Keywords severe early childhood caries -
S. wiggsiae
-
Bifidobacterium
- real-time PCR - caries-related factors
Introduction
Early childhood caries (ECC) is still one of common childhood diseases worldwide.
Recent international survey showed that dental caries prevalence in 5 years old children
ranged from 23 to 90%.[1 ] In Thailand, caries prevalence is higher than 50%.[2 ]
Severe ECC (S-ECC) is an aggressive form of ECC. Based on the definition of S-ECC
by the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD), children aged between 3 and
5 years who have one or more cavitated lesions, caries-caused missing or filled smooth
surface in primary teeth or decayed, missing or filled surfaces greater than or equal
to four (age of 3), five (age of 4) or six (age of 5) are diagnosed as S-ECC patients.
It occurs earlier in life, with more incidence, and affects children growth, even
physical and psychological health of the subjects during their whole lifespan.[3 ] S-ECC is associated with decreased oral-health-related quality of life for the child,
and high costs for families and society.[4 ] The etiology is complicated because it involves numerous factors, including biological,
behavioral, psychological, cultural and lifestyle factors.[3 ]
Dental plaque, or biofilm, is composed of more than 1,000 species of microorganisms
living together. Under normal circumstances, oral microbiota has a symbiotic relationship
with all other microorganisms and live together in a nondisease environment. A shift
of the microbiota in biofilm can cause disease such as dental caries, which initiates
from the formation of biofilm on tooth surfaces, where the proportion of acidogenic
and aciduric bacteria in biofilm are increasing and overbalance the healthy microbiota
leading to a changing ecological equilibrium.[4 ] These bacteria produce acidic conditions by metabolizing fermentable carbohydrates.
A frequent aciduric environment can disrupt microbial hemostasis in biofilm and promote
demineralization of tooth structure when the pH is lower than 5.5.[4 ]
Streptococcus mutans is one of major microbial pathogens in S-ECC development.[5 ] However, not all children with S-ECC harbor S. mutans .[5 ] Microbiota associated with dental caries is highly complex and multiple members
of the community can be implicated in caries development.[6 ]
[7 ], Besides S. mutans , studies in S-ECC have detected other pathogens involved in dental caries that are
nonmutans bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium and S. wiggsiae .[6 ]
[7 ]
[8 ]
[9 ]
Bifidobacterium is a gram-positive, rod-shaped, anaerobic, nonfilamentous and nonmotile bacteria.
It is acidogenic, aciduric and able to survive in an acidic environment.[9 ] When living in acidic conditions, it has several self-protection mechanisms even
in the absence of an energy source in order to maintain their lives.[10 ] Besides its acidogenicity and aciduricity, it has an ability to produce an acidic
environment to resist low pH and promote biofilm formation when coadhered with primary
colonizers that were similar to S. mutans .[11 ]
[12 ] Recent studies found the link between Bifidobacterium and S-ECC including Thai children, and suggested that it might be a major pathogen
in cavitated dentin caries because it has an ability to demineralize tooth structure
at a pH below 4.2.[2 ]
[8 ]
[11 ]
[12 ]
[13 ]
[14 ] One of the studies in ECC and S-ECC children showed 80% detection of Bifidobacterium from plaque samples.[13 ] It was detected higher in children with caries (95%), when compared to caries-free
children (9%).[12 ]
S. wiggsiae is anaerobic, gram-positive, bacilli-shaped bacteria. It is one of acid producer
bacteria and able to tolerate in an acidic environment.[15 ] It can grow on agar at a low pH similar to S. mutans .[15 ] It has been detected from dental plaque, saliva, and infected dentin lesions in
S-ECC in the presence of S. mutans .[15 ] However, S. wiggsiae has also been detected in children in the absence of S. mutans , which suggests that it might play an exclusive role in the caries process when S. mutans is not the main cariogenic specie.[15 ] Recent studies showed an interesting association between S. wiggsiae in the initial stages of caries and in children who are receiving orthodontic treatment.[6 ]
[15 ] Moreover, previous studies reported that the combination of S. mutans with Bifidobacterium and S. wiggsiae was associated with S-ECC and suggested that they might be microbiological markers
in active caries lesions.[16 ]
[17 ]
The aims of this study were to detect Bifidobacterium and S. wiggsiae quantitatively in dental plaque samples from S-ECC and caries-free children in the
Northern part of Thailand and analyze the association between these bacteria and clinical
presentation as well as other factors assessed by questionnaire. The hypothesis is
that the amounts of Bifidobacterium and S. wiggsiae in S-ECC and caries-free groups should be different.
