Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology 2024; 07(01): 027-054
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1772162
Review Article

Radiological Assessment of Sarcopenia and Its Clinical Impact in Patients with Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic, and Gastrointestinal Diseases: A Comprehensive Review

Shameema Farook
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
Saumya Soni
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
Pankaj Gupta
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
Anindita Sinha
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
,
Mahesh Prakash
1   Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
› Author Affiliations

Funding None declared.
 

Abstract

Sarcopenia is defined as a syndrome characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength with a risk of adverse outcomes such as physical disability, poor quality of life, and death. The diagnosis of sarcopenia is based on documentation of two of the three criteria: low muscle mass, low muscle strength, and low physical performance. Imaging-based assessment of muscle mass is preferred in both clinical and research settings. Anthropometry for the evaluation of muscle mass is prone to errors and is not recommended in the clinical setting.

There is a lack of literature on the radiological assessment of sarcopenia and its association with prognosis in hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal diseases. Thus, we aim to provide a review of studies that utilized radiological methods to assess sarcopenia and evaluate its impact on outcomes in patients with these diseases.


Introduction

Sarcopenia is characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength with a risk of adverse outcomes such as physical disability, poor quality of life, and death.[1] Sarcopenia can be classified as primary and secondary according to the age at onset and associated inciting factors. Aging has been classically associated with primary sarcopenia, whereas secondary sarcopenia can result in any age group and is related to the underlying disease process.[2] Due to its increased relevance in determining outcomes in the geriatric population, cancer patients, and patients with chronic illness, sarcopenia is recognized as a disease entity in the International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision (ICD-10).[3] The sarcopenia disease burden is expected to increase to around 200 million by the end of 2050 due to its higher prevalence in the long-term care and community-dwelling population.[4]

Sarcopenia progresses through three main stages: presarcopenia, sarcopenia, and severe. Prolonged muscle disuse results in fatty infiltration within the myofibrils with a reduction in muscle attenuation and conversion of type II myofibrils to type I. This leads to impaired muscle contractility and reduction in muscle power.[5] The current recommendation for diagnosis of sarcopenia is based on documentation of two of the three criteria: low muscle mass, low muscle strength, and low physical performance. Clinical examinations for detecting sarcopenia are effective when there is a reduction in muscle power, which may manifest as difficulty or inability to maintain posture, balance, or perform repeated maneuvers.[6] As a result, clinical examinations alone will not suffice for the early detection of sarcopenia, and radiological investigations have become increasingly important. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are most widely used for the assessment of sarcopenia. Various parameters and criteria have been used to diagnose sarcopenia.[7]

Although, readily available, ultrasound is not reproducible and no widely accepted consensus is available for cut-off values of sarcopenia.

DEXA is readily available, cost-effective, and reproducible. It is a widely accepted modality for sarcopenia assessment. The lean mass derived from DEXA scan can be used to calculate the appendicular skeletal mass index (ASMI), which is a measure of sarcopenia on DEXA.

CT is considered the gold standard for body composition analysis and is used as a screening tool for assessment of sarcopenia ([Table 1]). Skeletal muscle index (SMI) is the most commonly used parameter for sarcopenia. It is calculated at the level of L3 or L4 on a CT scan by segmentation ([Fig. 1]).[1] Peripheral quantitative CT (pQCT) is a novel imaging modality primarily used to investigate bone mineral content. pQCT produces a cross-sectional image that enables quantification of three-dimensional tissue structure and skeletal muscle evaluation. It has extremely low radiation exposure and short scan time with relatively lower cost; however, it lacks standardization. The limitations of CT are exposure to ionizing radiation and inability to distinguish between intra-myocellular fat and intermuscular fat.

Zoom
Fig. 1 Computed tomography (CT) image of a 50-year-old male who had vague abdominal pain. Image depicts utilization of segmentation technique in CT for calculating skeletal mass index at L3 level. In this case, the skeletal mass index was 60 cm2/m2 (>52.4 cm2/m2 cut-off), suggesting that there is no sarcopenia.
Table 1

Sarcopenia measurement at CT

Parameters

Comments

Muscle area

Cross-sectional area within region of interest with attenuation −29 and +150 HU

Intermuscular adipose tissue area

Cross-sectional area within region of interest with attenuation −190 and −30 HU

Muscle density

Mean attenuation of tissue contained within the region of interest, after applying attenuation thresholds of −29 and +150 HU

Muscle fat density

Mean attenuation of tissue contained within the region of interest, after applying attenuation thresholds of −190 and −30 HU

Skeletal muscle index

Cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle at L3/height2. The most widely used thresholds to diagnose CT sarcopenia are SMI <52.4 cm2/m2 in men and SMI <38.5 cm2/m2 in women

Psoas muscle index

Cross-sectional area of psoas muscles at L4 level/height2

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; SMI, skeletal muscle index.


MRI can assess muscle composition by using several semiquantitative or quantitative sequences without the need of ionizing radiation. Muscle quality abnormalities, such as muscle disruption, edema, myosteatosis, and myofibrosis can also be evaluated on MRI ([Fig. 2]). T2 mapping, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Dixon sequence, diffusion tensor imaging, and strain rate tensor imaging can be used for assessment of sarcopenia.[4] Though MRI can differentiate between intra-myocellular fat and intermuscular fat (which was a drawback of CT), it is costly and time-consuming and there are no specific cut-offs for diagnosis of sarcopenia.

Zoom
Fig. 2 Dixon MRI sequence of the right thigh in a 64-year-old woman. Axial T1W in-phase (a), out of-phase (b), 100% fat images (c), and 100% water images (d) are shown. The images depict reduction in the muscle bulk with fatty infiltration of the muscles (as seen by chemical shift artefact on out-of-phase image). These findings are suggestive of myosteatosis and sarcopenia. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

Sarcopenia is frequently detected in patients with hepatobiliary, gastrointestinal, and pancreatic disorders and has been associated with decreased overall survival (OS), a higher mortality rate, hospitalization, and postoperative complications. Because these patients frequently undergo imaging for diagnosis or follow-up, radiological tests can effectively assess sarcopenia in this group of patients.

This review aims to review studies that utilized radiological methods for assessing sarcopenia and evaluate its impact on outcomes in patients with hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal diseases.

We systematically reviewed the PUBMED database with the search terms “sarcopenia” AND “imaging.” Studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the impact of sarcopenia diagnosed by imaging in hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal systems. Exclusion criteria included case series (<10 patients), case reports, letters to editors, reviews, meta-analysis, pediatric studies (age < 12 years), studies that evaluated sarcopenia clinically without utilizing radiological tests, and those with insufficient data. We collected data from the selected studies regarding patient demographics, type of study, the origin of the study population, the radiological method used for sarcopenia detection, measurement techniques, muscle site, area, and cut-off values. In addition, predictive outcomes and complications related to the prevalence and degree of sarcopenia in these diseases were recorded.

Radiological Assessment of Sarcopenia

Our literature search yielded 305 studies. After filtering out duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 136 studies met the inclusion criteria.[8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [111] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [Table 2] enumerates all these studies.

