CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Lab Physicians
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771242
Case Report

A Rare Case of Nodular Fasciitis Presenting as a Parotid Tumor: Clues to Cytodiagnosis

Seetu Palo
1   Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Telangana, India
,
2   Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India
› Author Affiliations

Source(s) of Support/Grants None.
 

Abstract

A 14-year-old boy presented with left preauricular painless swelling of 10 months' duration. Local examination revealed a 3 × 2-cm, firm, nodular, nonmobile mass in the left preauricular area, just in front of tragus. Fine needle aspiration yielded paucicellular smears comprising singly scattered histiocyte/myofibroblast-like spindle cells and occasional giant cells. It was reported as benign mesenchymal lesion on cytology. Left superficial parotidectomy was performed. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed the diagnosis of nodular fasciitis (NF). It was an ill-circumscribed cellular neoplasm, abutting and focally infiltrating into otherwise normal parotid gland. The tumor comprised spindle cells arranged in short bundles and storiform pattern with interspersed osteoclast-like giant cells, foam cells, extravasated red blood cells (RBCs), and focal areas of keloidal collagenization. The cells were positive for smooth muscle actin and negative for CD34, beta-catenin, S100, and pan-cytokeratin. Final diagnosis of NF was rendered. NF can rarely involve the parotid gland or present as parotid enlargement and pose diagnostic challenge, especially on cytology. However, in appropriate clinical context, subtle cytomorphological clues such as presence of myofibroblasts and fibrocollagenous stromal fragments can help in ruling out the commonly occurring salivary gland neoplasms and offering a definitive cytodiagnosis of NF which will be helpful in deciding the further course of management.


#

Introduction

Nodular fasciitis (NF) is a benign, self-limiting, fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumor, commonly encountered during third and fourth decades of life.[1] NF is a great masquerader and can be easily misdiagnosed clinically as sarcoma because of its presentation as a rapidly growing mass. Accurate characterization of the lesion is often not possible by radiological modalities such as ultrasonography (USG), computed tomography (CT) scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).[2] On fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), another very important modality of preoperative diagnosis, offering a confident diagnosis of NF can be quiet challenging. Here, we report an interesting case of NF presenting as a parotid mass in a teenager with emphasis on cytomorphological features.


#

Case Report

A 14-year-old boy presented to the otorhinolaryngology outpatient department with the complaints of painless, left preauricular swelling of 10 months' duration. There was no history suggestive of chronic sialadenitis/toothache/trauma to the site. Local examination revealed a 3 × 2-cm, ill-defined, firm, nodular, nonmobile mass in the left preauricular area, just in front of tragus. There was no facial nerve weakness or other intraoral lesions or cervical lymphadenopathy. FNAC yielded paucicellular smears comprising singly scattered histiocyte/myofibroblast-like spindle cells and rare multinucleated giant cells ([Fig. 1a–c]). Occasional collagenous fragments were also noted ([Fig. 1d]). No ductal cells or acinar cells were found. A diagnosis of benign mesenchymal neoplasm was rendered. Subsequently, the patient underwent left superficial parotidectomy by external approach using modified Blair incision ([Fig. 1e]). Intraoperatively, a multilobulated tumor mass was found attached to the superficial lobe of parotid and fibrocartilaginous framework of preauricular cartilage. The lesion was completely excised and measured 2.4 × 1.8 × 1.2 cm in toto ([Fig. 1f]). Histopathology was suggestive of NF ([Fig. 2a–i]). Microscopic examination showed an ill-circumscribed cellular neoplasm, abutting and focally infiltrating into an otherwise normal parotid gland. The tumor comprised spindle cells arranged in short bundles and storiform pattern with interspersed multinucleated giant cells. The lesional cells were oval to spindle with bland nucleus, fine chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and ill-defined cytoplasmic borders. Few mitotic figures were noted. Also noted were foam cells clusters, plenty of extravasated RBCs, and focal areas of keloidal collagenization. On immunohistochemistry, the cells were positive for smooth muscle actin (SMA) and negative for S100, CD34, beta-catenin, and pan-cytokeratin. The postoperative period was uneventful, and no local recurrence was noted at 18-month's follow-up.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 (a) FNAC smear shows singly scattered oval to spindle cells against a haemorrhagic background (May Grunwald–Giemsa stain, ×40); (b) higher magnification showing the histiocyte/myofibroblast-like nature of the lesional cells with wispy amphophilic cytoplasm (May Grunwald–Giemsa stain, ×400); (c) a multinucleated giant cell on cytosmear (May Grunwald–Giemsa stain, ×400); (d) collagenous extracellular material/fragment (May Grunwald–Giemsa stain, ×400); (e) left superficial parotidectomy by external approach using modified Blair incision; (f) excised tumor along with superficial lobe of left parotid gland. FNAC, fine needle aspiration cytology.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Histomorphological features: (a) Tumor (right top) seen in juxta position to the parotid gland (left bottom) (H&E, ×40); (b) tumor focally infiltrating into the parotid parenchyma. Blue arrows point to the entrapped glandular epithelium of parotid by tumor (H&E, ×40); (c) the tumor–soft tissue interface. The surgical margins were free of tumor (H&E, ×40); (d) tumor displaying tissue culture–like appearance and storiform arrangement of cells (H&E, ×40); (e, f) oval to spindle tumor cells with bland nucleus, fine chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and ill-defined cytoplasmic borders. Inset shows diffuse smooth muscle actin positivity on immunohistochemistry (H&E, ×400); (g) an interspersed multinucleated giant cell (center) (H&E, ×400); (h) a focus depicting cluster of foam cells (circled area), few cholesterol clefts (asterisk), and plenty of extravasated RBCs (H&E, ×40); (i) a focus showing keloidal collagenization (H&E stain, ×40). H&E, hematoxylin–eosin.

