Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · VCOT Open 2024; 07(S 01): A1-A12
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1786205
Canine Podium Abstracts (Non-Resident)

Wearable Activity Monitor Detection of Rhythmicity in Canine Agility Weaving Performance

Authors

  • A. Pechette Markley

    1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • C. Ramey

    2   College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  • R. A. Olson

    3   Department of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States
  • B. J. Sietz

    3   Department of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States
  • A. B. Shoben

    4   Division of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • M. Moore Jackson

    2   College of Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
 
 

Introduction: The weave pole obstacle has been implicated in agility-related injuries and it has been speculated that changes in agility obstacle performance could indicate an injury. It is currently unknown how much variability in obstacle performance exists within a single dog. Wearable sensors have been developed to detect performance of specific agility obstacles. Our aim was to evaluate variability of weave pole performance within dogs and determine whether a wearable sensor could detect and quantify variability.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-two Master’s level agility dogs of various breeds performed four repetitions of the weave pole obstacle while wearing a custom designed activity monitor collar. A measure of rhythmicity was then computed from activity monitor data, which corresponded to the similarity of the dog’s weaving pattern throughout obstacle performance. Linear mixed models were used to estimate the amount of variance due to between dog variability (rather than within dog variability).

Results: The measure of rhythmicity varied between and within dogs, with 34% of total variance attributable to between dog variation (ICC=0.34). In contrast, dogs tended to be more consistent in obstacle completion time, with 84% of the variability in time to obstacle completion attributable to between dog variation (ICC=0.84).

Discussion/Conclusion: These data suggest a higher than expected level of within dog variability in weave obstacle performance. Despite this result, the wearable sensor was able to predict the level of variability within and between repetitions. Limitations of this study include a relatively small sample size and a small number of repetitions per dog.

Acknowledgments:

This study was funded by the American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation.


Publication History

Article published online:
09 April 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany