Keywords
atorvastatin - burr hole - chronic subdural hematoma - recurrence
Introduction
The incidence of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has been found to be 1 to 13.1/100,000
persons/year.[1]
[2] A recent study in Japan found an increasing incidence and earlier onset of CSDH.[3] Surgical drainage of retained subdural blood with a significant pressure effect
remains the major treatment for CSDH.[4] There are several reported factors associated with recurrent CSDH after surgery,
such as an elderly age, antiplatelet or anticoagulant intake, separated type of CSDH,
and bilateral CSDH.[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9] Our previous study showed that the overall recurrence rate of CSDH after burr hole
surgery was 9.8%.[10]
The pathophysiology of CSDH is a cascade of inflammatory processes that occur with
encapsulated blood or fluid collected in the subdural space following a minor head
trauma.[11] Therefore, some studies have focused on anti-inflammatory medication, such as dexamethasone
and lipid-lowering drugs (e.g., atorvastatin), to reduce the recurrence of CSDH after
surgery.[12]
[13] A recent trial of dexamethasone showed fewer recurrent cases, but less favorable
outcomes and more adverse events.[14] Studies of atorvastatin use in rodents[15]
[16] and humans[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21] found that it led to a reduction in CSDH volume without the requirement for surgery
and showed no adverse effects. While all of these studies showed the efficacy of atorvastatin
in reducing the need for surgical treatment, they did not show its efficacy in preventing
recurrence in surgical cases. Consequently, we conducted the present prospective study
to evaluate the efficacy of atorvastatin in reducing the recurrence of CSDH after
burr hole surgery, which is the most common surgical therapy for CSDH.
Materials and Methods
Patient Population
Adult patients with CSDH who were operated on at Siriraj Hospital between May 2019
and December 2020 were included in this prospective study. All the patients were diagnosed
as CSDH according to their symptoms, such as headache, seizure, or focal neurologic
deficits, and by brain imaging, either cranial computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic
resonance imaging, showing radiographic features corresponding with CSDH. Patients
who had a history of statin allergy, previous ventriculoperitoneal or lumboperitoneal
shunting, and who regularly used atorvastatin were excluded from this study. The included
patients underwent single or double burr hole surgery with drainage of the chronic
hematoma. The patients were operated by various neurosurgeons with a common standard
burr hole technique. Numbers of burr hole were based on extension of the chronic subdural
blood, and catheters for gravitational drainage of residual subdural blood were always
placed approximately 3 to 5 days postoperatively. The CSDH characteristics based on
Nakaguchi's classification[9] and volume were recorded and the demographic data of all the patients were collected.
Atorvastatin at 20 mg once daily was administered to all patients for 4 weeks, starting
as soon as they could have an oral diet postoperatively.
During the 8-week follow-up period, patients who discontinued atorvastatin before
4 weeks postoperatively, or who needed antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment, or
who had coexisting thrombocytopenia were withdrawn from the study. Adverse effects
of atorvastatin were clinically assessed throughout the study.
Patients with recurrent CSDH were defined as patients who had recurrent neurologic
symptoms and their cranial radiographic study showing persistent or increasing CSDH
that finally required reoperation during the 8-week follow-up period.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj
Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand; Certificate of Approval (COA) number SI 355/2019.
All the patients' data retained full confidentiality in compliance with the Declaration
of Helsinki.
Outcome Assessment
The outcome was the recurrence rate of CSDH in the 8-week postoperative period. Symptoms
of recurrent CSDH, such as a headache or focal neurological deficit, were recorded.
Patients with a suspicion of recurrent CSDH underwent cranial CT. If cranial CT showed
CSDH that was compatible with the symptoms, that patient was diagnosed as recurrent
CSDH, and surgical treatment was performed for treating the recurrent hematoma. Our
recurrence rate of CSDH was compared with the results from previous studies.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was conducted using PASW Statistics (SPSS) version 18.0 software.
Demographic data are presented herein as the mean ± standard deviation for continuous
data and the number (percentage) for the categorical data. The chi-square test was
used to compare the recurrence rate between this study and other studies. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used to determine statistically significant differences
between the studies' results.
Results
In total, 75 patients were included in the study. Two individuals were withdrawn from
the study before completion of the 8-week postoperative period: one died of pneumonia
within the first week after the burr hole surgery, and the other discontinued atorvastatin
before completion of the 4-week course due to a drug allergy presenting with a skin
rash. Therefore, 73 patients who completed the 4-week course of atorvastatin after
the burr hole surgery were finally included in the statistical analysis.
The included patients' demographic characteristic is shown in [Table 1]. There were 50 (68.5%) male and 23 (31.5%) female patients. Their ages ranged from
51 to 102 years old, with a mean age of 73.9 ± 11 years old. Of all the patients,
50 (68.5%) had hypertension, and 30 (41.1%) took antiplatelets, which were withheld
during the perioperative and postoperative periods. The most common causes of CSDH
were falling in 33 (45.2%) patients and an unknown cause in 21 (28.8%). Most patients
presented with weakness of the extremities, headache, alteration of consciousness,
and an unstable gait (49.3, 31.5, 21.9, and 20.5%, respectively). Sixty-three patients
(86.3%) had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 14 to 15, while 6 (8.2%)
had a GCS score of 9 to 13, and 4 (5.5%) had a GCS score of 8 or less. Regarding the
hematoma appearance on cranial CT as classified according to Nakaguchi et al,[9] 35 (47.9%) were a homogeneous type, 22 (30.1%) were a separated type, and 16 (21.9%)
were a laminar type. The locations of the hematomas were equally distributed on the
left, right, and bilateral sides. The mean hematoma volume was 106.3 ± 47 mL. Double
burr hole surgery was performed in 43 (58.9%) patients, 28 (38.4%) underwent single
burr hole surgery, and the remaining 2 (2.7%) underwent combined double and single
burr hole surgery for the treatment of bilateral CSDH.
Table 1
Patients' demographic data
|
Patients' characteristics
|
n (%)
|
|
Gender
|
|
Male
|
50 (68.5)
|
|
Female
|
23 (31.5)
|
|
Age range (y)
|
|
51–60
|
10 (13.7)
|
|
61–70
|
20 (27.4)
|
|
71–80
|
19 (26.0)
|
|
81–90
|
19 (26.0)
|
|
> 90
|
5 (6.8)
|
|
Causes
|
|
Falling (with/without head injury)
|
33 (45.2)
|
|
Unknown
|
21 (28.8)
|
|
Mild head injury (not from falling)
|
9 (12.3)
|
|
Vehicle accident
|
5 (6.8)
|
|
Coagulopathy
|
5 (6.8)
|
|
Symptoms
|
|
Limb weakness
|
36 (49.3)
|
|
Headache
|
23 (31.5)
|
|
Deterioration of consciousness
|
16 (21.9)
|
|
Unstable gait
|
15 (20.5)
|
|
Others
|
8 (11.0)
|
|
Seizure
|
4 (5.5)
|
|
Sensory impairment
|
1 (1.4)
|
|
Initial GCS score
|
|
14–15
|
63 (86.3)
|
|
9–13
|
6 (8.2)
|
|
3–8
|
4 (5.5)
|
|
Hematoma location
|
|
Left
|
22 (30.1)
|
|
Right
|
28 (38.4)
|
|
Bilateral
|
23 (31.5)
|
|
Hematoma volume (ml)
|
|
< 50
|
8 (11.0)
|
|
51–100
|
29 (39.7)
|
|
101–150
|
24 (32.9)
|
|
> 150
|
12 (16.4)
|
|
Hematoma type
|
|
Homogeneous
|
35 (47.9)
|
|
Separated
|
22 (30.1)
|
|
Laminar
|
16 (21.9)
|
|
Operation
|
|
Double burr hole surgery
|
43 (58.9)
|
|
Single burr hole surgery
|
28 (38.4)
|
|
Both surgeries
|
2 (2.7)
|
|
Recurrence
|
|
Present
|
2 (2.7)
|
|
Absent
|
71 (97.3)
|
|
Adverse effect of atorvastatin for 4 weeks
|
|
Present
|
0 (0)
|
|
Absent
|
73 (100)
|
Abbreviation: GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale.
Of the 73 patients, recurrent CSDH was found in 2 (2.7%) of the patients. Of the two
cases with recurrent CSDH, the first cranial CT showed a homogenous type CSDH in one
case and a separated type CSDH in the other. Both of them underwent single burr hole
surgery as the primary surgical treatment for their unilateral CSDH. After that, they
developed a headache on the second week after the surgery and subsequent cranial CT
revealed persistent CSDH with a significant pressure effect. Subduroperitoneal shunting
surgery was performed for the treatment of recurrent CSDH in both patients and their
symptoms were relieved.