#

Discussion

NF usually presents as a painful/tender, subcutaneous lesion with rapid growth pattern.[1] It can potentially occur anywhere in the body but most commonly seen in upper extremities, trunk and head and neck region.[1] [3] NF presenting as a parotid mass is a rarity, with only a handful of case reports and case series on the record.[4] Gibson et al analyzed 30 cases of parotid gland NF and found that male-to-female ratio was 1:1, mean age at presentation was 35.7 years, and the duration of symptoms ranged from 0.2 to 12 months.[4] They also noted that right parotid was involved more than left (right:left = 19:6) with superficial lobe being commonly affected. The size of the lesion ranged from 0.7 to 6 cm. The clinical parameters of the current case fairly corroborate with the findings of Gibson et al.

Spontaneous resolution of NF is a commonly noted phenomenon, and therefore, arriving at an accurate preoperative diagnosis is crucial in order to avoid surgical excision.[5] [6] It should also be distinguished from its clinicopathological mimickers that occur in the parotid region. In this context, imaging tools such as USG, CT scan, and MRI lack specificity in picking up NF. NF usually displays infiltrative borders and thus can be misinterpreted as a malignant lesion radiologically.[2] As a preoperative diagnostic modality, FNAC thus plays an important role in narrowing down the clinical differential diagnoses and ruling out certain salivary gland lesions. Wong and Di demonstrated a diagnostic accuracy of 88% for rendering a diagnosis of NF on FNAC.[6]

The cytosmears of NF display predominant population of singly scattered or loosely cohesive sheets of spindle cells admixed with variable amount of myxoid stroma. Inflammatory cells, polygonal cells, myofibroblasts, ganglion cell-like cells, multinucleated giant cells, and fibrocollagenous stromal fragments can be present.[2] [3] [4] Mild nuclear atypia and few typical mitotic figures may be encountered, and their presence should not raise an alarm.[2] [4] [5] Few investigators have observed the presence of ganglion cell-like cells to be specific for the cytodiagnosis of NF.[3] [6] A ganglion cell-like cell is a large polyhedral or triangular cell (at least twice the size of a plump fibroblast) with a round to oval nuclei displaying finely dispersed chromatin, prominent nucleoli, and smooth nuclear membrane.[6]