Table 2

Diagnostic modalities, measurement methods, and cut-off values for diagnosing sarcopenia

Author

Year

N

Disease

Modality

Parameter

Cut-off values (SMI and PMI in cm2/m2, TPMT in mm/m, PMA, SMA, and FFMA in cm2, TPA in mm2/m2, muscle attenuation [MA] in HU), TPV in cm3/m, ASMI in kg/m2)

Peng et al[8]

2012

557

PDAC

CT

TPA

M < 611, F < 454

Tandon et al[9]

2012

142

LT

CT/MRI

SMI

M < 52.4, F < 38.5

Dodson et al[10]

2013

216

HCC

CT

TPA

M < 477, F < 338

Krell et al[11]

2013

207

LT

CT

TPA

M < 1449.2, F < 954.3

Montano-Loza et al[12]

2014

248

CLD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤ 43 (for both M and F with BMI < 25)

Broughman et al[13]

2015

87

CRC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F with BMI < 25)

Choi et al[14]

2015

484

PDAC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 42.2, F ≤ 33.9

Fujiwara et al[15]

2015

1,257

HCC

CT

SMI

MA

M < 36.2, F < 29.6

M < 44.4, F < 39.3

Hamaguchi et al[16]

2015

477

HCC

CT

PMI

M < 6.089, F < 4.020

Hiraoka et al[17]

2015

988

CLD

CT

PMI

M < 4.24, F < 2.5

Iritani et al[18]

2015

217

HCC

CT

SMI

M < 36.0, F < 29.0

Jeon et al[19]

2015

145

LT

CT

PMI

M < 7.7 (20–50 y) and <6.6 (>50 y)

F < 4.6 (20–50 y) and <4.4 (>50 y)

Jones et al[20]

2015

100

CRC

CT

PMA

M < 54.5, F < 38.5

Levolger et al[21]

2015

90

HCC

CT

SMI

M < 52.0, F < 39.5

Nault et al[22]

2015

52

HCC

CT

SMI

M < 55, F < 39

Okumura et al[23]

2015

230

PDAC

CT

PMI

M < 5.896, F < 4.067

Valero et al[24]

2015

96

HCC

CT

TPV

M < 34.9, F < 23.3

Voron et al[25]

2015

109

HCC

CT

SMI

M < 52.4, F < 38.9

van Vugt et al[26]

2015

206

CRC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Zhang et al[27]

2017

114

IBD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 55, F ≤ 39

Kobayashi et al[28]

2016

241

HCC

CT

PMI

M < 6.089, F < 4.020

Holt et al[29]

2016

32

IBD

CT

SMA

M <161.9, F < 104.8

Fujikawa et al[30]

2016

69

IBD

CT

TPA

M < 56.7 and F < 35.5

Hamaguchi et al[31]

2016

492

HCC

CT

PMI

M < 6.089, F < 4.020

Nishida et al[32]

2016

266

PDAC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F with BMI < 25)

Reisinger et al[33]

2016

87

CRC

CT

SMI

M < 50.5, F < 39.7

Sandini et al[34]

2016

124

PDAC

CT

TAMA

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F with BMI < 25)

Zhang et al[35]

2017

204

IBD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 55, F ≤ 39

Yabusaki et al[36]

2016

195

HCC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 43.75 F ≤ 41.1

Black et al[37]

2017

447

GIC

CT

SMI

M < 43, F < 41

Bamba et al[38]

2017

72

IBD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 42, F ≤ 38

Begini et al[39]

2017

92

HCC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F with BMI < 25)

Boer et al[40]

2016

91

CRC

CT

TPA/TAMA/MEAN HU

Cut-off not mentioned

Hamaguchi et al[41]

2017

250

LT

CT

SMI

M < 40.31, F < 30.88

Hanaoka et al[42]

2017

133

CRC

CT

MPM, TPA

345.8

Imai et al[43]

2017

351

HCC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 36, F ≤ 29

Cravo et al[44]

2017

71

IBD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F with BMI < 25)

Nishikawa et al[45]

2017

232

HCC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 36.2, F ≤ 29.6

Dedhia et al[46]

2018

29

IBD

MRI

PSM

3.55

Pedersen et al[47]

2017

178

IBD

CT

TPI

M < 611, F < 454

van Roekel et al[48]

2017

104

CRC

CT

SMI

47.8

Shintakuya et al[49]

2017

132

CP

CT

SMI

M < 39.4, F < 30.1

Takagi et al[50]

2017

219

PDAC

CT

SMI

M: 68.5, F < 52.5

van Vugt et al[51]

2017

452

GI CANCER

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Wada et al[52]

2017

32

LT

CT

TPA

TPV

M < 796, F < 506.8

M < 146.9, F < 86.2

Yamashima et al[53]

2017

40

HCC

CT

TPMT/HEIGHT

18.27 ± 3.09

Yoon et al[54]

2017

203

AP

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Ozola-Zālīte et al[55]

2019

265

CP

CT

TPA

M: 3.3, F: 2.5

Antonelli et al[56]

2018

96

HCC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F, BMI < 25)

Chae et al[57]

2018

36

LT

CT

PMI

308.8

van der Kroft et al[58]

2018

80

CRC

CT

SMI

MA

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F, BMI < 25)

34.1

Deng et al[59]

2018

101

CRC

CT

∆SMI

3.28

Huguet et al[60]

2018

173

CLD

CT

TPTI

15.22

Kobayashi et al[61]

2018

102

HCC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 42, F ≤ 38

Levolger et al[62]

2018

122

LARC

CT

∆SMI

M: 1.95, F: 4.53

Praktiknjo et al[63]

2018

116

CLD

MRI

MA

FFMAa

M < 3,523 mm2, F < 3,153 mm2

M < 3,197 mm2, F < 2,895 mm2

Shirai et al[64]

2018

402

HCC

CT

PMI

M < 6.36, F < 3.92

Sugimoto et al[65]

2018

323

PDAC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 49.9, F ≤ 39.4

Tachi et al[66]

2018

362

CLD

CT

SMI

MEAN HU

M < 42, F < 38

<41 (BMI < 25), <33 (BMI ≥ 25)

Tachi et al[67]

2018

288

CLD

CT

SMA

<31

Takada et al[68]

2018

214

HCC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 42, F ≤ 38

Thiberge et al[69]

2018

162

IBD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 55.4, F ≤ 38.9

van Vugt et al[70]

2018

224

LT

CT

SMI

M < 50.4, F < 41.8

Velasquez et al[71]

2018

211

CLD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F, BMI < 25)

van Vugt et al[72]

2018

816

CRC

CT

SMI

MEAN HU

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F, BMI < 25)

< 41 (BMI < 25), <33 (BMI ≥ 25)

Xiao et al[73]

2018

3,051

CRC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.3, F ≤ 38.6

Acosta et al[74]

2019

168

LT

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Bieliuniene et al[75]

2019

100

CP/PDAC

CT/MRI

SMI

M < 45.4, F < 34.4

Choi et al[76]

2018

188

LARC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Dohzono et al[77]

2019

78

GIC

CT

PMA

M < 482.8, F < 326.3

Esser et al[78]

2019

172

LT

CT

TPA

PD

PMI

SMI

M < 1,561, F < 1,464

<38.5

M < 6.36, F < 3.92

M < 50 and F < 39

Galata et al[79]

2020

230

IBD

CT/MRI

SMI

M ≤ 41.5, F ≤ 31.8

Hamaguchi et al[80]

2019

606

HCC

CT

SMI/IMAC

M < 40.31, F < 30.88

Herod et al[81]

2019

169

CRC

CT

MEAN PSOAS DENSITY

<43.5

Jang et al[82]

2019

284

CP

CT

SMI

M < 52.4, F < 38.5

Jochum et al[83]

2019

47

LARC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Kamo et al[84]

2019

277

LT

CT

SMI/IMAC

M ≤ 40.3, F ≤ 30.8

Kitano et al[85]

2019

110

IHS

CT

SMI

F ≤ 41, M ≤ 53 (BMI ≥ 25) and M/F ≤ 43 (BMI < 25)

Kobayashi et al[86]

2019

465

HCC

CT

SMM

M < 40.31, F < 30.88

Kuo et al[87]

2019

126

LT

CT

SMI

M < 48

Lindqvist et al[88]

2019

53

LT

DEXA/CT

ASMIb FFMIb, SMI

M < 7.59 F < 5.47

M < 43 F < 41

Mardian et al[89]

2019

100

HCC

CT

SMI/MEAN HU

M ≤ 36.2, F ≤ 29.6

Praktiknjo et al[90]

2019

168

CLD

CT

TPMT

M: 17.8, F: 14

Agalar et al[91]

2020

65

CRC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Badran et al[92]

2020

262

HCC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 50, F ≤ 39

Beer et al[93]

2020

265

CLD

MRI

TPMT

M < 12, F < 8

Cabo et al[94]

