Keywords
awareness - parents - pit and fissure sealants - meta-analysis
Introduction
Dental caries is one of the most common oral ailments in children worldwide (∼50%).
Delayed treatment can affect not only basic daily routine like chewing, speech, and
smiling but family's quality of life.[1] Treatment of dental diseases is very expensive across the globe and notably prevention
is easy and effective.
The prevalence of dental caries in Indian population considering the mixed dentition
was found to be 58% and among the children with primary dentition was found to be
54%.[2] This indicates a slow increase in caries prevalence during the transition between
deciduous and mixed dentition. This is due to the time taken for caries to manifest
as a clinically detectable lesion and the effects of dietary changes. The study assessing
the geographic distribution of caries prevalence in India—the regional prevalence
in western India was particularly high with 72%.[2]
The occlusal surfaces of posterior teeth are most prone to caries due to the deep
and narrow anatomy of pits and fissures that can harbor plaque-derived bacteria that
are inaccessible during brushing.[3] Pit and fissure sealants act as a major preventive barrier against plaque and acids
by forming a tough shield that prevents food and bacteria from entering these vulnerable
areas on the occlusal surfaces of the teeth causing decay.[4] It is well-known that sealants work better at preventing occlusal caries than topical
fluoride. About 90% of caries in permanent posterior teeth and 44% of caries in primary
teeth are caused due to deep pit-and-fissure.[5] Moreover, it has been reported that using resin-based fissure sealants on first
molars reduces caries from 86% in the first year to 78.6% in the second year and 58.6%
in the fourth year.[3] The pit and fissure sealant was developed to help manage these sites of stagnation
that are generally resistant to various therapeutic approaches and, hence, contribute
to a significant portion of the caries disease burden in the population. Although
the public faces a significant difficulty in avoiding dental caries, raising parental
awareness and implementing preventative measures, as carried out in industrialized
nations, may result in a decline in dental caries and improved child health.[6] The dental health care of a child is the responsibility of the parents.
Preschoolers often lack the manual dexterity and psychological maturity to brush themselves,
as well as the ability to appreciate the significance of keeping good oral health.
Most parents are extremely busy in their work schedules that they are unable to dedicate
time toward the child's daily routine activities. The knowledge of parents definitely
plays a great role in improving the oral health of the patients. Parental or caregivers'
knowledge of nutrition, the impact of feeding practices, screen time, and peer pressure,
all play a role in influencing the child's eating behavior and its impact on oral
health. This review aims to systematically assess cross-sectional studies and summarize
the evidence on the awareness of the parents toward pit and fissure sealants as an
effective measure to prevent dental caries.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (International
register for registering systematic reviews prospectively; CRD42022351020). This report
follows the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
statement.
Selection Criteria for the Studies in This Review
Type of studies
We included cross-sectional, observational studies and epidemiological studies. We
excluded quasi-randomized trials, nonrandomized trials, and parallel and split-mouth
randomized controlled trials.
Type of Participants and Outcome Measures
We included studies that involved parents of children from the general population
who were assessed for their awareness toward pit and fissure sealants. We defined
“population” as either parent or both and outcome as their awareness toward “pit and fissure sealant.”
Search Methods for the Identification of Studies
We searched electronic databases like PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, MEDLINE,
and Google Scholar, from inception to December 2022. We used a combination of keywords
and controlled vocabulary that we adapted for each electronic database ([Table 1]).
Table 1
Search strategy used in PubMed to search for the relevant articles
|
Search strategy used in PubMed
|
Number of articles selected
|
|
Parents AND children AND awareness AND dental caries
|
5
|
|
Parents AND children AND awareness AND dental caries AND prevention
|
1
|
|
Parents AND children AND awareness AND pit and fissure sealant
|
0
|
|
(father OR mother OR parents) AND (child OR siblings) AND (pit fissure sealants OR
dental sealants) AND awareness
|
1
|
|
Parents AND (child OR siblings) AND (pit fissure sealants OR dental sealants) AND
knowledge AND attitude AND practice
|
0
|
|
Parents AND children AND pit and fissure sealant AND knowledge
|
1
|
|
Total number of articles retrieved
|
8
|
Data Collection and Analysis
Selection of Studies
In the first stage, two reviewers (K.S.D. and A.M.) independently screened the titles
and abstracts of all retrieved references by using a standardized form. Because they
used an inclusive criterion, when the reviewers disagreed on the eligibility status
for a particular reference, they included the citation in question at this stage and
resolved the disagreement at the full-text screening stage. In the second stage, two
reviewers independently screened the full text of all potentially eligible studies.