On cytology, NF presenting as a parotid mass may be misdiagnosed as the commonly encountered pleomorphic adenoma (PA) due to the presence of polygonal cells and myofibroblasts mimicking plasmacytoid myoepithelial cells and fibrocollagenous stromal fragments mimicking chondromyxoid substance as in the present case.[5] In the present case, a diagnosis of mesenchymal tumor was favored over PA due to clear-cut myofibroblast-like appearance of the spindle cells with basophilic to amphophilic cytoplasm with unipolar and bipolar cytoplasmic extensions. The occasional stromal fragment encountered displayed some degree of metachromatic hue but was clearly more opaque and coarsely fibrillary in nature as opposed to the chondromyxoid substance seen in PA. However, a confident cytodiagnosis of NF could not be made in this case owing to paucicellularity, and superficial parotidectomy was performed. [Table 1] provides a comparison of cytomorphological features of present case with reported literature.

Table 1

Clinicocytological characteristics of the present case in comparison with other studies on nodular fasciitis

Present case

Allison et al[2]

Wong and Di[6]

Number of cases studied

1

15

46

Clinical parameters

 Location of the lesion

Parotid

Parotid (n = 15)

Upper extremity (n = 31), lower extremity (n = 10), trunk (n = 3), neck (n = 2)

 Male:female

Male

1:2

17:29

 Median age, y (range)

14

37 (11–64)

38 (7–94)

 Average time from symptom onset to clinical presentation (range)

10 mo

3.67 mo (1–8 mo)

1 wk (1 d–26 wk)

 Median size in cm (range)

2.4

1.86 (3.5–1.0)

1.5 (0.5–5)

Cytomorphological features

 Cell arrangement

Singly dispersed

Singly dispersed (69.2%), tissue fragments (23.1%)

Singly dispersed (78%), tissue fragments (22%)

 Cell shape

Spindle to polyhedral

Spindle (100%), polyhedral (30.8%), ganglion cell-like cells (0%)

Spindle (100%), ganglion cell-like cells (83%), polyhedral (82%)

 Amount of cytoplasm

Moderate

Not specifically mentioned

Not specifically mentioned

 Color of cytoplasm (in Giemsa-stained smears)

Pale basophilic

Not specifically mentioned

Pale basophilic

 Cell borders

Ill defined

Not specifically mentioned

Well demarcated

 Cytoplasmic processes

Both unipolar and bipolar long cytoplasmic processes seen in few cells

Unipolar (76.9%), bipolar (38.5%)

Both unipolar and bipolar long cytoplasmic processes seen in few cells

 Nuclear shape

Round to oval

Round to oval (61.5%), elongated/spindle (84.6%), bent contours (30.8%)

Round to oval, elongated/spindle

 Bi-/multinucleation

Present

Present (15.4%)

Present (25%)

 Nuclear placement

Central to eccentric

Eccentric (46.2%)

Central to eccentric

 Nuclear membrane

Smooth

Smooth (100%)

Thin, smooth (100%)

 Chromatin

Fine, evenly dispersed

Fine, evenly dispersed (100%)

Fine, evenly dispersed (100%)

 Nucleoli

Inconspicuous

Inconspicuous (53.8%)

Conspicuous

 Cytologic atypia

Absent

Minimal (46.2%)

Not specifically mentioned

 Mitosis

Absent

Absent (100%)

Frequent, but not atypical mitosis

 Necrosis

Absent

Absent (100%)

Absent (100%)

 Background

Fibrocollagenous (rare fragments)

Myxoid (76.9%), inflammatory (23.1%)

Myxoid (28%), inflammatory

 Others

Nuclear grooving (15.4%), bare nuclei (15.4%)

Not specifically mentioned

Clinical outcome

No recurrence during 18-mo follow-up

Five patients (33.3%) had a recurrent lesion with an average time interval of 1.6 mo (range, 1–2.5 mo) postsurgery

Spontaneous resolution after FNAC in 41 patients and no recurrence in 5 patients where excisional biopsy was performed

Abbreviation: FNAC, fine needle aspiration cytology.