2020

97

LT

CT

PMA

M < 784.0, F < 642.1

Celentano et al[95]

2021

31

IBD

MRI

TPA/

SMA

M: 11.93, F: 9.77

M: 73.49, F: 65.85

Dhaliwal et al[96]

2020

57

LT

CT/MRI

PMA

M < 1,561, F < 1,464

Pinto Dos Santos et al[97]

2020

368

LT

CT

PMI

6.3

Han et al[98]

2020

1,384

LARC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Grillot et al[99]

2020

88

IBD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Romagna et al[100]

2020

83

CLD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 50, F ≤ 39

Salman et al[101]

2020

52

CLD

CT

SMI

F ≤ 41, M ≤ 53 (BMI ≥ 25) and M/F ≤ 43 (BMI < 25)

Schaffler-Schaden et al[102]

2020

85

CRC

CT

SMI

M < 43, F < 41

Shakhbazov et al[103]

2020

34

CP

CT

TPA

M < 492, F < 362

Shirdel et al[104]

2020

974

CRC

CT

SMI/SMR

39.4, 41.0

Takada et al[105]

2020

153

HCC

CT

PMI

M < 6.36, F < 3.92

Tankel et al[106]

2020

185

CRC

CT

TIP

F ≤ 41, M ≤ 53 (BMI ≥ 25) and M/F ≤ 43 (BMI < 25)

Trikudananthan et al[107]

2020

138

CP

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Xie et al[108]

2020

298

CRC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 49.5, F ≤ 29.9

Yeh et al[109]

2020

136

HCC

CT

PMI

M < 4.24, F < 2.50

Zager et al[110]

2021

121

IBD

CT/MRI

PMA

95.12 ± 263.2

Akce et al[111]

2021

57

HCC

CT/MRI

SMI

M < 43, F < 41

Akturk et al[112]

2021

107

AP

CT

TIP

NA

Alsebaey et al[113]

2021

262

HCC

CT/MRI

SMI

M < 50, F < 39

Argillander et al[114]

2021

233

CRC

CT

∆SMI

>1 SD

Bamba et al[115]

2021

187

IBD

CT

SMI

M < 42, F < 38

Box et al[116]

2021

220

PDAC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F BMI < 25)

Cárcamo et al[117]

2021

359

CRC

CT

SMI

MEAN HU

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F, BMI < 25)

<41 (BMI < 25), <33 (BMI ≥ 25)

Boparai et al[118]

2021

44

IBD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 36.5, F ≤ 30.2

Guichet et al[119]

2021

82

HCC

MRI

FFMAa

M ≤ 31.97, F ≤ 28.95

Irwin et al[120]

2021

106

LT

CT

SMI

M < 50, F < 39

Jang et al[121]

2021

160

HCC

CT

PMA

M < 3.33 F < 2.38

Lee et al[122]

2021

2,333

CRC

CT

SMI

M < 52.4, F < 38.5

Lim et al[123]

2021

266

HCC

CT

SMI

M < 49.6, F < 43.1

Maddalena et al[124]

2021

56

CRC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 53, F ≤ 41 (BMI ≥ 25) and ≤43 (for both M and F BMI < 25)

Mihai et al[125]

2021

52

CLD

CT

SMI

M ≤ 52.4, F ≤ 38.5

Salinas-Miranda et al[126]

2021

105

PDAC

CT

∆SMI

2.8

Murachi et al[127]

2021

34

CRC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 6.36, F ≤ 3.24

Paternostro et al[128]

2021

203

CLD

CT

TPMT

M < 12: F < 8

Qayyum et al[129]

2021

36

HCC

CT

T12 SMI

M < 11.4, F < 8.2

Jördens et al[130]

2021

75

IHCC

CT

SMI, PMI

54.26, 1.685

Seror et al[131]

2021

110

HCC

CT

SMI

M < 52, F < 38

Williet et al[132]

2021

79

PDAC

CT

PMI

M < 5.73, F < 4.37

Wu et al[133]

2021

137

HCC

CT

TPA

M < 39.1

Wu et al[134]

2021

271

LT

CT

PMI

2.63

Yasueda et al[135]

2022

56

IBD

CT

SMI

M < 6.36, F < 3.92

Yıldırım et al[136]

2021

219

PDAC

CT

SMI

M < 52, F < 38

Zheng et al[137]

2021

75

HCC

CT

∆PMA

NA

Wackenthaler et al[138]

2022

37

LT

CT

PMA

M < 52.4, F < 38.5

Chong et al[139]

2022

1,011

LT

CT

∆SMI

29.4

da Silva Dias et al[140]

2022

178

CRC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 49.82, F ≤ 35.85

Özkul et al[141]

2022

115

PDAC

CT

SMI

M ≤ 56.44, F ≤ 43.36

Rom et al[142]

2022

117

PDAC

CT

SMI

M < 52, F < 38

Sato et al[143]

2022

92

CRC

CT

SMI

M < 42.6, F < 36.8

Abbreviations: AP, acute pancreatitis; ASMI, appendicular skeletal muscle index; CLD, chronic liver disease; CP, chronic pancreatitis; CRC, colorectal carcinoma; CT, computed tomography; DEXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; FFMA, fat free muscle area; FFMI, fat free muscle index; GIC, gastrointestinal cancer; SMI, skeletal muscle index; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; IMAC, intramuscular adipose content; LARC, locally advanced rectal carcinoma; LSN, liver surface nodularity; LT, liver transplant; MA, muscle area; MPM, morphological changes in psoas muscle; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PMA, psoas muscle area; PMI, psoas muscle index; PSMA, paraspinous muscle area; PTI, transverse psoas muscle thickness index; TAMA, total abdominal muscle area; TPA, total psoas area; TPMT, transverse psoas muscle thickness; TPV, total psoas volume.


Note: All these parameters are used in CT except in aMRI and bDEXA.


These studies were published from 2012 to 2022. The total number of subjects/patients evaluated in these studies was 33,960. Abdominal CT was the most common imaging modality in these studies. The most common measurement parameter used for the measurement of sarcopenia in CT and MRI was SMI in 80 (58.8%) studies. The other commonly used parameters included psoas muscle area, transverse psoas muscle thickness (TPMT), and total abdominal muscle areas, which were used in 10, 4, and 3 studies, respectively. In MRI, sarcopenia was estimated using fat-free muscle areas, while in DEXA, ASMI was utilized. In addition to muscle area quantification, some of the studies used mean muscle attenuation values (n = 14) or intramuscular adipose content (n = 6) for qualitative assessment of myosteatosis. Most of these studies utilized L3 levels for the measurement of sarcopenia.

These studies' cut-off criteria for diagnosing sarcopenia showed marked heterogeneity with 24 different gender-specific cut-off values for SMI. The most common cut-off value for SMI was less than 52.4 cm2/m2 in males and less than 38.5 cm2/m2 in females. Few studies also employed cut-off values based on body mass index. Some studies relied on a change in SMI measurement on serial imaging. For assessment of myosteatosis, average muscle attenuation cut-off values varied from 31.4 to 41 HU.


Sarcopenia and Chronic Liver Disease

Eleven studies analyzed the impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD; [Table 3]).[17] [63] [66] [67] [71] [88] [90] [93] [100] [125] [128]

Table 3

Studies reporting association of sarcopenia with outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease

Author

Year

Country of origin

Study type

Study population

N

Age (y)

Modality: parameter

Outcomes

Beer et al[93]

2020

Austria

Retrospective

CLD

265

5

MRI: TPMT

Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with CLD (p = 0.005).

Praktiknjo et al[90]

2019

Germany

Prospective

CLD patients undergoing TIPS

168

56[a]

CT: TPMT/height

Patients with sarcopenia showed significantly higher rates of mortality, ascites, overt hepatic encephalopathy, and acute on chronic liver failure than the nonsarcopenic group (p < 0.001).

Praktiknjo et al[63]

2018

Germany

Retrospective

CLD patients

116

58[a]

MRI: FFMA

Sarcopenic patients showed no clinical improvement after TIPS and had higher mortality.