Materials and Methods
Subject Selection
A statistician consultation was done based on previous studies, performed with α = 0.05
and power of 80%, using the software package Primer of Biostatistics (McGraw-Hill,
New York, United States).[7 ] A minimum of 61 children in each group was enough to achieve statistical difference.[8 ]
Total of 140 Thai children aged 2 to 5 years were recruited from four public childcare
centers in Mae Lao district in the Northern part of Thailand, Chiang Rai Province,
Thailand. Consent forms were signed. Subjects were divided into two groups: Seventy
children in an S-ECC group, and 70 children in a caries-free group. S-ECC was diagnosed
based on the AAPD 2018 to 2019, which defines S-ECC. For children younger than 3 years
of age, any sign of smooth-surface caries indicates S-ECC. For children aged between
3 and 5, one or more cavitated, missing (due to caries), or filled smooth surfaces
in primary maxillary anterior teeth, or a decayed, missing, or filled score of less
than or equal to 4 (age 3), less than or equal to 5 (age 4), or less than or equal
to 6 (age 5) surfaces also indicate S-ECC.[17 ] For the caries-free group, subjects had no caries nor existing restorations (decay,
missing, and filled tooth [dmft] = 0). Obtained bitewing radiograph only when interproximal
caries was suspected. Subjects who had any systemic disease(s), taking any kind of
antibiotics, had professional fluoride application or any dental treatment within
2 months prior to the sample collection period were excluded from the study.
Clinical Examination, Plaque and Modified Gingival Indices
Two examiners who are in a pediatric dentistry residency training program performed
a clinical examination at schools based on World Health Organization criteria.[18 ] Decayed, missing, and filled tooth (dmft) scores, plaque and gingiva inflammation
indices were recorded as mentioned in previous studies.[19 ]
[20 ]
[21 ]
The Questionnaire
The questionnaire was assessed by parents or caretakers in a face-to-face interview.
All questions were close ended. Except the parents' general information, two categories
were examined ([Table 1 ]).
Table 1
Questionnaire used in this study
Categories
Questions
1. Demographic characteristics
1.Child's age
2. Child's gender
3.Guardian's age
4. Guardian's gender
5. Major caregiver
6. Parent's education levels
2. Child's diet and oral hygiene care
1. Prolonged bottle feeding
2. Night-time feeding
3. Eating cariogenic snacks
4. Night-time snack feeding
5. Frequency of dental visit
Plaque Sample Collection
Informed all parents/guardians to brush their child's teeth at 8.00 PM the night before
plaque collection day. No food or drink before sample collection. Collected pooled
overnight dental plaque using a sterile toothpick and released in 1 mL of Tris-EDTA
buffer. Transported all samples on ice to the Oral Biology Laboratory and stored at
−20°C until the DNA extraction process.
DNA Extraction
DNA was extracted based on enzymatic lysis using a commercial kit (Flavogen, Taiwan)
as previously described.[8 ] In brief, we added 20 µL of Proteinase K, 400 µL of FABG buffer, and 20 µL of a
lysozyme mixture (lysozyme 20 mg/mL and mutanolysin [Sigma Aldrich, United States]
in 1:10 proteinase K) and mixed by means of rapid whirling. Incubated the mixture
at 60°C for 1 hour; added 200 µL ethanol and centrifuged at 11,000 rpm for 30 seconds.
Transferred the solution into a spin column and centrifuged for 1 minute. Discarded
supernatant, then added 500 µL of W1 buffer and centrifuged for 1 minute. Again discarded
supernatant and added 750 µL of wash buffer and centrifuged for 1 minute, then added
50 µL of elution buffer, left at room temperature for 3 minutes, before a final centrifuge
for 2 minutes. Then measured the extracted DNA concentration and purity using a spectrophotometer
at 260 nm/280 nm (Nanodrop 2000C Thermo Fisher Scientific, Delaware, United States).
