New Delhi

Endoscopic Ultrasound in Differentiation of Solid Pancreatic Head Lesions: A Single-Center Experience

Pabitra Sahu
1   Department of Gastroenterology, MAX Super-specialty Hospital, Vaishali, India
,
Subhasish Mazumder
1   Department of Gastroenterology, MAX Super-specialty Hospital, Vaishali, India
,
Nishant Nagpal
1   Department of Gastroenterology, MAX Super-specialty Hospital, Vaishali, India
,
Ashish Garg
1   Department of Gastroenterology, MAX Super-specialty Hospital, Vaishali, India
,
Sanchit Singh
1   Department of Gastroenterology, MAX Super-specialty Hospital, Vaishali, India
,
Anant Kumar
1   Department of Gastroenterology, MAX Super-specialty Hospital, Vaishali, India
,
Pravinkumar Rejliwal
1   Department of Gastroenterology, MAX Super-specialty Hospital, Vaishali, India
,
Premashish Kar
1   Department of Gastroenterology, MAX Super-specialty Hospital, Vaishali, India
› Author Affiliations
 
 

    Background: Precise characterization of pancreatic head lesions remains a challenge even with all the radiological advancement. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the most common malignant lesion, but many other malignant and benign pathology can masquerade with similar clinical and radiological features. This study designed to see the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in such cases.

    Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases in a tertiary care center of north India. Patients with suspicious solid mass lesion in pancreatic head in CT-scan/MRI who underwent EUS-FNB in last 3 (2020–2022) years were analyzed. Those who have at least 6 months of F/U or F/U until surgery or death were included. Different EUS characteristics were compared to look for predictors of malignant head lesions.

    Results: A total of 92 patients identified, among which 39 patients included in final analysis. Twenty-four (61.5%) patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 1 (2.6%) neuro-endocrine cancer (NEC), 11 (28.2%) inflammatory head mass, 2 (5.1%) autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), and 1 had pancreatic tuberculosis. History of acute pancreatitis in recent past significantly favored benign pathology. Increased pancreatic duct (PD) diameter (5.2 ± 2.5 mm vs. 3.3 ± 1 mm; p = 0.01) and negative duct penetrating sign (22 (88%) vs. 7 (50%); p = 0.03) predicted malignancy. In EUS elastography, both qualitative (color pattern) (p = 0.01) and quantitative (strain ratio) (p = 0.02) parameters found to be significant predictor of malignant lesion.

    Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of EUS and EUS elastography in differentiation of solid pancreatic head lesions.

    Table 1

    Diagnosis of pancreatic head mass

    Diagnosis

    Numbers (%)

    Malignant (adeno-carcinoma)

    24 (61.5%)

    Inflammatory

    11 (28.2%)

    Auto-immune pancreatitis

    2 (5.1%)

    Tuberculosis

    1 (2.6%)

    Malignant (neuro-endocrine cancer)

    1 (2.6%)

    Table 2

    EUS characteristics according to nature of head mass

    Malignant lesion (25)

    Benign lesion (14)

    p-Value

    Dilated CBD

    19 (76%)

    9 (64.3%)

    0.43

    Dilated PD

    19 (76%)

    8 (57.1%)

    0.22

    Double duct sign

    14 (56%)

    6 (42.9%)

    0.43

    CBD diameter (mm)

    12.8 ± 4.8

    10.9 ± 3.5

    0.19

    PD diameter (mm)

    5.2 ± 2.5

    3.3 ± 1

    0.01

    Max diameter of lesion (mm)

    32.2 ± 12

    31.4 ± 3.2

    0.75

    Duct penetration

    3 (12%)

    7 (50%)

    0.03

    Surrounding vascular encasement

    5 (20%)

    0

    0.14

    Significant peripancreatic LAP

    9 (36%)

    1 (7.1%)

    0.1

    Calcification with in the lesion

    2 (8%)

    2 (14.3%)

    0.6

    Echogenicity

    Hypoechoic: 16 (64%)Heteroechoic: 9 (36%)

    Hypoechoic: 5 (35.7%)Heteroechoic: 9 (64.3%)

    0.09

    Elastography

    Heterogenous; predominantly blue: 20 (80%)Heterogenous; predominantly green: 5 (20%)

    Heterogenous; predominantly blue: 3 (21.4%)Heterogenous; predominantly green: 11 (78.6%)

    0.01

    Strain ratio

    26 ± 7.2 (n = 13)

    14.8 ± 10.2 (n = 6)

    0.02


    #

    No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    22 April 2024

    © 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

    Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
    A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India