Lindqvist et al[88]

2019

Sweden

Retrospective

CLD with liver transplant

53

57[a]

DEXA/CT: ASMI/SMI

ASMI measured with DEXA is a useful alternative method to SMI measured with CT when a CT scan is not clinically indicated or available.

Hiraoka et al[17]

2015

Japan

Retrospective

Chronic hepatitis

988

68.4

CT: psoas index

Frequency of presarcopenia was higher in chronic hepatitis regardless of age (p < 0.01)

Tachi et al[66]

2018

Japan

Retrospective

CLD

362

68.4

CT: SMI

Lower BMI (p < 0.001), myosteatosis (p < 0.001), lower ALT (p = 0.010), and female gender (p = 0.034) were significantly associated with skeletal volume loss.

Tachi et al[67]

2018

Japan

Prospective

CLD

288

67.5

CT: SMA

Cirrhosis (p < 0.001) and lower SMA (p = 0.017) were significantly associated with HCC development in patients with CLD.

Paternostro et al[128]

2021

Austria

Prospective

CLD with HVPG measurements

203

55

CT: TPMT

Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for mortality (p = 0.007), irrespective of severity of portal hypertension.

Romagna et al[100]

2020

Brazil

Retrospective

CLD

83

56

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia has a high prevalence among patients with CLD. However, it is not significantly associated with predictors of severity of cirrhosis.

Moctezuma-Velázquez et al[71]

2018

Canada

Retrospective

CLD

211

55

CT: SMI

Low testosterone levels are associated with sarcopenia in male cirrhotic patients (p = 0.002), and the frequency of hypotestosteronemia (p = 0.006) was also higher. There were no significant differences in female patients.

Mihai et al[125]

2021

Romania

Retrospective

HCV CLD treated with antivirals

52

59

CT: SMI

Low creatinine serum level correlates with sarcopenia (p = 0.031)

Abbreviations: ACLF, acute on chronic liver failure; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; ASMI, appendicular skeletal mass index; CLD, chronic liver disease; FFMA, free fat muscle area; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HVPG, hepatic venous pressure gradient; MELD (model for end-stage liver disease); SMA, skeletal mass attenuation; SMI, skeletal mass index; TIPS, transjugular Intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; TPMT, transverse psoas muscle thickness.


a Median, rest mean.


There were 2,789 patients (aged 54 to 68.4 years). Most studies were retrospective. Two studies also recruited a control group.[67] [90] Abdominal CT was the commonest modality used (nine studies). The commonest parameters were SMI and TPMT. In addition, one of these studies evaluated the relationship between sarcopenia and response after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts,[90] while two other studies compared sarcopenia with biochemical markers of cirrhosis.[71] [125] Overall, these studies showed that sarcopenia has a negative impact on survival and is associated with the development of acute decompensation.


Sarcopenia and Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Cancer is associated with reduced fat and muscle stores with resultant wasting and cachexia in later stages. The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is higher ([Table 4]).

Table 4

Studies reporting association of sarcopenia with outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Author

Year

Country of origin

Study type

Study population

Number

Age (y)

Modality: parameter

Outcomes

Fujiwara et al[15]

2015

Japan

Retrospective

HCC

1,257

68.8

CT: SMI, MA

Sarcopenia (p = 0.001) and visceral adiposity (p = 0.005) independently predicted mortality in patients with HCC.

Jang et al[121]

2021

Republic of Korea

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

160

55

CT: PMI, PMA, visceral adipose tissue

PMI showed a positive correlation with PMA (ρ = 0.493, p < 0.001) in HCC patients. In curatively resected HCC patients, sarcopenia and high visceral adiposity predict poor OS but not RFS, while PMA did not predict OS.

Akce et al[111]

2021

Atlanta, Georgia

Retrospective

HCC + immunotherapy.

57

NA

CT: SMI

After controlling for baseline Child–Pugh score and NLR, sex-specific sarcopenia does not predict OS.

Seror et al[131]

2021

France

Retrospective

HCC

110

67.7

CT: SMI

The combination of liver surface nodularity and sarcopenia help predict severe postoperative complications (p < 0.001).

Badran et al[92]

2020

Egypt

Prospective

HCC

262

59.6

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was associated with lack of response to therapy, liver decompensation, and higher mortality in HCC.

Mardian et al[89]

2019

Indonesia

Prospective

HCC

100

55.03

CT: SMI, MA

Patients with sarcopenia had shorter median survival than the reference groups (both p < 0.0001).

Voron et al[25]

2015

France

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

109

61.6

CT: skeletal muscle mass

Sarcopenia was found to be an independent predictor of poor OS (HR = 3.19; p = 0.013) and DFS (HR = 2.60; p = 0.001) in patients with HCC.

Salman et al[101]

2020

Egypt

Prospective

HCC

52

53.9

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was an independent prognostic factor for 1-year deaths.

Acosta et al[74]

2019

Lexington, Kentucky

Retrospective

HCC + transplant for HCC

168

59

CT: skeletal muscle mass

Alpha-fetoprotein level >100 mg/dL (p = 0.034) and male gender (p = 0.002) were independently associated with the presence of sarcopenia in patients who underwent liver transplant for HCC.

Guichet et al[119]

2021

New York, United States

Retrospective

HCC + 90Y radioembolization.

82

65

MRI: FFMA

Patients with sarcopenia were found to have increased mortality at 180 days (31.8 vs. 8.9%) and 1 year (68.2 vs. 21.2%).

Imai et al[43]

2017

Japan

Retrospective

HCC

351

70.4

CT: skeletal muscle volume

Sarcopenic patients died significantly earlier than nonsarcopenic patients (p = 0.007).

Begini et al[39]

2017

Rome, Italy

Retrospective

HCC

92

71.9

CT: SMI

Mean OS was reduced in sarcopenic HCC patients (p = 0.001).

Takada et al[68]

2018

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + chemotherapy − sorafenib

214

71

CT: SMI

OS in patients with presarcopenia tended to be worse than in patients without presarcopenia (median 252 vs. 284 days; p = 0.16).

Nishikawa et al[45]

2017

Japan

Retrospective

Unresectable HCC

232

72

CT: SMI

The objective response rate and disease control rate to sorafenib in the sarcopenia group were significantly lower compared with those in the nonsarcopenia group (p = 0.0146 and p = 0.0151, respectively).

Takada et al[105]

2020

Japan

Retrospective

HCC

153

73

CT: SMI

The median event-free survival in HCC was significantly worse in presarcopenia (p = 0.016)

Qayyum et al[129]

2021

United States

Retrospective

HCC + immunotherapy

36

70

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was associated with reduced survival and HCC necrosis in patients treated with systemic targeted therapy (p = 0.037 for women, p = 0.015 for men).

Levolger et al[21]

2015

Netherlands

Retrospective

HCC + thermal ablation

90

62

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was associated with poor survival in patients with potentially curable HCC, mainly due to an increase in treatment-related mortality (p = 0.002).

Antonelli et al[56]

2018

Rome, Italy

Retrospective

HCC + chemotherapy − sorafenib

96

69

CT: SMI

The sarcopenic group showed shorter OS (p = 0.01) and shorter time on treatment with sorafenib (p = 0.004).

Wu et al[133]

2021

Taiwan

Retrospective

HCC + chemotherapy − sorafenib

137

70

CT: muscle area at L3.

Patients with sarcopenia exhibited poorer OS than patients without sarcopenia (p < 0.001).

Hamaguchi et al[80]

2019

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

606

68

CT: SMI

OS and RFS were significantly lower (p < 0.001 and p = 0.016) among patients with sarcopenia undergoing resection for HCC.

Shirai et al[64]

2018

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

402

67

CT: PMI

Preoperative low muscle mass in males and low muscle quality in males and females were significantly associated with pulmonary dysfunction in patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC.