They resolved any disagreement by means of discussion. When consensus was elusive,
a third reviewer (So.K), acting as an arbiter, decided final eligibility.
Data Extraction and Management
Using a standardized form, two reviewers (K.S.D. and A.M.) independently extracted
data from all the included studies. The form included instructions to extract the
main characteristics of the studies, including the type of study design, population
(age, sex, and education of parents) and the outcome (knowledge of the parents with
respect to), and the authors' conclusion. When these reviewers identified discrepancies
that they were unable to clarify, a third reviewer (So.K) acted as arbiter.
Assessment of the Risk of Bias of Included Studies
Two reviewers (K.S.D. and A.M.) independently assessed the risk of bias for each included
study by using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool for analytical
cross-sectional study. For each domain, we determined whether a study had high or
low risk of bias. We resolved any disagreements by means of discussion until we reached
consensus.
Results
The cross-sectional studies included in the review were from inception till August
2022, and 1,217 studies were revealed from the search procedure. A total of 1,205
records were identified through database search in PubMed and Scopus. Google Scholar
yielded 12 articles based on titles giving 1,217 articles overall. These articles
were subjected to screening process based on titles, duplicates, abstracts, and full-text
reading and were included and/or excluded according to eligibility criteria predefined.
In the stepwise process, the articles were screened based on titles and duplicate
removal to include the relevant manuscripts. The articles were screened finally for
full text, the articles which were unable to provide the relevant information were
excluded at this step. Thus, a total of seven manuscripts were excluded. The reason
for exclusion was information being reported in mean, irrelevant data or the information
was not reported. After selection according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12
studies were included in the quantitative pooling (meta-analysis; [Fig. 1]). On critical appraisal of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute
critical appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies, it was found that two studies
had a low risk of bias and nine studies had a high risk. Results of bias assessment
are presented in traffic light plot ([Fig. 2]).
Fig. 1 PRISMA flow chart of the included studies. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; SD, standard deviation.
Fig. 2 Risk of bias of the included studies.
The data obtained from 12 studies were compiled in a single spreadsheet reporting
knowledge of parents toward pit and fissure sealant therapy. The characteristics of
the studies were narratively discussed ([Table 2]).
Table 2
Characteristics of the included studies
|
Study Id
|
Author's name/Year of publication
|
Place
|
Sample size
|
Age of children
|
Education of parents
|
Previous dental visit
|
Knowledge with respect to; n (%)
|
Authors' conclusion
|
|
1.
|
Mafeni J 1994[19]
|
Melbourne
|
487
|
18 years and below
|
Secondary and postsecondary
|
84%
|
Sealants are effective in preventing dental caries
226 (46.4%)
|
Parents not well informed of sealants, also area of origin and socioeconomic status
had an impact on sealant placement
|
|
2.
|
Nakhjavani YB et al 2012[20]
|
Iran
|
250
|
7–9 years
|
University degree: 49%
High school: 45.2%
Below high school: 5.8%
|
?
|
Sealant definition, application, age group related to application, and survival
56 (22.3%)
|
The knowledge among the mothers regarding sealants was low
|
|
3.
|
Nair BG 2016[21]
|
South Africa
|
295
|
Grade 1 children
|
Tertiary: 24.4% Secondary school: 50.2%
Primary school: 22.3%
|
?
|
Awareness of fissure sealant
192 (65%)
|
There is a gap in knowledge, attitude, and practice of parents with respect to dental
sealants
|
|
4
|
Gurunathan D et al 2018[10]
|
Tamil Nadu
|
432
|
pre-school children
|
School level: 35% Diploma/Degree: 65%
|
?
|
Pit and fissure sealants as a preventive measure of dental caries
2 (0.013%)
|
Graduate mothers had more knowledge about preventive measures
|
|
5.