Histopathological examination showed typical features of NF, but immunohistochemistry for SMA, S100, CD34, pan-cytokeratin, and beta-catenin was performed to rule out desmoid-type fibromatosis and deep benign fibrous histiocytoma (BFH) as the management would differ ([Table 2]).[7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] Desmoid-type fibromatosis are locally aggressive tumors with high recurrence rate ranging from 19 to 77%.[13] Hence, a multimodal management approach by combining surgery with chemoradiation and endocrinal therapy is often warranted.[13] Even deep BFH can recur locally in approximately 20% of cases and rare examples of distant metastasis have been reported.[11] S100 was performed to rule out the rare possibility of myoepithelial lesions of parotid gland with spindle cell morphology and was negative in this case. Histopathology and an appropriate panel of immunostains usually confirm the diagnosis of NF, but in rare cases with atypical morphology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction, or next-generation sequencing to look for ubiquitin-specific protease 6 (USP6) rearrangements can be undertaken. The MYH9 gene, located at 22q12.3-q13, is the commonest somatic fusion partner of the USP6 gene in NF.[8]

Table 2

Usual pathological features of nodular fasciitis, desmoid-type fibromatosis, and deep benign fibrous histiocytoma[7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

Nodular fasciitis

Desmoid-type fibromatosis

Deep benign fibrous histiocytoma

Circumscription

Circumscribed or infiltrative, but not encapsulated

Poorly circumscribed with infiltrative margins

Well circumscribed and often have a fibrous pseudocapsule

Architecture/pattern

Feathery, or tissue culture-like appearance, often with S- or C-shaped fascicles or storiform pattern

Long sweeping fascicles

Can be hyper- or hypocellular

Storiform architecture with short fascicles

Tumor cells

Plump, regular spindle-shaped fibroblasts/myofibroblasts

Usually lacks nuclear hyperchromasia and atypia

Mitotic figures may be plentiful but no atypical forms

Uniform and slender fibroblasts/myofibroblasts

Usually lacks nuclear hyperchromasia or cytologic atypia

Mitoses: absent or sparse

Spindle fibroblasts with plump, ovoid to elongated vesicular nuclei

No nuclear pleomorphism or hyperchromasia

Mitoses typically < 5 per 10 HPF but can be numerous. No atypical forms

Stromal component

Collagen may be increased focally and keloidal collagen bundles may be present

Can show myxoid change, cystic degeneration

Myxoid change, keloidal collagen bundles, stromal hyalinization, hemangiopericytoma-like vessels may be present

Peripheral lymphoid infiltrate can be seen

Stromal hyalinization is relatively common

Can show myxoid change, cystic degeneration

Hemangiopericytoma -like vessels are common

Peripheral lymphoid infiltrate can be seen

Immunohistochemistry

SMA: strong and diffusely positive

CD34/beta-catenin/keratins/S100: negative

SMA: strong and diffusely positive

Nuclear reactivity for beta-catenin

CD34/keratins/S100: negative

SMA may be positive, only focally

About 40% cases express CD34

Beta-catenin/keratins/S100: negative

STAT6: negative

Genetic abnormality

MYH9–USP6 gene fusion as a recurrent event

Sporadic cases: CTNNB1 gene mutations

Familial cases: APC gene mutations

Rearrangements involving either PRKCB or PRKCD

Clonal t(16;17)(p13.3;q21.3) was reported in a single case

Abbreviations: HPF, high power field; SMA, smooth muscle actin; USP6, ubiquitin-specific protease 6.



#

Conclusion

NF can rarely present as a parotid mass. Every effort should be made to accurately characterize the lesion on FNAC, so that tailored treatment options with conservative approach can be provided to such patients. Clues to cytodiagnosis include spindle cell–rich smears with myofibroblastic appearance, histiocytic multinucleated giant cells, and fibrocollagenous stromal fragments.


#
#

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

Note

Institution to which the work should be credited: Department of Pathology, Andaman & Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences, Port Blair.