Zheng et al[137]

2021

China

Retrospective

HCC + TACE

75

54.5

CT: BMD, cross-sectional area of paraspinal muscles

Cross-sectional area of paraspinal muscles, Child–Pugh class, and portal vein thrombosis were associated with prognosis of HCC.

Kobayashi et al[86]

2019

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

465

65

CT: skeletal muscle mass

Patients with sarcopenic obesity displayed worse median OS (p = 0.002) and worse median RFS (p = 0.003).

Preoperative sarcopenic obesity was an independent risk factor for death (p = 0.005) and HCC recurrence (p = 0.006) after hepatectomy.

Yeh W et al[109]

2020

Taiwan.

Retrospective

HCC + thermal ablation

136

65.4

CT: PMI

Presarcopenia was found to be an independent prognostic factor of OS (p = 0.026), but not of recurrence of HCC after radiofrequency ablation.

Lim J et al[123]

2021

Korea

Retrospective

HCC + TACE

266

69.9

CT: SMI

Patients with sarcopenia had a shorter life expectancy than those without sarcopenia (p = 0.007) after TACE.

Kobayashi et al[61]

2018

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + TACE

102

69

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was found to be an independent prognostic factor in patients who underwent TACE for HCC (p = 0.037).

Kobayashi et al[28]

2015

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

241

65

CT: IMAC, PMI

Postoperative depletion of skeletal muscle quality at 6 months was associated with HCC recurrence (p = 0.024).

Hamaguchi et al[16]

2016

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

492

68[a]

CT: IMAC

Preoperative high IMAC was an independent risk factor for increased major postoperative complications (p = 0.049) and infectious complications (p = 0.021).

Yabusaki et al[36]

2016

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

195

66

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was associated with higher cumulative recurrence rate (p = 0.13).

Iritani et al[18]

2015

Japan

Retrospective

HCC

217

72

CT: SMI

Sarcopenic patients showed a significantly lower OS than those without sarcopenia (p = 0.004). Sarcopenic patients who were overweight (BMI > 22) died earlier (p = 0.012).

Dodson et al[10]

2013

United States

Retrospective

HCC + TACE

216

60

CT: total psoas area

Sarcopenia was independently associated with increased risk of death (p = 0.04) after TACE.

Valero et al[24]

2015

United States

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

96

61.9

CT: total psoas area

The presence of sarcopenia was an independent predictive factor of postoperative complications (p = 0.01).

Hamaguchi et al[16]

2015

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + hepatectomy

477

68[a]

CT: intramuscular adipose tissue content

The OS and RFS were significantly lower in patients with sarcopenia than in nonsarcopenic patients (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0012, respectively). Sarcopenia was significantly associated with death (p < 0.0001) and HCC recurrence (p = 0.0007) after hepatectomy.

Yamashima et al[53]

2017

Japan

Retrospective

HCC + chemotherapy − sorafenib

40

71.5

CT: PMI

Patients with mild muscle atrophy exhibited a significantly longer OS compared with patients with severe muscle atrophy (p = 0.045).

Abbreviations: BMD, bone mineral density; EFS, event-free survival; FFMA, free fat muscle area; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MA, mean muscle attenuation; MA, mean muscle attenuation; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; OS, overall survival; PFS progression-free survival; PMA, psoas muscle attenuation; PMI, psoas muscle index; SMA, skeletal mass attenuation; SMI, skeletal muscle index; TACE, trans arterial chemoembolization; Y90, yttrium 90.


a Median, rest mean.


Sarcopenia in this group of patients is associated with negative impact on outcomes. There were 34 studies (7,836 patients, age 53.9 to 73 years) reporting radiological assessment of sarcopenia and its prognostic impact in CLD patients with HCC.[10] [15] [16] [18] [21] [24] [25] [28] [31] [36] [39] [43] [45] [53] [56] [61] [64] [68] [74] [80] [86] [89] [92] [101] [105] [109] [111] [119] [121] [123] [129] [131] [133] [137] There were 32 retrospective and 2 prospective studies. The studies included both newly diagnosed and advanced HCCs. Twelve studies included patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy or transplant. In six studies, patients were on systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy[53] [56] [68] [111] [129] [133] and in another seven studies, patients underwent locoregional therapies.[10] [21] [61] [109] [119] [123] [137] The most common modality was CT (n = 33), and the commonest parameter was SMI. Most studies reported poor outcomes including OS and HCC recurrence in patients with sarcopenia.


Sarcopenia and Liver Transplant

In this subgroup, there were 20 retrospective studies (4,168 patients) that assessed outcomes of sarcopenia in patients who underwent liver transplantation or had been waitlisted for the transplant procedure ([Table 5]).[9] [11] [12] [19] [41] [52] [57] [60] [70] [78] [84] [87] [94] [96] [97] [113] [120] [133] [138] [139]

Table 5

Studies reporting association of sarcopenia with outcomes in liver transplant patients

Author

Year

Country of origin

Study design

Study population

N

Age (y)

Modality: parameter

Outcomes

Irwin et al[120]

2021

South Africa

Retrospective

LT recipients

106

50[a]

CT: SMI

One year after transplant, myosteatosis was associated with higher mortality (p = 0.049), greater risk of allograft failure (p = 0.021), and longer hospital and ICU stays compared with those without myosteatosis.

Kuo et al[87]

2019

United States

Retrospective

Urgent LT

126

53[a]

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was strongly associated with posttransplant mortality in men.

Alsebaey et al[113]

2021

Egypt

Retrospective

LT recipients

262

59.6

CT: SMI

MELD sarcopenia was found to be better prognostic model than the MELD scores alone in HCC patients awaiting liver transplantation.

Wu et al[134]

2021

Taiwan

Retrospective

LT recipients

271

51.93

CT: PMI

Female recipients with major postoperative complications had significantly lower mean PMI values (p = 0.028).

Krell et al[11]

2013

United States

Retrospective

LT recipients

207

51.7

CT: total psoas area

A lower TPA was associated with increased risk of posttransplant infectious complications and mortality (p = 0.003).

Dhaliwal et al[96]

2020

United States

Retrospective

Re-OLT

57

50

CT: PMI

Patients without sarcopenia had a trend toward longer median time between the first and second transplant.

Pinto Dos Santos et al[97]

2020

Germany

Retrospective

OLT recipients

368

57.5[a]

CT: PMI

Sarcopenia was found to be an independent predictor of early post-LT survival in male patients and not in females.

Tandon et al[9]

2012

Canada

Retrospective

Listed for LT

142

53[a]

CT: SMI

Male sex, Child–Pugh class C cirrhosis were independent predictors of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia was associated with increased waiting-list mortality.

Jeon et al[19]

2015

Korea

Retrospective

Follow-up LT recipients

145

50.2

CT: PMI

Newly developed sarcopenia was associated with increased mortality.

Cabo et al[94]

2020

Spain

Retrospective

LT recipients

97

55.8

CT: PMI

Sarcopenia was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications (p = 0.08).

Chong et al[139]

2022

United States

Retrospective

Urgent LT

1011

CT: SMI

Progressive perioperative sarcopenic deterioration was associated with inferior patient and graft survival in high-acuity LT.

Esser et al[78]

2019

Austria

Retrospective

Listed for LT

172

54.6

CT: total psoas area, psoas muscle density

Sarcopenia was associated with inferior patient and graft survival (p < 0.05).

Chae et al[57]

2018

Korea

Retrospective

LT recipients

473

52

CT: PMI

PMI change ≤ −11.7% between the day before surgery and postoperative day 7 was an independent predictor of patient mortality after LDLT.

van Vugt et al[70]

2018

Netherlands

Retrospective

Listed for LT

224

56

CT: SMI

It was found that an incremental increase in SMI was significantly associated with a decrease in total hospital costs (p = 0.045).

Kamo et al[84]

2019

Japan

Retrospective

LT recipients

277

54

CT: SMI

Patients with sarcopenic obesity showed worse OS after LT compared with nonsarcopenic/nonobese patients (p = 0.002).