|
Sabbagh HJ et al 2019[14]
|
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
549
|
≤16 years
|
Illiterate: 7 Primary/Intermediate:31
High school: 81 University or higher: 164
Mothers are illiterate: 5 Primary/Intermediate:38
High school: 98 University or higher: 142
|
?
|
Aware of fissure sealants
96 (24.4%)
|
They found an association between socioeconomic status and the level of parental dental
knowledge and practices
|
|
6.
|
Kaur S et al 2019[11]
|
India
|
250
|
11–14 years
|
?
|
36.80%
|
Sealants prevent dental caries
26 (10.4%)
|
Knowledge was found to be insufficient among parents. The practice regarding fissure
sealants was nil and the attitude was not up to the mark in spite of motivational
program
|
|
7.
|
Junger ML et al 2019[22]
|
United States
|
716
|
?
|
High school diploma or lower: 13.6%
High school diploma: 21.6%
High school diploma or higher: 64.8%
|
?
|
Sealants prevent dental caries
395 (55.1%)
|
Half of the parents had knowledge about the dental sealants
|
|
8.
|
Zakirulla M et al 2019[15]
|
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
350
|
7–12 years
|
Academic: 22.9%Diploma: 48.9%
High school: 22.0%
Illiterate: 6.3%
|
100%
|
Fissure sealants are beneficial in prevention of dental caries in children
77 (22%)
|
Mothers' knowledge and acceptance of preventive dental procedures for children was
low
|
|
9.
|
Lakshmanan L 2020[12]
|
India
|
250
|
?
|
Graduates: 80%
High school: 15% Primary schooling: 5%
|
?
|
Sealants are effective in preventing dental caries
178 (71%)
|
Knowledge and attitude of parents was supportive for the sealant placement. Practice
was found to be poor
|
|
10.
|
Deep A et al 2020[13]
|
India
|
80
|
7–12 years
|
Diploma: 26%
Academic education: 37%
|
?
|
Fissure sealants as preventive measure for dental caries
18 (22%)
|
Knowledge among parents for fissure sealant was low while attitude was found to be
positive
|
|
11.
|
Almalki SA et al 2021[16]
|
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
|
350
|
?
|
Not educated: 15 (5%)
Up to secondary: 111 (37%)
Bachelor: 154 (51.3%)
Masters: 16 (5.3%)
PhD: 4 (1.3%)
|
65.7%
|
Awareness about pit and fissure sealants
134 (58%)
|
Parents had knowledge about preventive dental treatment which was related to their
level of education. The level of utilization was poor
|
|
12.
|
Almutairi MA 2021[23]
|
Saudi Arabia
|
206
|
?
|
Below high school: 22 (10.7%)
High school: 33 (16%)
University degree: 151 (73.3%)
|
Less than a year: 105 (50.5%)
Between 1 and 2 years: 44 (21.4%)
More than 2 years: 58 (28.2%)
|
Covering deep normal fissures of tooth crown by tooth color material as a foundation
31 (15%)
|
Parents knowledge about pit and fissure sealant was found to be poor
|
Discussion
There are several studies being conducted globally to comprehend the knowledge and
awareness of parents toward pit and fissure sealants for prevention of dental caries
among children. The purpose of this review was to assess the level of knowledge of
parents toward the pit and fissure sealant therapy. In affluent nations, raising parental
awareness of their children's oral health has decreased dental caries and in turn
improved children's health.[7] Children's dental health today and their future oral health as adults are both impacted
by the healthy habits they develop as youngsters.[8] Children's fissure sealants play an important role in the prevention of dental cavities.
Dental fissure sealants should be applied to primary or permanent teeth when it is
established that the tooth is at risk of developing dental caries in dental fissures
and deep grooves, according to the American Dental Association and the American Academy
of Pediatric Dentistry.[9] Among the included studies, only four studies were conducted in varied regions of
India.[10]
[11]
[12]
[13] Of these, studies conducted by Kaur et al and Lakshmanan et al included same number
of parents as their sample size (n = 250).[11]
[12] The study by Lakshmanan et al was conducted in a hospital-based setting, while the
study by Kaur et al was conducted among parents of children coming to four different
schools in Udham Singh Nagar area and, therefore, the results of the study could be
generalized with respect to the population of that area. Highest sample size (n = 432) was conducted among mothers of school children chosen randomly. A small sample
size (n = 80) was recruited in a study conducted by Deep et al[13] and the authors did not provide any details wherefrom the sample was chosen. A cross-sectional
survey conducted with small sample size will not help in generalizing the results
to the population of interest.