Authors' Contribution

S.P. contributed to the concept and study design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, grossing and analysis of the histopathological slides, retrieval of clinical details, manuscript preparation, and is the guarantor. C.B.G. contributed to the study design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, analysis of the histopathological slides, manuscript editing and review.


Prior Presentation

The case was presented as an e-poster at Virtual TAPCON (IAPM-Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry chapter) 2021 conference, held from June 4–6, 2021.


Declaration of Patient Consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.


Financial Support and Sponsorship

None.


  • References

  • 1 Lu L, Lao IW, Liu X, Yu L, Wang J. Nodular fasciitis: A retrospective study of 272 cases from China with clinicopathologic and radiologic correlation. Ann Diagn Pathol 2015; 19 (03) 180-185
  • 2 Allison DB, VandenBussche CJ, Rooper LM. et al. Nodular fasciitis of the parotid gland: A challenging diagnosis on FNA. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126 (10) 872-880
  • 3 Jaiprakash P, Radhakrishnan B, Kudva R, Valiathan M, Prasad S. Nodular Fasciitis – fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis and its pitfalls, with review of literature. Iran J Pathol 2019; 14 (01) 76-82
  • 4 Gibson TC, Bishop JA, Thompson LDR. Parotid gland nodular fasciitis: A clinicopathologic series of 12 cases with a review of 18 cases from the literature. Head Neck Pathol 2015; 9 (03) 334-344
  • 5 Hwang CS, Lee CH, Kim A. et al. Nodular fasciitis of the parotid gland, masquerading as pleomorphic adenoma. Korean J Pathol 2014; 48 (05) 366-370
  • 6 Wong NL, Di F. Pseudosarcomatous fasciitis and myositis: Diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2009; 132 (06) 857-865
  • 7 Fisher C, Montgomery E, Thway K. Cellular benign and intermediate lesions of fibroblasts and myofibroblast. In: Epstein JI. ed. Biopsy Interpretation of Soft Tissue Tumors. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015
  • 8 Erber R, Agaimy A. Misses and near misses in diagnosing nodular fasciitis and morphologically related reactive myofibroblastic proliferations: Experience of a referral center with emphasis on frequency of USP6 gene rearrangements. Virchows Arch 2018; 473 (03) 351-360
  • 9 Zreik RT, Fritchie KJ. Morphologic spectrum of desmoid-type fibromatosis. Am J Clin Pathol 2016; 145 (03) 332-340
  • 10 Le Guellec S, Soubeyran I, Rochaix P. et al. CTNNB1 mutation analysis is a useful tool for the diagnosis of desmoid tumors: A study of 260 desmoid tumors and 191 potential morphologic mimics. Mod Pathol 2012; 25 (12) 1551-1558
  • 11 Gleason BC, Fletcher CDM. Deep “benign” fibrous histiocytoma: Clinicopathologic analysis of 69 cases of a rare tumor indicating occasional metastatic potential. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32 (03) 354-362
  • 12 Frau DV, Erdas E, Caria P. et al. Deep fibrous histiocytoma with a clonal karyotypic alteration: Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a t(16;17)(p13.3;q21.3). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2010; 202 (01) 17-21
  • 13 Wang YF, Guo W, Sun KK. et al. Postoperative recurrence of desmoid tumors: Clinical and pathological perspectives. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 26

Address for correspondence

Seetu Palo, MD
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Administrative Block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Bibinagar, Hyderabad Metropolitan Region, Telangana 508126
India   

Publication History

Article published online:
20 July 2023

© 2023. The Indian Association of Laboratory Physicians. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
A-12, 2nd Floor, Sector 2, Noida-201301 UP, India