Montano-Loza et al[12]

2014

Canada

Retrospective

LT recipients

248

55

CT: SMI

Sarcopenic patients had longer hospital stays (p = 0.005) and a higher risk of perioperative bacterial infections (p = 0.04) after LT.

Hamaguchi et al[41]

2017

Japan

Retrospective

LT recipients

250

54[a]

CT: SMI

Low SMI was associated with increased risk of death after LDLT (p = 0.002).

Huguet et al[60]

2018

France

Retrospective

Listed for LT

173

54.7

CT: psoas thickness

Low psoas thickness was associated with increased mortality (p = 0.034).

Wada et al[52]

2017

Japan

Retrospective

LT recipients

32

54

CT: total psoas volume, total psoas area

Preoperative volume of the skeletal muscle is a better predictor of postoperative risks in LDLT than preoperative area of the skeletal muscle.

Abbreviations: LT, liver transplantation; MELD, modified end stage liver disease score; OLT, orthotopic liver transplant; OS, overall survival; PMI, psoas muscle index; POC, postoperative complications; Re-OLT, liver re-transplantation; SMI, skeletal muscle index.


a Median, rest mean


Two studies included patients who underwent emergent liver transplant following acute liver failure.[87] [139] SMI was the most common parameter. Sarcopenia was associated with increased mortality, graft failure, reduced OS, and increased postoperative complications and infections in these studies, except for the study by Dhaliwal et al,[96] in which there was no difference in clinical outcomes between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic patients. A study by van Vugt et al showed that sarcopenia is associated with increased health care costs and longer hospital stay following transplantation.[70]


Sarcopenia and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Studies predominantly assessed the relationship of sarcopenia with adverse outcomes and postoperative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. There were 16 studies (1,589 patients, age 17.9 to 43.8 years).[27] [29] [30] [35] [38] [44] [46] [47] [69] [79] [95] [99] [110] [115] [118] [135] Ten studies specifically were related to Crohn's disease ([Table 6]). One study assessed the feasibility of MRI for the detection of skeletal muscle mass.[95] In contrast, the rest of the studies evaluated the association of sarcopenia with adverse outcomes such as the need for surgery, increased hospitalization, abscesses, and fistula formation. CT was the commonest imaging modality used, and SMI was the parameter employed for the assessment of sarcopenia and muscle mass.

Table 6

Studies reporting association of sarcopenia with outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Author

Year

Country

Study type

Study population

Age (Y)

Modality: parameter

Outcomes

Boparai et al[118]

2021

India

Retrospective

CD

34

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia and increased visceral fat associated with increased rate of surgery (p = 0.01) and (p =  0.002), respectively.

Grillot et al[99]

2020

France

Retrospective

CD

NA

CT: SMI

Sarcopenic CD patients had significantly more abscesses (51 vs. 16.7%, p = 0.001), hospitalizations (61.2 vs. 36.1%, p = 0.022), and digestive surgery (63.3 vs. 27.8%, p = 0.001) than nonsarcopenic patients during the follow-up.

Zhang et al[27]

2017

China

Prospective

CD

32

CT: SMI

Major POC in patients with sarcopenia (15.7 vs. 2.3%, p = 0.027) compared with nonsarcopenic patients.

Zager et al[110]

2021

Israel

Retrospective

CD

35.9

CT/MRI: PMI

Patients with major POC had lower mean psoas muscle index (p = 0.03).

Bamba et al[38]

2017

Japan

Retrospective

IBD

NA

CT: SMI

Presence of sarcopenia (p = 0.015) was a significant factor predicting intestinal resection. Cumulative operation-free survival rate was significantly lower for sarcopenic patients (p = 0.003).

Yasueda et al[135]

2022

Japan

Retrospective

CD

NA

CT: SMI

Operation time was significantly longer, hemorrhage occurred more often in the sarcopenia group. CD activity index at 6 months post-op had significantly decreased in the nonsarcopenia group (p = 0.01) but not in the sarcopenia group (p = 0.20).

Celentano et al[95]

2021

United Kingdom

Retrospective

CD

NA

MRI: TPA/SMA

Incidence of 30-day POC was higher in patients with sarcopenia.

Zhang et al[35]

2017

China

Prospective

IBD

NA

CT: SMA/VFA/SFA

Sarcopenia (p = 0.007) was a negative predictor of high Mayo score in UC patients. Sarcopenic patients with UC had high probability of need for colectomy.

Cravo et al[44]

2017

Portugal

Retrospective

CD

43

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia associated with increased risk of severe phenotypes (stricturing/penetrating disease and recurrent surgeries) in patients with CD.

Bamba et al[115]

2021

Japan

Prospective

IBD

NA

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was a significant factor for predicting intestinal resection (p = 0.015). The cumulative operation-free survival rate was significantly lower for sarcopenic patients than in all IBD patients (p = 0.003).

Galata et al[79]

2020

Germany

Retrospective

CD

37.2

CT/MRI: SMI

SMI was an independent risk factor for major postoperative complications (p = 0.002; odds ratio= 0.914).

Holt et al[29]

2016

Australia

Retrospective

CD

43.8

CT: SMA

Sarcopenia found to be more prevalent in ambulatory CD patients and is predictive of lower bone mineral density.

Dedhia et al[46]

2018

United States

Retrospective

UC

17.9

MRI: PSMA

Reduced PSMA was associated with increased complication rates (p = 0.04).

Fujikawa et al[30]

2016

Japan

Retrospective

UC

39.8

CT: TPA

Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for surgical-site infections (p = 0.03).

Pedersen et al[47]

2017

United States

Retrospective

IBD

42.7

CT: TPI

Sarcopenia affects surgical outcomes among patients younger than 40 years

Thiberge et al[69]

2018

France

Retrospective

CD

41

CT: SMI

SMI was reduced in patients with adverse outcome, compared with patients without surgery or death (p = 0.07)

Abbreviations: CD, Crohn's disease; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; PMI, psoas muscle index; POC, postoperative complications; PSMA, paraspinal muscle area; SFA, subcutaneous fat area; SMA, skeletal muscle area; SMI, skeletal muscle index; TPA, total psoas area; TPI, total psoas index; UC, ulcerative colitis; VFA, visceral fat area.



Sarcopenia and Biliary, Pancreatic, Gastrointestinal, and Colorectal Malignancy

Association between cancer and muscle function has been increasingly evaluated over the last decade. There is an association between sarcopenia with mortality, OS, recurrence-free survival, and postoperative complications. In this review, we found 13 studies[8] [14] [23] [32] [34] [65] [85] [126] [130] [132] [136] [141] [142] that reported on pancreatic and biliary malignancies and 31 studies[13] [20] [26] [33] [37] [40] [42] [48] [51] [58] [59] [62] [72] [73] [76] [77] [81] [83] [91] [98] [102] [104] [106] [108] [114] [117] [122] [124] [127] [140] [143] that reported on gastrointestinal and colorectal malignancies ([Tables 7] and [8]).

Table 7

Studies reporting association of sarcopenia with outcomes in biliary and pancreatic malignancy

Author

Year

Country

Study type

Study population

N

Age mean

Modality: parameter

Outcomes

Jördens et al[130]

2021

Germany

Retrospective

Cholangiocarcinoma

75

70

CT: SMI/PMI

Sarcopenia is associated with significantly reduced median OS.

Sandini et al[34]

2016

Italy

Retrospective

PDAC post-pancreatoduodenectomy

124

72

CT: TAMA

Sarcopenic obesity is a strong predictor of major complications after pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer.

Sugimoto et al[65]

2018

United States

Retrospective

PDAC post-pancreatoduodenectomy

323

65

CT: SMI

Smaller sex-standardized SMI associated with shorter OS (p = 0.011) and shorter RFS (p = 0.007)

Özkul et al[141]

2022

Turkey

Retrospective

PDAC

115

64.9

CT: SMI

SMI was found as poor prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.009).