Culture Condition and Standard Strains
Bacterial strains, Bifidobacterium longum (subspecies 51139) and Streptococcus sobrinus ATCC (6715), were used as standard strains. Bifidobacterium longum (subspecies 51139) was inoculated in Brain Heart Infusion broth and incubated at
37°C for 24 hours. S. sobrinus was grown anaerobically (5% CO2 ) in Brain Heart Infusion broth at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours. After DNA extraction from
the overnight culture as described above, performed a tenfold serial dilution, starting
from 108 to 102 CFU/mL.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
Using specific primers, the reaction mixture (total volume of 20 μL) contained water
(2–9.1 μL), 10 μL of 2X KAPA SYBR FAST quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Master Mix, 0.4 μL of 10 μM forward and reverse primer, and 0.1 to 7.2 μL of bacteria
DNA. The thermocycler (C1000 Thermal cycler and CFX 96 real-time System) was set for
40 cycles. Each cycle consisted of enzyme activation at 95°C for 3 minutes, denaturing
at 95°C for 3 seconds, annealing at 52°C, 53°C, and 53°C for 20 seconds for universal
BAC16S (F 5′-TGG AGC ATG TGG TTT AAT TCG A-3′, R 5′-TGC GGG ACT TAA CCC AAC A-3′ amplicon
160 base pair),[22 ]
Bifidobacterium (F 5′ CTC CTG GAA ACG GGT GG-3, R 5′ GGT GTT CTT CCC GAT ATC TAC A-3′ amplicon 550
base pair),[23 ]
[24 ] and S. wiggsiae (F 5′-GTGGACTTTATGAATAAGC-3′, R 5′-CTACCGTTAAGCAGTAAG-3′ amplicon 200 base pair),[11 ] respectively. Melting curves were generated from 60 to 95°C and read every 0.5°C
for 5 seconds.[8 ]
Statistical Analysis
Data was analyzed using SPSS 18.0 software (Microsoft Corporation. California, United
States). Normality of the data was tested using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk
test (p < 0.05). The different levels of bacteria between the S-ECC and caries free groups
were analyzed using a Mann–Whitney U test (p < 0.05). The association between Bifidobacterium and S. wiggsiae was analyzed using McNemar's test (p < 0.05). Pearson chi-squared test was used for analysis of the detection of each
bacteria and association of factors in the questionnaire for caries status.
Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by the Ethics Approval Review Board, Faculty of Dentistry
and the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University (MU-DT/PY-IRB 2020/DT039).
Results
Children's age and gender between caries-free and S-ECC groups were not different
([Table 2 ]). Mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the plaque index in caries-free and S-ECC groups
was 0.87 ± 0.56 and 1.40 ± 0.64, respectively. Mean ± SD of the modified gingival
index in caries-free and S-ECC groups was 0.29 ± 0.44 and 0.61 ± 0.46, respectively.
The plaque (p < 0.001) and modified gingival indices (p < 0.001) in the S-ECC group was higher than in the caries-free group ([Table 3 ]).
Table 2
General information of subjects between caries-free and S-ECC groups
Caries-free
S-ECC
p -Value
Age (months)
Mean ± SD = 35.54 ± 6.90
Median = 35
Mean ± SD = 35.07 ± 6.88
Median = 34
0.664[a ]
Gender
- Male
44(62.9%)
33(47.1%)
0.062[b ]
- Female
26(37.1%)
37(52.9%)
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; S-ECC, severe early childhood caries.
a Mann–Whitney U test.
b Pearson chi-squared test.
Table 3
Plaque index and modified gingival index in caries-free and S-ECC groups
Clinical parameters
Caries-free
S-ECC
p -Value
Median
(min, max)
Mean ± SD
Median
(min, max)
Mean ± SD
Plaque index
0.75
(0, 2.50)
0.87 ± 0.56
1.33
(0.33, 3.00)
1.40 ± 0.64
<0.001[a ]
Modified gingival index
0
(0, 1.80)
0.29 ± 0.44
0.67
(0, 2.00)
0.61 ± 0.46
<0.001[a ]
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; S-ECC, severe early childhood caries.
a Mann–Whitney U test at the significant level of p < 0.05.