There was no adverse effect of atorvastatin found in the 73 patients who completed
the 4-week course of atorvastatin.
Discussion
The pathophysiology of CSDH consists of a cascade of inflammation, impaired coagulation,
fibrinolysis, and angiogenesis in encapsulated blood or fluid collection inside the
subdural space between the dura and arachnoid maters following a minor head trauma.
This subdural space is a layer of cells called the “dural border cell layer.” Either
injury of the bridging vein or of the cortical vein resulting in an acute subdural
hematoma or injury of the dural border cell layer is believed to be the initiator
of CSDH formation. When hematoma has lysis, the inflammatory process in this cell
layer brings about increased vascular permeability, allowing microhemorrhages and
exudative fluid collection within this encapsulated subdural space, which then causes
the hematoma expansion.[11]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25] Therefore, anti-inflammatory medication may play a major role in the treatment of
CSDH.
A recent randomized control trial of dexamethasone for the treatment of CSDH was reported
by Li et al. Their study investigated whether the use of dexamethasone could reduce
the need for surgical treatment and the recurrence of CSDH after surgery. Even though
the authors only found a small number of recurrent cases, the outcomes were less favorable
and the incidence of adverse events was increased.[14] On the contrary, a randomized clinical study on the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin
use in patients with CSDH revealed a reduction of the hematoma volume, a decrease
in the requirement for surgical treatment, and no adverse effects of the drug.[17]
[21]
The recurrence rate of CSDH after surgery was not low. The results from previous studies
showed an overall recurrence rate ranging from 9.8 to 15%, while a meta-analysis revealed
a recurrence rate of 10.7 to 39.0%.[4]
[26] Most of the recurrent CSDH cases occurred within the first 3 months after surgery.[10]
[27] In regards to our previous prospective study, most the recurrent CSDH cases occurred
within 8 weeks after the initial operation (80% of the recurrent CSDH occurred within
2 weeks, and 90% occurred within 8 weeks, postoperatively).[10] Therefore, we decided to use a follow-up period of the study of 8 weeks.
Mechanisms of atorvastatin in reduction of CDSH volume and recurrence rate of CSDH
remain elusive. The major mechanisms involve inhibition of inflammatory process, promotion
of vascular maturation at the neomembrane of CSDH, and antiangiogenic effect.[11]
[15]
[28] An animal study proposed by Quan et al showed that atorvastatin administration in
rats with CSDH significantly increased the number of regulatory T-cells in circulation,
accelerated absorption of CSDH, and improved neurological and cognitive outcomes compared
with rats with CSDH treated by saline. Also, atorvastatin treatment significantly
decreased the level of interleukin 6 and 8 (IL-6 and IL-8), and tumor necrosis factor-α
(TNF-α). Increase in the number of regulatory T-cells and reduction of IL-6, IL-8,
and TNF-α expression may be related to suppression of inflammatory reaction, and lead
to absorption of CSDH and improved outcomes.[29] In the same way, Yang et al demonstrated similar results in an experimental study
in rats with CSDH. They found that atorvastatin treatment effectively suppressed the
expression of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, increased expression of IL-10, accelerated absorption
of CSDH, and improved neurological function in rats with CSDH.[30]
Regarding effect of atorvastatin on the recurrence rate of CSDH in patients undergoing
burr hole surgery or twist-drill craniostomy, previous retrospective studies reported
a statistically significant reduction of the recurrence rate (p = 0.007)[19] or uncured rate (p = 0.045)[18] in patients receiving atorvastatin. In the present study, we prospectively investigated
the efficacy of atorvastatin in the reduction of recurrent CSDH after burr hole surgery.
According to the comparison of the recurrence rate of CSDH between our study and previous
studies with the same surgical procedure (single or double burr hole surgery) or the
same duration of postoperative follow-up period (60 days), patients with use of atorvastatin
for prevention of recurrent CSDH obviously had lower recurrence rate of CSDH compared
with patients without use of atorvastatin ([Table 2]).[10]
[18]
[19]
[26]
[27]
[31]
[32] These results indicate that an administration of atorvastatin following burr hole
surgery may be helpful in the reduction of recurrent CSDH.