Choi et al[14]

2015

Korea

Retrospective

PDAC + chemotherapy

484

60

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia during chemotherapy (p < 0.001) was poor prognostic factor for OS

Okumura et al[23]

2015

Japan

Retrospective

PDAC post-pancreatoduodenectomy

230

67

CT: PMI

Low muscle mass and low muscle quality were independent prognostic factors of poor OS (p < 0.001; p < .001) and RFS (p = 0.007; p = 0.004), respectively.

Rom et al[142]

2022

Israel

Retrospective

PDAC post-pancreatoduodenectomy

111

67

CT: SMI/IMAC/VSR

Low SMI correlated with poor OS (p = 0.007), DSS (p = 0.006), and RFS (p = 0.01)

Nishida et al[32]

2016

Japan

Retrospective

PDAC post-pancreatoduodenectomy

266

69

CT: skeletal muscle mass

Sarcopenia (p = 0.007) was an independent risk factor for the development of clinically relevant POPF.

Salinas-Miranda et al[126]

2021

Canada

Retrospective

PDAC + chemotherapy

105

61.7

CT: ∆SMI

ΔSMI was prognostic for OS with a HR of 1.2 (95% CI: 1.08–1.33, p = 0.001).

Peng et al[8]

2012

United States

Retrospective

PDAC post-pancreatoduodenectomy

557

65.7

CT: TPA

Sarcopenia associated with an increased risk of death at 3 years (HR = 1.63; p < 0.001).

Williet et al[132]

2021

France

Retrospective

PDAC

79

NA

CT: PMI

Sarcopenia associated with decreased OS.

Yıldırım et al[136]

2021

Spain

Retrospective

PDAC

219

66.6

CT: SMI

Survival of the patients with normal nutritional status was significantly

longer than that of those who were malnourished (p < 0.001).

Kitano et al[85]

2019

Japan

Prospective

Cholangiocarcinoma

110

71[a]

CT: SMI

Presence of sarcopenia was an independent predictor of poor OS (p =  0.0008).

Abbreviations: DSS, disease-specific survival; HR, hazard ratio; IMAC, intramuscular adipose tissue content; OS, overall survival; PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PMI, psoas muscle index; POC, postoperative complications; POPF, postoperative pancreatic fistula; RFS, recurrence-free survival; SMI, skeletal muscle index; TAMA, total abdominal muscle area; TPA, total psoas area; VSR, visceral-to-subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio; ΔSMI, change of skeletal muscle index.


a Median, rest mean


Table 8

Studies reporting association of sarcopenia with outcomes in gastrointestinal/colorectal malignancies

Author

Year

Country

Study type

Study population

N

Age (years)[a]

Modality: parameter

Outcomes

Dohzono et al[77]

2019

Japan

Retrospective

GIC

78

68.3

CT: PMA

Lower paravertebral muscle density was an independent poor prognostic factor (HR: 2.23 [95% CI: 1.24–3.99], p = 0.007).

Deng et al[59]

2018

Taiwan

Retrospective

CRC

101

63.7

CT: SMI and MA

Progressive sarcopenia after diagnosis of colorectal cancer has a significant negative prognostic association with OS and PFS (p < 0.05).

Murachi et al[127]

2021

Japan

Retrospective

CRC + chemotherapy

34

65

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was significantly associated with poorer OS (median 3.2 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.031).

Maddelena et al[124]

2021

Italy

Retrospective

CRC + chemotherapy

56

67

CT: SMI

Baseline sarcopenia did not affect survival and was not related to worse treatment toxicity[b].

Hanaoka et al[42]

2017

Japan

Retrospective

CRC + surgery

133

68.3

CT: morphologic change of the psoas muscle (MPM) at L3 vertebrae

Severe sarcopenia was identified as an independent factor associated with infectious complications (OR: 4.26, 95% CI: 1.38–13.10).

Broughman et al[13]

2015

United States

Retrospective

CRC + surgery

87

77

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was found to be highly prevalent among older patients with early-stage CRC.

Lee et al[122]

2021

Korea

Retrospective

CRC

2333

60.4

CT: SMI

Both OS and RFS were lower in patients with persistent sarcopenia 2 to 3 years postoperatively than in those who recovered (OS: 96.2% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.001; RFS: 91.1% vs. 83.9%, p = 0.002).

Xie et al[108]

2020

China

Retrospective

CRC

298

67

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for POCs (p = 0.008) and independent predictor for poor PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001).

Agalar et al[91]

2020

Turkey

Prospective

CRC + chemotherapy

65

54.4

CT: SMI

Low SMI is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing CRC surgery.

Argillander et al[114]

2021

Netherlands

Retrospective

CRC + surgery

233

76

CT: ∆SMI

Muscle wasting was associated with reduced OS (HR: 2.8, p = 0.002).

van Roekel et al[48]

2017

Netherlands

Retrospective

CRC

104

64.3

CT: SMI

No significant association of sarcopenia with long-term health-related quality of life in stage I–III CRC survivors[b].

Reisinger et al[33]

2016

Netherlands

Prospective

CRC

87

65.6

CT: SMI

Low muscle mass in patients undergoing surgery for CRC was associated with an increased postoperative inflammatory response (p = 0.007).

van Vugt et al[72]

2018

Netherlands

Prospective

CRC + surgery

816

70

CT: SMI/mean HU

Low skeletal muscle mass (p = 0.018) and density (p = 0.045) were independently associated with severe POC.

Xiao et al[73]

2018

Canada

Cross-sectional study

CRC

3051

56

CT: SMI

Pre-existing co-morbidities were more prevalent in sarcopenic patients with CRC.

Jochum et al[83]

2019

United States

Retrospective

LARC

47

59.3

CT: SMI

POCs were significantly higher in sarcopenic patients (p = 0.03).

Cárcamo et al[117]

2021

Chile

Retrospective

CRC

359

64

CT: SMI/mean HU

Sarcopenia does not independently influence survival in nonmetastatic CRC[b].

da Silva Dias et al[140]

2022

Portugal

Retrospective

CRC + chemotherapy

178

62

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was associated with higher incidence of drug-limiting toxicities (p = 0.030).

Sato et al[143]

2022

Japan

Retrospective

CRC + stent + surgery

92

70.5

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was an independent predictor of POC (p = 0.001) and infectious complications (p < 0.001).

Choi et al[76]

2018

South Korea

Retrospective

LARC

188

61

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was negatively associated with OS in locally advanced CRC patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and curative resection (p = 0.013).

Herrod et al[81]

2019

United Kingdom

Retrospective

CRC + surgery

169

68

CT: mean psoas density at the level of the L3 vertebra

Sarcopenia was associated with an increased risk of POCs (p =  0.007) and an increased risk of anastomotic leak (p = 0.026).

Shirdel et al[104]

2020

Sweden

Retrospective

CRC

974

67.1

CT: SMI/SMR

Sarcopenia and myosteatosis were associated with decreased cancer-specific survival.

Tankel et al[106]

2020

Israel

Retrospective

CRC + surgery (LAP)

185

68

CT: TPI and HUAC

Sarcopenia was significantly associated with preoperative comorbidities, peri-operative mortality, and a greater incidence of respiratory, cardiac, and serious POC and those aged >75 were at particular risk of morbidity (p =  0.002) following elective laparoscopic CRC surgery.

Han et al[98]

2020

Korea

Retrospective

LARC

1384

59

CT: SMI

5-year OS rate was significantly lower in sarcopenic patients (p = 0.003) and patients with sarcopenic obesity (p = 0.02).

Schaffler-Schaden et al[102]

2020

Austria

Retrospective

CRC

85

77

CT: SMI

SMI is a significant prognostic factor for early cancer recurrence in nonobese CRC patients (p = 0.04).

van der Kroft et al[58]

2018

Germany

Prospective

CRC

80

69

CT: SMI/MA

Muscle attenuation and sarcopenia were not significantly associated with postoperative complications[b].

Levolger et al[62]

2018

Netherlands

Retrospective

LARC

122

61

CT: ∆SMI

Loss of skeletal muscle mass during chemoradiotherapy was independently associated with lower DFS (p = 0.025) and distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.013).