Studies conducted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia showed better level of education
among the parents.[14]
[15]
[16] Among these studies Almaki et al[16] in their results showed that only 58% of parents were aware about pit and fissure
sealant as a preventive material, while 74% of parents had a positive attitude toward
prevention of oral diseases. The results are similar to a study conducted in Ethiopia
by Duguma and Zemed where 72.5% of participants had a positive view regarding prevention
of childhood caries. The parents' level of knowledge will determine their attitude
toward preventing the disease.[16]
[17] Taking into consideration that the primary teeth are significant as they are considered
the natural space maintainers for permanent teeth and preserving them is of utmost
importance.[18] If the parents are made aware of the various materials available for preventing
dental caries, this would definitely improve the oral health-related quality of life.
Dental visit pattern of parents to the dental clinic has an impact on the level of
knowledge. Parents who frequently visit their dentists are exposed to preventive knowledge
that may have an impact on the dental health of their children. Thus, it is crucial
to raise dentists' knowledge emphasizing the importance of teaching parents how to
protect their children against dental problems. To assess if parents are aware of
the issues surrounding the oral health of their children, more research is required.
A study conducted by Mafeni et al reported that 84% of parents visited the dentist
biannually, but only 46% of parents had the awareness that sealants are effective
in preventing dental caries.[19] One of the reasons could be that patients visited the dentist with some other concern
rather than dental caries or they were not accompanied by children. Another reason
could be that they did not have an interaction on caries prevention method. In a study
by Zakirulla et al in Saudi Arabia all the mothers had visited the dentist earlier.
In spite of sound education, only 22% of the mothers were aware that fissure sealants
help in prevention of dental caries.[15] This was contrary to another study conducted in Saudi Arabia among fathers where
more than 50% of the recruited samples had a graduation degree, and 66% of the fathers
had visited the dentist earlier. Fifty eight percent of the fathers in the study were
aware that pit and fissure sealant is a preventive dentistry procedure. This signifies
that self-awareness combined with routine visits to dentist will increase the knowledge
and acceptability of parents toward fissure sealants.
A study conducted in Tamil Nadu, India, showed that 71% of parents had the knowledge
that pit and fissure sealants help in preventing dental caries which was contrary
to another study conducted in a district in Uttarakhand where only 10% of parents
were aware of the fact that dental sealants prevent dental caries. This might be due
to the literacy level of the population and accessibility of parents to dentists as
Udham Singh Nagar is an area with hilly terrain.
Overall, the knowledge of parents on combining 12 studies was found to be 29%, which
was on a lower side. Improving the knowledge and awareness of parents toward pit and
fissure sealants will definitely improve their usage. Consequentially, this will help
in improving the oral health status and oral health-related quality of life of the
children.
Limitations
There were few limitations of this review; first, though the intention was to present
global data yet there are a smaller number of published studies portraying the burning
issue. There were very few studies captured from the literature that would represent
maximum countries. Second, limitation of the databases searched for the inclusion
of articles might have led to missing out of important articles from other databases.
Conclusion
The awareness of parents toward pit and fissure sealant was limited globally, which
could be concluded through meta-analysis. Majority of the studies included in the
review had high risk of bias. Hence, studies of high standards will help to reach
a better conclusion. Parents are seen to have little knowledge of professional preventive
dental treatment, thus there is a need to increase public awareness which will help
to enhance children's oral health. It appears that by increasing dentists' knowledge
toward preventive strategies and by motivating them to uplift their usage by prescribing
sealants during their regular services would impart a better knowledge to the parents.
Involving the media in public education can also be effective strategy to increase
society's utilization of the use of preventive measures for oral health. Parents should
seek more primary dental care education from health care professionals and governmental
agencies.