Prevalence of Bifidobacterium in the caries-free and S-ECC groups was 6 (9%) and 19 (27%), respectively. Prevalence
of S. wiggsiae in the caries-free and S-ECC groups was 1 (2%) and 27 (39%), respectively. The prevalence
of Bifidobacterium (p = 0.004) and S. wiggsiae (p < 0.001) in the S-ECC group was significantly higher than in the caries-free group
([Fig. 1 ]).
Fig. 1 The prevalence of bacteria between caries-free and severe early childhood caries
(S-ECC) groups. BF, Bifidobacterium ; CF, caries-free; SW, S cardovia wiggsiae.
b Pearson chi-squared test at the significant level of p < 0.05.
The median numbers (minimum, maximum) of total bacteria, Bifidobacterium , and proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria in the S-ECC group were 6.63 × 1025 (9.37 × 105 , 1.92 × 107 ), 0 (0, 7.61 × 105 ), and 0 (0, 8.5 × 10−2 ), respectively. The median numbers (minimum, maximum) of total bacteria, Bifidobacterium , and proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria in the caries-free group were 5.27 × 1025 (1.14 × 106 , 3.06 × 107 ), 0 (0, 3.43 × 104 ), and 0 (0, 3.51 × 10−03 ), respectively.
The median numbers of total bacteria (p = 0.003), Bifidobacterium (p < 0.001), and proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria (p < 0.001) were higher significantly in the S-ECC group in compared to the caries-free
group ([Table 4 ]). Detections of both bacteria in combination, Bifidobacterium + S. wiggsiae (p < 0.001), were higher in the S-ECC group than in the caries-free group ([Fig. 1 ]).
Table 4
Number of bacteria between caries-free and S-ECC groups
Bacteria
Caries-free
Median
(min, max)
S-ECC
Median
(min, max)
p -Value
Total bacteria
5.27E + 06
(1.14E + 06,3.06E + 07)
6.63E + 06
(9.37E + 05, 1.92E + 07)
0.003[a ]
Bifidobacterium
0
(0, 3.43E + 04)
0
(0, 7.61E + 05)
0.001[a ]
Bifidobacterium /total bacteria
0
(0, 3.51E–03)
0
(0, 8.50E–02)
0.001[a ]
Abbreviation: S-ECC, severe early childhood caries.
a Mann–Whitney U test at the significant level of p < 0.05.
[Table 5 ] shows clinical parameter comparisons between the presence and absence of bacteria
in the S-ECC group. In the S-ECC group, the mean ± SD of dmft scores in the presence
and absence of Bifidobacterium were 8.47 ± 3.58 and 5.06 ± 3.52, respectively. Mean dmft scores were significantly
higher in the presence group than in the absence group (p < 0.001). Mean ± SD of the modified gingiva index in the presence and absence of
Bifidobacterium was 0.87 ± 0.4 and 0.52 ± 0.41, respectively. Mean dmft scores (p < 0.001) and modified gingiva index (p = 0.004) were significantly higher in the presence group than in the absence group.
Same as Bifidobacterium, in the S-ECC group, mean ± SD dmft scores in the presence and absence of S. wiggsiae were 7.04 ± 3.67 and 5.33 ± 3.82, respectively. Mean ± SD of the modified gingiva
index in the presence and absence of S. wiggsiae was 0.82 ± 0.48 and 0.48 ± 0.39, respectively. The mean dmft scores (p = 0.024) and modified gingiva indexes (p = 0.002) were significantly higher in the presence group than in the absence group.
Table 5
The association of clinical parameters and bacteria in S-ECC group
Presence
Absence
p -Value
Median
(min, max)
Mean ± SD
Median
(min, max)
Mean ± SD
Bifidobacterium
- dmft
8 (4,16)
8.47 ± 3.58
4 (1,19)
5.06 ± 3.52
<0.001[a ]
- Plaque index
1.50 (0.67, 3.00)
1.63 ± 0.74
1.33 (0.33, 3.00)
1.31 ± 0.58
0.141
- Modified gingiva index
1.00 (0.04, 2)
0.87 ± 0.49
0.54 (0, 1.17)
0.52 ± 0.41
0.004[a ]
Scardovia wiggsiae
- dmft
6 (2,16)
7.04 ± 3.67
4 (1, 19)
5.33 ± 3.82
0.024[a ]
- Plaque index
1.60 (0.33, 3.00)
1.55 ± 0.74
1.17 (0.33, 3.00)
1.30 ± 0.55
0.178
- Modified gingiva index
1.00 (0, 2.00)
0.82 ± 0.48
0.50 (0, 1.00)
0.48 ± 0.39
0.002[a ]
Bifidobacterium+ S. wiggsiae
- dmft
8 (2, 16)
8.12 ± 4.04
4 (1, 19)
5.30 ± 3.53
0.005[a ]
- Plaque index
1.67 (0.50, 3.00)
1.62 ± 0.80
1.33 (0.33, 3.00)
1.31 ± 0.56
0.242
- Modified gingiva index
1.00 (0, 2.00)
0.91 ± 0.48
0.50 (0, 1.17)
0.52 ± 0.41
0.004[a ]
Abbreviations: dmft, decay, missing, and filled tooth; SD, standard deviation; S-ECC,
severe early childhood caries.