Black et al[37]

2017

United Kingdom

Prospective

CRC and EGC

447

75

CT: SMI

Among the CRC patients, survival was shorter for those with sarcopenia (p = 0.017) or low levels of subcutaneous fat (p = 0.005).

Boer et al[40]

2016

Netherlands

Retrospective

CRC + surgery

91

71.2

CT: TPA/TAMA/mean HU

Sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for POCs (p ≤ 0.002) and an independent predictor of worse OS (HR: 8.54; 95% CI: 1.07–68.32).

Jones et al[20]

2015

United Kingdom

Prospective

CRC

100

70

CT: PMA

Sarcopenia was associated with a significantly increased risk of developing major complications (p = 0.01).

van Vugt et al[26]

2015

Netherlands

Retrospective

CRC

206

62.1

CT: SMI

Sarcopenic patients underwent significantly more reoperations than the nonsarcopenic patients (25.6 vs. 12.1%; p = 0.012). SMI independently associated with the risk of severe POC (p = 0.018).

van Vugt et al[51]

2017

Netherlands

Prospective

GIC

452

65

CT: SMI

Low skeletal muscle mass was independently associated with increased hospital costs (p = 0.015).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRC, colorectal carcinoma; DFS, disease-free survival; EGC, esophagogastric cancer; GIC, gastrointestinal cancer; HR, hazard ratio; HUAC, Hounsfield unit average calculation; LARC, locally advanced rectal carcinoma; MA, muscle attenuation; OR, odds ratio; OS, overall survival; PMA, psoas muscle area; POC, postoperative complications; SMI, skeletal muscle index; SMR, skeletal muscle radiodensity; STS, short-term survival; TAMA, total abdominal muscle area; TPA, total psoas area; TPI, total psoas index.


a Mean age.


b Studies which showed no significant correlation between sarcopenia and clinical outcome.


Six studies compared outcomes of sarcopenia in these malignancies following chemotherapy.[76] [91] [124] [126] [127] [144] Most studies also report the effect of sarcopenia on postoperative complications and OS in these patients who had undergone surgical resection of malignancy. One study had reported the influence of sarcopenia and muscle mass on the development of pancreatic fistula formation in patients following pancreatoduodenectomy.[32] A study by van Vugt et al showed that sarcopenia is associated with increased health care costs in patients with malignancy of the alimentary tract.[51]


Sarcopenia and Pancreatitis

Ten studies evaluated the radiological detection of sarcopenia in patients with pancreatitis (chronic pancreatitis in eight and acute pancreatitis in two).[49] [50] [54] [55] [75] [82] [103] [107] [112] [116] Of these studies, two studies evaluated outcomes in chronic pancreatitis patients undergoing total pancreatectomy with auto islet transplantation[103] [107] ([Table 9]).

Table 9

Studies reporting association of sarcopenia with outcomes in pancreatitis

Author

Year

Country

Study design

Study population

N

Age (years)

Modality: parameter

Outcomes

Trikudananthan et al[107]

2020

United States

Prospective

CP undergoing TPAIT

138

40

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia (p = 0.023) was an independent predictor of low islet yield.

Ozola-Zālīte et al[55]

2019

Latvia, Lithuania, and Denmark

Retrospective

CP

265

54.3

CT: TPA

Sarcopenia was found to be present in 1 of 5 patients with CP (prevalence 20.4%)

Bieliuniene et al[75]

2019

Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Denmark

Prospective cohort

CP

100

58.3

CT/MRI: SMI

34% patients had sarcopenia. The presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis predicted the presence of sarcopenia (p = 0.02).

Shakhbazov et al[103]

2020

United States

Retrospective

CP undergoing TPAIT

34

43.1

CT: TPA

Patients with sarcopenia experienced more complications (83.3%) compared with patients without sarcopenia (50%). However, differences were not significant (p = 0.31).[a]

Box et al[116]

2021

United States

Retrospective

CP

220

64.1[b]

CT: SMI/SFI

SFI ≥2.9 was significantly associated with POPFs (OR: 8.2).

Shintakuya et al[49]

2017

Japan

Prospective

CP

132

70[b]

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was independently associated with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (p < 0.001).

Jang et al[82]

2019

South Korea

Prospective

CP

284

62.6

CT: SMI

Sarcopenic obesity was the only independent predictor for POPF (OR: 2.65).

Akturk et al[112]

2021

Turkey

Retrospective

AP

107

NA

CT: TPI

Lower volume and density of psoas muscle was associated with worse CTSI and larger pancreatic necrosis in patients with AP.

Yoon et al[54]

2017

South Korea

Retrospective

AP

203

53.3

CT: SMI/SAT/VAT/VMR

VMR demonstrated the highest area under the ROC curve (0.757, 95% confidence interval: 0.689–0.825) in predicting moderately severe or severe AP.

Takagi et al[50]

2017

Japan

Retrospective

CP

219

65.9

CT: SMI

Sarcopenia was significantly associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (p = 0.004) and infectious complications (p < 0.001).

Abbreviations: AP, acute pancreatitis; CI, confidence interval; CP, chronic pancreatitis; CTSI, computed tomography severity index; POC, postoperative complications; POPF, postoperative pancreatic fistula; ROC curve, receiver operating characteristic curve; SAT, subcutaneous adipose tissue; SFI, subcutaneous fat area indexed for height; SMI, skeletal muscle index; TPA, total psoas area; TPAIT, total pancreatectomy with auto islet transplantation; TPI, total psoas index; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; VMR, visceral muscle to fat ratio.


a Sarcopenia is not associated with outcome in this study.


b Median, rest mean.



Expert Opinion and Future Directions

Sarcopenia is gaining importance as a prognostic marker of several diseases. In the context of hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal disorders, more than 100 studies have reported the negative impact of sarcopenia assessed at radiological investigations on clinical outcomes. Radiological assessment is preferred to evaluate skeletal muscle mass, a key component of sarcopenia. Anthropometry-based evaluation of muscle mass is unreliable. CT is the most common radiological modality utilized for assessing sarcopenia as it is widely available. Most patients with hepatobiliary, pancreatic, and gastrointestinal diseases undergo CT as a part of their evaluation. Various parameters are used to evaluate sarcopenia at CT. Several cut-off values have been proposed. Due to this variability, as well as the need for manual measurements, the utilization of imaging for the clinical assessment of sarcopenia is hampered. Therefore, till recently, radiological assessment of sarcopenia has been used in the research setting only. Standardizing radiological methods and the cut-off for assessing sarcopenia is necessary. Automating measurements will significantly help allow the seamless incorporation of imaging in the clinical assessment of sarcopenia. Artificial intelligence can be utilized to achieve this. Finally, in the future, indices that account for both obesity and sarcopenia may be developed, and these may fully explore the impact of body composition on the outcomes.




Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Author Contribution

S.F.: data curation, writing—original draft preparation; S. S.: data curation, writing—original draft preparation; A. S.: data curation, writing—original draft preparation; P. G.: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, reviewing and editing; A. S.: writing—reviewing and rditing; M. P.: writing—reviewing and editing.



Address for correspondence

Pankaj Gupta, MD
Department of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)
Chandigarh 160012
India   

Publication History

Article published online:
04 August 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India


Zoom
Fig. 1 Computed tomography (CT) image of a 50-year-old male who had vague abdominal pain. Image depicts utilization of segmentation technique in CT for calculating skeletal mass index at L3 level. In this case, the skeletal mass index was 60 cm2/m2 (>52.4 cm2/m2 cut-off), suggesting that there is no sarcopenia.
Zoom
Fig. 2 Dixon MRI sequence of the right thigh in a 64-year-old woman. Axial T1W in-phase (a), out of-phase (b), 100% fat images (c), and 100% water images (d) are shown. The images depict reduction in the muscle bulk with fatty infiltration of the muscles (as seen by chemical shift artefact on out-of-phase image). These findings are suggestive of myosteatosis and sarcopenia. MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.