  • References

  • 1 Lu L, Lao IW, Liu X, Yu L, Wang J. Nodular fasciitis: A retrospective study of 272 cases from China with clinicopathologic and radiologic correlation. Ann Diagn Pathol 2015; 19 (03) 180-185
  • 2 Allison DB, VandenBussche CJ, Rooper LM. et al. Nodular fasciitis of the parotid gland: A challenging diagnosis on FNA. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126 (10) 872-880
  • 3 Jaiprakash P, Radhakrishnan B, Kudva R, Valiathan M, Prasad S. Nodular Fasciitis – fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis and its pitfalls, with review of literature. Iran J Pathol 2019; 14 (01) 76-82
  • 4 Gibson TC, Bishop JA, Thompson LDR. Parotid gland nodular fasciitis: A clinicopathologic series of 12 cases with a review of 18 cases from the literature. Head Neck Pathol 2015; 9 (03) 334-344
  • 5 Hwang CS, Lee CH, Kim A. et al. Nodular fasciitis of the parotid gland, masquerading as pleomorphic adenoma. Korean J Pathol 2014; 48 (05) 366-370
  • 6 Wong NL, Di F. Pseudosarcomatous fasciitis and myositis: Diagnosis by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2009; 132 (06) 857-865
  • 7 Fisher C, Montgomery E, Thway K. Cellular benign and intermediate lesions of fibroblasts and myofibroblast. In: Epstein JI. ed. Biopsy Interpretation of Soft Tissue Tumors. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015
  • 8 Erber R, Agaimy A. Misses and near misses in diagnosing nodular fasciitis and morphologically related reactive myofibroblastic proliferations: Experience of a referral center with emphasis on frequency of USP6 gene rearrangements. Virchows Arch 2018; 473 (03) 351-360
  • 9 Zreik RT, Fritchie KJ. Morphologic spectrum of desmoid-type fibromatosis. Am J Clin Pathol 2016; 145 (03) 332-340
  • 10 Le Guellec S, Soubeyran I, Rochaix P. et al. CTNNB1 mutation analysis is a useful tool for the diagnosis of desmoid tumors: A study of 260 desmoid tumors and 191 potential morphologic mimics. Mod Pathol 2012; 25 (12) 1551-1558
  • 11 Gleason BC, Fletcher CDM. Deep “benign” fibrous histiocytoma: Clinicopathologic analysis of 69 cases of a rare tumor indicating occasional metastatic potential. Am J Surg Pathol 2008; 32 (03) 354-362
  • 12 Frau DV, Erdas E, Caria P. et al. Deep fibrous histiocytoma with a clonal karyotypic alteration: Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a t(16;17)(p13.3;q21.3). Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2010; 202 (01) 17-21
  • 13 Wang YF, Guo W, Sun KK. et al. Postoperative recurrence of desmoid tumors: Clinical and pathological perspectives. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13: 26

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 (a) FNAC smear shows singly scattered oval to spindle cells against a haemorrhagic background (May Grunwald–Giemsa stain, ×40); (b) higher magnification showing the histiocyte/myofibroblast-like nature of the lesional cells with wispy amphophilic cytoplasm (May Grunwald–Giemsa stain, ×400); (c) a multinucleated giant cell on cytosmear (May Grunwald–Giemsa stain, ×400); (d) collagenous extracellular material/fragment (May Grunwald–Giemsa stain, ×400); (e) left superficial parotidectomy by external approach using modified Blair incision; (f) excised tumor along with superficial lobe of left parotid gland. FNAC, fine needle aspiration cytology.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Histomorphological features: (a) Tumor (right top) seen in juxta position to the parotid gland (left bottom) (H&E, ×40); (b) tumor focally infiltrating into the parotid parenchyma. Blue arrows point to the entrapped glandular epithelium of parotid by tumor (H&E, ×40); (c) the tumor–soft tissue interface. The surgical margins were free of tumor (H&E, ×40); (d) tumor displaying tissue culture–like appearance and storiform arrangement of cells (H&E, ×40); (e, f) oval to spindle tumor cells with bland nucleus, fine chromatin, inconspicuous nucleoli, and ill-defined cytoplasmic borders. Inset shows diffuse smooth muscle actin positivity on immunohistochemistry (H&E, ×400); (g) an interspersed multinucleated giant cell (center) (H&E, ×400); (h) a focus depicting cluster of foam cells (circled area), few cholesterol clefts (asterisk), and plenty of extravasated RBCs (H&E, ×40); (i) a focus showing keloidal collagenization (H&E stain, ×40). H&E, hematoxylin–eosin.