Table 2
Comparison of the recurrence rate of CSDH following burr hole surgery between the
present and previous studies[10]
[18]
[19]
[26]
[27]
[31]
[32]
|
Authors reference
|
Year
|
n
|
Study design
|
Use of atorvastatin for prevention of recurrent CSDH
|
Follow-up
|
Recurrence rate (%)
|
|
Mori and Maeda[31]
|
2001
|
500
|
Retrospective, single center
|
No
|
12 wk
|
49/500 (9.8)
|
|
Weigel et al[26]
|
2003
|
3,601 (burr hole group)
|
Meta-analysis
|
No
|
N/A
|
437/3,601 (12.1)
|
|
Oh et al[27]
|
2010
|
149
|
Retrospective, single center
|
No
|
12 wk
|
18/149 (12.1)
|
|
Xu et al[18]
|
2016
|
102 (surgical group)
|
Retrospective, single center
|
Yes (n = 39)
|
3 mo
|
1 uncured[a]/39 (2.6)
|
|
|
|
|
No (n = 63)
|
|
12 uncured[a]/63 (19)
|
|
Nunta-aree et al[10]
|
2017
|
75
|
Prospective, single center
|
No
|
8 wk
|
10/102 (9.8)
|
|
You et al[32]
|
2018
|
226
|
Retrospective, single center
|
No
|
1 mo by CT brain
1 y by telephone
|
34/226 (15)
|
|
Tang et al[19]
|
2018
|
245
|
Retrospective, single center
|
Yes (n = 125)
|
6 mo
|
6/125 (4.8)
|
|
|
|
|
No (n = 120)
|
|
18/120 (15)
|
|
Present study
|
2021
|
73
|
Prospective, single center
|
Yes
|
8 wk
|
2/73 (2.7)
|
Abbreviations: CSDH, chronic subdural hematoma; CT, computerized tomography; mo, month;
N/A, no available data; wk, week; y, year.
a Uncured case is defined as volume of chronic subdural hematoma decreased by less
than 50%, recrudesced, or even increased on postoperative cranial images with aggravated
neurologic symptoms.
Several radiographic factors that may increase the recurrence of CSDH were reported
by Nakaguchi et al. These included the hematoma characteristic as defined by Nakaguchi's
classification, degree of the midline shift, and location of the hematoma. Regarding
the hematoma characteristics, the separated type of CSDH carried the highest risk
of recurrence (36%), followed by the homogeneous type (15%).[9] Furthermore, bilateral CSDH and a preoperative and postoperative midline shift of
more than 5 mm were found to be the independent predictors of the recurrence of CSDH.[5]
[6] Nevertheless, owing to the scant number of recurrence cases in our present study,
an association between the recurrence of CSDH and the potential risk factors for the
recurrence could not be determined.
From the safety point of view, there was no adverse effect of atorvastatin found in
our patients who achieved the 4-week course of the drug. This result indicates that
an administration of a short course of atorvastatin after burr hole surgery is relatively
safe. Several previous studies also showed safety of perioperative administration
of atorvastatin in CSDH patients.[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21] However, common adverse effects, such as allergic rash, diarrhea, indigestion, myalgia,
or sore throat, must be concerned and closely monitored.
Some limitations of the present study have been encountered. For the first drawback,
our study is a single-arm prospective study without control group. To improve evidence-based
practice, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in comparison between
atorvastatin and placebo for reducing the recurrence rate of CSDH after burr hole
surgery is required in the future study. Moving on the next disadvantage, our results
may not represent the actual recurrence rate of CSDH in the real-world practice because
we eliminated confounding variables by exclusion of patients who received antiplatelet
or anticoagulant drug or patients with thrombocytopenia during postoperative follow-up
period. This exclusion may lower the recurrence rate in our cohort. On the contrary,
in neurosurgical practice, several patients need to resume these drugs before 8 weeks
after the initial surgery of CSDH due to various reasons, such as coronary artery
disease or cardiac valve replacement, and risk of recurrent CSDH may be increased
in such patients. The last defect of our study is a relatively short duration of postoperative
follow-up period. Based on our previous study on 102 CSDH in 75 patients, 10 of 102
(9.8%) were recurrent. Of 10 recurrent CSDH, 9 (90%) developed the recurrent hematoma
within 8 weeks postoperatively.[10] That was the reason why this duration was chosen as a postoperative follow-up period
in the present study. However, longer follow-up in the future study is mandatory to
investigate the effect of atorvastatin on prevention of recurrent CSDH in a long term.
Conclusion
An administration of atorvastatin of 20 mg daily for 4 weeks may be helpful in reducing
the recurrence rate of CSDH following burr hole surgery without there being any serious
adverse effects of the drug.