a Mann–Whitney U test at the significant level of p < 0.05.
Interestingly, in the S-ECC group, there was a detection of the combination of two
bacteria that was not found in the caries-free group. In the S-ECC group, mean ± SD
dmft scores in the presence and absence of a two bacteria presence, Bifidobacterium + S. wiggsiae, were 8.12 ± 4.04 and 5.3 ± 3.53, respectively. In the S-ECC group, mean ± SD of the
modified gingiva index in the presence and absence of two bacteria, Bifidobacterium + S. wiggsiae, was 0.91 ± 0.48 and 0.52 ± 0.41, respectively. The mean dmft scores (p = 0.005) and modified gingiva index (p = 0.004) were significantly higher in the presence group than in the absence group
([Table 5 ]). There was a positive correlation between the levels of Bifidobacterium (p = 0.003) and the proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria (p = 0.017) in the S-ECC group.
In the S-ECC group, the correlation coefficiency between Bifidobacterium and dmft, plaque index and modified gingiva index was 0.489, 0.165, and 0.378, respectively.
The correlation coefficiency between the ratio of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria and dmft, plaque index, and modified gingiva index was 0.449, 0.168,
and 0.381, respectively. The level of Bifidobacterium (p < 0.001) and the ratio of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria (p < 0.001) was significantly correlated with the dmft score. Also, the level of Bifidobacterium (p = 0.001) and ratio of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria (p = 0.001) were significantly correlated with the modified gingival index.
Caries-related factors assessed by the questionnaire showed that major caregiver (p = 0.002), parent education levels (p = 0.02), prolonged bottle-feeding (>18 months of age) (p = 0.015), night-time feeding (p < 0.001), eating cariogenic snacks (p = 0.019), night-time snack feeding (p = 0.023), and frequency of dental visits (p = 0.003) were associated with S-ECC ([Table 6 ]).
Table 6
The association between related factor and caries status
Variable
Caries-free
n (%)
S-ECC
n (%)
p -Value
Demographic characteristics
Child's age (months)
35.54 ± 6.90
35.07 ± 6.88
0.664[a ]
Child's gender
Male
44 (62.9)
33(47.1)
0.062b
Female
26 (37.1)
37(52.9)
Guardian's age (years)
33.40 ± 8.73
33.87 ± 8.42
0.727[a ]
Guardian's gender
Male
13 (18.6)
12(17.2)
0.825b
Female
57 (81.4)
58(82.8)
Major caregiver
Father or mother
60 (85.7)
44 (62.9)
0.002b
Grandparents or others
10 (14.3)
26 (37.1)
Parent's education levels
<Bachelor's degree
46 (65.7)
58 (82.9)
0.02b
≥Bachelor's degree
24 (34.3)
12 (17.1)
Child's diet and oral hygiene care
Prolonged bottle feeding
Yes
20 (28.6)
34 (48.6)
0.015b
No
50 (71.4)
36 (51.4)
Night-time feeding
Yes
10 (14.3)
37 (52.9)
<0.001b
No
60 (85.7)
33 (47.1)
Eating cariogenic snack
Never or in meal
14 (20.0)
15 (21.4)
0.019b
Between meal ≤2 times/day
47 (67.1)
33 (47.1)
Between meal >2 times/day
9 (12.9)
22 (31.4)
Night-time snack feeding
Yes
20 (28.6)
33 (47.1)
0.023b
No
50 (71.4)
37 (52.9)
Frequency of dental visits
Regularly
23 (32.9)
26 (37.1)
0.003b
When child had symptom
8 (11.4)
22 (31.4)
Never
39 (55.7)
22 (31.4)
a Mann–Whitney U test or b Pearson chi-squared test at the significant level of p < 0.05.
Discussion
In this study, in S-ECC group, plaque, and gingival indices were significantly higher
than in the caries-free group, which are similar to previous studies.[3 ]
[8 ] Dental plaque or oral biofilm on tooth surfaces actively supports the metabolism
of cariogenic microbes, which brings about an acidic environment, growth, and proliferation
of aciduric and acidogenic bacteria, and tooth demineralization.[9 ] This study showed that the Bifidobacterium prevalence in the S-ECC group was higher than in the caries-free group significantly.
Moreover, the amount of Bifidobacterium and proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria in the S-ECC group were higher than in the caries-free group, which
were in the same direction to previous studies.[16 ]
[17 ]
[26 ] Our findings showed no detection of Bifidobacterium in the caries-free group, which is similar to the previous study by Zhai et al.[27 ] Their study performed PCR from saliva and plaque samples from 30 caries-free and
40 S-ECC subjects, aged between 3 and 5 years. Their results showed that Bifidobacterium was detected 47.5% and 0 in the S-ECC and caries-free groups, respectively. There
was significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05).[27 ] It was previously reported that a higher level of Bifidobacterium was detected in mature plaque from subjects with poor oral hygiene when compared
with good oral hygiene subjects, which was in the same direction as our results.[8 ]
[10 ] This study also found the correlation between levels of Bifidobacterium and the proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria with the gingival index in the S-ECC group, which is similar to
previous studies.[2 ]
[28 ] One of our previous studies showed a higher level of Bifidobacterium significantly in the S-ECC group than in the caries-free group and also found that
the level of Bifidobacterium and the proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria were positively related to the dmft scores in S-ECC group, which
were similar to this study.[8 ] Conversely, our recent study analyzed the association between Bifidobacterium in plaque from S-ECC children recruited from the Southern part of Thailand showed
the detection and quantities of Bifidobacterium from the S-ECC group and caries-free group were not different significantly.[2 ] The reason could be from the level of caries severity and demographic. Although
both previous studies and this study were done on Thai children, subjects in each
study were recruited from different regions. We noticed that the mean dmft scores
in this study and the study in 2017 were higher than the study in 2022. It is possible
that the dental caries severity might be related to the Bifidobacterium quantity, thus resulting in different outcome. Previous study showed the positive
correlation between Bifidobacterium levels and dentin active lesions (p = 0.001) in children aged between 2 and 5 years. This suggested that the higher detection
levels of Bifidobacterium may be linked to lesion activity.[16 ]
[17 ] The current literature mentions special properties of Bifidobacterium that increase the violence in caries development because of its abilities to store
polysaccharides inside their cells and degrade them into acids under limited conditions
of carbohydrate. Moreover, it can tolerate to fluoride because of the availability
of unique metabolic pathway.[17 ] Taken together, Bifidobacterium seems to play an important role in caries progression. The association between Bifidobacterium and caries severity should be assessed and confirmed in the future.
S. wiggsiae belongs to the Bifidobacteriaceae family.[29 ] It was first detected in S-ECC in 2002.[29 ] This study found a significantly higher prevalence of S. wiggsiae in the S-ECC group than in the caries- free group, which is similar to previous studies.[2 ]
[29 ]
[30 ]
[31 ]
[32 ]
[33 ] The prevalence of S. wiggsiae in the S-ECC group was 39% in this study, while in our previous study it was 49%.[2 ] This study showed that dmft scores and the gingival index of children presented
with S. wiggsiae were higher significantly than in children who were absent of S. wiggsiae . Previous studies showed a positive correlation between dmft scores and levels of
S. wiggsiae in saliva, which was similar to our study.[2 ]
[34 ]
[35 ]
[36 ] This is the second study to show the association between gingival index and S. wiggsiae in Thai children, which supported the association between S. wiggsiae and mature plaque, which is a highly complex oral community, consistent with numerous
microorganisms associated with gingivitis and dental caries.[35 ]
[37 ] A previous study reported that when S. wiggsiae metabolized sugar, the environmental pH immediately decreased into 3.5.[35 ] Due to its characteristics, S. wiggsiae is an acidogenic and aciduric bacteria, similar to S. mutans . It can grow in acid agars (pH 5) and produce high acid that induces demineralization
and increased caries progression.[35 ]
S. wiggsiae might be one of bacteria involved in caries development. Previous studies have shown
that in S-ECC groups, a combination of S. mutans and S. wiggsiae was detected, and this combination was not found in the caries-free groups.[2 ] This study also showed that the combination of Bifidobacterium and S. wiggsiae was detected in the S-ECC group, whereas they were not found in the caries-free group.
Moreover, the dmft scores and gingival index of the S-ECC group, with the presence
of these bacteria groups, were significantly higher than the absence of the bacteria
group. As for the results in the amount of S. wiggsiae, which was detected in higher amounts in the S-ECC group and associated with the dmft
scores and the gingival index. Our previous study was done in Thai children also,
but from the Southern part of Thailand, and showed similar results. This is the second
study in Thai children to confirm this result.[2 ]
According to the questionnaire, the education level of guardians and major caregivers
was significantly associated with S-ECC. The higher the education (bachelor's degree
or higher) of guardians, the more caries-free children, compared to those whose guardians
had a lower education, below a bachelor degree. Similar to previous studies, major
caregivers with university levels had better knowledge and attitudes, hence a better
practice to improve the oral health care of their children.[2 ]
[36 ]
[37 ] In this study, S-ECC were significant associated with prolonged bottle-feeding,
night-time, eating cariogenic snacks, and night-time snack feeding. As found in previous
studies, on-demand bottle-feeding habits and nocturnal bottle-feeding in children
aged over 12 months, with irregular brushing, could increase the risk of developing
caries because of extended contact time with sugary liquids on teeth and declined
salivary flow at night.[38 ] More frequent activities of bottle-feeding and sugary foods consumption at age 12
months increased the risk of dental caries when the children were 3 years old.[39 ] Consumption of cariogenic snacks, which contain low-nutrients but high-energy, such
as candies, sugar-coated starchy foods, cookies, Thai desserts, sticky sweets, juice,
sweetened milk, sweetened beverages and other sweets, was associated with caries status.[2 ]
[37 ]
[39 ] Frequent sugary food intake is especially related to a higher chance of developing
S-ECC. Night-time consumption of sweetened drinks is also associated with caries production.[38 ]
[39 ] Moreover, this study showed a significant difference of frequency of dental visits
between the S-ECC group and the caries-free group. Generally, children who had never
seen a dentist associated with increased risk of caries development.[39 ] However, our study found that children in the S-ECC group had more dental visits
than those of the caries-free group. Previous studies found that most parents and
caregivers did not focus on the children's oral health status, due to many reasons,
until their children unavoidably visited the dentist due to severe toothache.[1 ] This may assume that children in the S-ECC group had made more dental visits in
the past due to several oral health problems, while children in the caries-free group
had visited dentists less. Limitations of this study are that it is a cross-sectional
study that is able to show only a short period of time. The oral biofilm community
is dynamic and might need longer time to observe. Second, only two bacteria were investigated
and analyzed. Analysis of multiple bacteria is strongly recommended in the future
to more accurately represent the oral environment and the relationship between pathological
bacteria and caries initiation. Third, larger sample size from multiple areas of Thailand
is strongly recommended in the future study.
In conclusion, the prevalence of Bifidobacterium and S. wiggsiae in an S-ECC group was higher than in a caries-free group significantly. Levels of
Bifidobacterium and the proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria were higher in the S-ECC group significantly compared with the
caries-free group. There was positive correlation between levels of Bifidobacterium and the proportion of Bifidobacterium to total bacteria and the dmft scores and gingival index. The detection of Bifidobacterium , S. wiggsiae, and combinations of these bacteria in the S-ECC group presented significantly higher
modified gingival index and dmft scores. The factors from the questionnaire that were
significantly associated with S-ECC were the major caregiver, parent's education levels,
prolonged bottle-feeding (> 18 months of age), night-time feeding, eating cariogenic
snacks, night-time snack feeding, and frequency of dental visits.
